Hells to the no frickin way

As a transsexual man, I disagree with that article. I’d feel like if they are saying that lesbian sex can be penis in a vagina that it’s contradictory. Lesbians to my knowledge have always been women who are attracted to other women and women genitalia. I believe genitalia is a preference. People should not shame people for that and I feel like in a sense that is what the article is doing.

Who made up this "Penis is female thing"???

As an old school LGBT person this is not only confusing, but delegitimizes the struggles that our elders went thru for visibility and equality.

This is going towards beyond crazy. And I think the whole purpose of this bullshit is to destroy the acceptance that the LGBT community have gained over the last 10 years.

Maybe it's just because I'm bi, but I feel like stuff like this is people rejecting bisexuality. Is bisexuality really that scary to people?

This is strange to me. the idea that a penis can be female goes against Biology. How did we get here? No offense to the trans women in this group but if you have a penis, it is not female. the definition of female is, "of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) which can be fertilized by male gametes." Penises cannot do any of these things. I have no issue how you chose to life your life but to call penis in vagina sex lesbian is crazy at best.

I've seen this article - it made me so angry I could barely see straight. It's supposed to be "sex tips for lesbians" - it's literally a graphic blow-by-blow on how to have straight sex. This article supports the kind of garbage that activists like Riley Dennis and Rachel McKinnon try to push, and it's going to end up reflecting badly on the LGBT in the long run. Telling gay boys and gay girls that they need to be open-minded to partners with opposite genitalia is just going to confuse the shit out of them and make them question their identity more than they already do. Also, this article opens up an issue that's been circulating for a while: If individuals like Alex Drummond and Danielle Muscato want to identify as lesbians ... well, whatever. But for them to imply that HOMOSEXUAL FEMALES might be bigots for having no interest in sleeping with them - how is this not delusional or harmful? Not to mention misogynistic and homophobic towards, you know, HOMOSEXUAL FEMALES. And yes, Riley and Rachel - I'm giving you the stink-eye because you're encouraging the crap this article is promoting, it reflects badly on trans women as a whole, and I would sooner eat my cat's feces than support it.

In my opinion it depends because of course not every trans women can get bottom surgeries and they will not be able to have sex any other way but this should only happen if both women are comfortable with the situation I still think that lesbian sex should stay lesbian sex two women two vaginas or at least the definition should stay that way

So I'd say that 10 years ago "lesbian sex" would be described as between two consenting adult females. What has changed between now and then to change the definition of "Lesbian" or "Female". Has there been a radical change (radical because the definition mentioned in this article is 180 degrees from what the definition was 10 years ago) in the medical community to change these terms/conditions/definitions? Or has there been changes brought about by TV/Social Media/Lawyers...people that are not in the medical community? I think the latter...and that currently the "Non Medical 3" are trying to ram down everyone's throats that 2 plus 2 equals 3.

Piv/any kind of sex between opposite sex partners will never be gay

As Antonin Scalia wrote in King v Burwell, pure applesauce