4 5


I will make one SILLY (I admit) observation. To decide to see a movie or not, I look for how the critics score it in terms of so many things, like acting, plot, special effects, etc... Invariably, there are differences of opinion among critics. I accept that. After I read the reviews, I decide for myself if I want to waste or use 2 hours of my time to view the movie.

Now, imagine in the case of this medication, which could be not a 2 hour waste of time, but a life and death decision for many, I am forced to accept only ONE critic's opinion (CDC or WHO that are greatly influenced by pharma industry). Not just forced to (medication not given by pharmacists) but any other opinion is NOT allowed (censored !!!). HELLO, HELLO, IS THEIR INTELLIGENCE LEFT IN THIS PLANET?

Someone asked me: why are you not touting the benefits of Remdisivir and dexamethasone at the same time that you are engaged in your crusade for HCQ? MY answer to that question is simple: There is Dr Fauci and the entire pharma industry promoting these ( at costs thousands of times more than HCQ). We should all ask ourselves WHY?

The real question to ask is WHY OH WHY so many ARE ATTACKING ME and people like me??? please don't rush a reply to my question: There is the entire Mainstream Media attacking people like me and not just that, they convinced High Tech to remove any posts we put not supporting the Left Liberal Agenda. That is clear and evident. They can enjoy their hollow victory, but they must understand this: Even the BLIND can SEE through the Hypocrisy. Even the DEFT can HEAR the voices of Truth.

I am Canadian, and I am no Troll. USA Politics unfortunately touches the entire world especially us north of the USA.

We the PEOPLE have the right to hear and listen, EVEN if we are a minority. Look at BLM, they are a minority, but not only do people listen to them, they are rushing to help their cause.


drshallal 6 Aug 2

Post a comment Author doesn't reply Reply Author doesn't reply Add Photo

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account


Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.


I’ve posted MANY Articles going back MONTHS on this topic ... this one is one I posted today from OAN just the other day.


I only had time to Search out One review of this from the other side, and the thing that was amazing to me was , (I read the whole thing) it was nothing but personal attacks against the doctors. Nobody refuted the science, or cited any sources to support what they said.



I am not in any way in the health field, but please read the Conclusion of this important article:

Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-CoV antiviral compounds].

For heaven's Sake, I am a doctor, but not of medicine, yet, intelligent enough to say: if I read this correctly, the conclusion is clear. This medication is effective against SARS CoV. WHY ARE (THEY ?) NOT LISTENING. Why are they not allowing the Front Line Doctors to Speak as to its effectiveness with COVID 19?

Because THEY can not admit that TRUMP is right about ANYTHING!!!!!

Uh ... No.
They ACTIVELY are promoting ... and Have Promoted the Idea that He LIES about EVERYTHING ... and They’ve got A LOT of people believing it.

Because ...
Politics (Orange Man BAD ... STUPID ... Trying to KILL YOU!!!)
MONEY (Rem...whatever ... not as effective and We’re Gonna Have a VACCINE!!!)

@Bay0Wulf Definitely the MONEY, CHLOROQUINE has been around long enough that there is little profit to be made by using it, let's get something new that cost 10 plus times more!!!!

I am in the health field, and while I understand how you are reading the information, it is crucial to point out that studies done on cell cultures, such as the one you referenced, are not indicative of how the same drug will work in the human body. A cell culture is a petri dish, In a petri dish, they can directly apply a compound to a cell culture. When you are working with a human, you have the entire body and it's multiple interrelated systems to contend with and finding ways to get that drug to the virus where it can work like it does in a petri dish, is worlds away from easy and very rarely pans out even when in vitro studies look promising. We are not petri dishes, as much as we may feel we are right now. The large majority of in vitro studies (meaning done in cell cultures in a petri dish) do not end up being successful when used on an animal or human. That precisely why it is fallible to jump to the conclusion that because it works in a petri dish, it will auromatically work in a human, let alone be safe even if you can find a way to make it work. This drug has been exhaustively studied by people willing to do the work and not just jump to fallible conclusions. The evidence clearly is not there to support it.

@Amzungu Thank you. You make sense. But so do the doctors in my post. The exhaustive studies you mentioned are not really as you pointed out to them since I am aware that a couple were retracted. And, I have done all kind of studies in my younger days, I still favor "field experience" over studies and theories. These doctors are taking risks to speak up. Why are they shut off. We need open debate not censorship.

@drshallal Field studies are not used to create or change best practices in medicine. There is a higher level of evidence required to determine both safety and efficacy., and you can't exactly just step around that process because it's easier or more efficient. Especially in a litigation happy place like the good ol US of A. I'm also aware of the retracted studies, but there are numerous others which haven't been retracted. Anecdotal evidence, which is all the doctors in your post have provided is the lowest form of evidence that exists. Anecdotal evidence only shows that further research is needed. I am extremely skeptical of any medical professional who claims anecdotal evidence equates proof and advocates that the process of further research is not needed. I think we'd all be better looking at this drug for possible preventative effects rather than a treatment, based on the highest levels of evidence that exist in regards to it, and thankfully there are scientists who are willing to do the work of investigating the preventative potential through valid scientific research.


Your description of the "big Pharma" industry and mainstream media sounds like "the oppressors" while the "people like you" being the oppressed. Are you actually a Marxist?

Absolutely Not. You obviously have not read my other posts. I am against censoring. I am against manipulating studies to fit a given narrative. And, yes, I suspect that Big Pharma want HCQ to be removed in favor of their preference for monetary reasons. Heck, being a conservative does not mean being always with big corporations.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:118245 does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.