The Good, the Bad, and the Unmentionable.

Addition information on the POWER to decide which candidate legitimately received the permission, the prerogative, and the privilege to command The Office of President of (the Corporate) United States was posted by someone here at IDW in another forum:

"And there is nothing stopping Pence, under the authority vested in him as President of the Senate, from declining to open and count the certificates from the six disputed states. If they are (as more than 70% of Republicans believe) certificates from non-electors appointed via voter fraud, why should he open and count them? As Harrison noted, “the certificates that the President of the Senate is to open… are those of the electors, not those of non-electors.”"

[macris.substack.com]

As to what is or is not legitimate:

When Boris Epshteyn offers to the MEGA Deplorables a to do list, he does not suggest the unmentionable.

That which is unmentionable to others is not unmentionable to me.

Each individual at law is on an equal footing with each other individual at law or it is not legitimate.

That means that anyone injured by frauds perpetrating fraud is not merely able - at law - to set the wheels of due process going in that individual case, that individual is duty bound to do so, for life, for liberty, and for equal footing at law, meaning: for justice, for peace, for harmony, for speedy trials to peacefully resolve, remedy, conflicts, and restore injuries within the boundaries of physical reality.

So why doesn't Boris Epshteyn mention the unmentionable?

He, like so many, are either stupified and servile to falsehood without question, having been "schooled" on the Nationalist Indoctrination Organs falsely called Public School, or he, like a few others, actually know about the fake government scam, the scam that places Summary JustUS Courts above our common laws as eluded to in the Bill of Rights.

What does it say?

Example:

"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense."

What does that mean in the context of the current crimes perpetrated by the current frauds upon the current victims of those frauds?

I'll list 4 of the major current frauds:

1. National or Global Level Central Banking Fraud

2. National or Global Level Summary Justus Fraud

3. National or Global Level Pandemic Fraud

4. State AND National Level Election Fraud

Any accuser anywhere on behalf of all people take ONE accusation to ONE member of the common law due process system as eluded to in the Bill of Rights.

Where is the GATE between the accuser and the ONE who represents the local Grand Jury in any county, in any state, in the area Federated by 50 or so States, under the common law?

The GATE is in between your ears. The GATE is placed in between your ears by frauds. The GATE continues to be closed at your exclusive say so.