slug.com slug.com

3 1

I wonder how many still remain confident that the so called main stream media, so called news, holds total credibility. I often hear people chatting, making reference to news they've heard, showing their confidence of presented stories as true. Supporting blatantly twisted points of view gained from the news. They've swallowed it without any skepticism or question whatsoever.

Parents lie to kids about Santa Claus & tooth fairies, and that getting dirty is bad for you. Doctors and the medical establishment lie to us claiming that vaccines are completely "safe & effective". Politicians running for office lie to us promising outlandish impossibilities. Spouses lie with hiding their secret lover(s). Lying to a boss or the police is pretty common. "WHY" would anyone even contemplate that the news casts perspectives presented to us as worthy to believe, as being valid??? Like... Uhhh, DUH!!!

As though people don't equate that broadcasting (via television or regular radio) that they see and hear comes from a corporation, owners / managers who comply with their instructions, follow orders. They are under the thumb of those at the top, those who establish all rules, laying down the nature of what kind of material is presented (be that entertainment related movies or what they call the news). If those who steer the direction of a perspective that's being presented to the public have certain goals or agendas in mind, or information they want to remain hidden, those are the directives handed down. CONTROL the narrative.

Don't people notice that previous to wars in the middle east there were suddenly numerous war movies came onto the market? Would that stimulate public support and patriotism? (I could say more on that.) Stirring up a predictable response in the public is not all that difficult, especially when we hear the narrative over and over and over... Manipulating and even managing public awareness and attitude on a given subject is very possible and is used consistently by those who have agendas and who OWN both the media and most of the movie / TV industries. They allow us to see and hear whatever they discern is applicable for their goals to thrive, while disallowing perspectives they don't want people to get.

People need to support the importance of their personal values, consider the "value" of personal priorities. Everyone has children they care about, either theirs or in their families. People generally care for themselves and have hopes for their futures, and likely have hopes for the children. We "value" ourselves and our children. We constantly make choices and decisions around ourselves and our families hoping those decisions are based on good information, that we have reliable basis and perspective to hopefully bring a better outcome all around. What if our information is skewed, what if it is not based in truth?

Would our being aware of our "likely" future be a good thing? Would it be a good idea to "understand" actual realities that seriously affect our present and future? Instead of "assuming" about conditions that affect our lives, would it be preferable to base our decisions on reality and truth? Would people not prefer factual information around real life consequential matters, or prefer to be manipulated in directions that carry serious and negative consequence? Is it better to realize what is truly happening and deal with our lives for a positive growing outcome? I think people choose reliable truth.

Paying attention to different sources of information WILL help enable a more positive future. It's up to you to discern what is reliable. I look for supporting backup for information. An opinion or information needs others corroboration to give it eventual credibility. Alternative sources of supporting opinion or information, unrelated to the original source, builds more credibility. I call it backup. I need sufficient backup before I believe most opinions or information. Being seriously skeptical is a kind of self preservation amidst the tsunami of misinformation.

So, sacrificing some time, instead of sports, Hollywood, video games... to seek opinion and information that describes and clarifies our actual reality becomes well spent time. Our choices and decisions can become more productive and positive when they are based on what YOU conclude to be reliable perspectives. PLEASE take a look at the following sites for alternative perspectives of our reality:
Bitchute, Jerry Day, The Crow House, Corbett Report, The Dollar Vigilante, Edward Griffin, London Reel,
A plane truth 4 you, Vox News, Dana Ashlie, Red Pill University, Celeste Solum, Brighteon . Com, Freedomtaker . Com, New World Next Week, Children's Health Defense, look up stuntmen Brad Martin and Mike Smith, look up Kevin Shipp, look up information on 5G. Look, Listen, Learn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

MadManatee 5 May 31
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

I have listened to Howard Stern for many years and lately I just cant, he says the New York times is the best newspaper and they always tell the truth. He and other like him believe wholeheartedly that CNN and MSNBC and others like them are telling the absolute truth everyday. Even after their stories have been exposed as biased and false these celebrities a talk show hosts stick with the stories and lies as if their lives depend on it. I don't understand why the left can never admit when they are wrong.

1

Literally every news person on every channel apologized for the rioters and evoked the "systemic racism" trope while America burned.

2

Very few people on this site believe anything the mainstream media says.

Preaching to the choir a bit.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:100622
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.