Gosh. Where do we begin?

Should we celebrate Michael Flynn’s long over due exoneration? Or focus on the criminal injustice that nearly destroyed his life?

Do we aim our sights on the utterly corrupt James Comey and the Lynch Justice department for their efforts to frame Flynn in the first place?

Or should the Gestspo tactics of Herr Mueller and his storm troopers with their predawn raids and manufactured prosecutions capture our attention?

And please, let’s not forget Adsm Schiff for brains, who has been deliciously exposed as both a congenital liar, and quite possibly a seditious conspirator.

And shouldn’t we observe of moment of silence for the now dead Russian collusion hoax, finally exposed for the attempted coup that it always has been, a frame-up from the start, an effort to subvert the government of the United States and illicitly remove a duly elected president. In any sane political environment we’d see banner headlines demanding “OFF WITH THEIR HEADS!!!” Unfortunately today’s media has been central to the plot and deserve to lose their heads as well. But hey, now we know.

But there is one subject that takes precedence over all these others, if only because it is at the core of everything else that has transpired. That has been, as one revelation followed on the next, the steady emergence of Barak Obama as the centerpiece that holds the entire far-flung narrative together.

Of course, we’ve always “known,” haven’t we? Come on, we’d assure ourselves, he had to be involved. How could he not? And yet, in a climate that permits an obvious criminal like Hillary Clinton to skate unscathed, cynicism left us resigned to the probability that he’d prove immune. Comey might go down. Brennen, one would fervently hope. Clapper? Sure. Collateral damage all. But Obama would be protected.

Maybe not. For the first time, a direct link between the plot to frame Michael Flynn and Obama himself has appeared. Under oath, no less. Sally Yates revealed that she first heard about the phone call between Flynn and Russian ambassador Kislyak from Obama himself, at the famous January 6, 2020 meeting. As any criminal investigator will tell you, when approaching any suspect, they’ll first try to put him out of the picture. Failing that, they’ll try to put him in. Obama just got himself put in. When you understand that removing Flynn was the necessary first step in both hiding the Spygate conspiracy, and then removing Trump, I think we’ll be hearing more about Barry.

That’s the crack in the wall. A legitimate media would now be hammering Obama and his inner circle with the now required question: What did he know, and when did he know it? But apparently, that question is reserved for Republican presidents only.

But make no mistake: the walls will crumble. It’s only a matter of time before the rats start turning on each other. Clapper has already taken the “I was only following orders,“ excuse out for a test run. He might Google “Nuremberg Trials,” to see what his chances will be with that approach.

My money’s on Sally Yates. Her profile is far too visible for her to slip under the radar. Her claim to fame is she was willing to carry water for the conspirators, but, too bad for her, she was inside. For all of it. She was left behind to mount a rear-guard action against the new administration, and was immediately fired for her efforts. Who’s in her corner now? She doesn’t even have an Ivy League law degree. If she’s not already talking to Durham, she’d best get on board. That train will be pulling out of the station soon and her usefulness will have a rapidly diminishing value. In the meantime, I’d advise her to avoid late-night drives on sparsely travelled roads. It might also be prudent for her to keep the name “Seth Rich” foremost in her thoughts.

These are, as our Chinese friends might say, interesting times indeed.