⁣Dr. Reiner Fuellmich | Pandemic Podcast ~ September 20, 2021

[odysee.com]

Time 47:47 or so…

After the concept of the power of at least 1 Court Case with 1 Major Suspect, such as Bill Gates, tried for Crimes Against Humanity is discusses, and both the interviewer and the German Lawyer agree that more than 1 case is necessary to end the Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud, the interview then moves to a discussion about the existence of 2 forms of due process.

1. Civil (such as Roman Law)
2. Common (such as common law)

Before adding my comments on the discussion about Civil and Common Law, I want to point out a few very important cases tried by a mixture of both Civil and Common Law forms.

1. The Federal Reserve System was found to be fraudulent in fact, as found by a jury, and as confirmed by a judge in that case.

"Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire 14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Anheuser-Bush Brewing co. V. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318. The Jury found there was no lawful consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of nothing."
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF SCOTT
First National Bank of Montgomery, Plaintiff
vs
Jerome Daly, Defendant.
December 9, 1968

I have that quoted from a copy of the transcript sent to me from a volunteer volunteering to help me gather the information I’ve been gathering.

If I am not mistaken, that case was appealed and was sent to an appellate jurisdiction Court, which would be, thereby, a Civil, or Roman, Law Summary Justice Court, such as would be assumed by such Statutes as The Judiciary Act of 1789, which formed the National Supreme Court System with these Districts in each formerly Independent States that were Consolidated with the 1789 Constitution, which was done fraudulently, since the original Federal Constitution, Articles of Confederation, March 1, 1781 to 1789, did not authorize “Consolidation,” or annihilating independence of states, or Monopolizing Power and Profit into the hands of an Aristocratic Elite, but it was done anyway, it was done fraudulently, and at that level it was Treason. So those treasonous psychopaths in the past, those “founders,” put Roman, or Civil, Law above common law, to serve them, and this is not news.

Back to the other case to mention before returning to the German Lawyer and his comments, in this second case the government was found guilty of Conspiracy Murder. This again was a mix of Common Law and Roman or Civil Law, where common law serves all the people all the time within natural boundaries binding people with limitations, such as dishonesty, therefore common law is based upon facts that matter in each case, and – in opposition to common law – is the opposition law, which serves the Elite, Aristocratic, psychopaths, sociopaths, and their armies of sycophants made into sycophants as the psychopaths and sociopaths spend the loot they steal on brainwashing productive people.

THE COURT: Let me ask you, do all of you
agree with this verdict?

THE JURY: Yes (In unison).

THE COURT: In answer to the
question did Loyd Jowers participate in a
conspiracy to do harm to Dr. Martin Luther
King, your answer is yes.

Do you also find that others, including governmental agencies, were parties to this conspiracy as alleged by
the defendant? Your answer to that one is
also yes.

And the total amount of damages
you find for the plaintiffs entitled to is
one hundred dollars. Is that your verdict?

THE JURY: Yes (In unison).

That is how the common law works. The accuser presents the evidence to the jury, a judge does not bar the free transfer of evidence to help a deceiver maintain deception, and the defendant presents a defense, if there is any, and the jury finds the facts, adjudicates the verdict, and prescribes a sentence. The judge in common law is merely a source of memory, advising the jurors as to their well established duties, such as a bias for the truth, and a rejection of falsehood as an obvious crime involving injuries caused by falsehood.

Note: no further DEFENSIVE actions was taken after representatives of The People voted unanimously that The Federal Reserve System is an ongoing Treasonous Fraud, and no further action was taken when The People returned a verdict of guilt in the Conspiracy Murder case when government agents conspired to murder Martin Luther King Jr.

Since those cases, Treasonous Fraud and Conspiracy Murderers were busy stealing everything that can be stolen and spending the loot on more of the same, now very well beyond mass murder, and well beyond genocide in fact.

If you still think I am the lunatic here, then consider listening to someone else showing you the same thing, in other words.

Roman Law, or Civil Law, the form of rules that protect and serve the psychopaths for centuries has always been accurately accounted as such with the opposition form of law: common law.

Will there be another battle between those who serve and protect the psychopaths, with their Civil Law, and on the moral side are those defenders who serve and protect all the people, doing so with the truth and the common law?

This is basic truth versus fiction, good versus evil stuff. It would be entertaining if it wasn’t so terrifying.