2304270900Th SOCIALIST IDENTITY POLITICS versus WESTERN CLASSISM?

At the outset, I’m not sure what video I’ll be linking hereto as several creators are becoming aware of this same human defect at the same time in multiple parts of the world.

Though the names may change the characterizations remain relatively the same within set categories worldwide.

For instance, politicians and government bureaucrats can easily be consigned to a class we can refer to as elites. With elitism encompassing only slightly different characters depending on time and circumstance. I mean that while The United States may not have royalty it does have politicians that occupy the same relative hierarchical position – or so they think.

Socialism has the same relative classes though they may be called identities as if that makes it any more palatable.

Then there’s this supposed subordinate class or identity the elites like to call the working class or possibly Bolsheviks.

Now, after trying to lay the ground work I’ll try to get to the point of this post.

THERE ARE ONLY TWO CLASSES (kinds) OF PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD – PERIOD!

Those that PRODUCE and those that live off of those PRODUCERS. I’ll stop just short of referring to the ‘later’ as parasites as they may at limited times actually serve a useful service to the ‘former’ – and for that reason only.

And before it’s asked, children along with the infirmed retired & elderly not capable of PRODUCING should always be considered part of the PRODUCTIVE class – without exception.

What I’m trying to get at is that there is no excuse for the NON-PRODUCTIVE holding sway (control) over the PRODUCTIVE of society. The whole system, or way of thinking, is up-side down as it were. It’s just basically wrong for the elites of society to be in a position to lord over the productive (working classes) of humanity.

It is the habit of socialism to use this dependency to foment revolution just long enough for these socialists to usurp (supplant) the positions of the current elites.

The bottom line is that Usurpation is never actual Revolution as the American Revolution was and still is. In point of fact the American Revolution is still in progress which means that socialists are trying to foment Counter Revolution – not an actual Revolution such as that of our founding fathers.

Usurpation is nothing more or less than an exchange of elites.

PS. The ongoing American Revolution is an ongoing experiment in SELF-RULE – still in progress. And this socialist onslaught is yet one more test of the American peoples in determining their capability for that self same SELF-RULE.

Posted by: Bill Whittle ~ 5 days ago ~ 7.3K views ~ 187K subscribers
“Socialism”

Please do correct for me any errors that you discern – thanks in advance?

#LETSGOBRANDON ~ A Socialist (whether he’s capable of realizing it or not?
#MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) an existentialist (individualist) philosophy of life.
#ONLY PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE – STICKS & STONES DON’T, NOT EVEN GUNS KILL PEOPLE

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
u·surp

VERB
usurp (verb) · usurps (third person present) · usurped (past tense) · usurped (past participle) · usurping (present participle)

take (a position of power or importance) illegally or by force:

"Richard usurped the throne"

SIMILAR: seize, take over, expropriate, take, appropriate, steal, wrest, arrogate, commandeer, annex, assume, take possession of, lay claim to.

• take the place of (someone in a position of power) illegally; supplant:

"the Hanoverian dynasty had usurped the Stuarts"

SIMILAR: oust, overthrow, remove, topple, unseat, depose, dethrone, eject, dispel, succeed, come after, supplant, replace, deprive, step into the shoes of.

• ARCHAIC (USURP ON/UPON)
  encroach or infringe upon (someone's rights):

"the Church had usurped upon the domain of the state"

ORIGIN:
Middle English (in the sense ‘appropriate a right wrongfully&rsquo: from Old French usurper, from Latin usurpare ‘seize for use’.

Data from Oxford Language