Brendan O’Neill
Wall Street Journal6:53
2:00AM January 9, 2021
Let’s be clear about what took place at the Capitol building on Thursday. This was a mob assault on the institutions of democracy. The ragtag army of Capitol breachers may have looked ridiculous, decked out in Trump-wear, face paint and antlers. But what they did was not ridiculous, it was serious. They illegally entered the democratic citadel of the United States, a beacon of democracy to many people around the world, with the express intention of blocking the peaceful transition of power voted for by their fellow citizens. They committed a violent incursion against the practice and the ideal of democracy.
**And now let’s be clear about what did not take place at the Capitol building. This was not a fascist coup, as so many shrill, supposedly liberal commentators are claiming. Their flagrant use of the word “fascist” to describe every political movement they disapprove of is an insult to reason and history. This wasn’t a coup full stop. The National Guard swiftly suppressed the morons, the barricades were put back up, and even their hero, Donald Trump, told them to go home. A coup is a conscious effort to illegally seize power from the government. These people couldn’t even believe they made it into the Capitol. They were like children finding a candy store unguarded.
And it wasn’t an insurrection, either, as Joe Biden and others are calling it. Except perhaps a pantomime insurrection, a cosplay revolt, a more heated version of those history aficionados who spend their weekends dressed up as soldiers of the American Revolution or the American Civil War.
Challenging the narrative that has been so swiftly built around the invasion of the Capitol — the narrative of a fascist threat to the American republic, of Trump leading a coup d’etat, of populism finally revealing its true, foul colours — is not about minimising what occurred. It’s about clarifying what occurred. And it’s about taking a stand against the threat inflation currently being engaged in by significant sections of the cultural and political elites. Their hysterical warnings of resurgent fascism, of small mobs threatening America’s apparently pristine democracy, can only lead to greater authoritarian controls on political action and even on political speech.
Those of us who genuinely believe in freedom and democracy should call for some perspective on Thursday’s events, not to excuse the anti-democratic cretins who engaged in riotous behaviour, but to guard against an illiberal, anti-democratic response from the managerial elites; to ensure the response to this event doesn’t end up threatening democracy more than the event itself. I fear it will, and soon.
Across the media, there is a striking disparity between the claims being made about the Capitol incursion and the photographs of it. The claims are extreme: this is fascism, they say; it’s like 1933; the far right is now usurping democracy itself. The German Foreign Minister even made a reference to the Reichstag Fire, the 1933 arson against the German parliament that the Nazis used as a pretext to seize power.
But the photos show something very different. They show wide-eyed protesters, as bemused as the rest of us that they are inside the Capitol building. In some photos it looks more like an unscheduled tour of the Capitol rather than anything like a coup — the protesters even stayed inside the barriers as they walked along the carpet. They took selfies while sitting on the Speaker’s chair.
One of the modern-day Hitlers grins as he poses for a photo next to the statue of Ronald Reagan. If it wasn’t for the terrible tragedy that subsequently unfolded — five people have now died in the melee — one could be forgiven for thinking this was a badly timed public visit to the Capitol, accidentally occurring while representatives were present.
It is important to note this disparity because it confirms that something very political is taking place right now. The threat inflation, the wild claims about a fascist coup, are transparent efforts by the cosseted political and cultural elites to endow their project with moral importance; to give their restoration of managerial, technocratic power after the four-year populist experiment — which is fundamentally the project that Biden and his influential supporters are currently engaged in — the gloss of historical urgency. It is mission creation. Worse, this narrative-building will allow the elites to circumscribe even more forms of political thought and speech than they already desire to do, on the basis that the latent fascism among the American rabble is likely to be stirred up by inflammatory ideas and commentary. Indeed, we’ve already been given a chilling glimpse of this post-incursion clampdown on “violent” speech in Twitter’s extraordinary decision to ban, outright, three of Trump’s tweets on Thursday and to lock him out of his account for 12 hours.
It strikes me that this unilateral use of corporate power by Silicon Valley to prevent the democratically elected president of the US from engaging with millions of his voters and supporters, to physically forbid him from partaking in online discussion, is a grave assault on democracy, too. More grave, I would say, than the immoral and anti-democratic incursion of the Capitol building. Already, right away, we are seeing that the threat-inflating response to Thursday’s events will likely have longer-lasting negative consequences for open debate and democratic norms than the thing itself.
Republican politicians 'damned if they support Trump and damned if they don't'
The increasingly polarising figure cut by Donald Trump has resulted in a situation where Republicans risk hurting their political career by taking a stance either for or against the outgoing president, according to The New Republic’s Alex Shephard.
It is not whataboutery to draw attention to the elites’ meek response to earlier riotous behaviour. Rather, it is about understanding the growing dominion enjoyed by the new clerisy over the political narrative and even over language and words themselves. Their cultural and media supremacy means they increasingly have the power to narrate BLM rioting as not being rioting at all, while a violent incursion in the Capitol is literal fascism; it means they can say that anti-lockdown protests during a lockdown are lethal to public health, but anti-police protests are not; it means they can secure the silencing and even sacking of anyone who referred to the BLM violence as looting and who called for the National Guard to intervene, while cheering as police at the Capitol shoot protesters. It is this control of political narration, of thought itself, of the very meaning of words like riot, looting, fascism, peaceful and so on, that must be highlighted and confronted.
Then there’s the double standards over democracy. British politicians who spent four years trying to trash the largest democratic vote in our country’s history — the vote for Brexit — are now condemning protesters in America for trying to trash a democratic vote. Labour’s David Lammy refers to Trump as an “enemy of democracy” — big talk for an MP who explicitly called on his fellow MPs to overthrow the “nightmare” of Brexit.
Hillary Clinton supporters, too, spread conspiracy theories about Russia stealing the 2016 presidential election and cheered on the security state as it investigated Trump’s election. Did they think this behaviour would not have a long-term impact on respect for democracy? That it wouldn’t encourage cynicism towards America’s electoral process? Democrat conspiracy theorists and hardcore Remainer agitators should look a little more closely at the hotheads who stormed the Capitol — they might see a more clownish, fancy-dress version of their own anti-democratic selves staring back.
Joe Biden won the election, fair and square. The Trumpite campaign to rubbish the election result is wrong and dangerous. Losers’ consent is vital in a healthy democratic society. From Britain’s Remainer elites to the Mueller lovers of the American liberal media to the pro-Trump rioters at the Capitol — all must cease; all must have some respect for the people and their democratic will. That democracy is threatened as much by the supposedly respectable managerial elites as it is by a mob of Biden-haters — more so, in fact — is an important point to reiterate. Otherwise the loud condemners of Thursday’s terrible actions will secure for themselves an unearned moral authority on the question of democracy, while undermining democracy in a more thorough if more peaceful way than the antlers guy at the Capitol.
Right now, many observers are reading history backwards. They’re talking about Thursday’s events as the culmination of Trump’s rule, as the ultimate expression of his four-year anti-establishment presidency. This is a teleology of doom. In truth, the incursion of the Capitol signals the desperation and decline and decay of Trumpism. It’s over. And they know it’s over. That is why they are going mad. But just because Trumpism is finished, that doesn’t mean populism should be. On the contrary, we need the populist spirit, unencumbered by Trump, more than ever. We are in greater need of that public energetic thirst for power and for change more now than we were in 2016. Why? To guard America and democracy more broadly against the aloof elites whose illiberal, technocratic project will sadly benefit from Thursday’s disturbing events and from the dishonest narrative being weaved around them.
I agree with much of the sentiment of the article but feel that the election was stolen from Trump and Republican voters. There is way too much evidence of fraud from what I can see, all be it from afar, as I do reside in Australia.
The one troubling aspect I see is the legitimate fear that Trump supporters, who it seems will end up as losers, will be canceled and, worse still, may then be persecuted by the government and big tech for supporting the wrong party. We have seen that even Mastercard can decide to blackball you. So the effects can be far reaching. So I think some Republicans now abandoning Trump are playing to survive. There is already talk of some people seen at the Capitol Hill demonstration losing their job.
So everyone now need to think about whether holding a particular view publicly will end life as they know it. We know already that polls are frequently wrong due to shy conservative supporters. I think such fears are well grounded.
This is an incredibly dangerous precedent in the west. As someone far wiser than I said, we live in dangerous times.
It wasn't a "mob assault" on our institutions... it was the predictable result of the on-going, coordinated mob assault on our institutions; likely instigated by the very Democrats who are crying about it the loudest, for the equally-predictable political benefit and propaganda value.
"...voted for by their fellow citizens" is the important part of the first paragraph.
That didn't happen this time, and it's quite possible that legitimate elections are a thing of the past; thanks to Democrats and their pathological lack of any principles or integrity.
In short: yes, Progressives are a danger to "Democracy". However, not to nit-pick but words matter... it's not really Democracy that's threatened, it's our Constitutional Republic; in which the individual's rights are preserved against the fleeting whims of the mob (a.k.a. "Democracy".)
Actual Democracy is more like what Progressives are trying to establish: which is nothing more noble than mob-rule, with them controlling the mob.
Some key components of that control are:
And that's why these... "initiatives", among others, are all hallmarks of Progressivism.
Democracy is "mob rule" is actually a fallacy.
@Lightman that definition is useless. It loosely describes a mob... but acting is not ruling.
Consent for your behavior doesn't come from government authorities. Your behavior is none of their business unless you violate somebody else's rights. i.e., when you violate a just Law.
Consent comes from the governed, to approve and authorize the actions of those authorities in protecting other people's rights... actions taken on behalf of the governed themselves.
Accordingly; "the governed" only have the legitimate authority to intervene in your behavior as an individual, in one specific circumstance: to protect someone else's rights from you.
Otherwise... "consent" for your behavior is moot. You don't need anybody's consent.
When the collective (mob) uses their sheer numbers to breach that constraint, and directs the government to impede or coerce your behavior based, not on your actions... but on the will of the mob; then you have "mob rule".
That's how Democracy works.
@Lightman interesting, you let whomever edited that dictionary do your thinking for you... but I have a closed mind...?
Do you even know who's opinion that is? lol
So, your argument is that "acting" and "ruling" are the same thing... maybe your omniscient Dictionary can help you out with that misconception.
Look them both up, and compare. You don't need me for that.
@rway Mob rule or ochlocracy (Greek: ὀχλοκρατία, romanized: okhlokratía; Latin: ochlocratia) is the rule of government by a mob or mass of people and the intimidation of legitimate authorities. Insofar as it represents a pejorative for majoritarianism, it is akin to the Latin phrase mobile vulgus, meaning "the fickle crowd", from which the English term "mob" originally was derived in the 1680s
Note... Ochlocracy is not Democracy.
I can of course keep citing sources and dictionaries that will totally agree with me and not the fallacy you believe.
@Lightman yes, you can keep citing sources that continue to make my point... if you like.
When the mob uses their number to vote-away your rights, that is not legitimate authority.
Now you can look up the word legitimate.
Definitions are fun... but at some point you may want to take a moment and try to understand what they mean.
@Lightman you insist that there is some difference between "Democracy" and "Mob Rule", and yet you refuse to attempt explaining what that difference is.
You've used a British dictionary definition that is obviously insufficient: it offers a description that could describe a "mob"... but a mob, and mob rule are not the same thing.
Then you offer a definition for Ochlocracy... and claim that Democracy "obviously" doesn't fit that description... when in fact it fits quite nicely.
And finally you pulled a second vague definition for "Democracy" out of an un-sourced hat, that could be applied to literally any system of government or lack thereof. North Korea is ruled by "...all eligible members of [the] state." Kim just happens to be the only eligible member.
Cutting and pasting can be useful skills. But thinking comes in handy once in a while, as well.
If there is some salient difference between "Democracy" and "Mob Rule": what is it?
...it's a simple question.
Posted by JohnHoukAI Dystopia Moving from Sci-Fi to a WEF NWO: A Look at Stop World Control Documentary, ‘THE END OF HUMANITY - As Planned By The Global Leaders’ SUMMARY: An intro by Patricia Harrity followed ...
Posted by JohnHoukGlobalist Tyranny Videos Batch – Part TWO SUMMARY: The video list I’m sharing leans more toward Globalist Tyranny (which includes the American traitors – the Dem-Marxists) in this batch.
Posted by JohnHoukGlobalist Tyranny Videos Batch – Part ONE SUMMARY: I’ve spent the last few days looking at saved videos largely from Telegram Social Media.
Posted by JohnHoukWATCH OUT FOR AN AI TYRANNY & NSA Spying SUMMARY: I’ve witnessed too many dark-side leaps and bounds to give credence to AI-Tyranny naysayers.
Posted by Sensrhim4hizvewzCohencidence or PLANNED???
Posted by Sensrhim4hizvewz Hopefully, everyone catches it and everyone gets better
Posted by JohnHoukFBI Investigates Baltimore Bridge Collapse! Suggests NOT an Accident! SUMMARY: On 3/27/24 I shared a Lara Logan Tweet on her opinion of what caused the Francis Scott Key Bridge near Baltimore ship ...
Posted by JohnHoukPolitical Tyranny – Part Two Videos Showing the Political Tyranny of Factionalism & Globalist Entanglements SUMMARY: IN Part 1 I used President Washington’s 1796 Farewell Address as a ...
Posted by JohnHoukPolitical Tyranny – Part One President Washington Warned of the Insidious Outcome of Political Factions & Foreign Entanglements SUMMARY: George Washington – RIGHTLY SO – is called the Father...
Posted by JohnHoukFuellmich Political Persecution Encapsulates Globalist Lawfare SUMMARY: A few thoughts on Deep State Political Persecution of Trump & Supports.
Posted by JohnHoukLooking at Birx Not Fauci Managed Medical Tyranny Includes Personal Observations on Legit President Trump SUMMARY: Looking at a VNN examination of the short Documentary: “It Wasn't Fauci: How ...
Posted by FocusOn1Uh oh, i hate to say this, but israel was formed in 1948, 100 years after karl marx wrote his book. Was it formed as a atheist communist country?
Posted by MosheBenIssacWith woke fat ass acceptance, only applies to women (fat bitches). What used to be funny is now illegal. The video won a Grammy Award for Best Concept Music Video in 1988 [youtu.be]
Posted by JohnHoukRemember WHY You Are Resisting the Coup Summary: Well… It’s series of videos time again.
Posted by JohnHoukA Call for Intercession Over WHO Power Grab Treaty SUMMARY: A call for prayer on America’s leaders related to the National Sovereignty terminating Pandemic (better known as Plandemic) Treaty.
Posted by MosheBenIssacDisney COLLAPSES Billions Lost In MINUTES After Shareholders Troll Company Sticking With WOKE! [youtu.be]