Most likely females have experienced more Neoteny than males because of sexual selection. Sexual selection favored faster maturation in females than males. Selection for males didn't change that much because physical strength would remain a selection factor. Females are still selected on signs of fertility associated with youth. It's a recipe for runaway sexual dimorphism. Neoteny doesn't just affect physical characteristics but behavior as well. For example domestication leads to less overt aggression while the underlying instincts stay intact. For both sexes intelligence would remain a selection factor accounting for the small difference in male and female intelligence. That said, female intelligence is concentrated around the norm. Male intelligence is more varied, most likely due to both the expendability of males and higher mutation rates. Biologically the base is xx chromosomes while xy is an induced condition.

The above is all well understood but what isn't as well understood is how civilization and group selection has affected human evolution. In part because group selection is a taboo topic. For the same reason that differences between the sexes are a taboo topic. They are seen as a threat to the idea that "all men (and women) are created equal". History tells us that identifiable groups will in fact not be treated equally. Many of our current problems exist because of the failure to achieve our ideals. Sins of our fathers you could say still affect us all.

I think we can all agree that biology should not be the basis for unequal treatment. We should be able to also agree that we want a meritocracy. The problem is there is no easy way to define merit. It is closely tied to values and values vary widely by individual. When looking at groups, males and females will have different values. By extension different ideas of merit. Agreeing on a set of values would go a long way to solving the conflicts between males and females.

Feminists resent their benefactors. It's an old, old story!