2308211900M SOCIALISTS CAN’T HAVE EVERYTHING BOTH WAYS, CAN THEY?

To set something straight: While “Climate Change” may indeed be regional, it most certainly isn’t global – and to say so is pure alarm-ism. Alarm-ism just like the Russia Hoax was intended to elicit a specific response so too is the “Climate Change Hoax.”

Ice Ages have come and gone throughout Earths history all without concern for human carbon emissions. And I dare say, that they’ll continue to come and go long after humanity has managed to exterminate itself. Earth’s weather systems are far too intricately dynamic for human intervention even if he wanted to. Humanity can’t even control rain let alone hurricanes and tornadoes, but leftists would have you believe that humanity can now easily destroy the Earth by carbon emission(s).

Climate changes have existed throughout Earth’s history, but without human influence. I would point to North Africa as a prime example of regional climate change – but that may be another story.

While I don’t believe in ‘determinism’ with regard to individual human actions or inaction, one has to believe in ‘determinism’ with regard to regional “Climate Change(s)” on this big blue marble hurtling through space at 67K miles an hour on our way to somewhere unknown. Why, we don’t even know if we’re early or late getting to our destination.

Someone I’m acquainted with wants to use the term “determinism” when it suits their viewpoint, but dispense with it when it doesn’t help their viewpoint. For instance, as far as a leftist is concerned, Donald Trump must be guilty of something therefore ‘determinism’ must be dispensed with as quickly as possible. However, looters in San Francisco, to that same leftist, must be innocent being but victims of ‘determinism’ as they are.

Fate would be a better word to use as it at least implies a possibility of free will – otherwise how could you tempt it?

I’m not going to say that ‘determinism’ doesn’t exist altogether as it does in isolated instances. For instance, a person cannot change the sex of their birth as their chromosomes can’t be changed. That’s determinism isn’t it?

Nature is oppressive to everyone, male or female, and yet my friend thinks men are required for some reason to have empathy for human females? Such special empathy is against all that Marxist/Socialism stand for – how can that be. But that’s precisely what I’m talking about: If a woman doesn’t want to get pregnant she doesn’t have to. MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) philosophy isn’t for forcing pregnancy upon women – never may that be so.

PS. I’d like to point out that a woman can get pregnant, carry to term, and give birth all while in a coma. So where’s the empathy, where’s the applause?

Posted by: It's Just Astronomical! ~ 4 years ago ~ 8.5M views ~ 88.2K subscribers
“How Ice Ages Happen: The Milankovitch Cycles”

PS. Men actually love, women confuse covetousnous with love on their part.

#LETSGOBRANDON ~ A Commun-ist (whether he’s capable of realizing it or not?).
#MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) an existentialist (individualist) philosophy of life.
#ONLY PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE – STICKS & STONES DON’T, NOT EVEN GUNS KILL ONLY PEOPLE DO

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
de·ter·min·ism

NOUN PHILOSOPHY
determinism (noun)

the doctrine that all events, including human action, are ultimately determined by causes external to the will. Some philosophers have taken determinism to imply that individual human beings have no free will and cannot be held morally responsible for their actions.

Data from Oxford Languages