I have not held back on the fact I am not a big supporter of Trump as president, but I do offer credit where credit is due, and he has earned that respect more often than not since he has been in office. This is one such occasion.

"Trump employs violence as political fuel for reelection fight"

This headline is, to be short and sweet about it, A LIE! They worded this to suggest that Trump is urging his supporters to do exactly what the democrats have been doing since O-bomb-a's days in office, telling them to use violence to confront their ideological opponents. They make it sound like Trump is doing just like O-bomb-a back when O-bomb-a was standing right next to the president of the AFL-CIO when the union prez promised that union members would be going out, and getting their fists bloody to make sure O-bomb-a won the election, and O-bomb-a stood there with a stupid grin on his face, nodding his head like a little professional football bobble head figure.

The text of the article offers a little truth...

"His 2016 focus on Islamic radical terrorism and undocumented-immigrant crime, which he credited with helping him win the Republican nomination, has been replaced by warnings of new threats, as he elevates gruesome images of Black-on-White crime, street fights involving his supporters and police misconduct riots nationwide."

A little bit of truth, Trump did focus on islamic violence, and criminality of illegal aliens in the last election. Now his administration is focused on black on white crime, street fights, and riots. But before slipping in a little truth they have to preface that with more headline like diversion lie,

"President Trump has reverted to using graphic depictions of violence as a centerpiece of his reelection campaign strategy, using his Twitter account, stump speech and even the White House podium as platforms for amplifying domestic conflict."

The diversion came right at the end, "...amplifying domestic conflict."

The word amplifying was carefully chosen for it's dualistic use. It is meant to suggest Trump is wanting to create, amplify, more domestic conflict, even so far as to suggest he is urging husbands to be more violent with their wives, hence the use of the word domestic rather than something like national conflict, or political conflict in America. Domestic was another useful word for it's duality in this context. Of course if the writer, and publishers are confronted about the unrealistic tone of this article they will declare that is not what they said, they will defend themselves by using the other side of those two words, that amplifying simply means focusing on and raising awareness of, and that domestic simply means problems within the Untied States and this is no reference to domestic violence with regard to spousal abuse.

Back to
"His 2016 focus on Islamic radical terrorism and undocumented-immigrant crime, which he credited with helping him win the Republican nomination, has been replaced by warnings of new threats, as he elevates gruesome images of Black-on-White crime, street fights involving his supporters and police misconduct riots nationwide."
Highlighting black on white crime is a reasonable thing to bring attention to in face of these months long, wide spread riots fired up by BLM with the assistance of antifa, causing millions of dollars of damage and leading to acts of murder, and physical assault under the name of protesting black people killed by police. The false narrative these people are pushing is that blacks are being hunted by cops and routinely attacked by any white person in this country for the sole reason they are black. Highlighting the true facts about black on white crime, and even black on black crime will bring to light all the lies BLM and antifa are using as the excuse to become Brown Shirts and carry out their own extended Krystallnacht.

Then we have this misleading crap about Trump focusing on "...street fights involving his supporters..." technically that is an accurate statement. However it would have been more honest if they had printed something like "unprovoked attacks against his supporters". This very small tidbit was very specifically worded to suggest Trump supporters are the ones starting all the violence they have been caught up in since he started campaigning in the GOP primaries. I was surprised they printed "...riots nationwide." since the press in has been pushing the lie these are peaceful protests so damned hard.

Attacking Trump for having a sense of humor the article points out Trump tweeted a mocked up video of the antifa molotov that hit their own crew, and the video of the guy running out of the fireball with his feet flaming. Hell I watched that clip quite a few times the night I found that, and I laughed until I had tears coming down and my sides hurt. If I knew how to edit youtube videos I would have made my own comic spoof vids of that.

The article took a trip down memory lane with reminding people that Trump highlighted criminality of illegal aliens, especially rapists, but shot themselves in the foot when they admitted he brought victims and families before the press to show that what he was talking about was a reality.

I did not open the article up to read the rest. They had more than enough to show this was not any kind of true journalism, or real news, they went right to the tried and false method of running a fake news hit piece on Trump.

[msn.com]