slug.com slug.com

8 9

A wasted Century
The mathemagicians’ conference of October 1927 effectively destroyed science in conference in Brussels. This is where Einstein stopped scientists from engaging in physics when he removed the standards of length and time, which became malleable and subjective in his view. Neils Bohr introduces quantum theory, which removed cause and effect too. Along wit others these two numerology paradigms crippled science then and there.

What we have had since then is the resignation of ‘settled science’, which has remained settled, in other words, going nowhere for almost a century. It is technology that has made the major changes to the world and made the past look starkly different to the present. However, technology has had to advance without the benefit of an advancing and underpinning science. It has done remarkably well with the old scientific concepts like rocketry but most of the science that support modern technology was invented or discovered long before the 1927 conference.

Scientists have had to show something to justify their existence so they claim credit for advances in technology that have nothing to do with them. These advances are accomplished generally by tinkering in research departments of industry until the researchers find something that works better than it did and they build that instead; then selling it into market as an amazing new product. Scientifically speaking, there is nothing new under the sun. This has also meant that the general public are treated like lab rats for doing market research and the catastrophic results of this can be seen in Pharmaceuticals, Auto immune diseases, Cancers, Radio emissions fog, GM foods, Microwave cellular heating. etc. No science supports or regulates these human trials in the market place and the sellers have no idea what their products will actually do. We are, of course, experiencing the results of this scientific vacuum in environmental damage as well: nuclear melt downs, runaway A.I. Rampaging pollution and deteriorating global health.

Einstein was described by those who knew him best as a glorious day dreamer but this ‘glorious daydreamer’ wasn’t much good at physics or maths. Day dreaming is not a useful quality for a physicist. His daydreams disconnected mathematical physics from standards of measurement. This left mass, energy, and time as undefined in terms of matter in motion relative to a standard. Scientists need to throw away their obsolete text books and start again by learning these principles

1.) Energy is matter in motion in reference to the rest of the universe (fixed stars).

2.) Light is a wave transmitted through a medium. The medium (ether) also went missing at the Brussels conference. It is not a massless particle. It is not a photon. Multiplying zero by infinity to give you a number is imbecilic.

3.) ‘C’ and ‘c’ are not universal constants and are dependent on the medium through which they travel; they are not speed limits for the transfer of information. They are artificial constructs legitimized solely by circular reasoning. When you discuss the ‘speed of light, you must have a standard to measure it by but Einstein removed that standard and as a consequence the metre is defined in terms of the wavelength of light. In other words it requires that you know the speed of light before you can measure it. Despite finding many variations in the speed of light, science has made sure that ‘ C’ remains constant by defining it in terms of itself. Science is replete with this sort of sleight of hand.

4.) Quantum mechanics must be redefined in terms of cause and effect. Pilot wave theory may be the solution to do just that. Quantum effects are not confined to subatomic particles

5.) Particle physics must be scrapped. It must apply all these lessons and start over again, binning 90% of the theory and stop wasting billions of dollars on 150 year old dead ends.

A true genius of the 20th century was the Psychoanalyst and mathematician Emanuel Velikovsky. He recognized an innate and sublimated desire for humans not to know about things that seem to threaten their illusion of stability and certainty about the world and wider universe around them. The idea that the cosmos was subject to the same chaotic and mercurial forces as human beings encountered on earth was just too much for most to contemplate. Scientists are no more immune to this cognitive dissonance than anyone else. This explains the delusional belief that chaos can be managed into order by scribbling on paper - mathematics. Needless to say, the reaction to Velikovskys’ attack on such scientific complacency was received with the enhanced zealotry and vitriol of the academic book burners who literally cremated Velokovsky’s best selling book ‘Worlds in Collision’ published in 1950.

We need a new cosmology and a new physics. It was Velikosky that provided the forensic keys with which to include human beings in that cosmological story, which led to the Thunderbolts of the Gods and the hugely successful and self-evident Electric Universe model.

It is its’ principles and simplification that returns physics to a classical model. There is actually no new ideas, if you look hard enough and the founding ideas were around 300 years ago. But their synthesis results in a much bigger jigsaw than ever conceived before with far fewer of the pieces missing. It is ‘Open Science’ entirely open to people providing new pieces or displacing existing ones for those with a better fit. This is an Engineers' version of how science should be done.

There is very little left of value in the standard model of cosmology. Just about everything telescopes see and data shows from stars to galaxies; quasars to neutron stars; super clusters to nebulae - as well as a plethora of celestial phenomenon, simply cannot exist within the accepted model of the Big Bang universe. More fundamentally, they shouldn’t exist even exist in any universe where gravity and gravity alone is held to be the sole force dominating. Even the expansion rate now sigma 6 confirmed by the Maunakea observatory in Hawaii, does not fit the expanding universe model and that this discordance is real. If you follow the scientific journals, these sort of reports appear in them continuously. Whatever universe the cosmologists are modeling, it is not the one we live in!

The very notion of a Big Bang should sound alarm bells because what we observe in the universe is a balanced system. From the clockwork solar system, to Spiral Galaxies, all is in balance - but a purely attractive gravitational force could not produce them. So something seems desperately wrong with the idea that all this observed balance was initiated by an explosion. Anyway, it seems that only an idiot would design a universe with an unbalanced primer force and expect anything much, never mind complex life would turn up in it.

Because we encounter gravity solely within our star's heliosphere it is always attractive. Scientists have assumed that must apply universally and when they try to do so, it simply doesn’t work. So they invent fictitious dark matter and other pixie dust to try to make it work. Even Newton conceived of gravity as a balanced force and it takes a special kind of stupid to think it would be otherwise. But, scientists just ignore that.

It was left to Halton Arp (Hubbles’ Assistant) to explain that the balanced universe observed at the cosmic scale required a repulsive gravitational effect. As soon as you explain gravity as a balanced force, the whole notion of a Big Bang goes away. You don’t need anything to separate matter in the beginning, because the result of all that separation is that it falls back together again or keeps expanding forever. It is conceptually impossible to have it expend to a certain point and just stay there.
. There is a lack of any real physics in explaining how the Big Bang may have originated. The idea of a hot, dense singularity with no stars, atoms, form or structure is physically meaningless. Singularities, by their very definition, involve infinities, which are useless for calculation. Having singularities in your model is a clear sign that your model has failed. To be hot requires the presence of energetic particles. Their movement is how we measure heat - it is a measure of the kinetic energy of particles. That would mean that there would have to be matter already there in that infinitely small point in space. This schoolboy error results from energy being undefined in physics. There is no such thing as pure energy. It is always in relation to matter. This is a gaping hole dug by Einstein in his relativistic model where any arbitrarily moving observer can consider himself at rest at the centre of the universe. All observers are at the centre of their own universe. This is patently absurd as the movement of any of these observers is a form of energy.

To be dense requires that matter is again squashed into an infinitely small space before the Big Bang. How can a force be dense? Matter can be dense. Force only has meaning in the presence of matter. If either matter or density were present in a singularity, it would be one of these imaginary Black Holes, where nothing can expand out of it. Even the mathematics doesn’t work and uses pseudo tensors creating a meaningless jumble of symbols. The Big Bang is utter nonsense and has nothing to do with real science.

What started this worship of an expanding universe? The Hubble telescope observed that light was ‘red-shifted’, which was assumed to be a Doppler effect of stars moving away from the observer. Hubble himself remained unconvinced of this as there was no underpinning science to explain it. It was Halton Arp that discovered intrinsic red shift, which meant the object emitting the light had a lower energy, which meant that the protons and neutrons within the atoms of the star had a different mass to those objects in our own heliosphere. This means that the frequency of light emitted by these stars is shifted towards the red end of the spectrum. It is as simple as that

Again scientists just assume that their measurements of local atomic mass apply universally and they just don’t. Halton Arp was also able to verify that this light was quantized, that it is a supposed subatomic effect and that we observe it at Galactic scale objects as well shows that the whole model of particle physics is based on non-sensical ideas. The idea that quantized effects apply only to the subatomic scale is incorrect so the entire edifice of finding answers through current cosmology and particle physics fails in that foundation.

The reason that nobody understands quantum physics is that it is not supported by any physical model.
A better description is to return to a classical model and explain quantized effects as resonant behavior of structured, subatomic particles of near massless, charged sub-units, either positive or negative. These can only exchange energies at discrete, resonant frequencies. Solar system orbital mechanics simply up scales the atomic process to create stable orbits for celestial bodies. The foundational work on stable orbits was done by Wilheim Weber 150 years ago but nobody paid much attention. Maxwell and Faraday were aware of his work on electrodynamics. They preferred their field theories though.

This is a real theory that relies on real physics with real particles in real space and real time without any of the relativistic chicanery with it's malleable time over distance. Therefore, the whole model remains coherent. Neils Bohr’s quantum mechanics, on the other hand, is a purely statistical model without objective reality, so you can dream up anything you like. The uncertainty principle is an example of this happy dreaming.

Wave particle duality also arises because physicists do not understand matter interactions at the structured, subatomic level and because because photons do not exist. There cannot be a particle with no mass travelling at the speed of light. Light is a wave phenomenon. The particles involved in describing that wave are communicating with one and other instantaneously so all these strange non-locality and spooky action at a distance phenomina are just standard interactions in the electrical model of Wilheim Weber.He also showed that there are stable orbits in electrodynamic interactions – not electrostatic interactions.

Scientists then go on and assume that there are 4 fundamental forces. This is simply a product of not understanding the physics in the first place. There is need of only 1 fundamental force, the electric force. Then all phenomena including magnetism, gravity and nuclear forces are described in terms of the response of orbiting matter to exposure to an external electric force; or in the case of atoms, an internal electric force - if the nucleus is offset from the centre. This explains the elliptical stable orbits of celestial bodies too.

Scientists say that energy can neither be created nor destroyed and to do so would be a miracle. They actually have no idea how matter is created or would go about creating it or what the constituent parts are, if indeed it is real at all. What would the components of a proton or an electron be? If you disassociated them, where would they go and how would they detect them? This is all unknown.

Having taken in all that, which represents only the tip of the tip of the iceberg of the avalanche of failures heaped upon humanity by scientists; how can they be trusted with shaping humanities future or declaring what is possible and what is not?

They can’t. Ignore everything they say and do. Never listen to a gray haired expert or media ‘scientist’. They are always the last to know when change is coming. Isolate true scientific research from their knowledge. That way, we may advance scientifically to allow the technologists new and better tools to work with. That is how we get to space and escape our otherwise inevitable extinction on this planet.

Century-1 4 Jan 6
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

8 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

change in entropy of universe = (change in entropy of system + change in
entropy of surroundings) > 0

Assuming the 2nd Law of thermodynamics is operating at the universal scale. There is no reason to think that it does. A steady state universe is still entirely plausible without a thermodynamic arrow of time at the cosmic scale.

1

sometimes basic well founded knowledge and common sense are overlooked because they are unpretentious and - well, basic and well founded.
What is genius anyhow? Genius is the ability to make sense of basically understood truths in the fields of mathematics and applied physics and then to teach it or to publish it in ways that the average person can understand and thereby learn objectively.
This essay is the most brilliantly conceived and stated bit of "heresy" possible.

IF (and that is a big if) the concept of "consensus" is ever to be used where "science" is concerned it should be not necessarily on the result of experimentation but on the universally acknowledged and understood laws and principles of applied mathematics and physics that were used to conduct and to control experimentation in the first place. This can be the only way to give credibility to a resulting outcome of scientific experimentation.

God or "intelligent creation" can never be comprehended objectively and some folks simply could not and can not abide the possibility of it and therefore eliminate it completely as a "probability" - they created their own god and named him "quantum physics" and gave him all manner of helpers called "pure energy" and "singularity" and so on.

Believe what you will but the laws of the physical universe consistently apply and it's origin and its limits can never be known or quantified - much less who or what animates it.

The most perplexing thing about the universe is that it CAN be understood by, of all things, US! The force of electromagnetism is indeed - understood. The modern world is testimony to that. Our approach to understanding the universe and how the it woks is correct. By we, I don't mean mainstream science, I mean an intelligent person who approaches knowledge with honesty and courage, experimenting with and attempting to destroy the idea until after all that, it still stands. I spent my working life in destructive testing of complex designs and trying every possible stimulus to get it to fail in an unplanned for way. That is how you understand something and not until then!

3

This was a fascinating read and I am going to have to read it over several times.

Thank you. If you would like to know more about how deep the rabbit hole goes, I can point you in the right direction. Be ready to abandon everything you thought you knew first though.

1

so much like the lie of climate change so is science. is it money that keeps our knowledge limited......

Yeah. That is a cover for something I can assure you isn't a hoax. The Earths magnetic Pole reversal will wipe us out more surely than any climate change. It was well over due and but has now started. Have a think about that then wonder if man made climate change is being blamed as a cover for something that is far worse that we can do nothing about.

Electrical 101. When the magnetic poles are perpendicular to the axis of the Sun, the magnetic field strength is at it's maximum. When the magnetic poles of the Earth become parallel to the axis of the sun at the equator, the generated magnetic field strength will be at 0. This means all the protection from the Cosmic radiation will be at 0. Surface life cannot survive that and as the pole approaches the Sun / Earth axis, the magnetic field will diminish as a sine wave. A little at first and then the major effects will start to be felt as we are bombarded with more and more lethal radiation. The Australia fires are the start and it will get worse from here.

1

Good to hear from you! Astounding to say the least. Too much here to comment on but, you mentioned 'energy'. Care to define it in more detail? As far as I know there are only two forces in existence. Thanks

Thanks. Energy is simply the movement of matter relative to the rest of the universe. If an object moves, it has measurable energy. If the atoms that make up an enclosed structure are moving, the structure also has energy. The ability to effect change is energy. It really is that simple.

@Century-1 Yes, but what causes the movement? Thanks

@dmatic For any matter with a temperature above 0K (0 degrees Kelvin - 273 degrees C), it is what we call heat. Movement is not possible without a heat gradient being present. This is stated in the 2nd Law of thermodynamics: Heat flows from hot to cold. Order flows towards disorder. In the the thermodynamic model the universe finishes up in a heat death, where everything sits at absolute 0 so nothing can happen. I do not believe this analysis to be correct though. The universe is an electric field and all energy is is a reaction of what is perceived as matter to the presence of this changing electrical field. This electric field is what is refereed to as SpaceTime. For movement of energy to be perceived, the electrical circuits in our brains have to resonate with this field. Only a very small percentile of what is actually happening does so through the 5 senses. The rest of what we can be aware of comes from direct electrical interactions through the pineal gland from the pattering geometry decoded as the experience we are all having. If this system is working, it transforms us from a mind body computer to an infinitely conscious manifestation of being. This produces our holographic, fractal reality with repeating patterns at all scales that we have to interact in.

4

This does not inspire confidence in "climate change science"!
Fascinating post, thank you!

Yeah. That is a cover for something I can assure you isn't a hoax. The Earths magnetic Pole reversal will wipe us out more surely than any climate change. It was well over due and but has now started. Have a think about that then wonder if man made climate change is being blamed as a cover for something that is far worse that we can do nothing about.

Electrical 101. When the magnetic poles are perpendicular to the axis of the Sun, the magnetic field strength is at it's maximum. When the magnetic poles of the Earth become parallel to the axis of the sun at the equator, the generated magnetic field strength will be at 0. This means all the protection from the Cosmic radiation will be at 0. Surface life cannot survive that and as the pole approaches the Sun / Earth axis, the magnetic field will diminish as a sine wave. A little at first and then the major effects will start to be felt as we are bombarded with more and more lethal radiation. The Australia fires are the start and it will get worse from here.

@Century-1 the Australia Fires are man made!

1

The phrase"shut up and calculate" was used

Yes. The theoreticians took over; hiding an aloof and Kabalic numerology behind a scientific facade. What a baroque and elaborate mess they have made of physics and cosmology!

@Century-1 check out Jim all khalili physicist

Maybe, but if so, the HOW? is interesting.

1

I must admit that allot of this is over my head. But in the above you said "the balanced universe observed at the cosmic scale required a repulsive gravitational effect."

This means push gravity as opposed to a pulling force, no?

Theorizing basically means scientists merely make it up as they go. Without the postulated dark matter, the Big Bang theory is unsupportable.

Yes. Gravity is now understood as an electrical effect so a repulsive anti-attraction drive is now within reach. The Big Bang idea was always social engineering to appease the creationist lobby. Like evolution, which had the opposite intent, it was never a scientific idea. Sometimes people believe their own Bullshit.

Many years ago I was introduced to the concept of push gravity. The theory seemed to be demonstrable. It blew my mind that something so basic as gravity as a pulling force was never really a 100% valid theory at all. It made me start to call bullshit anytime I hear the words "The Science is Settled".

Fascinating post by the way!

@James Thanks for that.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:68433
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.