“… the challenged practices violate neither the constitution nor the (Voting Rights Act)," Jones wrote in his ruling. "As the Eleventh Circuit notes, federal courts are not 'the arbiter[s] of disputes' which arise in elections; it [is] not the federal court's role to 'oversee the administrative details of a local election.'"
Jones stipulated, though, that, "this Order should not be construed to mean that Georgia's election procedures are flawless," citing testimony from both sides to state, essentially, that no election process will be perfect.