slug.com slug.com

7 1

What is your opinion on climate change

  • 0 votes
  • 5 votes
  • 3 votes
  • 9 votes
Crikey 7 Apr 21
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

7 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

2

The climate of this planet is in constant flux and has been for its entire life. The fact that these groups have decided that CO2 is evil is where I really have issues, when you know that all plants need CO2 to grow and that we need plants to survive and that higher levels of CO2 bring more plant life and this in turn reduces temperatures then the focus is pointed in the wrong direction. I would like to see more done to reduce waste, so much stuff is just thrown away, we have landfills full of stuff, we have cities and countries dumping untreated waste into oceans and rivers and this is where we should be placing our energies.

0

Nothing in science is ever settled. There is a half life of knowledge in all things and as technology advances, so does our understanding of the planet and our universe. Science is also driven and utilized by humans, we are inherently flawed and susceptible to our own failures of character. Science is a very competitive field and with higher degrees of learning and competition, so comes those human flaws. I believe the climate is always changing and always has been and while I do believe we have an impact I don’t believe it’s as influential as they claim it to be. Nature is massive and always changing and I think that if we’ve outlived our usefulness in this ecosystem, then nature itself will make corrective actions to mitigate that impact. Humanities ego is very susceptible to thinking we are bigger and more powerful than nature itself. But, this also doesn’t mean we should ever stop trying to understand where we fit into the puzzle and we may or may not impact that puzzle. Our nature is also very inquisitive and we must hone that better and more objectively.

2

A broader selection of choices would improve the accuracy of the poll and offer a more diverse platform for the opinions that exist on climate change. The narrative of climate has been designed to focus on two choices as to the etiology and cures with governments politics and green venture capital dictating that narrative. Initially the alarm was sent out under the guise of a new ice age then shifted to global warming with the advent of Al Gore's alarmist presentations, until the latest doom and gloom predictions from Alexandria O'casio Cortez, warning of the demise of humanity within twelve years if America does not make radical changes and enact a carbon tax. Governments influences on the scientific community (due to grant money) has led to data being corrupted to fit a specific narrative that ignores the root cause and implies a false conclusion. Largely ignored for America has been the large influence of uncontrolled immigration overwhelming our delicately balanced ecology at a rate that we have not been able to manage. That and our relatively minuscule ability to positively impact the earth's total environment with the largest population centers in China and India negatively overwhelming the ecology. Carbon credits are an absolute farce that will accomplish nothing positive but permitting the uber rich to purchase offsets enabling them to live exactly the life styles they choose. How do we, the global population, eliminate the green energy's propaganda from adversely communicating their corrupted information as factual?

0

None of the above.

4

Why those choices in the poll? Where's the differentiation between climate change and anthropogenic impact on climate? Alarmists are arguing entirely about anthropogenic climate change and like to make that the sole reason for any climate change and ignore all other factors whatsoever. A very unscientific and very political approach to an issue.

0

Nasa means to deceive in Hebrew

5

I would choose none of the above. I do think our climate changes over time and I also think that there’s a possibility that mankind has a small impact on it. I also believe that there is somewhat of a conspiracy among leftists and scientists because it means more money, power and fame for all of them

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:32857
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.