slug.com slug.com

9 2

Does anybody really think that there’s going to be any evidence of collusion or obstruction in the Mueller report and why besides “Orange man bad” I mean real evidence

PeterOTool 5 Apr 17
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

9 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Most likely not. If Muller didn’t find anything worth a damn then it is probably nothing to spectacular. There might be some more details about events that we already knew occurred.

0

HEY, GUESS WHAT. . . . Lack Luster Chuck Todd is now saying there is "collusion" between the White House and Barr to hide parts of the Muller report. Interesting invention, TOTAL "BS".

0

Not a snowballs chance. It will be full of garbage.

0

Evidence? I do not believe there will be anything useful to those that had hope and magnified what they imagined might happen or hoped would happen. After the millions spent, the band of dedicated and well paid lawyers looking for any leverage to create an indictment could not find enough according to the DOJ. There may be a dearth of evidence that it will cause lamentations for lost hopes and dreams. BTW - What if the Mueller report uncovered Russian collusion that didn't involve Trump at all - what a can of worms that would open up if it is released and not redacted.

1

2 years and everything of value has been leaked long ago. We've seen all the evidence already.

0

Any real evidence?

With indictment happy Mueller in charge?

[sarcasm]

0

Unless Bar's a complete idiot, there won't be any evidence of collusion. I'm sure Schiff will find something in there he will call evidence though. The same for obstruction. When Nadler tries to say that Trump calling the Mueller investigation a witch hunt constitutes obstruction, they'll find something in there they'll call evidence of obstruction as well.

All of it will be fodder for CNN and MSNBC but, I doubt a reasonable person will see it as a big deal.

0

Evidence? We don't need no stinking evidence. Each side will predictably "read between the lines" and state that this or that proves what they've been saying all along. Time for the spin doctors to go to work. Sometimes, if something is important to you - you have to do the work yourself (read the report) rather than rely on media to "report" the contents. Media is biased to the point there opinions are worse than irrelevant.

0

I'm not sure what the report will have to say. I mean, it will cover all of the indictments, for sure. It better cover Russia and the social media campaign. It will cover every single conversation between anybody who knows Trump and anybody who knows a Russian. It will cover every time Trumps said the investigation is a fraud, etc. The left will call it a slam dunk case and scream and rage about no charges being brought against Trump or his family. Then the impeachment hearings will begin.

The victory lap Trump took after Mueller first turned his report in is going to look like a pity party compared to the one he takes after the impeachment fizzles out with a senate acquittal.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:31435
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.