Well the BBC thing makes sense. You know there is always a broadcast delay, right??

@jwhitten well the information came from the person watching it live on the broadcast so no it don't make sense

Of course not.

OK, I'll spell it out for you. She's tired of "it." "It" being the restriction of the civil rights of American Muslims. She's not tired of the US. She's grateful to have been able to come there after escaping war in Somalia and surviving four years in a Kenyan refugee camp.

@WilyRickWiles No one talk about removing civil rights of American Muslims. We can legitimately put into question her devotion toward the country she got elected to serve after her past actions and commentaries.

To be more worried about muslims nowdays more than any other religion is not bigotry.

@WilyRickWiles oh boy, here you are again. Why don't you tell everyone about your anti-Semitic beliefs, about how gays are an abomination and then preach about how poor Muslims are being picked on by a country that in your opinion is the ground zero of Babylon? Before you preach about anyones rights being violated, why don't you step out of that ideological closet? TruNews anyone??

@purdyday LOL

@purdyday Check out my website! [rightwingwatch.org]

@shj648 You're correct that no one is talking about removing civil rights from American Muslims today--their rights were already restricted after 9/11. That's what she was talking about.

@WilyRickWiles "their rights were already restricted after 9/11" Lol really? How many muslim countries allow a no-muslim to sit in their parliament and preaching things contrary to sharia law?

@shj648 That's irrelevant.

@WilyRickWiles just a question . What rights were restricted ?

@WilyRickWiles ok mildly impressed, lol You made their top 10 hit list, tied for 9th spot with Mitt Romney

@beekeeper Namely there was racial profiling, special registration, and secret detentions without charges.

@WilyRickWiles I'm not denying what you claim but I've seen no proof of such things and as far as racial profililing goes when blue eyed , blond haired Swedes start blowing us up I'd would be looking real close at them also

@beekeeper Some references:

Detention (from November 2001): [nytimes.com]

Registration (NSEERS): [migrationpolicy.org]

Today we have the "travel ban" and of course the Patriot Act lives on.

Glad you didn't write the Constitution!

@WilyRickWiles what restrictions? They enjoy more civil rights in the West than they would have in any one of 50 some authoritarian Muslim majority countries in the world.
She doesn't need a male guardian to approve her going to college or leave the country. She won't be stoned for committing adultery. She doesn't have to dress in the hijab, niqab or burka. Mislims have more rights in the West than do non-Muslims living in Muslim countries.
She's outright lying about Muslim oppression.
It isn't oppression to tell a Muslim to do the job he was hired to do just because his Koran forbids it sucj as selling pork. It isn't oppression to deny the installation of a Mislim prayer room on the work site or in a school because we believe in the separation of church and state.
Freedom of religion means that following the teachings of your religion come strictly at your own costs just like the benefits accrue to you alone. Freedom of religion doesn't mean that you can call upon the state, business or government to assist you in maintaing the religion's rules for finding salvation. Those costs are strictly your own.

@Chicago Uhh, read the evidence that I already posted.

@WilyRickWiles the government can place a travel ban on any none citizen individual or group it deems a threat. Foreigners don't have a Constitutional right to enter America.

@WilyRickWiles that's not evidence of mass denial of their civil rights. And nothing there would justify murdering 3000 innocent people. Plus the high jackers had no greivance with the U.S. government.
The government took reasonable and limited steps to protect its citizens.
What about the civil rights of the victims? I don't see you talking about that.

@Chicago You're not making any sense, dude. Read the Constitution.

@WilyRickWiles Their rights were never restricted. A travel ban on non-citizens, even if the ones targeted are of a certain religion, is not a violation of their civil rights under American law because only citizens and lawful residents are under U.S. law.
They've still been building mosques, schools, spreading their sick religion through such things as, hijab day etc.
More fake news by you.

@WilyRickWiles if their rights were restricted after 9/11 then her comment that, some people did something, makes no sense because the something, flying the planes into the twin towers and killing thousands of people, happened before the supposed restriction of their rights.
If you want to know the reason for 9/11 then you should read the letter that one of the terrorists left behind. There's no mention in that letter of anything pertaining to Muslims losing their civil rights.

@shj648 seems as though her statment : some people, who did something" is her trying to seperate peoples perception of her, from religion itself.

She also pushed back against being forced to pledge allegence to another country than the one she serves.. how was this hre being anti-sematic? being that she strongly expresses that the seperation between religion and state is too be respected as the constition should be as a whole.

It seems that every point she attempts to make is only turned around...which is politics.
She's a Democrat, which by default places the Republicans against her, so whether they agree with her on certain topics or not, they are going to oppose to everything she is for.

Us not being politicians, means that we don't have to disagree with a certain person, just because they are said to be the enemy. we have the ability in being open to listen to them and decide for ourselves.

Right. A small percentage of Muslims take part in acts of terror and jihad. The rest just quietly celebrate when they do.

A radical Muslim wants to cut your head off because you are an infidel. A moderate Muslim wants a radical Muslim to cut your head off because you’re an infidel.

Ditto.