slug.com slug.com

1 3

Supreme Court declines to review Carter Page defamation suit against DNC

Page's case had been dismissed by several lower courts

The suit, Page v. Democratic National Committee, alleges that while working as an adviser on the Trump 2016 presidential campaign, a DNC subsidiary company, the law firm of Perkins Coie, and two two Perkins partners – Michael Sussman and Marc Elias – of disseminating false information about the adviser.

The suit had previously been dismissed on procedural grounds, and not further revived by a number of lower courts.

[justthenews.com]

Garsco 8 Jan 10
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

No judge in America is willing to uphold the Constitution of the United States it seems. The First Amendment guarantees the right to petition the government for redress of grievances and the courts were set up to be the mechanism by which we do so. But the excuses they create to avoid hearing grievances on their merits astounds me. Latches, standing, mootness, etc., ad infinatum, ad nausium. Any judge who deems unconstitutional precedent to bear more weight than the plain language of the supreme law of the land ought to have his bar card burned before he hangs for sedition.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:303570
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.