slug.com slug.com

5 2

Will Democrats realize their leaders are crazy? I mean do Booker, Harris, Warren, Gillibran, et al really have a shot at getting the nomination?

I’ll say yes. Democrats, after hearing the litany of Hillary’s wrongdoings as laid out by James Comey in July 2016, were still comfortable in voting to elect her. And after finding out there’s no evidence of Russian collusion on Donald Trump’s partstill want to lock him up.

[thefederalist.com]

Garsco 8 Apr 12
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

They pay to much attention to Twitter trends and it’s biting them in the ass. They pander to what is basically a cult and if they back out now the outrage mob will attack. They censored themselves with leftist propaganda and it’s going to hurt them in the long run.

2

Their leaders aren't crazy. It's just a game they play on TV. They know exactly what they are doing. They are playing to the 'cheap seats', to quote someone forgettable... They are pandering to their base by making it baser-- more base? Whatever, it's all about that base! Whipping them up into a lather and then setting them loose to do their worst. They don't care what that looks like-- they can smash windows, beating people up, turning over cars-- they can even set 'em on fire if they like. They can march through the streets with their pussies on their heads-- whatever, it doesn't matter. The more outrageous and audacious, the better. Because it gums up the system and works to keep people divided and distracted and inattentive to the REAL instigators-- the corporate / globalist elites who are busy building their infrastructure to control and direct the masses and profiting from their chaos and confusion.

They know full well what they're doing and they just don't give a damn. Their America is not our America. Their America is no America at all. They've even said as much themselves.

0

It's not about values, or facts . It's about your tribe winning.
A good example(because it's currently more contained) would be the Trump train. A large amount of conservatives bought into the idea. Even now some of those conservatives excuse clearly nonconservative actions by Trump. They placed Tribal platform above principle.
The vocal left is entirely consumed by this type of action. Which is why we are currently seeing large scale conflict between voices of the left, and the ideas the base holds.

Tribalism is the end of conservativism and liberalism. It's sole purpose is to create Authoritarian neoconservatism and Authoritarian social progressives. Both of which are not the world anyone wants.

IMO, Trump is far more liberal than he is conservative, on most (many) things apart from his fiscal policy. And he pretty much always has been. Just don't tell anybody, they might not take it very well 😉

@jwhitten correct. Upside down land where a New York moderate Democrat is now the most hated "conservative".

@CodeNameZebra Ironic, huh?

0

I think it's as simple as they get their political views from biased main stream media and shows like The View, who only report on these things as right wing lunacy. If news media were focused on presenting the facts and not just Democratic propaganda, we wouldn't as divided as we are today.

Everything it 'Right-Wing' when you're standing at the Left Pole.

I remember when I went to College as an adult, the professors essentially said that if I didn't agree with their views I would never get a good grade in their class. Sadly our youth are taught the same way and are not taught to critical think... they get their views from liberal sources and perpetuate the same lines. I find that conservatives tend to look at numerous sources and question other people's comments
and analysis before deciding opinions. The difference is that the conservatives have a tendency not to force their opinions or get into name calling rhetoric if people don't agree with them.

@MacTavish Aye! That is bad. It is very important to learnt to think for yourself. To examine things critically and come to conclusions based on your own analysis. Certainly you probably want to consider other points of view and whatever sources you have to review, but at the end of the day-- so goes the old adage-- you get the Government you deserve.

3

The democrats I know around here are crazy, so why wouldn't they continue to elect crazy candidates? How long has Maxine Waters been in congress--going on 30 years? Why did real voters elect AOC? I want to think the best of people, but people drink the lies and come back for more in the face of all of the evidence. There's certainly more going on than policy.

Because the Left is the true home of the 'low information' voter.

@jwhitten, okay first I always enjoy reading your perspectives--agree almost always. But, I gotta say low-information voters are probably the majority of voters. Honestly, I don't think I know enough about what's going on, and it seems I'm at least as informed as most people I run into. That would be fine with ME if that explained the truth--not really, but I'd accept it--the truth seems to be most people are far less informed that the people on a site like this--gravely so. I think literally the vast majorty of voters are team voters. They're Giants fans or Dodger fans, and they root for the team wearing their preferred colors. Good and evil is divided on team colors. And, frighteningly there is no more depth than that. We elect 'leaders' to the ruling class based only on the team they play for.

@chuckpo But when you think about it, wouldn't you say that the people you run into tend to be more like you than not? With respect to their socioeconomic status I mean mostly. So just polling "random people" that you run into may not be giving you a good cross-sampling of opinions.

I take your point though about most voters being 'low-information' voters, and you might be more right about that than I am. In fact, I often wonder if many people do much research into the candidates at all prior to pulling their levers. But that said. it always seems like the people making the dumbest choices time and time again are on the left. Maybe it has more to do with their promotion of 'free stuff' and handing out cash (through various programs). Or else perhaps they are swayed somewhat by the constant barrage of leftist themes from the media?

Yes, I agree with your point about 'team voters' too-- which dovetails well with a sort of 'sports' analogy where it's my team versus yours, rather than an actual examination of issues and picking and choosing from the buffet of candidates. But then what other affect can most people have than standing on the sidelines and rooting for their teams?

So yes, after mulling it over some I accept that my previous remark might have been a bit hasty and aimed below the belt a little.

Do you think the average person, male or female-- or male vs. female-- or even various combination of ethnicity-- feels more or less enfranchised in our present day system and circumstance? Do you think we're coming together-- whether we admit it or not-- more or less? Or has our society become too 'class-ist' and stratified? Do you think there is as much potential movement (preferably upward) between the classes as is exemplified by the so-called 'American Dream'? If not, what do you think that does to the psyche and outlook of the typical voter, and how do you think that could influence their choices at the ballot box?

@jwhitten, I'm pretty middle-class, educated more than most (I don't think that's important except in the case the left has made it an issue in defining Trump voters incorrectly). I am mostly around my 'class', but I'm a little sensitive to lower classes and a little biased against upper-classes. I'm 'woke' to stratification. In real human language, I'm trained to be aware of psychological/sociological/educational influences, and I do run into people from various parts of life in regular course. So, maybe I am overvaluing my convenience sample, but I don't think I am.

I tend to think voters are low in information because they choose to be low in information. It actually takes quite a lot of time, and I have to admit I gain the information I do have usually by doing something other than what I should be doing, though I do it in my free time too--like this site. I guess to answer your question with a question, I'd ask doesn't it make sense MOST people would not want to do all of that work? Who has time for it? And, who wants to actually do it? I think that's the issue more than thinking in terms of disenfranchisement--though, this is just my hypothesis, and it's no better than your hypothesis.

So, given that people don't have the time or inclination to learn enough, it's natural to grab onto talking-point-politics and even MY TEAM vs. the other team strategies. It makes sense. I don't have to think very hard, and I don't have to work very hard. I'm a Yankees fan and Yankee fans hate the Red Sox. Done! Pull the lever.

On your other questions, I think we can learn a lot by studying intersectionality. Are we coming together? No. We are dividing into increasingly smaller groups, and the only thing saving the left's identity groups from each other is their collective loathing of conservatives. If conservatives would get out of their way, the left would feed on each other. BUT, conservatives have nowhere to go, and they're not going to oblige the left and die, so conservatives remain the glue that holds the left together. The classes are divided too, because classism is immersed in ideology. Inescapable. None of this is good.

A sliver of hope is I've seen a movement--some represented in this site that has people looking up and center. It's a whisper, and if you turn toward it, it might blow away. Just a single spark in the grass--maybe. Or, I'm a nut, which is probably more plausible.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:30036
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.