slug.com slug.com

5 1

As a friend said, "Science tells the truth [and] humans are liars. If you don't want to live in The Hunger Games, I'd pay attention."

If you only read one thing today, make it this article from Zero Hedge (dot com):
"'Damn You To Hell, You Will Not Destroy America' - Here Is The 'Spartacus COVID Letter' That's Gone Viral"
By Tyler Durden, Monday, Sep 27, 2021 - 10:45 AM

Excerpt (but don't stop here, read the whole thing):
The media have disingenuously claimed that because Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug, it has no utility as an antivirus. This is incorrect. Ivermectin has utility as an antiviral. It blocks importin, preventing nuclear import, effectively inhibiting viral access to cell nuclei. Many drugs currently on the market have multiple modes of action. Ivermectin is one such drug. It is both antiparasitic and antiviral.
In Bangladesh, Ivermectin costs $1.80 for an entire 5-day course. Remdesivir, which is toxic to the liver, costs $3,120 for a 5-day course of the drug. Billions of dollars of utterly useless Remdesivir were sold to our governments on the taxpayer’s dime, and it ended up being totally useless for treating hyperinflammatory COVID-19. The media has hardly even covered this at all.
The opposition to the use of generic Ivermectin is not based in science. It is purely financially and politically-motivated. An effective non-vaccine intervention would jeopardize the rushed FDA approval of patented vaccines and medicines for which the pharmaceutical industry stands to rake in billions upon billions of dollars in sales on an ongoing basis.

[zerohedge.com]

Wordmage 8 Sep 27
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

As best I can tell Ivermectin has been mildly successful in reducing hospitalization but had little effect on mortality where studied in India. It's safety record however is so well established that I see little reason for all the propaganda from the liberal press being thrown at it. The few people that would refuse the vaccine preferring to gamble with modestly effect therapeutics doesn't warrant so much attention.

Ivermectin has little effect when administered to patients who are already dying/in end stages, and those are the only ones who were included in the studies that deemed it ineffective. Do the studies were essentially designed to produce predetermined results.
When administered early , during initial symptoms, or prophylactically, it is Very effective, and this is demonstrated by India’s virtual elimination of the virus by mandating its prophylactic use.

0

For anybody interested, here is the document with all of the notes linked within. It's a 41 page document, of which 14 are the article itself. Almost every significant medical claim is restated in brief, and then linked to at least one paper or journal article (for the most part). Like, 27 pages of links to mostly non-news, non-opinion, straight up difficult reading.

[docdroid.net]

2

When you catch a whole of those details in small batches that lead to fact checks, deboonks, or internet media silence, it just seems like noise. If you see it all put together into a documented presentation it becomes a firewall of text that few will penetrate. That text could be made into a simple website faq:

How does covid progress through the course of a few differing sorts of manifestations?

Given the observation of a list of symptoms and typical biological causes and reactions, what are know effective treatments that might be used, and in what combinations?

What treatments are currently being recommended by government experts?

Are any of the recommended treatments within norms for the treatment of non-covid symptoms running a similar course due to other causes of illness?

Etc....

Good idea. I say, go ahead and do it. It would be great to see that kind of resource. But, for now, this document is the resource we have — along with a bunch of collected links in our bookmarks. (At least, in mine.) However, as many entries as it would take to rebuild the information in this document, I suspect that the list of questions and answers word also result in a "firewall of text that few will penetrate."

Today, to penetrate that firewall, I set my mom down and read her the entire article. She was very appreciative, as she said that she would not have delved into it herself. And I understand — it's not easy reading. It's the sort of thing we have to read, though, to make sure we are properly equipped to defend our (and others'😉 Liberty. And we need to somehow get these messages out through the fog created by agenda-driven Tech Giants.

2

Well, that's pretty damming.

3

ALSO (excerpted),

We have been told that SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines cannot be integrated into the human genome, because messenger RNA cannot be turned back into DNA. This is false. There are elements in human cells called LINE-1 retrotransposons, which can indeed integrate mRNA into a human genome by endogenous reverse transcription. Because the mRNA used in the vaccines is stabilized, it hangs around in cells longer, increasing the chances for this to happen. If the gene for SARS-CoV-2 Spike is integrated into a portion of the genome that is not silent and actually expresses a protein, it is possible that people who take this vaccine may continuously express SARS-CoV-2 Spike from their somatic cells for the rest of their lives.

By inoculating people with a vaccine that causes their bodies to produce Spike in-situ, they are being inoculated with a pathogenic protein. A toxin that may cause long-term inflammation, heart problems, and a raised risk of cancers. In the long-term, it may also potentially lead to premature neurodegenerative disease.

Absolutely nobody should be compelled to take this vaccine under any circumstances, and in actual fact, the vaccination campaign must be stopped immediately.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:271624
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.