slug.com slug.com

3 2

Why in this era of censorship and where anti-'phobias' speech of every sort are politically mandated. Yet it is still politically and socially okay to call every sort of human scum by a reference to a womans private parts or an innocent animal? I was shocked a few years back when on Three and a Half men Charlie started calling people douche bags -

Continue to be shocked that it is anyone can call a despicable human; a dirty rotten scoundrel, a pig or a cunt or douche or pussy or snatch or bitch or ....

But it is considered hate speech to call 'he' a 'she' cause he has a beard and a penis but wearing lipstick?

IzoraRaeE 5 Mar 29
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Sometimes a phobia isn't just an abberant mental state

Sometimes there really are spiders under the bed

0

Just wondering if you are a liberal snowwflake but I am pretty sure you are

I am curious as to why the question makes you feel you can insult me? No - I am not a liberal snowflake - I am a woman and wonder why it is socially acceptable to use words in a negative manner that are references to a womans private parts? And Sir - recognition of the state of the patriarchial civilization doesn't make one a feminist; it is a historical and current social truth. I simply wonder about this aggressive media acceptance and usage of these terms.

@IzoraRaeE Whatever

0

That's Canada for ya! It's social B/S here in the US, but at least it is still only considered "hate speech" by those people directly, and not by the majority of society, nor our laws.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:25736
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.