I think he was part of the clean up by the Clinton Foundation, turned down a sizable amount of money from the CCP, among some other nefarious outreaches of the globalists. He got whacked, Christopher Sign got whacked, John McAfee got whacked. Epstein's Lolita Island Express ran from point A to & back from some point B and/or C. Haitian Earthquake 2010(?) had lots of graft of relief, just look at the response times of humanitarian efforts of various nations especially field hospitals & set ups.

If he did not agree with the world government political landscape, then YES he would have been taken out quite expeditiously; just like Colonel Muammar Muhammed Abu Minyar Al-Gaddafi or Saddam Hussein. The people who protested the World Trade Organization meeting in Seattle in 1990s were demonized as 'anti-globalization forces' by the MSM. The people that took out the World Trade Center had tried before in the 1990s. They do not want world government that is debauchery promiscuous and morally deviant.

Slaves in the past had value, they were worth something in substantial investment of capital & work production. Today's 'human resources' are quite expendable. So, if you see what I am saying, we, collectively, are worthless at a certain point on a certain graph in a certain boardroom office.

If you have trouble viewing brandnewtube.com videos, just go to the site and use the search function. Paste the "title" of my posting into that search engine.

I found this. What do you think?

PRESIDENT OF HAITI ASSASSINATED BY THE CIA WAS THE THIRD PRESIDENT TO DIE AFTER REFUSING VACCINES (as were 2 other country leaders)
[brandnewtube.com]

best explanation -
A)its a 3rd world country
B)political officials always corrupt in their own right
C)assassination is the dominant if not the preferred way they bring about regime change
D)Everything the Clintons touch dies