slug.com slug.com

5 4

Scientific explanation on why global warming measurement and computerized guesses regarding possible anthropogenic CO2 contribution and effect are not reliable _____

[hoover.org]

Conclusions

If someone with a hand-held stopwatch tells you that a runner cut his time by 0.00005 seconds, you should be skeptical. If someone with a climate model tells you that a 0.036 Wm–2 CO2 signal can be detected within an environment of 150 Wm–2 error, you should be just as skeptical.

As Willie Soon and his coauthors found, “Our current lack of understanding of the Earth’s climate system does not allow us to determine reliably the magnitude of climate change that will be caused by anthropogenic CO2 emissions, let alone whether this change will be for better or for worse.”

MarPep 7 Mar 20
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

The earth itself is the largest source of greenhouse gases . Mt. St. Helen's emits more than twice as much sulfur dioxide as the next biggest polluter in Washington State

0

There is s decent daily solar system weather report called "suspicious observer" on youtube, you can connect to some strong scientific alternative reporting sources. Daily solar activity teports daily earthquake predictions. Global wind and rain patterns. Links to alternative reporting

0

Well said. My meteorologist can’t get the forecast right for 3 days from now yet climate folks want me to believe that their models can accurately tell us what the climate will be doing 20 years from now. Climate is much more complex than weather.

0

AOC says that cows are causing the problem.

0

Indeed so.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:23696
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.