Question.
If the technology is available to make any video/ audio recordings of people doing and saying things, that never happened and those (fake) video/audio recordings are indistinguishable from (real) video/audio.
How can any video/audio recording be admissible in court from now on.
Can't it be said that if it has the possibility of being fabricated, that it must be considered fabricated until proven to be genuine.
Like innocent until proven guilty.
Fake until proven real?
2
Be part of the movement!
Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.Create your free account
3 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.
There's rarely one piece of evidence they gets a conviction. Testimony alone, some video aren't typically enough for convictions
Rus-T-Balls
Level 7
Mar 15, 2019
1
Be part of the movement!
Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.