slug.com slug.com

4 1

Regarding the fear of CO2 levels:

100 years ago, atmospheric CO2 was at 300 ppm, and it is now at 400 ppm. Optimum levels for plant/crop growth are 2-4 times higher (700-1400 ppm). If CO2 levels were to fall to 200 ppm, plant growth would be very slow, and many plants would become extinct. Is CO2 really a good thing?

Our exhaled air is about 5-7% CO2 (50,000--70,000 ppm).

CO2 becomes sedating to humans at about 70,000 ppm of inhaled air.

What is your opinion on CO2 levels?

  • 1 vote
  • 1 vote
  • 1 vote
  • 8 votes
MarPep 7 Mar 12
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

4 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

2

First it was over population then it was the coming Ice Age and now it’s climate change. The left comes up with a crisis under the guise of which they can take our money away and increase their power

1

Voted for both numbers two and three.

4

I've posted this before but it is very informative. I didn't write this.

“No matter if the science of global warming is all phony, climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.” - Christine Stewart, fmr Canadian Minister of the Environment

Quote by Jim Sibbison, environmental journalist, former public relations official for the Environmental Protection Agency: "We routinely wrote scare stories...Our press reports were more or less true...We were out to whip the public into a frenzy about the environment."

Quote by Ottmar Edenhoffer, high level UN-IPCC official: "We redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy...Basically it's a big mistake to discuss climate policy separately from the major themes of globalization...One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore."

Some light reading for all you climate cultist.
“Data tampering at USHCN/GISS”, Goddard
“The Fiddling With Temperature Data Is The Biggest Science Scandal Ever” by Christopher Booker
“Temperature Adjustments Transform Arctic Climate History”, Paul Homewood
“Globally Averaged Land Surface Temperatures, 1900-2014 (GHCN) Sea Level Info, 9 February 2015 by Dan Burton

Same Study where the 97% came from . 91% of those scientists said that man's affect on Global Warming is 1% or less. So You have 91% of scientists saying man's effect is 1% or less. You have 3% abstaining. and 6% saying it is more than 1%. That makes up your 97%

Fact: The percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere = 0.04%.
Fact: There are 32 molecules of CO2 in the atmosphere for every 85,000 other molecules and only one of these 32 is of manmade origin.
Fact: The percentage of man-made CO2 is 3% of the 0.04% which = 0.0004×0.03 = 0.000012 or 0.0012% of the atmosphere.
Fact: Burning fossil fuels is about 50% of that.
Therefore: The amount of man-made CO2 from burning fossil fuels is about 0.0006% of the atmosphere.

FACT: H2O absorbs more than 8X the heat producing infrared light CO2 does
FACT: Nitrogen absorbs more than 3X the heat producing infrared light CO2 does
FACT: both of these gasses are present in vastly larger volumes than CO2
FACT: these gasses both also retain heat no less than 4X longer than CO2
FACT: CO2 is heavier than water with a molecular weight of 22 to waters molleculat weight of 10, meaning it sinks not only in water but also through the air so it's existence is primarily in the lower atmosphere.
FACT: As light is absorbed by gasses going through the upper atmosphere there is less of it as it reaches the lower atmosphere meaning that CO2 naturally can't absorb the maximum amount of heat producing Infrared Light as it possibly can.
FACT: All of the facts I listed are stated in scientific laws which are universal to science
FACT: AGW is a religion not a science.

On 2/10/2015 "At a news conference last week in Brussels, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.'s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism."

3

If CO2 is the boogeyman than nukes are the current answer. Until the radical greenies push legislation to legalize more nukes in this country, I am happy to wait for innovation in wind power, battery technology and fusion. More tests on seeding the ocean would also be informative and potentially helpful. As long as the radical greenies continue to push for central planning solutions, I'll continue to look for their red undershirts.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:22360
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.