So I was just banned from FB, citing hate-speech. This was due to a discussion with a woman who was proud to have turned her toilets in her business into a multigender toilet. I pointed out, regardless of probability that men were abusing this to either expose themselves to children, and or, sexually attack them. All in the guise of wearing a dress. And that this would be on her head if someone was attacked.
I pointed out until one minute ago, gender dysphoria was unequivocally considered mental illness, and not an actual normal state of mind.
She said that it would make them feel safe, and that many trannies were very convincing....I said there's a reason they get attacked often. If a man meets a beautiful woman and dates her, wines and dines her etc etc and when he gets her home, he expects to see a prawn under her knickers not a manhood to match his own. She could not understand how humiliating it could be,?(No not my experience, but someone I know who did punch a guys lights out for such deciept.) And that, he would likely understandably lash out. (FYI, I hate violence and pointed this out)
To my mind, it should be illegal not to declare to an unsuspecting potential partner, your true sex.
On a similar note, I know a beautiful girl, 21yrs, and she's a he. Seriously beautiful, had hormones young. She hates her life, she wants a man, but has learned due to a few attacks to admit before the date that she has a penis. 100% of hetro males bale on her, so she always ends up with a gay man, oned who just wants her manhood in them.
I'm certain she regrets her early hormone treatment but GP's etc are only too eager to put these confused young men on hormones.
I urge you to watch this video where the Professor of Paediatrics discusses the scientific literature on gender dysphoria, it is real but not the phenomenon the extreme left would have you believe, and the problems associated with treatments. The problems the left are creating are far greater than the embarrassment of mistaking a transgender
A trans who gets “involved” with someone has the responsibility to inform that person of their status. Failure to do so makes them responsible for whatever action may result ... and they should be well aware that it might be violent.
Sexual persuasion or “orientation” can be extremely problematic in certain circumstances ... like the military ... where most shower facilities, like locker rooms, are open usage. Most males are not, in any way, accepting of the concept of being viewed in a sexual manner by another male. This fact is 10’s of thousands of years in the making ... and for good reason.
As to mixed gender bathrooms ... I understand why there are those that say this should be allowed ... be considered a “good” thing ... should be applauded ... I can also understand why a Father/Husband would punch out an obvious male regardless of how they “identify” for using the woman’s room with his child or wife inside.
All three of these things are part of the recent “PC” / SJW thought process ...
What is actually quite a small percentage of the Population is trying to force the rest of the Population to follow THEIR Mandates ... seeking to wipe away thousands of years of evolution, custom and culture to create a system that THEY are comfortable in at the Expense of the “Rights” of the Majority of People.
It's a bit strange the first "thought" you go to is "trans sexual abuse" when a business owner declares "inclusivity" in the toilets of her business (presumably not a big business so inadvertently saving money on toilet facilities). You're entitled to feel uncomfortable sharing a toilet with the opposite sex, just like I'm uncomfortable sharing a gym changing room with the opposite sex (becoming more common!!) You have to appreciate in some countries unisexual toilets aren't a big deal (if that is indeed what we're talking about and not separate walled off toilets) So if you were an employee at her business, then you'd have every right to say you're uncomfortable. Personally I don't like sharing the bathroom with ANYONE. The problem I have is you went straight to "Trans sexual abuse" issue which is very niche and Uber specific, thus in conclusion I do actually think you've inadvertently published hate speech. It would have been more reasonable if you suggested she had additional toilets for those who don't feel comfortable, such as the religiously indoctrinated, or those who are a little more sensitive (ie have embarrassing medical conditions like IBS, or just those who don't like taking a shit in front of the opposite sex). Instead you escalated her gesture from 1 to 10 by going straight to "Sexual rape trans men" which for me says more about you, than it does about her.
I wonder what the statistics are for sexual assaults by transgender people in bathrooms. Is there a probability statistic number that would change your mind about the risk? What if the percentage of assaults of women in bathrooms by transwomen was less than transwomen's percentage in the overall population?
Jeez, that's not even hate speech. Even if it is regarded as hate speech, free speech should include hate speech anyway. I also understand that gender dysphoria is a mental condition.
I remember someone said, quite rightly, that from a medical point of view, there is a huge difference between a woman having an abdominal pain and a man having an abdominal pain, and things can get very complicated with anyone who went through transgender operations.
Censorship is real and very bad in the UK. People only have to mention the name Tommy Robinson to be banned from Facebook - that's how bad it is at the moment.