slug.com slug.com

43 6

What's people's thoughts on Tommy Robinson being banned from all social media????

Scroves 3 Feb 28
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

43 comments (26 - 43)

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

3

It's a joke. Like him or not, he was banned from Twitter for stating a fact. He's in court tomorrow, wonder if any mainstream outlets cover that.

2

They fear him.

2

I would share this elsewhere but it would likely be blocked an interesting interview

2

I'm a Tommy Robinson FAN. British Politics and Society ab shameful Many issues. Correctness Absurdities. All this Social Media banning is villainy and will have to become refused/ via pocket book, vote, or Civil Action.

2

Facebook stated “Tommy Robinson’s Facebook Page has repeatedly broken these standards, posting material that uses dehumanizing language and calls for violence targeted at Muslims. He has also behaved in ways that violate our policies around organized hate,” [washingtonpost.com]

Does anyone have any knowledge of TR posting calls for violence targeted at Muslims? If he did then good for Facebook for holding up their standards.

As one would expect, it is more likely that TR did not make such an amateur mistake and this is just Facebook trying to avoid conflict from people who practice freedom of speech in a violent way - [jihadwatch.org]

I was a member of one of the websites banned. Never did I hear any threats. As a matter of fact, it was filled with videos from around the world of people standing up to their gov't. Dutch, German, French even Australian and South African. Must be they don't want us to know...

It's Panodrama that's what it's about

Sargon of Akkad has been following Tommy Robinson for a long time and he says that Facebook is yet to provide an example of how Tommy violated Facebook rules. In other words, Facebook can't.

2

The social media moguls are ignorant of "The Streisand Effect".
[en.wikipedia.org]

That's because they (the social media moguls) are blatantly displaying Dunning-Kruger effect.
[sciencedirect.com]

1

Absolutely disgusting! The establishment are trying to silence him because he speaks the truth! Tommy was one of the first to report on the Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs raping young girls all over England!

1

I am outraged

1

If anyone want to read the trial documents for Tommy's case last year - links below
[judiciary.uk]

[judiciary.uk]

1

Is there Tommy Robinson group with his material on this website? As an American, I've had limited access to his work, and his story. This would be a great place to share his message.

Lots on YouTube (at the moment!)

Talking to alternative views

1

Has he been banned from YouTube?

He predicts that he will be, but just not yet.

1

I didn't know he was banned
I used to follow him and he was interesting
From what i saw i didn't find him that bad

0

The banning and even worse false imprisonments expose the UK state as a hidden evil regime, with judges, the govt, senior police behind a very bad attack on a single citizen. No doubt the truth will out in 30 years or more when some of us will be dead. They have chosen the wrong target shooting the messenger rather than taking head of the message. Is it racist to expose bad stuff suppressed by the media?

0

Something about him always seemed... I'm not sure how to put it. Something isn't right and its not the censorship. Maybe I'm imagining things.

0

You can find Tommy on his Website and Telegram
[tr.news]

[t.me]

0

Fed up with the hypocrisy on all social media platforms.

0

Not Just His Social Media see the link below even other governments are bending to pressure

[tr.news]

0

Their standards may be hypocritical why is it wrong for a company to refuse to do business with someone that they fundamentally disagree with and who they feel is bad for their business.

When you comply with a platforms guidelines/standards and they kick you off simply because they don't like you it's at the very least unethical. Tommy had a following of over a million people on Facebook so you are also depriving them.

@JDJ07 definitely wrong, but I think what is going on with louder with Crowder, where they are filling false legal claims preventing a fair market costing them direct revenue. Plus additional legal fees. I'm not sure how Tommy has been affected in the market.

@Rus-T-Balls I know Tommy lost 70% of his revenue when PayPal closed his account.

@Rus-T-Balls (I'm not sure how Tommy has been affected in the market.)

  • legal fees to fight charges that are brought against him and removed his platforms to raise money

trial documents for Tommy's case last year - links below
short version
[judiciary.uk]
long version
[judiciary.uk]?

Maybe, they should change their name to Facebook Corporate, so at least people know it is not a site of the free sharing of ideas and opinions.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:21056
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.