What's people's thoughts on Tommy Robinson being banned from all social media????
Facebook stated “Tommy Robinson’s Facebook Page has repeatedly broken these standards, posting material that uses dehumanizing language and calls for violence targeted at Muslims. He has also behaved in ways that violate our policies around organized hate,” [washingtonpost.com]
Does anyone have any knowledge of TR posting calls for violence targeted at Muslims? If he did then good for Facebook for holding up their standards.
As one would expect, it is more likely that TR did not make such an amateur mistake and this is just Facebook trying to avoid conflict from people who practice freedom of speech in a violent way - [jihadwatch.org]
I was a member of one of the websites banned. Never did I hear any threats. As a matter of fact, it was filled with videos from around the world of people standing up to their gov't. Dutch, German, French even Australian and South African. Must be they don't want us to know...
It's Panodrama that's what it's about
Sargon of Akkad has been following Tommy Robinson for a long time and he says that Facebook is yet to provide an example of how Tommy violated Facebook rules. In other words, Facebook can't.
The social media moguls are ignorant of "The Streisand Effect".
[en.wikipedia.org]
That's because they (the social media moguls) are blatantly displaying Dunning-Kruger effect.
[sciencedirect.com]
If anyone want to read the trial documents for Tommy's case last year - links below
[judiciary.uk]
Has he been banned from YouTube?
He predicts that he will be, but just not yet.
The banning and even worse false imprisonments expose the UK state as a hidden evil regime, with judges, the govt, senior police behind a very bad attack on a single citizen. No doubt the truth will out in 30 years or more when some of us will be dead. They have chosen the wrong target shooting the messenger rather than taking head of the message. Is it racist to expose bad stuff suppressed by the media?
Something about him always seemed... I'm not sure how to put it. Something isn't right and its not the censorship. Maybe I'm imagining things.
Fed up with the hypocrisy on all social media platforms.
Their standards may be hypocritical why is it wrong for a company to refuse to do business with someone that they fundamentally disagree with and who they feel is bad for their business.
When you comply with a platforms guidelines/standards and they kick you off simply because they don't like you it's at the very least unethical. Tommy had a following of over a million people on Facebook so you are also depriving them.
@JDJ07 definitely wrong, but I think what is going on with louder with Crowder, where they are filling false legal claims preventing a fair market costing them direct revenue. Plus additional legal fees. I'm not sure how Tommy has been affected in the market.
@Rus-T-Balls I know Tommy lost 70% of his revenue when PayPal closed his account.
@Rus-T-Balls (I'm not sure how Tommy has been affected in the market.)
trial documents for Tommy's case last year - links below
short version
[judiciary.uk]
long version
[judiciary.uk]?
Maybe, they should change their name to Facebook Corporate, so at least people know it is not a site of the free sharing of ideas and opinions.