slug.com slug.com

5 1

When it comes to the gender debate, do you believe there are multiple genders or just two?

SpikeTalon 10 Feb 14
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Sex is biology. Gender is culture. Gender identity is psychology. It's not complicated.

3

This is a language game played in bad faith in the service of a misguided altruistic attempt to condition society of into accepting people who do not conform to socially prescribed gender roles.

Sexual diamorphism is real. Science concludes this. Men wearing pants and women wearing dresses is not genetic, fine.

So once, gender was a polite way to say sex in a prudish society. The term eventually came to denote socially prescribed gender roles. From one concept we got two, by allowing more nuance in our terminology.

This is good so far, no problems. We were asked not to fall prey to the fallacy of misplaced concreteness. The bible may say a man should have short hair and a woman long hair, but it's not a genetic predisposition. Pants are not an intrinsic property of an xy chromosone pairing. College freshman everywhere can smugly declare others who do not consider this nuance to be "reified", signaling their superiority. This is appearantly important.

But now the once euphemism for sex, having come into it's own, is to be treated as the dominant concept and the idea of sex is to be subsumed within it.

Why? Not because it's logical, not because it makes any sense, but because feminists see social utility in pretending there is no such thing as sexual diamorphism.

It's what we once would have called a Marxist truth.

LOL, in other words, it is complete bullshite.

1

Two. Because gender is based upon biology. What percentage of the population is born hermaphrodite? Why is it an issue for the remaining 99.whatever percent of us? What is the agenda behind making this statistical non-issue a bloody talking point? ...Umm, could it be the destruction of western society and culture rearing it's hydra like head? Why is it a debate when it affects such a minuscule proportion of the population?

1

I'd take a bet on just the 2, the rest has more to do with euphoria or an attempt to destroy traditional social foundations.

0

Definitely multiple. Gender is a construct.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:20037
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.