slug.com slug.com

3 1

This can't be stressed enough:

"Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be."

[nytimes.com]

“In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.”

“Most tests set the limit at 40, a few at 37. This means that you are positive for the coronavirus if the test process required up to 40 cycles, or 37, to detect the virus.

“Tests with thresholds so may detect not just live virus but also genetic fragments, leftovers from infection that pose no particular — akin to finding a hair in a room long after a person has left, Dr. Mina said.”

“Any test with a cycle threshold above 35 is too sensitive, agreed Juliet Morrison, a virologist at the University of California, Riverside. ‘I’m shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive,’ she said.”

Wordmage 8 Jan 2
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

2

This is not new news, but because the LIARS have been able to repeat their lies so often that they have scared the general public with unscientific foolishness and the suppression of truth, people will need to hear the truth repeatedly before they let go of their current perspective.

Keep repeating the truth until it eventually gets through to the ignorant masses of Karens.

1

Even Dr. Fauci has admitted that anything above 35 or 36 cycles is too much.

2

If you need this test to show that your sick the symptoms can't be bad enough to notice.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:167572
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.