slug.com slug.com

3 6

We are destroying our economy. Ruining lives over false positves. Case numbers. As hospitals are empty.
You sheep comply and make this last longer and longer. Wake up already. You are being manipulated.

1patriot 9 Dec 22
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Game Changer:

what the average ageof death.....what are the weely death rates of the last 10 years in texas find those two figures and come back and lets chat! and why do you not believe the other 50,000 doctor and professionals that say its a bullshit....also tell me how many people you know personally that have must at least 10 if it a pandemic

2

YOU ARE RIGHT - WE HAVE A PANDEMIC OF FALSE POSITIVES - There are great studies about this, in November the Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests “Unreliable” & Quarantines “Unlawful”. Now a group of scientist are requesting that the paper in support of the PCR be retracted. And WHO (finally) admits PCR tests create false positives.

28 September 2020 - Study by Jaafar et al., which found that – when running PCR tests with 35 cycles or more – the accuracy dropped to 3%, meaning up to 97% of positive results could be false positives. Correlation Between 3790 Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction–Positives Samples and Positive Cell Cultures, Including 1941 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Isolates - [academic.oup.com]

20 Nov 2020 - Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests “Unreliable” & Quarantines “Unlawful” - Important legal decision faces total media blackout in Western world - [off-guardian.org] --- [greatgameindia.com]

REVIEW OF THE JANUARY PCR STUDY AND REQUEST FOR ITS RETRACTION

27 November 2020 - RT-PCR Test to Detect SARS-CoV-2 Reveals 10 Major Scientific Flaws at the Molecular and Methodological Level: Consequences for False Positive Results - The published RT-qPCR protocol for detection and diagnostics of 2019-nCoV and the manuscript suffer from numerous technical and scientific errors, including insufficient primer design, a problematic and insufficient RT-qPCR protocol, and the absence of an accurate test validation. Neither the presented test nor the manuscript itself fulfils the requirements for an acceptable scientific publication. Further, serious conflicts of interest of the authors are not mentioned. Finally, the very short timescale between submission and acceptance of the publication (24 hours) signifies that a systematic peer review process was either not performed here, or of problematic poor quality. We provide compelling evidence of several scientific inadequacies, errors and flaws. - [globalresearch.ca]

27 November 2020 - Review report Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020 - External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results. "This paper will show numerous serious flaws in the Corman-Drosten paper, the significance of which has led to worldwide misdiagnosis of infections attributed to SARS-CoV-2 and associated with the disease COVID-19," the researchers write in their peer review. - [cormandrostenreview.com]

28 November 2020 - Retraction request letter to Eurosurveillance editorial board - The researchers are requesting a retraction letter from the authors of the January study published by Eurosurveillance, including German scientists Dr. Christian Dorsten (developer of PCR test) and Dr. Victor Corman. External Review and request to retract the paper of Corman et al, published in Eurosurveillance January 23, 2020. - [cormandrostenreview.com]

11 December 2020 - Coronavirus Scandal Breaking in Merkel’s Germany. False Positives and the Drosten PCR Test -- The widely-praised German model of the Angela Merkel regime to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic is now engulfed in a series of potentially devastating scandals going to the very heart of the testing and medical advice being used to declare draconian economic shutdowns and next, de facto mandatory vaccinations. The scandals involve a professor at the heart of Merkel’s corona advisory group. The implications go far beyond German borders to the very WHO itself and their global recommendations. - [globalresearch.ca]

14 December 2020 - WHO (finally) admits PCR tests create false positives -- The World Health Organization released a guidance memo on December 14th, warning that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests will result in false positives. This new WHO memo states that using a high CT value to test for the presence of Sars-Cov-2 will result in false-positive results. To quote their own words: Users of RT-PCR reagents should read the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result. They go on to explain: The design principle of RT-PCR means that for patients with high levels of circulating virus (viral load), relatively few cycles will be needed to detect virus and so the Ct value will be low. Conversely, when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain. - [who.int]

16 December 2020 - PCR Test for Coronavirus Questioned by Prominent Scientists - An International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS) have submitted a retraction request to the European public health journal Eurosurveillance of a well-cited article published in January 2020,1 2 which contained the first protocol for detecting the SARS-CoV-2 virus using a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. The test has been used by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a guideline for other researchers. The ICSLS retraction request, authored by 22 scientists with specialties in microbiology, virology, molecular genetics and molecular biology, immunology, pharmacology and other science fields, found “severe errors” in design and methodology of the RT-PCR which “render the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test useless.”4 The Eurosurveillance article has been cited over 800 times since publication. - [thevaccinereaction.org]

THE CASE AGAINST THE PROMOTERS OF THE CORONA PANIC

  1. How dangerous is covid-19 realy? Exageration of infection fatality rates
  2. How are covid-19 deaths counted? Inflation of COVID-19 deaths
  3. How are corona positives measured? Inflation of COVID-19 infected
  4. What models are the danger predictions based on? Imperial Model proved false, modeler resigns
  5. The Corona Scandal - Covid-19 statistiscs are unreliable, evidence of pandemic fraud, Global “Coup d’Etat”

PDF

  • 1- The case against the promoters of the corona panic - [docdro.id]
  • 2- Documentation and refferences - [docdro.id]
1

We have lost the republican party folks. Their knees are buckling as Biden steps in. They are so scared of losing their cushion in the swamp they just signed an outrageous stimulus bill sending billions worldwide and raising our debt to over 27 trillion.

We working class conservatives are absolutely fucked. What's next. The republican leaders will not stand up for us any longer. When sleepy Joe passes laws to make gun ownership near impossible who's going to step up?

we got 30 days before the guns start firing!

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:164537
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.