From John HINDERAKER: Texas Throws a Hail Mary. “The Texas motion and supporting brief are well-drafted and make a plausible case–importantly, one that, if accepted, does not require extensive fact-finding into alleged voter fraud. Reduced to its essentials, the motion alleges
that under the Constitution’s Electors Clause, state legislatures have plenary authority over appointment of each state’s electors;
that in each of the defendant states, non-legislative actors (e.g., the Secretary of State) unconstitutionally changed the rules governing this year’s election without legislative approval or ratification;
that these changes favored some voters over others, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause; and
in each state, the number of ballots that were counted pursuant to unconstitutional changes in election procedures exceeds the margin of Joe Biden’s alleged victory.”
UPDATE: From the comments: “I wonder if the left, and the court realize this is a hail mary to prevent a civil war, not to keep trump in office. 30% of democrats and 80+% of republicans think the election was stolen. That is a loss of legitimacy of the nation’s governments from the state level through the federal.”
“I wonder if the left, and the court realize this is a hail mary to prevent a civil war, not to keep trump in office. 30% of democrats and 80+% of republicans think the election was stolen. That is a loss of legitimacy of the nation’s governments from the state level through the federal.”
To me a group of onlookers in New York City watch a gang rape.
One says to the other: "Poor girl."
Another says: "Probably deserves it."
One more chimes in: "Someone ought to help that poor girl."
The crime scene turns into a murder.
Another onlooker asks: "Shouldn't we at least run, these criminals are murderous?"
Each of the onlookers are paid very well to Protect and Serve at the highest (lowest) levels of FAKE government.