slug.com slug.com

3 3

Retired 3 Star General Calls On Trump To Invoke Insurrection Act.

[ce-publiclw.naturalnews.com]

mccarthy 8 Dec 1
Share

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Such an action would put a bullet in the head of the Republic. We might be doomed no matter what. I just don't want my guy pulling the trigger.

1

IMO, a bit too late in the day. Should have been done during the riots, then some catfishing. But we know less than what Trump knows, maybe he has a better plan.

I don't agree. The rioting was primarily in blue cities and blue states.. therefore declaration of insurrection would have been a wholly partisan act on Trump's behalf. The wholesale levels of fraud throughout the six swing states concerning a federal matter and clearly not only against Trump but also against the electorate as a whole, along with clear defiance in both parties at the state and court levels ... THAT constitutes insurrection. And the nail in the coffin? clear evidence that DOJ and FBI were completely corrupted and unwilling to investigate and enforce the law of the land.

@torontogal4388 there must be a reason why Trump is holding off taking out the big guns. Once they're out, they can't be safely (for him, at least) holstered back in. Should he take them out of the holster, it should be to blast off as many heads of this hydra.

@eschatologyguy This is not just about Trump. When the entire country has been overtaken by rogue operators ... THEN the big guns need to come out.

@torontogal4388 it will probably come to that. When it does, don't forget about the Marxists in academia, the media giants (this already includes Hollywood) and big tech. You can't afford to have them running around all over the place.

@eschatologyguy and SOROS

@torontogal4388 I suspect he has the security detail of a head of state. You'd need Predators or Reapers for this one.

1

That's what I figured. With such systemic corruption and questionable judges in many of these states, they have to set up military tribunals to try the massive number of people involved. Further, as he said, non-corrupt judges would not have a knowledge base necessary to understand the cyber crime aspects of the cases. The scale too is unfathomable. Only a military tribunal would have the capacity to try all the parties involved and guarantee equal treatment and fair outcome.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:157106
Slug does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.