slug.com slug.com
1
1 Like Show

Comments

Looks like the smoking "gun" bioweapon has been traced back to the origin. [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 18, 2020:
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/harvard-university-professor-and-two-chinese-nationals-charged-three-separate-china-related FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Tuesday, January 28, 2020 Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases
Tucker: Why would America's media take China's side amid coronavirus pandemic? - YouTube
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 18, 2020:
It isn't. Why would anyone conflate yellow journalism with actual journalism? Is Tucker not an example of the whole SET knowable as "America's media"? How about Gerald Celente's Trends Journal, or Alex Jones Prison Planet, or Steve Pieczenik Talks, or many other examples of media contained within the SET knowable as "America's media"? Marxist propaganda media in America is what it is, a knowable fact that matters. It is Marxist propaganda media because it propagandizes Marxist idiology in the effort to turn the "hearts and minds" of regular people into idiologues, also knowable as Marxists drones: sycophants. Idio-illogical-idiots can be knowable as subjects of evil propaganda imposed upon their unsuspecting souls. People who have actually thought through the illogic of Marxist propaganda know better: see for example Jordan Peterson. Is everyone in America guilty of the evil crimes perpetrated by the Marxist idiologues and their evil masters? We are all one village? Does it take a village? Does it take a village by subterfuge? Conflating yellow journalism with actual journalism is likely to result in two accurately measurable power transfers. The evil people gain more power by close association with actual journalism, the conflating process works as a cloak. The actual journalists are guilty by association with the evil people and their Marxist propaganda crimes that include misfeasance, malfeasance, non-feasance, fraud, and treason. Those in power would not long be in power if Law were to return to America: if we use it for the intended purpose.
WHAT IF?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 17, 2020:
I'm not buying the "China" against "Trump" road map. In China as in everywhere else on the planet there are very powerful, very evil, very much people who wear clothes and speak messages. Next to those very powerful people are lesser evil people. Next to those very powerful people are marginally good people. Next to those very powerful people are demonstrably good people. If there is a road map (a way of generalizing the power struggle) then it may be worth noting that in each place on earth those in power at any degree are going to gain or lose power for themselves and for their group. So which groups have the most power right now? How about a number, or a letter, and then a name? Group 2: Previously most powerful, now less powerful Group 1: Now most powerful, now more powerful than Group 2 Group B: Previously most powerful, now less powerful Group A: Now most powerful, now more powerful than Group 2 Globalist Deep State Marxist Political/Economic Cartel, Cabal, Faction: Previously most powerful, now less powerful Nationalist Capitalist Political/Economic Cartel, Cabal, Faction: Now most powerful, now more powerful than the Marxists, Deep State, greater evil monopolist Globalists "WHO PROFITS from this World Wide Pandemic and Panic?" If it isn't, then truth tellers profit, liars who lie dig a deeper hole of their own making. "Could this simply be an Actual Strategy on the CCP’s Part?" It is not likely that every single mind in China is controlled absolutely, so there are likely to be lesser evil forces in China working to overpower the greater evil forces just like the current situation everywhere else. "Could this have been DELIBERATE?" MIHOP? Made it happen on purpose? LIHOP? Let it happen on purpose? or No opportunity is allowed to escape exploitation by those seeking absolute power, for if they fail: the competition will seize the opportunity as sure as the sun will rise and the price of toilet paper will eventually be greater than Central Bank Paper.
Strange thought; I have hurt some feelings on social media I am sure.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 17, 2020:
There was a suggestion about more judges. The concept of Trial by Jury, according to the common law (unwritten, ancient, law of the land, legem terrae), is to remove the power of government biased government agents whose pay check depends upon judgment in favor of funding the government with extortion payments enforced by the government upon anyone who dares to produce anything worth stealing. Any crime perpetrated by any non-government agent is lesser by exponential degree than the same crime perpetrated by a government agent. Crimes perpetrated by government agents cause increases in crimes by non-government agents, instead of preventing crime the government agents are guilty of crime, the power to defend is instead a power to offend. So all talk about using a criminal government to stop being so damn criminal, and instead do the job they were hired to do, is moot. Criminals, as a rule, do not obey moral rules, that is how they get into that club. The idea behind trial by the country, or trial by jury according to the common law, is to remove the power of government agents in judgment of what is or is not a fact in a crime, what is or is not lawful, what is or is not punishable, and what is or is not a just punishment. Just because people today have not been taught these facts that matter does not remove these facts as such, at least not outside the minds of those who ignore or are ignorant of these facts that matter. More biased judges spending the loot stolen from productive people means more stolen loot as a matter of demonstrable fact. Removing the dictatorial power from dictators removes the flow of loot from those who dare to produce anything worth stealing (including children) to the dictators. An example of a good start down that trial by the country road is here: "Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire 14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Anheuser-Bush Brewing co. V. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318. The Jury found there was no lawful consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of nothing." STATE OF ...
Spectator: American media is caught in a Chinese finger trap. [spectator.us]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 17, 2020:
"Why are major media outlets in the United States running interference for the Chinese government? Several newspapers and cable news channels scrambled to decry any use of ‘Wuhan Virus’ as xenophobic and racist, after weeks of deploying the term themselves. This appeared to be a coordinated effort to deflect blame from China." Good find, thanks.
Voluntary Mutual Defense: Equitable Commerce: Free Market Government Service Provider ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 16, 2020:
From the new book I found: "The fact that Warren was critical of the state did not make him less traditional: the state as Warren knew it was a recent invention. There was nothing traditional in government established only fifty years ago in the course of a revolutionary war. It is rarely disputed that the development of the nation state is closely connected to the growth of the bourgeoisie and its main sphere of activity, the free market. Therefore, the ideas which we use to regard as socialist might be rather reactionary in their historical context." That is an amazing coincidence. This individual writer is working on an idea that Warren was either ignorant of history concerning the just price principle, or he was not ignorant of history and his claims of a "new" idea were fraudulent: he knew his ideas were not new. Above, by coincidence, is a claim by this author that is either his own ignorance concerning the topic he speaks about, or he does know better, and yet he chooses to fail to express the facts that matter in the case. Example: "It is rarely disputed that the development of the nation state is closely connected to the growth of the bourgeoisie and its main sphere of activity, the free market." The revolutionary idea, expressed in such works as the Declaration of Independence, and so many Bills of Rights, was essentially a move from involuntary association (un-free government markets) to voluntary associations for mutual defense or Free Market Government Markets. The "development of the nation state" was the intentional annihilation of the Free Government Market by specific people who chose to replace the Free Government Market with a Profitable Monopoly Nation-State (where the people become hereditary property). The critic of Warren claims: "There was nothing traditional in government established only fifty years ago in the course of a revolutionary war." A federation of independent states was established and was agreed upon by members from roughly 1775 to 1789. That is an established fact that matters in this case. The federation worked as a Free Market for competing government providers, as explained in the following work: Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy by William Watkins "Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking ...
Strange thought; I have hurt some feelings on social media I am sure.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 16, 2020:
Fact: "It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Lysander Spooner, Trial by Jury, 1852 It is a well established fact that in 1787 a group of criminals assembled to perpetrate the crime of treason upon all Americans then and now. Those criminals even signed their confession on a document called the Constitution. The homework I've done so far leads to the obvious conclusion based upon the facts that matter in the case. I have yet to find any evidence that could lead to a different conclusion. No one I know will dare to contend otherwise. Plenty of people have and I'm certain will attempt to shoot the messenger while counterfeiting a debate on the subject matter.
Liberty activist 'murdered as he slept' by swat team seizing his guns- [thefreethoughtproject.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 16, 2020:
"Lemp was Caucasian, according to Sandler. She did not know the race of the unidentified officer involved because she said the officers were wearing masks. The officer was placed on administrative leave, a standard procedure after police shootings." https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/14/duncan-socrates-lemp-maryland-shot-police-officer Standard procedure for designated targets designated as targets by the "government" is to conspired to murder them, and murder them. How does one know, beyond doubt, that the government is counterfeit? How does one know, beyond reasonable doubt, that the people running the government are criminals? Ask them? How does that work for you?
Sky News Australia.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 15, 2020:
I did not view the link. If criminals did not get away with the LOOT, would there be power to purchase good things with the LOOT that was stolen by the criminals at the FED? You say, Joe, Joe, Joe. In your authoritarian (aristocratic) tone. The FED is here to save us from ourselves, and you Joe, are a conspiracy theorist. So... "Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire 14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Anheuser-Bush Brewing co. V. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318. The Jury found there was no lawful consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of nothing." STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF SCOTT First National Bank of Montgomery, Plaintiff vs Jerome Daly, Defendant. December 9, 1968 Sorry dude, the theorist is you, and your aristocratic soul, searching for the last dry place on the rat ship you and your kind sunk: on purpose. Oh, oh, but your fearless leaders didn't tell you in advance that it was time to jump ship? You are left holding the empty bag? Is that not some form of poetic justice? How about comic relief? If there are homes, then there is value, so long as people care to live in homes: an obvious measure of value and demand. But Mr. Dictator needs to INJECT liquidity into the National Economy to offset the destructive MOB RULE that inspires people to buy volumes of toilet paper with toilet paper money? And you have the nerve to call me stupid? 3 Trillion here, 9 Trillion there, who cares to keep score? You can't, by the way, it is against the "Law."
Politics U.S: Since When Is Joe Biden a 'Moderate'? [americanthinker.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 15, 2020:
Moderately satanistic, pedo without the blood sacrifice?
Australia. ABC. Public Broadcast. "Jordan Peterson Destroys Q and A." [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 15, 2020:
Time 57:40 or so... JP: "The Americans have a very tight respect for free speech." Explain then The Alien and Sedition Acts? The Bill of Rights were immediately thrown under the bus after 1789 and The Judiciary Act which placed a Supreme National Court Legal Fiction Power above the common law. If Jordan Peterson meant that the people as a whole "have a very tight respect for free speech," then why did he then change from speaking about the people as a whole and why did he then start speaking about the National Court members who publish their opinions under the false guise of "The Law of the Land"? The actual (common law) Law of the Land places lawful judgment in the whole people as one, through trial by jury, which is the method by which The People as a whole consent to, or do not consent to, government in any form whatsoever? Case in point: "Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire 14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Anheuser-Bush Brewing co. V. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318. The Jury found there was no lawful consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of nothing." STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF SCOTT First National Bank of Montgomery, Plaintiff vs Jerome Daly, Defendant. December 9, 1968 If "they" aren't a bunch of criminal psychopaths, sociopaths, and a rapidly growing army of sycophants, then why are "they" still getting away with counterfeiting money? "They" just injected 1.5 Trillion dollars, according to "them," just the other day. What gives? Why are these people on this panel speaking about politics while the obvious elephant in the room is ignored as if that elephant wasn't shitting all over everything?
Australia. ABC. Public Broadcast. "Jordan Peterson Destroys Q and A." [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 15, 2020:
Time 55:00 or so... Jordan Peterson: "Never in the history of an English common law society had a government dared to regulate the actual voluntary contents of someone's speech except in a commercial situation." The problem there is this idea that "government" is responsible and therefore accountable. It, like the gun, isn't responsible, nor accountable, for it has no power of moral judgment, or power of action. Those on the panel are each one under a spell in which they either believe, or they pretend to believe, that "governments" in the modern world is in any way legitimate, lawful, legal, moral, right, good, or beneficial to anyone at all. This is not news. "It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Lysander Spooner, an Essay on The Trial by Jury, 1852 If Jordan Peterson is going to refer to a process used by people, such as the common law process, then he may need to refer to those people who actually use that process, not to people who pretend to use it. "All legitimate government is a mutual insurance company, voluntarily agreed upon by the parties to it, for the protection of their rights against wrong-doers. In its voluntary character it is precisely similar to an association for mutual protection against fire or shipwreck. Before a man will join an association for these latter purposes, and pay the premium for being insured, he will, if he be a man of sense, look at the articles of the association; see what the company promises to do; what it is likely to do; and what are the rates of insurance. If he be satisfied on all these points, he will become a member, pay his premium for a year, and then hold the company to its contract. If the conduct of the company prove unsatisfactory, he will let his policy expire at the end of the year for which he has paid; will decline to pay any further premiums, and either seek insurance elsewhere, or take his own risk without any insurance. And as men act in the insurance of their ships and dwellings, they would act in the insurance of their properties, liberties and lives, in the political association, or government. "The political insurance company, or government, have...
Australia. ABC. Public Broadcast. "Jordan Peterson Destroys Q and A." [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 15, 2020:
At time 46:00 or so the subject matter turned to quotas for representative democracy according to the woman in red and Jordan Peterson. WIR (Woman in red) appears to think that government as it exists now is a form of representative democracy and that quotas may be a good idea to fill government positions so as to then reach the goal of having everyone represented in the democracy. There are no representative democracies as proven by the fact that the few who govern so often do the opposite of what those who are governed want those who govern to do. The closest that government gets to representative democracy is trial by jury according to the common law. During jury selection there has been an adaptation called voir dire. Those who represent The People as a whole are those who sit on juries. Those who sit in positions of arbitrary power in a dictatorship do whatever they want to do, as they are immune from prosecution, just ask them. So placing 50% women along with 50% men in positions of arbitrary power in a dictatorship may then tend to remove the possibility that those dictators will decide to exterminate all men, or all women, by their arbitrary powers. That isn't the problem with dictatorships. The dictators dictate that they can do whatever they want to anyone, and no one can do anything about it, according to their arbitrary powers. The problem isn't that too many men or too many women are in all the seats required to row the dictatorship to hell on earth, the problem is that malevolence is the price of admission onto the dictatorship. How about a compromise? Get the ball rolling (you can't because it is a functioning dictatorship) to split all government seats 50/50 women/men, but while you are at it make sure that none of those seats are filled with malevolent psychopaths, sociopaths, and the army of sycophants that always grow in numbers with functioning dictatorships? Pick from line A (Women) one member. Pick from line B (Men) one member. Test for criminal insanity, reject the criminally insane malevolent psychopaths, sociopaths, and the army of sycophants that always grow in numbers with functioning dictatorships. Does Jordan Peterson think that men are more suited as members of a functioning dictatorship, or is he too confused about how the U.S. National government works?
Australia. ABC. Public Broadcast. "Jordan Peterson Destroys Q and A." [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 15, 2020:
"Responsibility must be individual, or there is no responsibility at all." Equitable Commerce by Josiah Warren, 1852
President Trump tests negative for Covid-19... [businessinsider.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 15, 2020:
How was he tested? How long does it take to get tested? How much does it cost to be tested? If it is a concern then why not test a few more people? If the test is positive, does the President get the cure? http://www.hk-lawyer.org/content/covid-19-patent-controversy
Sidney Powell speaking at Hillsdale College on the corruption that is rampant in the US Dept of ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 14, 2020:
That is a false premise, followed by a compounding of the original falsehood. It (the department of injustice) is not broke, therefore it won't be fixed, not by those who use it for the intended purpose it was made in the first place. Beginning with the Judiciary Act of 1789, written by criminals, disseminated by criminals, and enforced by criminals ever since, the purpose has been, is, and will continue to be usurpation of the law of the land, which is the common law, and it is no coincidence that the Judiciary Act was rammed through before Amending the Slave Trade Central Bank Fraud Constitution of 1789 with the Bill of Rights. The first Dictator George Washington of the newly created Dictatorship (built on the ashes of the former federation of independent states) got away with the capital, treasonous, crime of assembling a conscripted National Army to invade the former independent State of Pennsylvania to extort National extortion payments (on whiskey) to create the demand for the National Central Bank Counterfeiting and National Debt Scheme. George and company got away with that treasonous crime, so much for JustUS in America from then on. See next the so-called Alien and Sedition Acts and the kangaroo summary justUS court trials employed to further usurp actual law (ancient law, common law, the law of the land, legem terrae) in all the former independent counties, in all the former independent states, in what was formerly a federation of independent states UNDER the common law. Appellate means usurpation. An example is provided anytime a jury in a common law trial by jury's decision is overturned by government appointed "judges" taking the law into their own unjust, corrupt, biased hands. Every single member of the fake government is guilty of at least nonfeasance, misfeasance, or malfeasance as they continue to support the original usurpation for their own personal profits. Every single judge or government "prosecutor" misinforming juries, or anyone, about the lawful jurisdiction commanded by jury members (grand and trial), is guilty of very serious crimes, jury tampering not the least.
What kind of news do you want?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 13, 2020:
P.S. Happy Friday the 13th Fast ⋅ Factual ⋅ Free The New Paper "Major US stock indices dropped ~10% yesterday ( officially entering a “bear market” ) amid continued uncertainty over the coronavirus. The Dow Jones saw its worst single-day drop since the “Black Monday” crash of 1987, and the selloff continued through the afternoon despite the US Federal Reserve announcing $1.5T of “repurchase agreements” meant to inject liquidity into the market." https://www.thenewpaper.co/r?r=jlb8z4jokbe
What kind of news do you want?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 13, 2020:
How about stimulus Packaging? Why would someone claim that the solution to the problem is to increase the cause of the problem? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzL6PgyTwnw "First in the importance of its evil influence they considered the money monopoly, which consists of the privilege given by the government to certain individuals, or to individuals holding certain kinds of property, of issuing the circulating medium, a privilege which is now enforced in this country by a national tax of ten per cent., upon all other persons who attempt to furnish a circulating medium, and by State laws making it a criminal offense to issue notes as currency. "It is claimed that the holders of this privilege control the rate of interest, the rate of rent of houses and buildings, and the prices of goods, – the first directly, and the second and third indirectly. For, say Proudhon and Warren, if the business of banking were made free to all, more and more persons would enter into it until the competition should become sharp enough to reduce the price of lending money to the labor cost, which statistics show to be less than three-fourths of once per cent. In that case the thousands of people who are now deterred from going into business by the ruinously high rates which they must pay for capital with which to start and carry on business will find their difficulties removed. If they have property which they do not desire to convert into money by sale, a bank will take it as collateral for a loan of a certain proportion of its market value at less than one per cent. discount. "If they have no property, but are industrious, honest, and capable, they will generally be able to get their individual notes endorsed by a sufficient number of known and solvent parties; and on such business paper they will be able to get a loan at a bank on similarly favorable terms. Thus interest will fall at a blow. The banks will really not be lending capital at all, but will be doing business on the capital of their customers, the business consisting in an exchange of the known and widely available credits of the banks for the unknown and unavailable, but equality good, credits of the customers and a charge therefor of less than one per cent., not as interest for the use of capital, but as pay for the labor of running the banks. "This facility of acquiring capital will give an unheard of impetus to business, and consequently create an unprecedented demand for labor, – a demand which will always be in excess of the supply, directly to the contrary of the present condition of the labor market. Then will be seen an exemplification of the words of Richard Cobden that, when two laborers are after one employer, wages fall, but when two employers are after one laborer, ...
I think this is WRONG .
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 12, 2020:
Enforced orders by anyone are subject to natural laws including just exactly how many people will obey. That is the problem with dictatorships: they sink.
Just Remember While the News is Showing One Thing What Is Happening That Your Not Watching.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 12, 2020:
The FED counterfeits more money?
Funny.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 12, 2020:
"It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Lysander Spooner, Essay on The Trial by Jury, 1852 Magna Carta was nullified by Pope Innocent as per: Bulla Innocentii Papae III. pro rege Johanne, contra barones. (In membr.) 1216. 151. https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/the-papal-bull-annulling-magna-carta
Has anyone ever read the 319 page interview with an alien by Matilda O'Donnell?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 11, 2020:
"Words and symbols in language convey very precise concepts and meanings. He said that the Japanese people have a lot of homonyms 38 (Footnote) in their language which cause a lot of confusion in day to day communication. They solve this problem by using standard Chinese characters 39 (Footnote) to write down the exact meanings of the word they are using. This clears up the matter for them."
StrategyPage Nigeria: What The Frack Archives March 11, 2020: The government is in panic ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 11, 2020:
Robert Newman's History of Oil https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DCwafIntj0
Has anyone ever read the 319 page interview with an alien by Matilda O'Donnell?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 11, 2020:
"The status quo of our government establishment has been to "protect the people" from knowledge of such matters. In fact, the only protection afforded by ignorance and secrecy is to hide the private agenda of those in power to enslave others. And, by doing so, to disarm every perceived enemy, and ally, through superstition and stupidity."
CHINA VIRUS - NEW JERSEY DECLARES ''STATE OF EMERGENCY'' - LIVE COVERAGE - WORLD UPDATE COVI-19 - ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 11, 2020:
https://www.nj.com/?fbclid=IwAR3nmhQSVHmxJMeGhNhzNNfw6ppaIFUpNyvTaxY6bu_SD2idU3ig2C42pUw
For people who think, when the feds decide total tyranny will be successful and depend on the cops ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 10, 2020:
In America it is a crime to infringe upon specified natural rights, so... Calling these criminals anything other than criminals is aiding and abetting the criminals in a small way. Small infringements tend to add up. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARPJJSPcFhM Get real, real soon.
Yes, there are Libertarians in pandemics- [reason.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 10, 2020:
"Your coronavirus prepping would be a lot tougher in a world without free markets." Free from what, exactly? A criminal organization may injure someone reporting the existence of a dangerous virus, and in that way the criminal organization spreads the virus in fact, while the "free market" informer is prevented from informing. Free from accountability, on the other hand, is the ball back in the court of the criminals.
What's your take on this article?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 10, 2020:
"Allowing even a chance of Sen. Bernie Sanders becoming president is too dangerous to risk." That, to me, is bordering on criminal negligence. There are a lot more fish to fry, such as Pedojoe or Killary, not to mention notorious bandits such as VICE president put-the-dick back in vice president Cheney, so this type of failure to actually report the facts that matter in the case is akin to littering, a crime unworthy of effort to defend in low scale cases. There is plenty of danger associated with Mr. Trump wielding power on top of the dictatorship known as U.S.A. Inc. (LLC). Having instead Pedojoe or the Marxist Sanders in charge is arguably more dangerous, but only because those clowns would be demonstrably not in charge. Trump appears to be in charge, and the evidence of that fact that matters is abundant. Bush II was a puppet of the Neo-cons, such as the already mentioned Dick. Why can't Trump, in charge, nail Hillary as promised to the cross she created with all her crimes perpetrated with malice aforethought? Trump is in charge of something that is evaporating. The next puppet will have less power than Trump. If regular people do not take it upon themselves (give themselves license) to reconstitute the law power in America, then America will evaporate one cut more, then another, then another, and that is because those who need to be in charge are - in a phrase - criminally negligent.
Homelessness in Progressive cities
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 10, 2020:
Why is the power of language so easily given to criminals for criminal purposes? If criminal gangs, Marxists or not, take over areas on Earth, an individual mind, a family, a church, a town, a city, a county, a state, or even a federation of states, the correct, accurate, useful word is criminal, not progressive, not left, not right, not democrat, not republican, not oligarch, not any word other than the word that is accurate in the language used to convey the facts that matter in the case. Oh, oh, look at those law enforcement officers burning those people alive in the church! Hello! Those would be criminals, and to miss-associate those criminals with LEOs is less than accurate.
Has anyone ever read the 319 page interview with an alien by Matilda O'Donnell?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 10, 2020:
"As for government denials and cover-ups, the events of September 11, 2001, have made it abundantly apparent to me that the U.S. government has destroyed any vestige of trust the American people and the world may have harbored, even through the Vietnam war, Watergate, and many similar betrayals, in the "honesty" of the American government, military and intelligence community, by blatantly lying to it's own people about almost anything and everything."
Super Tuesday 2.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 9, 2020:
Dig as they may with mixed metaphors, they have plenty of rope to hang their pedo-Marxists asses. Treason, unlike horse theft, is an actual capital crime.
Democratic strategist talks about Biden's deteriorating mental health: 'clearly not all there'.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 7, 2020:
Pedojoe is a time bomb. The dictatorship disease rots the brain, as the dictator no longer (or never) exercises the moral muscle, and the lack of strength in morality removes reason and logic, just as the lack of movement of limbs removes running or crafting. The desperation is not simply palpable now, in the Marxist Party (hidden behind the false front and false flag of democracy: which is not so-called Majority Rule), the situation is as claimed by Thomas Paine, they (Marxist Treasonous Criminals) took enough rope to hang themselves. Their only option now (the Marxists) is to dig faster into the hell of their own creation, and fewer, and fewer, Americans are stupid enough to dig with them.
Erik Prince Recruits Ex-Spies to Help Infiltrate Liberal Groups
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 7, 2020:
"Mr. Prince, a contractor close to the Trump administration, contacted veteran spies for operations by Project Veritas, the conservative group known for conducting stings on news organizations and other groups." The name Erik Prince is notorious or famous depending upon one's viewpoint. "Blackwater made Prince an infamous symbol of U.S. foreign policy hubris, but America’s most famous mercenary has moved on. Although he continues to dream of deploying his military services in the world’s failed states, and persists in hawking a crackpot scheme of privatizing the U.S. war in Afghanistan, Prince has diversified his portfolio. No longer satisfied with contracting out former special forces operators to the State Department and Pentagon, Prince is now attempting to offer an entire supply chain of warfare and conflict. He wants to be able to skim a profitable cut from each stage of a hostile operation, whether it be overt or covert, foreign or domestic. His offerings range from the traditional mercenary toolkit, military hardware and manpower, to cellphone surveillance technology and malware, to psychological operations and social media manipulation in partnership with shadowy operations like James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas." https://theintercept.com/2019/05/03/erik-prince-trump-uae-project-veritas/ I suggest a reading of the following book: https://libcom.org/library/blackwater-rise-worlds-most-powerful-mercenary-army-jeremy-scahill
Peter Thiel: Stagnation and how to get back to the future. [firstthings.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 7, 2020:
"For technologists, that means pursuing goals that are difficult but possible: cures for cancer and ­Alzheimer’s; compact nuclear ­reactors and fusion power. For statesmen, that means deconstructing the ­corrupt institutions that have falsely claimed to pursue those goals on our behalf." Awhile ago I read a book called PayPal Wars, and it was reported in the book that the idea behind Pay Pal (Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, etc.) was to take over the world, and those founding the project according to PayPal Wars included familiarity with the work of Alexandr I. Solzhenitsyn, who wrote The Gulag Archipelago, a book about the consequences of failing to defend against criminals running National governments. PayPal Wars was sold before it took over the world, but the concept was as a genie let out of the lamp, note for example Bitcoin. The problem with criminals running Nation States is their ability (power) to steal everything worth stealing through the Central Bank Fraud System of Extortion, a racket that requires some form of National Collection Agency such as the IRS. The IRS enforces payments that must be paid with the counterfeit money printed by the Central Bank Frauds. Thereby creating a demand for the Monopoly Money the criminals can spend faster than the people can be extorted. That power to spend faster than the slaves can be extorted is called: inflation. If money can be monopolized by a Nation State run Central Bank Extortion racket then the quality of money rapidly goes down while the cost of money rapidly goes up: inflation. Competition in money markets, on the other hand, force quality up (the unit power to purchase) and cost down (so-called interest rate) as higher quality and lower cost competitors take market share from the Monopoly Power. Enter stage left (or right) PayPal, Bitcoin, etc. As the Nation State operators scramble to defeat those competitors they are now facing a game of wack-a-mole, which places The People (the slaves) back in charge in a dynamic way. For those who have been fooled into believing that this Central Bank Fraud and Extortion Racket started with The Federal Reserve Act, you may want to dig deeper. "But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In ...
Below the radar: The School Violence Prevention and Mitigation Act of 2019.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 6, 2020:
"There has, probably, never been a legal jury, nor a legal trial by jury, in a single court of the United States, since the adoption of the constitution. "These facts show how much reliance can be placed in written constitutions, to control the action of the government, and preserve the liberties of the people. "If the real trial by jury had been preserved in the courts of the United States - that is, if we had had legal juries, and the jurors had known their rights - it is hardly probable that one tenth of the past legislation of Congress would ever have been enacted, or, at least, that, if enacted, it could have been enforced." Lysander Spooner, Essay on the Trial by Jury, 1852 Bills, bills, bills, what is the tally on the extortion fee today according to the current Dictator running the Dictatorship that I keep afloat?
Isn’t this the “Intellectual” dark web, a type of crowd-sourced “think tank”?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 6, 2020:
How about cards on the table? There is someone in charge here. Even if many people are in charge there is someone who can sway the group more so than someone else in a given situation, in time, in place. Call that masked individual The President presiding over the incorporated individuals sharing the common goal. I am now unfortunately a member of the Senate. I have an understanding of what a Senate is, so I think, believe, and therefore consider myself not a member of a Senate, nor a member of a House of Representatives, and I do not ever intend to preside over a corporate collective power structure. It is not my nature. If there is a code that works to raise average people who wander into the SLUG to the Senate, then can there be a code that works to raise average people who wander into the SLUG to a House of Representatives? The Senate is here already, and what does it do? What powers are afforded this Senate, exactly? If competition were afoot, between a Senate and a House, would there then be incentive to inspire an increase in the energy flowing from the SLOG government?
Isn’t this the “Intellectual” dark web, a type of crowd-sourced “think tank”?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 6, 2020:
How about a competition to find the people who are best able to increase discussion so long as discussion is clearly defined as the freedom to say whatever is lawful to say, meaning anything that does not intentionally injure someone innocent? Is there already a reward system for those people who post something that generates the most comments? I don't mean to suggest that total number of posts (spam) are unlimited. Something having to do with percentages of post whereby the post posted encouraged the most comments: is that already working in the program here? EDIT: Perhaps the above was poorly written, and not well communicated as a result. 100 posts with 10 total responses is a ratio of 10% Post/Comments https://www.calculator.net/percent-calculator.html?c22par1=10=100=22&x=80&y=27#pctcommon 1 post with 10 responses is a ratio of 1,000% 1,000% wins 10% loses I hope that helps. Edit: No time, No energy, No action, no power, powerlessness.
Isn’t this the “Intellectual” dark web, a type of crowd-sourced “think tank”?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 6, 2020:
OK, so... No interest, no time, no inspiration, no cause to think to act in response, no discussion, not deliberate sharing of viewpoint so as to hopefully increase the quality and lower the cost of all viewpoints (raise the tide that lifts all boats), no discussion, not even personal attacks as a counterfeit form of discussion, silence instead. No time? Barrister. My old Client! a - good morning to you: whither so fast? you seem intent upon some important affair. Jurym. Worthy Sir! I am glad to see you thus opportunely, there being scace any person that I could at this time rather have wished to meet with. Barr. I shall esteem myself happy, if in any thing I can serve you. - The business, I pray? Jurym. I am summoned to appear upon a Jury, and was just going to try if I could get off. Now I doubt not but you can put me into the best way to obtain that favour. Barr. It is probable I could: but first let me know the reasons why you desire to decline that service. Jurym. You know, Sir, there is something of trouble and loss of time in it; and men's lives, liberties, and estates (which depend upon a jury's Guilty, or Not Guilty, for the plaintiff, or for the defendant) are weighty things. I would not wrong my conscience for a world, nor be accessary to any man's ruin. There are others better skilled in such matters. I have ever so loved peace, that I have forborne going to law, (as you well know many times) though it hath been much to my loss. Barr. I commend your tenderness and modesty; yet must tell you, these are but general and weak excuses. As for your time and trouble, it is not much; and however, can it be better spent than in doing justice, and serving your country? to withdraw yourself in such cases, is a kind of Sacrilege, a robbing of the public of those duties which you justly owe it; the more peaceable man you have been, the more fit you are. For the office of a Juryman is, conscientiously to judge his neighbour; and needs no more law than is easily learnt to direct him therein. I look upon you therefore as a man well qualified with estate, discretion, & integrity; and if all such as you should use private means to avoid it, how would the king and country be honestly served? At that rate we should have none but fools or knaves entrusted in this grand concern, on which (as you well observe) the lives, liberties, and estates of all England depend. Your tenderness not to be accessary to any man's being wronged or ruined, is (as I said) much to be commended. But may you not incur it unawares, by seeking this to avoid it? Pilate was not innocent because he washed his hands, and said, He would have nothing to do with the blood of that just one. There are faults of omission as well as commission. ...
Teens beat up 15-year-old girl and steal her shoes in Brooklyn
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 6, 2020:
How many news worthy items are current news items whereby teen is unmolested because teen is not only capable of self-defense - not only that power - but said teen lives in a sanctuary where other people are actually, really, honestly, truthfully, prepared to protect the innocent teen from the guilty criminals? Not news worthy?
Bloomberg: Trouble in Erdogan's new Ottoman Empire [bloomberg.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 6, 2020:
"Turkey also asked for U.S. help, in the form of Patriot anti-aircraft batteries to protect its troops, but Washington has proved reticent, angered by Erdogan’s purchase last year—over fierce U.S. objections—of Russia’s S-400 equivalent." After I read through Anthony Sutton's 3 part series on Wall Street the above makes much more sense as does the acronym MAD. In order to get arbitrary governments formed and maintained there is a clear need for something to fear to the point at which people give up their own power of morally based reason. As the phrase "the enemy of my enemy is my friend also suggests," and as the phrase "the lesser of two evils," reinforces the phenomenon, these words can be deciphered to then constitute a currency that competitively opposes The Official Narrative. It is as if Legalese (The Official Narrative) can be deciphered and translated back into morally based reasonable language. So in order: First 1884, the book by George Orwell published on June 8, 1949. Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace as 3 (greatest, middle, least evil) Aggressive Powers seek total dominance of the world, to turn the world into one dictatorship. 1. Oceania 2. Eastasia 3. Eurasia Next is the work of Anthony Sutton 1. Wall Street and FDR 2. Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution 3. Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler Now the phrases: MAD: Mutually Assured Destruction Actual meaning: Mutually agreeable turf boundaries (Profitable Monopoly Zones where The People in each zone are seen as Hereditary Property) The Enemy of my Enemy is my Friend Official Narrative: We must help fund every dictatorship that is in a current war with our currently designated enemy. Actual meaning: The People can be terrorized to the point of giving up all internal moral reason if they fear my friend, who is their enemy. The dictators running the dictatorship at home must spend the extorted wealth to fund all sides in the current wars that keep our home dictatorship running smoothly without having to unleash the dogs of war at home to suppress any revolutionary rebellions at home. The Lesser of Two Evils The greater evil will consume us so we must rise up and become lesser evil to prevent our demise at the hands of the greater evil. Actual meaning: We the dictators must be the greatest evil in our home territory and we can negotiate with potentially greater or lesser evil organizations to agree to allow each other free access to our home slaves. Now to the quote from the topic piece: "Turkey also asked for U.S. help, in the form of Patriot anti-aircraft batteries to protect its troops, but Washington has proved reticent, angered by Erdogan’s purchase last year—over fierce U.S. objections—of...
[castbox.fm] You don't need a socialist government to be a socialist.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 6, 2020:
"What if proponents of Socialism practiced it with their own money?" I've had enough of the left versus right dogma. Either people grant each other exclusive control of specified forms of property or rights or people turn instead to crime. Not left or right, not republican or democrat, not red or blue, the two sides are found to be right and wrong, or more precisely voluntary association or crime imposed upon innocent victims by guilty criminals. If people are using the word Socialism to stand in place of crimes such as fraud, extortion, robbery, rape, and all the aggressive violence required to enforce extortion, then the question asked can be answered factually, not ambiguously. "What if proponents of Socialism practiced it with their own money?" Then it would be Socialism practiced without resorting to crime. Why call it Socialism if all it is, all that makes it what it is in fact, is that it is theft, plain and simple. If it is theft plain and simple, then it is now fraud because now it is theft hidden behind a cloak called Socialism. People didn't start calling fraudulent government socialism until relatively recently, so that ought to clue some people in on the use of words to cloak crime under a false label, or behind a false flag. Before people started calling fraudulent government socialism fraudulent government was called tyranny, despotism, Oligarchy, Aristocracy, The Divine Right of Kings, Profitable Monopoly and The People as hereditary property, Nationalism, Empire, Colonialism, Subsidized Slavery, The Inquisition, Theocracy, Protection Money, Central Banking, and how many other cloaking devices? Debate in Virginia Ratifying Convention June 6, 1788 George Mason: "Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common defence; and by that clause (so often called the sweeping clause) they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws. Now, suppose oppressions should arise under this government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of those powers; could not Congress, under the idea of providing for the general welfare, and under their own construction, say that this was destroying the general peace, encouraging sedition, and poisoning the minds of the people? And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within the ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury?" What is a socialist's (criminal government counterfeiter) wet dream? Section 8 - Powers of ...
DIGITAL DOPES - Has anyone noticed how so many younger males especially are becoming digitally ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 5, 2020:
Attention deficit disorder is probably an apt label for this phenomenon. "This condition is sometimes called attention deficit disorder (ADD), but this is an outdated term. The term was once used to refer to someone who had trouble focusing but was not hyperactive." Causes? I think that this phenomenon can be generally associated with the steady increase in so-called spare time, which would require a steady increase in the standard of living and that also means a steady decline in the cost of living, the rising tide that lifts all boats (even the boats shipping the slaves). When the difference between survival and death (of individuals and groups of individuals cooperating) depends upon focused discipline, those lacking focused discipline lose, those excelling win. What is the effect of necessary focused discipline on creativity? I mean, can someone grasp a creative thought if their brain power is all used up on a specific necessary task at hand? How many inventions are attributed to the Eskimo people, over and above the inventions that help catch fish and make shelter from the cold? Were those inventions invented during down time in winter? Does this line of thinking apply to this question? What happens if the distraction that attracts the most people becomes a high intensity form of brain activity that requires the development of focused attention? Would someone invent such a thing, would it be approved or wanted? Would that reduce or increase the phenomenon of digital incapacitation? Would some people try to use such a thing to enslave mankind?
Isn’t this the “Intellectual” dark web, a type of crowd-sourced “think tank”?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 5, 2020:
I am attempting to post a photo. The concept of the Dictator's Dilemma may help in answering some questions on this subject matter dealing with miscommunication or non-communication. Currency (data) flows from the origin to the subject of those messages. Call it any name you want, and a useful name is Narrative. Another name is a Script. Dictated by the dictator running the dictatorship dictation serves as a script by which a specified narrative is disseminated from the origin to the subjects for consumption and use by the subjects. Thou shall not discuss topics amongst your group there at the bottom. Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868 "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned." So it shall be, and so it is forevermore.
Isn’t this the “Intellectual” dark web, a type of crowd-sourced “think tank”?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 5, 2020:
I find it very interesting, even telling, as in telling a story or confessing something interesting, that specific subjects that are of the utmost importance are not discussed with a deliberate effort to get to the truth of the matter. To put context on this phenomenon that appears to me as a confession I think the following quote fits as a poignant message relating to this matter. "For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country." Patrick Henry, 1775 In those times World War III was a real present danger. It wasn't then called World War III, but the point is to point out that clear and present dangers, such as pending World War, or ongoing Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace, have not been defended against effectively, despite claims of taking the steps to do so. So why isn't there any discussion on this matter? Or where is such discussion if it isn't here and now? Perhaps the following might lead to a viable answer: Q. Let me ask you finally -- this has been a long road -- how you regard -- what is your explanation for the fact that there has been such little national media coverage of these -- of this trial and this evidence and this event here in this Memphis courtroom, which is the first trial ever to be able to produce evidence on this assassination -- what has happened here that Mighty Wurlitzer is not sounding but is in fact totally silent -- almost totally silent? A. Oh, but -- as we know, silence can be deafening. Disinformation is not only getting certain things to appear in print, it's also getting certain things not to appear in print. I mean, the first -- the first thing I would say as a way of explanation is the incredibly powerful effect of disinformation over a long period of time that I mentioned before. For 30 years the official line has been that James Earl Ray killed Martin Luther King and he did it all by himself. That's 30 years, not -- nothing like the short period when the line was that the Cubans raped the Angolan women. But for 30 years it's James Earl Ray killed Dr. King, did it all by himself. And when that is imprinted in the minds of the general public for 30 years, if somebody stood up and confessed and said: I did it. Ray didn't do it, I did it. Here's a movie. Here's a video showing me do it. 99 percent of the people wouldn't believe him because it just -- it just wouldn't click in the mind. It would just go right to -- it couldn't be. It's just a powerful ...
I’m not sure I hold the “sins of the Grandfather” against this guy but this article has a lot ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 5, 2020:
California 50th District: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California%27s_congressional_districts#/media/File:California_US_Congressional_District_50_(since_2013).tif
Jordan Peterson. "My Question For Friedrich Nietzsche." [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 5, 2020:
To me telling oneself the truth is an example of a discovery of a value, but for me to discover this I think it must be already a given, or consequence of genetic instruction, to judge, consider, or evaluate life as valuable. In fact I think that the preset internal genetic predisposition to value life as valuable (survival instinct) is as necessary for complex living beings as it is for any other form of matter. If matter is held together (surviving) by the force of gravity, for example, then why is it not possible to see the same thing with complex human life, where gravity is replaced with an internal need to enjoy life, to judge life as valuable, to evaluate the value of life positively? An aversion to lies and liars, internally as well as externally, is a judgment in real time as well as an instinctual, built-in, uncontrollable reaction, just as is an aversion to severe heat. That is not to say that everyone without exception is born with this genetic disposition, and also it is not a given that people born with this genetic disposition (aversion to falsehood) cannot remove it, or have it beat out of them, one lie at a time.
UK.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 4, 2020:
Just a thought.
UK.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 4, 2020:
Someone ought to help that poor girl. Is it too much "therapy" or not enough therapeutic caring from those who ought to love her dearly?
Thoughts on this one?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 4, 2020:
"It’s the kind of story the media loves." Witch media? Do you mean the Corporate Nation-State Propaganda Organ? The man is a known pedo for many people who care to actually check the facts that matter, so... Is America now home of the child molesters and land of the pedos? Those up against Trump are jokes, and if the Deep State (or whatever name you want to slap on the former Elite or PTB) managed to rig the election in favor of Pedojoe or the Marxist wannabe, then there will be helltoupee.
Sara Carter.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 4, 2020:
Something that warrants an action in defense (cause of action) is lawful, and therefore a duty to be performed by an individual and another one and another one, or failing to do so the criminals take over government. That is a fact that matters to some, but apparently not enough. The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots Page 40 Private Prosecutors "For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action. Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, however, private prosecutors were prohibited from withdrawing the action pursuant to private agreement with the defendant. Court intervention was occasionally required to compel injured crime victims to appear against offenders in court and "not to make bargains to allow [defendants] to escape conviction, if they...repair the injury."
TOKEN BIDEN is a try hard wanna'be working real hard to sound like TRUMP 2020.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 4, 2020:
"He should be banned from politics for life and go take some history lessons and memory improvement therapy." A trial by jury case (according to the common law) would work to begin draining the swamp. The criminals like Biden perpetrate treason on the official record, so there is no defense other than to make false claims. A problem with actual due process of law is a general failure to accept it, let alone use it.
Biden Wins Alabama. [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 4, 2020:
I thought that the logical choice for the Deep State (formerly The Elite, PTB, Military Industrial Complex, etc.) was Bloomberg, who will not now be "suicided" to then give the Throne to Killary. Creepy Pedojoe versus the Marxist Communist Rich guy set on taxing the rich. Both are laughably competent at telling lies to get "elected." A lesson from history: The Athenian Constitution: Government by Jury and Referendum by Roderick T. Long "The practice of selecting government officials randomly (and the Athenians developed some fairly sophisticated mechanical gadgets to ensure that the selection really was random, and to make cheating extremely difficult) is one of the most distinctive features of the Athenian constitution. We think of electoral politics as the hallmark of democracy; but elections were almost unknown at Athens, because they were considered paradigmatically anti-democratic. Proposals to replace sortition with election were always condemned as moves in the direction of oligarchy. "Why? Well, as the Athenians saw it, under an electoral system no one can obtain political office unless he is already famous: this gives prominent politicians an unfair advantage over the average person. Elections, they thought, favor those wealthy enough to bribe the voters, powerful enough to intimidate the voters, flashy enough to impress the voters, or clever enough to deceive the voters. The most influential political leaders were usually Horsemen anyway, thanks to their social prominence and the political following they could obtain by dispensing largesse among the masses. (One politician, Kimon, won the loyalty of the poor by leaving his fields and orchards unfenced, inviting anyone who was hungry to take whatever he needed.) If seats on the Council had been filled by popular vote, the Horsemen would have disproportionately dominated it — just as, today, Congress is dominated by those who can afford expensive campaigns, either through their own resources or through wealthy cronies. Or, to take a similar example, in the United States women have had the vote for over half a century, and yet, despite being a majority of the population, they represent only a tiny minority of elected officials. Obviously, the persistence of male dominance in the economic and social sphere has translated into women mostly voting for male candidates. The Athenians guessed, probably rightly, that the analogous prestige of the upper classes would lead to commoners mostly voting for aristocrats. "That is why the Athenians saw elections as an oligarchical rather than a democratic phenomenon. Above all, the Athenians feared the prospect of government officials forming a privileged class with separate interests of their own. Through reliance on sortition, ...
[m.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 4, 2020:
Bad and worse treatment of all the people by criminals claiming to be the government in America is not news. Each individual who discovers each example of these facts that matter constitute an individual cause to act in defense against such treasonous harm. What could possibly happen once enough people combined their individual causes to act into a lawful cause of action? 18 U.S. Code §â€¯2381.Treason "Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States." Every infringement of specified natural rights constitute treason but only if words have common meanings. If criminals are allowed to take over government offices, then they can redefine the meanings of words to suit their individual needs each day. George Mason, June 6, 1788: "Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common defence; and by that clause (so often called the sweeping clause) they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws. Now, suppose oppressions should arise under this government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of those powers; could not Congress, under the idea of providing for the general welfare, and under their own construction, say that this was destroying the general peace, encouraging sedition, and poisoning the minds of the people? And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within the ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury?" There was a revolt by the Revolutionary War Veterans as the Central Bankers in charge at the time decided not to pay them. This is part of the story, the part not told by the Monopoly Founder Cult. So that is clearly a president. Then there was this: The Bonus Army Invades Washington, D.C., 1932 "Having no other place to go, the majority of the Bonus Army remained encamped in the city, despite the fact that Congress had adjourned for the summer. Finally, President Hoover ordered the Army to forcibly remove the veterans. On July 28 a force of tanks and cavalry under the command of General Douglas MacArthur stormed the camps and drove the veterans out. Their makeshift houses were then set ablaze." Experimental animals, cannon fodder. The ...
Are you bored of the clown show that is politics?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 4, 2020:
Like Martin Luther King Jr.? Oh, wait, he didn't ignore them, and received a death sentence by them for questioning their authority to issue death sentences for questioning their authority. Ignoring them as they spend your capacity to prosper, spend posterities capacity to prosper, which includes spending all the loot they steal that could be productively invested in our self-defense against them, so that we can safely ignore them, since their crimes no longer pay them so well out of our productive capacity to defend against them. https://www.usdebtclock.org/ The fuse was lit in 1789. There was at least one explosion of the bomb lit in 1789, an explosion that occured predictably from April 12, 1861 – April 9, 1865. The explosion killed off many patriots while the criminals at the head of the beast remained solidly in power, and they took that opportunity to seize more power: on the official record no less, well documented treason against all lawful principles, such as those principles clearly documented in the Declaration of Independence (before it was censured), and the Bills of Rights in each State, and the failed Amendments to the criminal Constitution of 1789. Proof: The fuse is lit: "But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw debt as a menace to be avoided, Hamilton perceived debt's benefits. "In countries in which the national debt is properly funded, and the object of established confidence," explained Hamilton, "it assumes most of the purposes of money." Federal stock would be issued in exchange for state and national debt certificates, with interest on the stock running about 4.5 percent. To Republicans the debt proposals were heresy. The farmers and planters of the South, who were predominantly Republican, owed enormous sums to British creditors and thus had firsthand knowledge of the misery wrought by debt. Debt, as Hamilton himself noted, must be paid or credit is ruined. High levels of taxation, Republicans prognosticated, would be necessary just to pay the interest on the perpetual debt. Believing that this tax burden would fall on the yeoman farmers and eventually rise to European levels, Republicans opposed Hamilton's debt program. "To help pay the interest on the debt, Hamilton convinced the Congress to pass an excise on whiskey. In ...
Senator Mike Lee: Bring accountability to the the intelligence community. [foxnews.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 4, 2020:
I see a problem. Congress is filled with treasonous criminals who get paid large shares of the loot they steal from everyone in all the States, at least from everyone who can still produce anything worth stealing including children. So they, these out in the open treasonous criminals, are claiming to be also in charge of holding another treasonous group to account for their treason? Every single infringement perpetrated, including malfeasance, misfeasance, and non-feasance, by those criminals in Washington D.C. - on the official record no less - is cause to hold them to account for those treasonous crimes: The Law of The Land (common law). U.S. Constitution : Article I Section 6 - Compensation, Privileges, Disqualification in certain cases. "1. The Senators and Representatives shall receive a compensation for their services, to be ascertained by law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in all cases, except treason, felony and breach of the peace, be privileged from arrest during their attendance at the session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any speech or debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other place." Words mean something to honest, productive, law abiding, moral people as civilized people move from birth to death. "...except treason, felony and breach of the peace, be privileged from arrest..." They are (with almost no exceptions) clearly documented as treasonous felons breaching the peace every single day. There is no Law in America, not until there is.
Young minority women are the target of crime.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 3, 2020:
“God created men; Col. Colt made them equal.” Abigail Adams to John Adams Braintree, Mass., March 31, 1776 "I have sometimes been ready to think that the passion for liberty cannot be equally strong in the breasts of those who have been accustomed to deprive their fellow creatures of theirs. Of this I am certain that it is not founded upon that generous and Christian principle of doing to others as we would that others should do unto us. . . . "
I believe that the standard "propertarian" answer for who properly "owns" the Earth's resources is: ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 3, 2020:
I suggest the following book on this matter: https://archive.org/details/equitablecommerc00warr/page/n6/mode/2up Example: "By natural wealth is here meant all wealth; so far as it is not the result of human labor. "The COST principle being made the limit of price, opens all this wealth to every one at once. "Land being bought and sold on this principle, passes from owner to owner with no farther additions to prime cost than the labor of buying and selling it. If improvements C have been made upon it, their cost only being paid, makes the natural wealth free and accessible to all without price. In this manner simple equity would free, not only public, but private lands, from the trammels of profit-making. If it could not be sold for profit, it would not be bought for speculation; and, it cannot be sold for profit in competition with those who will buy and sell it for an equivalent. Therefore, here is a power in simple equity which is perfectly irresistible to free all lands, and to keep them free—a power by which one person alone can open the land for miles around him, and make it accessible to all who require it. No power on earth can prevent him, and he can do it without sacrifice to himself." And: "That by dispensing with government we shake off the greatest invader of human rights, the nightmare of society. "That cost being made the limit of price, would give to a washerwoman a greater income than the importer of foreign goods—that this would entirely upset the whole of the present system of national trade—stop all wars arising out of the scramble for the profits of trade, and demolish all tariffs, duties, and all systems of policy that give rise to them—would abolish all distinctions of rich and poor—would enable every one to consume as much as he produced, and, consequently, prevent any one from living at the cost of another, without his or her consent. "That it would prevent the ruinous fluctuations in prices, and in business, which are the chief elements of insecurity, and which give rise to the unprincipled scramble, for property so prevalent in all civilized countries, in which, in the very midst of the most clamorous professions of righteousness, the rights of persons, of property, and the great interests of the whole race are practicably forgotten or disregarded. "That upon this principle the great problem of machinery against labor is mathematically and harmoniously solved—and that no other principles or modes of action can thus solve it. That upon this principle the disgusting and degrading features of our pecuniary commerce would be changed, and men could exchange their products with each other without degrading their own characters and destroying their self-respect in the operation. ...
Outlaw Gravity!
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 2, 2020:
While the dictators are at it how about changing red to blue? Starting tomorrow anything that was previously red will now be blue, or else.
There is no reason that people of different religions or none could not live together without ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 2, 2020:
The trend shifts from Centralization to Decentralization in obvious ways such as protestantism. Once one convinces everyone that he (or she) alone speaks for God, and once all the others fall in line or else, with plenty of examples of what is meant by "or else," then Centralization reaches a peak. All power produced by all flows to the one, and there are no exceptions allowed, as per God, says the one. Statism, run by someone and their fellow statists, is a Religion, once called The Cult of Personality, as exemplified in the "secular" Russian crime spree, under the false flag of a Bolshevik government. History leaves evidence of times and places where conflict resolution has peaked, 2 noteworthy examples are those times in England after the Roman Empire collapsed, when the Saxons imported The Law of the Land, and before the Divine Right of Religious Kings CON swung in favor of Centralization. The other noteworthy example was the time in America between 1774 and 1789, when the Law of the Land was recognized as the method by which conflicts are peacefully resolved the lawful way.
American Greatness. "America Has a Con Woman In Office. Where s the Justice?" [twitter.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 2, 2020:
Every single one conspires to maintain the confidence scheme started in 1789. They maintain the fraud perpetrated in 1789 that places 12 devil worshipers in black robes above The People and the common law: The Law of the Land. This is not news.
Anarchy Short: Anarchy came about in 1600's in contrast to organisation and lent itself to ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 2, 2020:
"Even in a moneyless world creative wealth will still flow to 20% of the people - the most successful people." Assuming that wealth can be standardized the above could be applied to that standard. Example: Wealth as measured scientifically as a stored energy such as can be measured with standard measures of energy: Calories, Joules, Watt/hours, etc. Stored water at higher altitude (gravity forces water through turbines), Petroleum (falsely called "fossil fuels") in tanks, Food in bins, Electricity in batteries (or water tanks), etc. The same standard measure works when applying the principle (accurate measurement of the facts that matter in any case) to devices, such as people who are willing to labor, and machines, such as 3D printing devices that make more 3D printing devices, however the idea of reaching the goal of a standard measure of value in calories in this case would require compromises for non-standard subjective opinions concerning how to arrive at that standard measure, since these forms of stored wealth require stored wealth consumed in the process of producing more stored wealth. Stored wealth in BANKS of power, such as an elevated tank of water exist naturally (see for example Hover Dam) as well as man-made stores of the same standardized easily proven measure of precise calorie output potential. Free water until the water tank empties in either case. No more free water until the device is refilled with free water. But again, calories were consumed to refill (or maintain) the stored creative wealth. "Even in a moneyless world creative wealth will still flow to 20% of the people - the most successful people." A standard practice among psychopathic (pathological) criminals has been the routine of deceiving innocent people so as to control innocent people, such as for example the often repeated claims of absolute authority of ownership of everything including other people. How much "creative wealth" flows from producers of anything worth stealing to those pathological criminals over the same time period as the time period described in the original Post above? 1600s to 2020 There are official attempts to quantify "creative wealth" and the flow of it. https://www.usdebtclock.org/ "But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an annual appropriation. Redemption of the principal would be left to the government's discretion. At the time Hamilton gave his Report on Public Credit, the national debt was $80 million. Though such a large figure shocked many Republicans who saw ...
How To End Unemployment Contrary to what some experts appear to think or at least suggest, ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 1, 2020:
Theocratic solutions to unemployment? How about accurately identifying the willful manipulation of purchasing power that prevents the natural flow of investment to producers who then employ people? Extorting productive capacity from producers on a National level through Central Banking Fraud decreases the number of people starting potentially productive businesses, causing a scarcity of employers, and therefore a relative excess of employees, with obvious natural economic consequences: too many employees fighting over too few jobs and the subsequent reduction in labor wages. That is not news required to be deciphered by a theologian seeking control over the central bank (one purse). The cause (at least a major cause) of so-called unemployment was found a long time ago, and a competitive solution (competition in money markets) was, and is, an obvious competitive solution to money monopolies. Secular, religious, or otherwise enforced monopolies cause economic distortions, they do not fix them. First in the importance of its evil influence they considered the money monopoly, which consists of the privilege given by the government to certain individuals, or to individuals holding certain kinds of property, of issuing the circulating medium, a privilege which is now enforced in this country by a national tax of ten per cent., upon all other persons who attempt to furnish a circulating medium, and by State laws making it a criminal offense to issue notes as currency. It is claimed that the holders of this privilege control the rate of interest, the rate of rent of houses and buildings, and the prices of goods, – the first directly, and the second and third indirectly. For, say Proudhon and Warren, if the business of banking were made free to all, more and more persons would enter into it until the competition should become sharp enough to reduce the price of lending money to the labor cost, which statistics show to be less than three-fourths of once per cent. In that case the thousands of people who are now deterred from going into business by the ruinously high rates which they must pay for capital with which to start and carry on business will find their difficulties removed. If they have property which they do not desire to convert into money by sale, a bank will take it as collateral for a loan of a certain proportion of its market value at less than one per cent. discount. If they have no property, but are industrious, honest, and capable, they will generally be able to get their individual notes endorsed by a sufficient number of known and solvent parties; and on such business paper they will be able to get a loan at a bank on similarly favorable terms. Thus interest will fall at a blow. The banks will really not be ...
The smallest minority on earth is the individual.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 1, 2020:
The can claim that up is down.
Truth and responsibility, not rights and freedoms - Jordan Peterson
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 29, 2020:
The truth is that some people grant other people the same rights as they will defend for their own survival. This is a right thing to do so as to survive as a species, a natural adaptation which affords more complex forms of life a glue that binds them into gaining the advantages of collective power found in simpler life forms. The truth is that some people refuse to grant other people any rights that they themselves enforce as a right to deceive (to take the life of the target one calorie at a time or all at once) innocent people, the right to extort, threaten, coerce, force, cajole, incorporate, subjugate, enslave innocent people, and the right to murder innocent people for fun and profit, while ensuring no one else employs that right against some people that have historically been called criminals: those who refuse to grant defensive rights to other people while they enforce their own offensive rights on other people. If it is claimed to be true, but it is not, is it possible to know this fact that matters, and grant each other the power to know this truth?
Simple truth
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 28, 2020:
What does that mean? This dude was a psychopath, so...
The Logic Of Ownership What is ownership?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 28, 2020:
I read the warning concerning comments, my intention is to share a working concept of ownership, to improve my own working concept, to sharpen it when dealing with obviously unworkable concepts as I see them. At the start of the Podcast I already encounter problems with the message as I hear it, and there is no way I can find to listen to specific statement made without restating the whole podcast from the beginning, therefore I will not be quoting verbatim. The speaker claims that ownership is determined by the court. That is like saying breathing is determined by atmosphere. People can’t own the air on Mars. People can’t own the air for long in a tightly sealed garage where an automobile is also owning the air as the internal combustion engine of the automobile consumes the air, turning the air into carbon dioxide. In other words if the court in question is a Court run by those running the Inquisition, an Exchequer Court, Star Chamber Court, Chancery Court, Admiralty Court, Equity Court, or other Summary JustUS court system of plunder, then those running the court are there to prove to anyone who dares to disobey any order without question that they, those running the court, own you. The analogy is that these owners of these despotic, tyrannical, Monarchical, Empire Building legalized crime courts are as the car is in the garage, owning everything including the life that will die as the more powerful court consumes life so long as life allows it to continue to run amok in the sealed garage. So right off the bat in the podcast on ownership a claim is made concerning the law as determined by an unspecified court. If it is the common law court in reference, then the speaker could explain that fact, and therefore ownership is decided upon as contenders of ownership seek the judgment of the country represented by 12 people selected by lot, which is done for many reasons, such as the reason to avoid obvious bias in any decision involving claims of ownership. Someone owning people, a despot, a tyrant, a human trafficker, would have to face the slaves he owns in a court before 12 people picked randomly from the whole people in the country, which could then include owners of slaves and slaves, and if there isn’t a unanimous decision concerning this claim of ownership, then the slave owner isn’t judges as one, or the slave isn’t judged as one, and both are set free from each other by that type of court in that case explained that way. If the slave owners own the Summary Justice courts, as was the case in early America in some colonies that became states, setting themselves free from British Court Systems of plunder, Tyrants claiming ownership of people, and either enforcing similar ownership of people, or setting everyone...
How do you solve a problem like Ilhan Omar? [thefederalist.com] Easy, vote out Democrats.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 27, 2020:
"How do you solve a problem like..." ? Fill in the blank to accurately identify self-evident, self-confessed on the official record, treasonous criminals. How do you solve that problem? Once upon a time in America there was the law of the land. Page 42 The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots Law Enforcement as a Universal Duty "Law enforcement in the Founders' time was a duty of every citizen. Citizens were expected to be armed and equipped to chase suspects on foot, on horse, or with wagon whenever summoned. And when called upon to enforce the laws of the state, citizens were to respond "not faintly and with lagging steps, but honestly and bravely and with whatever implements and facilities [were] convenient and at hand. Any person could act in the capacity of a constable without being one, and when summoned by a law enforcement officer, a private person became a temporary member of the police department. The law also presumed that any person acting in his public capacity as an officer was rightfully appointed." The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots Page 40 Private Prosecutors "For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action. Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, however, private prosecutors were ...
More political correctness in public schools.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 27, 2020:
And does anyone wonder why the public is turning toward home schooling?
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rules Facebook and YouTube are not bound by the First Amendment- ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 27, 2020:
And what does anyone anywhere expect from Summary JustUS Courts?
Jordan Peterson.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 27, 2020:
Time 4:29 or so... “...the law in a sense that’s underlying this kind of distribution so it’s really it’s not a consequence necessarily of structural inequality it’s built into the system at a deeper level than that so you know people talk about all the time about how unfair it is that 1% of the population has the vast amount of the money and 1% of the 1% has most of that money and 1% of the 1% of the 1% has most of that money but it is a, it’s a, it’s an inevitable conclusion of iterated trading games and we don’t know how to fight it we don’t know how to take from the people who have and move it to the bottom without it instantly moving back up to the top, different people maybe but still back up to the top, because even the 1% churns a lot, like I think you have a 10% chance if I remember correctly, you have a 10% chance of being in the top 1% for at least one year of your life and a 40% chance of being in the top 10% for at least one year in your life.” BullSHIT! If the system in question is free from the criminal system then credit, power, flows immediately to those who earn it, without restrictions imposed by criminals. The best at supplying music supply it, and as they supply the music they are the source of the music in real time, and those listening credit the supplier in real time. The best able to supply The Law don’t, and instead criminals take-over and they use that power to grab everything worth stealing from anyone who can still produce anything worth stealing under that system that works to destroy all life. The best able to supply The Money don’t. “...we don’t know how to fight it we don’t know how to take from the people who have and move it to the bottom without it instantly moving back up to the top, different people maybe but still back up to the top...” What does the following report: "Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire 14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Anheuser-Bush Brewing co. V. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318. The Jury found there was no lawful consideration and I agree. Only God can...
Jordan Peterson.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 27, 2020:
I've heard a variation on this type of law in another speech by Peterson, and in this context it is even less valid as a law in my opinion. The required conditions for this to become a law is confessed at Time: 0:29. "As your company grows incompetence grows exponentially and competence grows linearly, got it, right, because with 10, its 3 who are doing half the work, but at 10,000 its 100 that are doing half the work, so 9,900 of your employees are doing as much as the best 100. You might not even known who the best 100 are but probably they know, and maybe their peers know too." Accurate accountability of the facts that matter in any case warranting the effort expended to discover and then employ those facts is valuable, a value worthy of producing, worthy of producing at a rate that supplies sufficiently to meet the demands. If there is no demand, why would anyone work to produce the supply? If the law were factually that very thing, then people demanding the law could be facing these things reported by Jordan Peterson in this presentation, this speech. Account for the facts that matter in this case. So, apply it, if you care to do so, or I will demand and supply it on my own authority to do so. I will account for the facts that matter in this case, even though I may be the only one demanding it. The law is the desperate need to discover the facts that matter in any case where a criminal will harm an innocent. Given that fact that matters, the people seeking the law create a company and hire employees to produce the valuable commodity at the company store or factory or whatever you want to call it. You may not think it is valuable, but I do, so this company is only me, and so I demand that information, just for myself, and therefore I have to produce all the valuable stuff on my own: 100 percent of the productivity must be produced by me alone. Oh, wait, other people take it upon themselves to do this work too, and they leave products for other people to consume, and the cost for much of it is spent by the producer and given freely to everyone else. Bullshit? Nonsense? Those who produce anything worth value do so, end of story. If someone else can't figure out which individual produces which amounts, and therefore nothing is done to credit that individual for that specific output, then the law applied here is the cost of failing to know the facts that matter in the case. What did he say, exactly? "You might not even known who the best 100 are but probably they know, and maybe their peers know too." What else did he say, exactly? "As your company grows incompetence grows exponentially and competence grows linearly." That is a description of a criminal organization, a pyramid scheme, an ...
Who Loves Dictators? Bernie Sanders or His Rivals?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 27, 2020:
The history of Empire Building is long, even if the people supporting it have no recent memory of it. "In April 1898 Senator Henry M. Teller (Colorado) proposed an amendment to the U.S. declaration of war against Spain which proclaimed that the United States would not establish permanent control over Cuba. It stated that the United States "hereby disclaims any disposition of intention to exercise sovereignty, jurisdiction, or control over said island except for pacification thereof, and asserts its determination, when that is accomplished, to leave the government and control of the island to its people." The Senate passed the amendment on April 19. True to the letter of the Teller Amendment, after Spanish troops left the island in 1898, the United States occupied Cuba until 1902. "The Teller Amendment was succeeded by the Platt Amendment introduced by Senator Orville Platt (R-Connecticut) in February 1901. It allowed the United States "the right to intervene for the preservation of Cuban independence, the maintenance of a government adequate for the protection of life, property, and individual liberty..." The Platt Amendment was finally abrogated on May 29, 1934." Some people refuse to be annexed. If some people refuse to be annexed, but they are cornered like rats in a cage, what are their options at that point? This is not an isolated case. The dogs of war are let out regularly. What often happens in cases where the people do not want to be subjected to the dictates of dictator A, a foreign dictator, yet another dictator promises to save the people from dictator A. Enter stage left (or right) Dictator B. "In June of 1775, George Washington was appointed Major General and elected by Congress to be commander in chief of the American revolutionary forces. Although he took up his tasks energetically, Washington accomplished nothing militarily for the remainder of the year and more, nor did he try. His only campaign in 1775 was internal rather than external; it was directed against the American army as he found it, and was designed to extirpate the spirit of liberty pervading this unusually individualistic and democratic army of militiamen. In short, Washington set out to transform a people's army, uniquely suited for a libertarian revolution, into another orthodox and despotically ruled statist force after the familiar European model. His primary aim was to crush the individualistic and democratic spirit of the American forces. For one thing, the officers of the militia were elected by their own men, and the discipline of repeated elections kept the officers from forming an aristocratic ruling caste typical of European armies of the period. The officers often drew little more pay than their men, and there were no hierarchical ...
Rapid social change from the top down and the bottom up- [ammoland.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 26, 2020:
This is the basic principle behind decentralization (federation) as opposed to Nationalization, Consolidation, so as to enforce a Profitable Monopoly enforced by Aristocrats upon dumbed down subjects of criminal organizations faking the law power. The decentralized independent units of defensive power retain their capacity to adapt to each new attack perpetrated by each new attacker. Why this is hard to see, or comment on, I don't know, but my guess is that the dumbing down front is almost completely lost. Not lost completely as proven in each successive generation that discovers the facts that actually matter.
NM Governor tells Sheriffs to enforce red flag laws or resign- [bearingarms.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 26, 2020:
"It won’t work to save lives, but it did get Gov. Grisham a photo op. In my opinion, that’s hardly worth the violation of New Mexicans’ due process and Second Amendment rights. Thankfully, many sheriffs agree, and I wish them well in their continued opposition to the state’s new red flag law." Sheriffs have the lawful authority to deputize anyone in the county including anyone on any military bases in that county. The people in each county in New Mexico have the lawful authority to put the criminal governor before the people in a trial by jury to answer for her treasonous crime. These are facts that matter. Any Sheriff in any county in any state in the states federated voluntarily for mutual defense against all enemies foreign and domestic, which includes enemies domestic, has the lawful duty, the legal duty, to serve criminals a court date. The people in independent juries (grand and trial according to the common law) - any common law member of a jury - has the authority, the jurisdiction civil and criminal, to employ a common law Sherrif, to use the available means to protect and serve the community, to keep the community safe from warranted, obvious, on the official record, criminals in office, like any other criminal anywhere, anytime, disarming their victims before enslaving them.
Good! Trump Campaign files libel lawsuit against The New York Times... [reason.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 26, 2020:
DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESENIDENT, INC., a Virgina corporation, Plaintiff v. THE NEW YOURK TIMES COMPANY d/b/a The New York Times, a New York corporation, Defendant. RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2020 https://www.scribd.com/document/448966483/Trump-v-NYT
How does this work?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 25, 2020:
All production above consumption can be collectively accounted for in the term Surplus Wealth. When all production above consumption is reinvested toward increasing the rate of production the result would be maximum production. When criminals run governments the goal is to steal all Surplus Wealth (stolen from anyone still able to produce anything worth stealing including children) and use that productive power to produce all the required products required to keep stealing, a mountain of lies, never ending threats, and all the gear and people required to torture the disobedient into obedience, and all the gear and people required to kill all those who can't be fooled, threatened or tortured into submission. And of course, those criminals in power also have some other things that pleases them, so they buy those things too. None of those purchases are thereby invested in increasing productive power, instead the inevitable shift from producers to liars, thieves, extortionists, torturers and murderers results in an ever-expanding number of criminals and an ever-shrinking number of producers, and like rats on a sinking ship, the last rat eventually eats the second to last rat. That is how that works.
Adam Kokesh my candidate next election [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 24, 2020:
Time 30:14 or so... "Localization provides the opportunity for communities to reclaim unjustly-acquired property and make it more widely available if returning it to its rightful owners is not possible." Just let that go, Joe. No. What is the step by step process by which said individuals in said local communities use, each step of the way, "to reclaim" anything stolen by criminals pretending to be the government? Please consider the need to deliberately deliberate on this specific point of contention, or not, who cares?
Oregon: how is it possible for people writing laws to be this painfully stupid... [ammoland.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 23, 2020:
"Clearly, no one intent on eliminating your 2nd Amendment rights gives this any thought." They confess to a capital crime (treason is a capital crime) on the official record: red handed. It is an American (and British) tradition to be stupid. "It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States." Lysander Spooner, an Essay on The Trial by Jury, 1852 Shall not infringe means infringe at will, no body will mind.
Adam Kokesh my candidate next election [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 23, 2020:
"Localization provides the opportunity for communities to reclaim unjustly-acquired property and make it more widely available if returning it to its rightful owners is not possible. This is especially important for land that has been sequestered, but can be made available for homesteading and other productive purposes." Words needing concurrent meanings: Sequester "take legal possession of (assets) until a debt has been paid or other claims have been met." Homesteading "the granting of homesteads to settlers" Grant "to permit as a right, privilege, or favor" The right to breath assumes the right to be someplace (a location, as in a locality) to breath. I can remember at least 3 definitions for land ownership that I can find and quote, but for now I think it is important to wing it on my own authority to claim ownership of the enforceable concept of land title. Call it, if you will, Stewardship of exclusive control over vacant land. Anyone landing on vacant land can, if that individual wills it, either abuse the land, improve the land, or move on. Extreme examples: An example of abuse of the right to breath air at a location: Dump extremely lethal toxins on the vacant land which is land that rain often washes over the land and that water empties in a constantly flowing river whereby the river runs at long length downstream and supplies much needed water to occupied land occupied by many peaceful, reasonable, non-aggressively violent, moral, productive, valuable, people. An example of improvement of the location at which an individual has the right to breath air: Clean up the toxins left by the abuser of land, rendering the power to destroy any further life caused by those toxins left by the abuser of the land null, and built onto the land a working capacity to supply a much needed item demanded by everyone needing that supply, and then setting in motion plans to pass on stewardship of the land in an inevitable future situation where the land steward is no longer capable of improving the land, nor returning the land to its natural state as it was before occupation by mankind on the land. An example of moving on from one location, traveling from that location, to another location, without either abusing that right to breath at any location, nor improving that location while breathing air: Hiker picks up, rather than dropping and leaving garbage. This goes hand in hand with a recent discussion about borders; in another topic. In the absence of a clearly visible defensive power an opportunity to abuse that weakness WILL be seized by an abuser. That, if history is worth anything, is a fact that matters, so there must be a power of deterrence that is greater than the natural vices built into ...
Adam Kokesh my candidate next election [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 23, 2020:
30:20 or so... On to property rights. Here is where I intend to work the information offered by Adam Kokesh and then bounce it back through this medium of exchange, this forum, this welcome topic, and this somewhat one-sided discussion. The two sides are Adam Kokesh (non-responsive) and me: one-sided. Point by point a discussion can move from A to B. A is where I see things now. B is where I see things now that I can add new data. I've been working on property rights as part of a theory concerning the meaning of the Latin term Legem Terrae, which is loosely translated in English as The Law of THE LAND. I have to do other things now, but I plan on returning to this, with quotes from Adam at that bookmarked time of 30:20 or so...
Adam Kokesh my candidate next election [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 23, 2020:
Time 30:30 or so.... "Large central governments have proven to be great tools for consolidating wealth in the hands of the few and the enforcers are paid to keep it that way." Here it is worth commenting in my opinion. The Federal government became unpopular among the Aristocrats (those who use false governments, or abuse of government, for filling their bank accounts) after the British Aggressors were driven off of the Territory then known as America. There was no mechanism in the Federal government by which the Aristocrats could steal wealth from those who produced it. The Aristocrats even had a hard time collecting claims of Debt as they financed both sides in the war at the Federal level, they had to work each State individually for collection of those Debts, as exemplified in the Massachusetts example which then triggered the Last Battle of the Revolutionary War. Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QSwmvMr9cY There was no Central Bank at the Federal level, there was no National Excise, Property, School, Income, or any Tax at the National Level other than a request to fund the Federal government that was thereby honored by the States (the people in the states through their representatives), and that was cause for concern for the Aristocrats, as well as concern for the Slave Consumers who had a hard time recovering their property when their property found sanctuary in a nearby Republic (an actual Republic where people are free and at Liberty). The point I want to point out here is that having no means to do as Adam Kokesh claims to be a systemic problem with "large central governments" is not one. The problem has nothing to do with a central location where decisions are made that affect members of an association, large or small. The GROWTH of the Federation was checked thereby as interest in FUNDING the Federal government was less after the defensive war, while people were recovering from the huge costs of defensive war, and there was no power in a Federal government to add FUNDING by criminal means: Central Bank Fraud and National Excise Tax to create the demand for the Central Bank issue of counterfeit money. So...blame as much as you want the centralization of a power that decides how the agreed upon agreement will be managed, you cannot throw that baby out with the bath water, not without breaking the agreement. In other words you can't get something (effective defense against the largest criminal army of aggression then on the planet) without that voluntary agreement to do so, and the power to make decisions that actually work to reach that goal. If the goal changes from Voluntary Mutual Defense then it is no longer a central government that is the exact size it ought to be, as determined by the investors ...
Adam Kokesh my candidate next election [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 23, 2020:
Time 24:00 or so... Localization. This is the acknowledgment of a natural law that localizes moral power in each individual (local to their own time, place, condition, experience, intentions, temptations, etc.) where the source of Law, the source of government, the source of choosing right instead of wrong, is localized in between each individual's ear. So that acknowledgment of that natural law has led (perhaps over and over again a thousand times in the history of mankind in different locations at different times) to applications of that natural law, such as those applications that lead to such messages as are those messages contained in the following: Equal Footing Doctrine Equal Rights Equitable Commerce The Sovereignty of the Individual Everyone is a King in his Castle (ridiculous if gender specific) Equal treatment in the eyes of the law Justice is blind No taxation without consent (without consent it is robbery disguised as taxation) Not taxation without representation Trial by the Country (not by a faction or dictator running a dictatorship which is merely a false flag flown over organized crime) So the concept, once acknowledged, that all forms of law (politics) is local, as in the hearts and minds of individual people, leads to means by which legal (political) power is afforded to everyone by everyone, and anyone claiming otherwise ought to be thereby known as someone who voluntarily decides, on their own local, lawful, political, authority to step (in their mind) above everyone else, and everyone else ought to (if not suffering a fit of insanity caused by word magic) recognize, acknowledge, and know without a doubt that the individual claiming to be above the law is confessing otherwise.
Adam Kokesh my candidate next election [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 23, 2020:
9:20 or so... On to ethics, misapplied to the word Federal Government. If he wants to throw a National government in the fire, more power to him, but here is where throwing the baby out with the bathwater is perhaps a rash thought, which could lead to a figurative abortion, as an unintended consequence when the goal is to get rid of the corrupted water. Data from the First Congress of the forming, framing, organic, grass-roots, bottom-up, FEDERATION of the United States of America: "That the question was not whether, by a declaration of independence, we should make ourselves what we are not; but whether we should declare a fact which already exists: That, as to the people or Parliament of England, we had always been independent of them, their restraints on our trade deriving efficacy from our acquiescence only, and not from any rights they possessed of imposing them; and that, so far, our connection had been federal only, and was now dissolved by the commencement of hostilities: That, as to the king, we had been bound to him by allegiance, but that this bond was now dissolved by his assent to the late act of Parliament, by which he declares us out of his protection, and by his levying war on us a fact which had long ago proved us out of his protection, it being a certain position in law, that allegiance and protection are reciprocal, the one ceasing when the other is withdrawn:" Ethics 101. We can agree to defend each other. When one of us then starts a psychopathic, insanely criminal, war of aggression, rioting in the blood of the innocent of their former associations in voluntary association, then hello, anyone home, knock, knock, anyone, hello, ahhhhhh, that is unethical. Who decides if it is unethical? I don't mean a trivial matter. I mean who has the ring? No one is allowed to have the ring? How about giving the ring to everyone as if everyone is on an equal footing legally, and lawfully, with everyone else, as if asking everyone for a decision, and the decision must be unanimous, without which one faction might overpower (take the ring for their own biased purposes) a lesser powerful faction? How about that idea? Not a good idea? Balderddash! Conspiracy Theory! Nonsense! Poppycock! You make no sense! How about someone else speaking instead of me the idiot? "As the trial by jury is provided for in criminal causes, I shall confine my observations to civil causes — and in these, I hold it is the established right of the jury by the common law, and the fundamental laws of this country, to give a general verdict in all cases when they chuse to do it, to decide both as to law and fact, whenever blended together in the issue put to them. Their right to determine as to facts will not be disputed, and their ...
Adam Kokesh my candidate next election [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 23, 2020:
Time: 7:50 or so... The only libertarian thing to do as president is to throw that power into the fire, or some such statement I did not quote verbatim. That assumes falsely that government (as defined by the one making the assumption) is evil, criminal, involuntary, immoral, offensive and therefore government is not good, not peaceful, not voluntary, not moral, and not defensive. My point here is to point out that words either have a common meaning used agreeably by people to convey accurate messages intended to be conveyed accurately so as to transfer ideas, intentions, plans, proposals, agreements, and other information intact, so that the one sending the message intends to send an accurate message and the one receiving the message receives the intended message as it was sent, where the message sent means the same thing to the sender as it means to the receiver. With that in mind, hopefully as intended, the point here that I want to point out is that someone intending to speak about organized crime could call organized crime organized crime, rather than calling organized crime: "government." If someone intends to convey to someone else an idea concerning methods by which people can defend against organized crime, would it make sense to speak of this defensive idea with the same words used to describe organized crime? Speaker: "I want to end organized crime, so I am going to rise to the top of organized crime and once at the top I am going to throw organized crime into the fire." Listener asking what the listener considers to be a valid question, which is not a listener asking if there was anyone else willing and able to start attacking someone who dares to ask a question: "What do you call your plan of action where you have this idea, you seek other people to share and support your idea, and then you defend against organized crime by throwing organized crime into the fire once you gain the top position at organized crime?"
What Happens to Postings
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 23, 2020:
I don't know. I can tell you that for some time now I save my comments (for the reason you state), so as then to offer precise examples of just exactly what was removed, when, and where, if someone volunteers to explain if, or why it happened. I sometimes hit the wrong button and my comment is lost, so I also write comments on a word processor first if it appears to be worthy of the effort.
Fairly Long Article but Worth a Few Minutes - Why Mercantilism and Economic Nationalism Will ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 23, 2020:
" Globalisation has created states that are less resilient, and more vulnerable to the sort of brutal economic shocks that may well accompany the coming coronavirus pandemic." The move in 1789 from Federation to Economic Nationalism was a move from Liberty to Globalization, or decentralization to centralization. This writer is ill informed, ignorant of history, or just another parrot spreading the lies produced by criminals seeking to gain or maintain absolute, or arbitrary, power. The federal union of many States (of any form formed according to the will of the people through rule of law in each State) protects the whole (each state) because each state is independent. The case of attack by man-made or nature made virus proves the point. A Global, or National Dictate to allow or not allow anything to move from outside to inside the area controlled by those in power affects (assuming it can be done) those in that area UNIVERSALLY. Assuming the power exists, the Globalists say: Let any lie, any threat, any act of aggressive violence, any virus, any war, to pass from one side of a border to another side of a border: NO BORDERS. Assuming the power exists, two competing powers say the same thing above, and the end result is virtually the same result. Assuming the power exists, two competing powers say opposite things above, and one power allows anything to pass into the area controlled by this power, and the other power does not allow specified things to cross that same border. If it is bad for mankind then the one allowing bad things in suffers from those bad things. If it is bad for mankind then the one not allowing that bad thing in does not suffer from those bad things. How simple can it get? Why make it complicated? Can anyone reading this understand the following in this context? Reclaiming the American Revolution: The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and Their Legacy by William Watkins "Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking into account any problems surfacing in Tennessee. If the plan proved to be a disastrous intervention, the other 49 could decide to leave the provision of medical care to the private sector. With national plans and programs, the national officials simply roll the dice for all 284 million people of the United States and hope they get things right. ...
Fairly Long Article but Worth a Few Minutes - Why Mercantilism and Economic Nationalism Will ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 23, 2020:
The original use of the word Mercantilism (reported in such works as Conceived in Liberty by Murray Rothbard) is a process exemplified with Monopoly enforcement of trade, such as Monopoly enforcement of the African Slave Trade. This type of criminal enforcement by counterfeit governments did, does, and will always destroy rather than build economies, it functions as a parasite on an otherwise healthy economy. Paring the term Mercantilism with Economic Nationalism thereby assumes (or I assume) that Economic Nationalism and Merchantilism just defined is the same thing: parasitic enforcement of power transfers from those who produce anything worth stealing - including children - to those who steal it through criminal means such as deception (fraud), threat of aggressive violence (extortion), and routine displays of horrid, torturous, murderous, and mass murderous violence (genocide and democide) also known as Merchantilism and Economic Nationalism. Why would someone want to read more fake credit afforded to the criminals who run governments? Are there new ways of lying about it, not yet published?
Is the Democratic party gone?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 23, 2020:
The 2 Party Monopoly in its present State is relatively less powerful than any competition against it in any form, such as a long list: 1. Actual Republicans learning the difference between a RINO (republican in name only) and an actual republican. 2. Actual Democrats learning the difference between a DINO (democrat in name only) and an actual democrat. 3. Libertarians learning the difference between a LINO (libertarian in name only) and an actual libertarian. 4. Socialists, Communists, Fascists, and other assorted criminals no longer posing as Republicans, Democrats, and Libertarians. Number 4 on the list gains power relative to the 2 Party Monopoly System of Extortion and Fraud (used to steal anything worth stealing - including children - from anyone still able to produce anything worth stealing while these criminals counterfeit governments) because - #4 gains power because - some people actually want the criminals in charge so they invest in the rise of those criminals to power because they are criminals, not because someone is fooled into investing in a counterfeit republican, democrat, or libertarian.
Adam Kokesh my candidate next election [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 23, 2020:
Time 4:30 or so... The question is posed "What would you do if you were president?" I'm going to answer that because I've done something similar internally as well as externally. This is a very good topic for discussion because representative government (rather than no government: brainless robots programed to make no decisions ever?) involves individuals who decide to improve life (solve problems or invent better ways of living) and individuals who run with the ball: representor, representee. The Rule of Law addition to government is such that representor and representee share the same goals, rather than packs of wolves sharing the goal of consuming the sheep. Wolves in human clothing do not represent sheep in human clothing, if you think so, then the word for you is criminal: do unto others (enslave, kill, consume) before they wander off and live a good life without your unwelcome, involuntary, non-consensual, deceptive, threatening, torturous, and murderous help. List: 1. End the FED 2. End the IRS 3. End the Kangaroo Court System, return America to Rule of Law: common law, law of the land, with trial by the country. 4. Return the combined military forces (foreign and domestic) to a defensive goal orientation. 5. Hammer home, accessing the Bully Pulpit, the step by step methodology for THE LAW OF THE LAND, so that everyone who cared to know in all the Independent States, each county, each city, each town, each church, each corporation, each family, can know their duty in that process. 6. End the Ministry of Truth (Department of Education) 7. End all National departments that are National, return all National Department Duties to Federal Duties if such Duties exist. 8. The last one includes Federal Prison Industrial Complex FUNDING. 9. Pardon Debt Slaves. (see 1 above) 10. Pardon non-victim (political) prisoners. That is a short list and there are many careful steps required along the way which demand many viewpoints adding to the effort to construct an effective, efficient, lawful, step by step methodology (including real time accurate assessment of progress) during the process of reaching the stated goals. Ending the Fed for example could involve a demand for someone like Ron Paul to fill a cabinet position to oversee that process with that goal. Ending the IRS is a no brainer, it goes hand in hand with ending The FED, for that criminal operation (IRS) is as violence is to deception the same way Extortion (IRS) is to Fraud (The FED) one does not last long without the other. "But let us not forget that violence does not live alone and is not capable of living alone: it is necessarily interwoven with falsehood. Between them lies the most intimate, the deepest of natural bonds. Violence finds its ...
Recovering a strong American conception of property rights- [thefederalist.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 22, 2020:
Having an enforced appellate (summary justice) court system in place after 1789 there would no longer be rights, any, not in the liberal sense of natural rights, as in absolute right to the land and the wealth created by independent use of the land. Gone are any natural rights, subject to the dictates of summary justice court "decisions." Property rights at the founding (previous to 1789): "In the name of these sovereign, free, and independent states we promise and engage to you that great privilege of man, the free and uninterrupted exercise of your religion, complete protection of your persons from injury, the peaceable possessions of the fruits of your honest industry, the absolute property in the soil granted to you to defend, unless you shall otherwise dispose of it, to your children and your children's children for ever." Federal Congress (previous to consolidation, nationalization, and subjugation 1789) The term allodial title is another way of communicating "absolute property" above: "Allodial title constitutes ownership of real property (land, buildings, and fixtures) that is independent of any superior landlord. Allodial title is related to the concept of land held "in allodium", or land ownership by occupancy and defense of the land." Modern Online Dictonary
The Constitution means your political opponents get due process too- [reason.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 21, 2020:
Comments, like the facts that matter, can be ignored, or sent down the memory hole, to protect and serve the plebs, and other willfully ignorant servants.
Think on this for a minute.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 21, 2020:
I don't know how absurd the absurd can get, but the upper limit is limited by the number of gullible people. How about a story-line type narrative in a vain attempt to expose this fraud? The Prince from African does not convince you that he will give you a lot of power if you just give him some first. He arrives at the door with a drivers license. It says right here: Prince of Africa. You are still skeptical, you ask for "Viable Identifying Documents." The Prince says, OK, how about this, and he hands you a note from Uncle Sam, on official paper, with a stamp, and it says yup, this dude is really a Prince from Africa, and he offers the best deal in town. Do you know what a Straw Man is, or a Man of Straw argument, or how about a Legal Fiction, any clue, any clue at all? No, then send your hard earned blood sweat and tears to the Prince so as to allow you perhaps one more day to shed blood, sweat, and cry about just exactly how much the Prince demands from you since you have provided "Viable Identifying Documents." Do you know why it is vital to enforce such things as Naturalization Acts? No? Get back in line.
Thoughts on this one?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 21, 2020:
"All around the nation, a lot of gun owners are getting ready to defend their right to keep and bear arms." This has been building at a steady rate since Waco, Ruby Ridge, and the OKFF. The beginning of the modern day so-called "Militia Movement" has been a series of decisions made by individual people concerned about a clear and present danger to all that is good in America, whereby the danger originates from the Legal Fiction headquartered in Washington D.C. The Major Media (Deep State is the modern term) has narrated this process all along the way, with examples of dogma such as the widespread use of terms such as the Militia Movement, Sovereign Citizen, and Conspiracy Theorist. Food for thought: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3trjBSYZP8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARPJJSPcFhM
Your thoughts on this one?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 21, 2020:
A crime is a crime even when the perpetrator claims to be a Prince from Africa. The actions confess what it is in fact, the words used by the perpetrator are often false, and therefore the word is as cheese is in a mouse trap. Looks like cheese, smells like cheese, oh, oh, now my neck is pinched and I can barely breath or eat, and I can't go anywhere, at least not without expressed permission from the one who maintains the better mouse trap. The history of the word socialism is like the history of so many other words that turn their coats like a statist to patriot to statist will do whenever the wind blows, a Romney for a recent example. Republic original: The Public Thing Democracy original: The Public runs the Public Thing Federation: Voluntary Association, which means join or leave at will, pay for or not pay for at will The Law of the Land: common law Socialism: NOT COMMUNISM according to the Communists written into the Communist Manifesto Learn from history or not, who cares?
The Constitution means your political opponents get due process too- [reason.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 21, 2020:
"The Constitution is not a guarantor of positive rights (free health care or college tuition), but the ultimate defense of negative rights—the right to be left alone from government intrusion." That is simply false. The Bill of Rights (written by a member of the cult at the time) guarantees absolutely nothing, it is vaguely written, and they are vaguely interpretable messages that can be interpreted in almost any way possible, and yet even the most absurd interpretations tend to oppose the messages in the body of the 1787 Constitution. Example: "To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions:" If the one in charge, this so-called President (of what exactly?) claims that protesters protesting taxation without representation constitute an "insurrection," then King George can order anyone he wants to join his Standing Army to then invade the former independent State, formerly under the common law, to suppress that insurrection. What happened to the Bill of Rights before the protest, during the protest, and after the invasion of Pennsylvania to enforce the payment of the National extortion fee, a fee which had to be enforced so as to create and maintain the demand for the First Bank of the United States counterfeit money printing con game? The Constitution affords the criminal dictator the excuse to steal anything anybody is still able to produce under a tyrannical government, the plan works so well the communists copied it. And people today, "educated" in "Public Schools," still parrot the lies as if somehow repeating the same lies enough times will make them true. Give the criminals in fake government office even more power, because they claim that more power is needed to "protect and serve" the people, and this time for-sure the transfer of power from those who are still able to produce anything worth stealing to those who steal anything of value produced, will, this time that transfer of power will, for sure, stop those who steal this way, stop them in their tracks for good, even though every time it was tried in the past made the problem worse, not better. Left, Right, whatever, it is the same lies, same cause for a return to actual law: accurate accountability of the facts that matter in any case processed universally the way that the process works to reach the goal of finding and employing the truth. The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots Page 40 Private Prosecutors "For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury ...
In many of my exchanges with Democrats, I'm confronted with the typical tactic of their asking ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 21, 2020:
First is so-called minimum wage, and the so-called Right also whine. The so-called right whine about paying the National Debt in the National Interest, but before doing so they whine about not having any National Debt. It turns out the the solution to the problem isn't. Problem: Workers are not paid fairly. Solution: Create a National Crime Cabal with a Central Bank that can pay anyone whatever anyone wants by simply writing an amount on a check, and charge the expense to anyone who dares to produce anything worth stealing, and then pay workers fairly according to the Criminals running the Central Bank Scam. Too complex to inspire any responding comments? The Right whines about paying off National Debt, so no comment? The Left whines about the wrong Dictator running the Nation? If only "my" Dictator were in power, then "we" would all be paid fairly! How about some evidence to link what was just offered in words above with the so-called minimum wage solution to a problem that isn't a problem itself, it is a crime in progress, a crime that benefits the criminals at the expense of the victims: so why fix it when the "problem" to be fixed is so enriching, and therefore not an actual problem? The problem that is supposedly being fixed by arbitrary government power (criminal power) is a distortion of what is known as a labor market. To turn this right-side-up, instead of up-side-down, the same market can be stated as a distortion in what is known as the employer market. The "problem" isn't a problem for those who profit from it, and therefore there is no need for a "solution" to a problem that is actually a benefit, a rapidly filling bank account, filled by simply adding zeros at will. If there are more employers, and fewer employees, the power shifts from the present distortion of power to a balance of power, or the balance of power shifts decidedly in the opposite direction: not enough workers and way too many people in desperate need of workers. The price of labor goes through the roof, and the cost of starting a business is determined by whatever the few workers are demanding for pay. Why would these distortions of markets happen in the first place? There is a distortion in the accurate accountability market. Too much bullshit, not enough facts that matter. The price of connecting accurate information to those who demand it is through the roof. People have to actually read, and to do so they have to pull their heads out of their asses. "But Hamilton wanted to go farther than debt assumption. He believed a funded national debt would assist in establishing public credit. By funding national debt, Hamilton envisioned the Congress setting aside a portion of tax revenues to pay each year's interest without an...
[ourfutureamerica.org] How are Democrats Doing in Advancing Their Agenda?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 21, 2020:
"Nice commentary, just the same." I would comment on that in the appropriate place but the button for commenting in the appropriate place does not work in this case; possibly a problem on my side of the net. What is nice about the commentary? Perhaps this: "...when two laborers are after one employer, wages fall, but when two employers are after one laborer, wages rise..." Perhaps that in the context of criminals in government pretending the fix the labor problem that isn't broke from their side of the fence, the slaves, after all, are. Too much text? I was loaded with a page full of links this morning, and I went through as many as I could before going to court. I found one among those many links to comment on hastily, just to get the game going, hit the ball back over the fence. What is the point? Fix the labor (slave) problem? It isn't broke, the are.
[ourfutureamerica.org] How are Democrats Doing in Advancing Their Agenda?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 21, 2020:
Raise Incomes and Restore Economic Security for the Middle Class "Increasing the minimum wage is central to this goal and the House passed a bill to increase the Federal minimum wage from $7.25 per hour to $15. " Central to the goal of protecting and serving people who are still able to produce anything worth stealing is decentralization. This lie has been deemed a lie the lawful way a long time ago. It is not NEWS, it is not NEWS WORTHY, it is perhaps worthy of the expenditure of time and effort (value) on arguing for the sake of arguing. The Central Bank prints as much money as those in power want, without limit, to keep the slaves divided and conquered. How does that work, someone broiled in modern day argumentation, might ask? "This facility of acquiring capital will give an unheard of impetus to business, and consequently create an unprecedented demand for labor, – a demand which will always be in excess of the supply, directly to the contrary of the present condition of the labor market. Then will be seen an exemplification of the words of Richard Cobden that, when two laborers are after one employer, wages fall, but when two employers are after one laborer, wages rise. Labor will then be in a position to dictate its wages, and will thus secure its natural wage, its entire product." Note the workings above, in those words written and published by the independent press in 1888. When capital is free to flow in free markets there is then a consequence by which the number of employers rises while the number of employees relatively shrinks. "...when two laborers are after one employer, wages fall, but when two employers are after one laborer, wages rise..." There is the fix on fixing poor people paid poorly by their masters who can pick in choose which slave to whip into blind obedience. Who are the masters? "Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of there interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire 14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Anheuser-Bush Brewing co. V. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318. The Jury found there was no lawful consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of ...
NBC. "Highlights Of the Democratic Debates." [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 20, 2020:
HIGH lights? There isn't enough light there to scatter rats or roaches.
Epstein is still kicking Moved Millions Since His Death Jeffrey Epstein's secret bank account ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 19, 2020:
In the absence of a viable method of finding the truth, there will be falsehood.
  • Level8 (85,725pts)
  • Posts777
  • Comments
      Replies
    1,895
    1,213
  • Followers 17
  • Fans 0
  • Following 1
  • Referrals11
  • Joined Oct 29th, 2019
  • Last Visit 3+ months ago
Josf-Kelley's Groups
Q is for question
460 members, Host
Voluntary Mutual Defence
37 members, Host
End Game (formerly Ryan Faulk Fans)
14 members, Host
Controversial Charts
48193 members
Jordan Peterson Group
25436 members
Ben Shapiro Group
22984 members
Joe Rogan Group
16342 members
Just Jokes and Memes
14494 members
Tucker Carlson Fans
13547 members
Dinesh D'Souza Fans
10234 members
IDW Topic-of-the-Day
9848 members
News From All Views
7277 members
DaisyCousens
5902 members
Tim Pool Group
5879 members
Sydney Watson Fanspace
5513 members
Classical Liberalism
4844 members
Canadian Politics
4019 members
Arielle Scarcella FanSpace!
2803 members
IDW Political Party
2798 members
Politically Incorrect folks
2480 members
Anti-Socialism
2269 members
Learning from Christ
2237 members
President Donald J. Trump... Latest
2066 members
Saving Western Civilisation
2056 members
RamZPaul
1889 members
John Paul Watson Group
1610 members
Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder
1567 members
Alex Jones Fans
1299 members
Conspiracy Truth : Wolves And Sheeple
1226 members
Stefan Molyneux Fans
1049 members
Anti Communists
1022 members
Emergency Preparedness and Survival
949 members
Libertarian Freethinkers
896 members
COVID-19
765 members
The Great Reset
708 members
The Second Amendment Sanctuary
649 members
True Crime Discussion Group
597 members
Conspiracy Research
575 members
Words of Wisdom
480 members
Feminism = cancer
474 members
International News
396 members
Comedy, Laughs and Humor.
327 members
Vaccine Education & Discussion Group
307 members
Ideas of God
291 members
The Case Against Corona Panic
250 members
Dr. Steve Turley Group
185 members
Joe Biden Is Not My President
178 members
United We Stand
153 members
The History Corner
150 members
Brain soup
128 members
IDW.Community Senate
124 members
ORIGINAL MEMES ( GREGORY ALAN ELLIOTT )
118 members
Liz Wheeler Fans Page.
116 members
Red Pilled Hotties (Yes you can still flirt & remain politically engaged)
107 members
Propaganda Clearing House
95 members
MGTOW: Exodus From The Plantation
63 members
Anarcho-Capitalism / Voluntaryism
55 members
IDW Liberty Alliance Culture War Room
49 members
Now You Are Talking With
48 members
Rednecks Anonymous
43 members
Current Events
28 members
50 Policies
23 members
Anthony Brian Logan Fans
21 members
Freemerica
19 members
Children's Health Defense
16 members
UnCommon Sense 42020 PodCast
9 members