Like
Haha
Sad
Wow
Hmmm
Grrr/Dislike
Send SmileNavigation
Bio
Born in West Orange, New Jersey, 1958.
1 oldest sister
2 older brothers
2 younger brothers
My first experience with data that did not fit the Official Narrative (propaganda) was a book I read in School for a book report. The book described data concerning the sinking of the Ocean Liner (false flag) that was the casus belli (excuse: false flag) for Americans to be deceived into fighting the Central Banker War called World War One. The ship that was sunk (murdering people aboard) to move power to the criminals running the Central Bank Cabal was the Lusitania.
The next big event which caused me to fully reject the Official Narrative (propaganda) was the massacre at Waco misreported on National Television (Corporate Propaganda Organ of the Nation-State Aristocracy).
Full BioThat event in Waco lead to my discovery of many other facts that support the more accurate narrative that I have been developing since Waco. I also managed to get on the National House of Representatives official Ballot for California District 40 (the number since then has changed). I ran against those who allow the National government to perpetrate capital conspiracy murder on men, women, , and babies in a Church; burning them alive after torturing them, experimenting on them, for months.
I've been a member of, fan of, student of, and thrown out of, or asked to leave:
The NRA
John Birch Society
United We Stand (Ross Perot)
JPFO (I won honorable mention for an essay)
Fully Informed Jury Association (removed me summarily from their forum)
Free State Project (removed me summarily from their forum)
Mises Institute (removed me summarily from their forum)
Libertarian Party (ran for National office)
Republican Party (joined to vote in primary for Ron Paul)
National Liberty Alliance (asked to leave after a year at the top spot in California)
Jury Duty (once on a jury, asked to leave by both prosecutor and defense, the judge wanted me to stay)
I worked about 70 hours a week while running for office, and at construction I worked for just over 25 years, then suffered a list of health problems, currently semi-retired.
Married for good, 2 already grown up.
I wrote a book, published it, printed it (misprinted) and am working on a second book.
Comments
[youtube.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 13, 2020:
At time 21:00 or so, speaking about the Pareto Principle (80/20 rule?), it was claimed that given enough time a number of traders flipping a coin ends up with one individual with all the money. I think that that is intellectual dishonesty. That is the zero sum game taught in the game Monopoly, an aptly titled game. Why would players in the game be spirited away to the gulag? Why would competitors in the game be exiled from the game? Why would one of the players in the example offered by Jordan Peterson fail to go out and get more money, then return to the game? Why is it important to tell this story about a game where those who fail are removed from the game? Why is that practice of removing players from the game confused with a natural law?
Around that time in the video is the following:
"If you look at creative production in any domain...what you find is that a very tiny percentage of people produce almost all the output."
And:
"It’s a deeply build feature of systems of creative production and no one really knows what to do about it."
Why are people incapable of seeing the true law power? Why is there so much power against people seeing and then using the true law power?
How about the total number of extremely destructive lies produced by all people?
"If you look at creative production in any domain...what you find is that a very tiny percentage of people produce almost all the output."
"It’s a deeply build feature of systems of creative production and no one really knows what to do about it."
Now look here:
"First in the importance of its evil influence they considered the money monopoly, which consists of the privilege given by the government to certain individuals, or to individuals holding certain kinds of property, of issuing the circulating medium, a privilege which is now enforced in this country by a national tax of ten per cent., upon all other persons who attempt to furnish a circulating medium, and by State laws making it a criminal offense to issue notes as currency.
"It is claimed that the holders of this privilege control the rate of interest, the rate of rent of houses and buildings, and the prices of goods, – the first directly, and the second and third indirectly. For, say Proudhon and Warren, if the business of banking were made free to all, more and more persons would enter into it until the competition should become sharp enough to reduce the price of lending money to the labor cost, which statistics show to be less than three-fourths of once per cent. In that case the thousands of people who are now deterred from going into business by the ruinously high rates which they must pay for capital with which to start and carry on business will find their difficulties removed. If they ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 13, 2020:
At time 21:00 or so, speaking about the Pareto Principle (80/20 rule?), it was claimed that given enough time a number of traders flipping a coin ends up with one individual with all the money. I think that that is intellectual dishonesty. That is the zero sum game taught in the game Monopoly, an aptly titled game. Why would players in the game be spirited away to the gulag? Why would competitors in the game be exiled from the game? Why would one of the players in the example offered by Jordan Peterson fail to go out and get more money, then return to the game? Why is it important to tell this story about a game where those who fail are removed from the game? Why is that practice of removing players from the game confused with a natural law?
Around that time in the video is the following:
"If you look at creative production in any domain...what you find is that a very tiny percentage of people produce almost all the output."
And:
"It’s a deeply build feature of systems of creative production and no one really knows what to do about it."
Why are people incapable of seeing the true law power? Why is there so much power against people seeing and then using the true law power?
How about the total number of extremely destructive lies produced by all people?
"If you look at creative production in any domain...what you find is that a very tiny percentage of people produce almost all the output."
"It’s a deeply build feature of systems of creative production and no one really knows what to do about it."
Now look here:
"First in the importance of its evil influence they considered the money monopoly, which consists of the privilege given by the government to certain individuals, or to individuals holding certain kinds of property, of issuing the circulating medium, a privilege which is now enforced in this country by a national tax of ten per cent., upon all other persons who attempt to furnish a circulating medium, and by State laws making it a criminal offense to issue notes as currency.
"It is claimed that the holders of this privilege control the rate of interest, the rate of rent of houses and buildings, and the prices of goods, – the first directly, and the second and third indirectly. For, say Proudhon and Warren, if the business of banking were made free to all, more and more persons would enter into it until the competition should become sharp enough to reduce the price of lending money to the labor cost, which statistics show to be less than three-fourths of once per cent. In that case the thousands of people who are now deterred from going into business by the ruinously high rates which they must pay for capital with which to start and carry on business will find their difficulties removed. If they ...
[youtube.com]
The Swine Flu Fraud of 1976 (60 Minutes with Mike Wallace)
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 30, 2021:
So far in my reading even so-called Small Pox was a fraud. The conditions ripe for disease are known and avoided when people are not misled by opportunistic psychopaths infesting all positions of power in a world without law.
Law is not even known by people today, rather people today are infected with the virus called falsehood, to a point at which people have generally lost their internal power of reason: their bullshit detectors.
"The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto
“Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.”
“The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.”
“How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.”
Take 100 people and see if any one of those 100 people (random sample of some means, such as "from a hat" or open a page in an address book, or blindly pick from a list of phone numbers) have ever questioned the "Germ Theory" which supports these "Experimental Treatments" known as "Vaccines."
People have been allowing their children to be injected with mercury for many years due to a well marketed false advertisement campaign exemplified by the Snake Oil Salesman.
The historical documents leave no reasonable doubt in my private study on the matter, meaning there is no reasonable doubt to me that accusations of treasonous fraud must move to independent grand jurors, and those independent grand jurors will find probable cause in validating the accusation. Independent grand juries will then present the accused with a court date based upon readily available inculpatory evidence which validates the accusation of Treasonous Fraud on the part of the leadership leading the latest versions of the Snake Oil Salesman routine crime.
A Bill Gates, for example, would be named on the accusation, the presumption of innocence would follow the course of due process of law, the accuser/prosecutor representing the accuser and The Public (a criminal case) would present the jury with all the available evidence, and if the jury demands further evidence those jurors can enlist a ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 30, 2021:
So far in my reading even so-called Small Pox was a fraud. The conditions ripe for disease are known and avoided when people are not misled by opportunistic psychopaths infesting all positions of power in a world without law.
Law is not even known by people today, rather people today are infected with the virus called falsehood, to a point at which people have generally lost their internal power of reason: their bullshit detectors.
"The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto
“Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.”
“The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.”
“How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.”
Take 100 people and see if any one of those 100 people (random sample of some means, such as "from a hat" or open a page in an address book, or blindly pick from a list of phone numbers) have ever questioned the "Germ Theory" which supports these "Experimental Treatments" known as "Vaccines."
People have been allowing their children to be injected with mercury for many years due to a well marketed false advertisement campaign exemplified by the Snake Oil Salesman.
The historical documents leave no reasonable doubt in my private study on the matter, meaning there is no reasonable doubt to me that accusations of treasonous fraud must move to independent grand jurors, and those independent grand jurors will find probable cause in validating the accusation. Independent grand juries will then present the accused with a court date based upon readily available inculpatory evidence which validates the accusation of Treasonous Fraud on the part of the leadership leading the latest versions of the Snake Oil Salesman routine crime.
A Bill Gates, for example, would be named on the accusation, the presumption of innocence would follow the course of due process of law, the accuser/prosecutor representing the accuser and The Public (a criminal case) would present the jury with all the available evidence, and if the jury demands further evidence those jurors can enlist a ...
Joe Biden a 'lame duck president'[youtube.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Dec 26, 2021:
PEDO
Whatever else is charged to those not addressing the serious matter.
Josf-Kelley comments on Dec 26, 2021:
PEDO
Whatever else is charged to those not addressing the serious matter.
I've said for months that Comrade Prime Minister would pull the trigger on a Fauxvid False Flag ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 17, 2021:
I have this on deck, and if it does address the Central Banking Fraud Money Monopoly Power Markets (U.S.D. Treasonous Fraud Notes currently on top of the pyramid), and the next move to (attempt?) Checkmate on Crypto, then this is THE news item, all else tending toward distraction.
In a perfectly evil world the dominant psychopaths will enforce a Crypto Monopoly, but that isn't really possible; is it?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 17, 2021:
I have this on deck, and if it does address the Central Banking Fraud Money Monopoly Power Markets (U.S.D. Treasonous Fraud Notes currently on top of the pyramid), and the next move to (attempt?) Checkmate on Crypto, then this is THE news item, all else tending toward distraction.
In a perfectly evil world the dominant psychopaths will enforce a Crypto Monopoly, but that isn't really possible; is it?
The Legendary Story of How President Andrew Jackson Killed a Man in a ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 20, 2022:
A case of slander in an outlaw state.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 20, 2022:
A case of slander in an outlaw state.
After watching a YouTube video on the decentralization of government, I’m finding myself intrigued...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 31, 2020:
“Psychopaths poses traits very useful to those who desire power. The best way to deal with the threat that these people pose is to limit the power they can obtain, and thus the damage they can do, and again this is best achieved through decentralization.” Narrator
Look for example George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Robert Morris, and John Adams who were all members of the Nationalist Party hidden behind a false Federalist Party fraud.
“There is nothing in the constitution of men or states that can prevent the rise of dictators...Power maniacs exist everywhere...The only difference lies in the degree of tyrannical government which, in turn, depends once more on the size of power of the countries falling victims to it.” (Leopold Kohr, The Breakdown of Nations)
The size of the group of people wanting government (look into the work of Thomas Paine) merely demands a representative form instead of a democratic form.
“Not all people desire to live in communities organized under the same social institutions. Some people favor free markets, while others believe that socialism is a far more just way to organize a society.” Narrator
Wrong, the problem is that some people favor criminal forms of government (involuntary association also known as “subsidized slavery”...), while other people favor voluntary associations for mutual defense, or for other reasons, with the basic principle of voluntary association as the foundation of government.
“If freedom of choice is considered an advantage economically, why not also politically? For, with a great multitude of systems prevailing in an area inhabited by hundreds of millions of people, it becomes mathematically inevitable that far more individuals are able to obtain what their hearts desire than if the same region were to permit only a single system, even as in a restaurant many more people can obtain satisfaction if the menu includes a great variety of dishes rather than a single one which can be made palatable to all only through the propaganda of the cook.” (Leopold Kohr)
Again, those who favor involuntary association (subsidized slavery) are criminals, and they gain power by criminal means, including deception, threat of aggressive violence, and very well demonstrated aggressive violence by criminals upon victims. If people conflate involuntary association with voluntary association, as if both are the same thing, then people will confuse actual government, based upon actual law power, with the opposite, which is counterfeit government, fake government, and RULE BY CRIMINAL MEANS. If people conflate the two then two obvious results are:
1. Actual government, and actual law, which is voluntary association, grows weaker as people confuse the actual government ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 31, 2020:
“Psychopaths poses traits very useful to those who desire power. The best way to deal with the threat that these people pose is to limit the power they can obtain, and thus the damage they can do, and again this is best achieved through decentralization.” Narrator
Look for example George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Robert Morris, and John Adams who were all members of the Nationalist Party hidden behind a false Federalist Party fraud.
“There is nothing in the constitution of men or states that can prevent the rise of dictators...Power maniacs exist everywhere...The only difference lies in the degree of tyrannical government which, in turn, depends once more on the size of power of the countries falling victims to it.” (Leopold Kohr, The Breakdown of Nations)
The size of the group of people wanting government (look into the work of Thomas Paine) merely demands a representative form instead of a democratic form.
“Not all people desire to live in communities organized under the same social institutions. Some people favor free markets, while others believe that socialism is a far more just way to organize a society.” Narrator
Wrong, the problem is that some people favor criminal forms of government (involuntary association also known as “subsidized slavery”...), while other people favor voluntary associations for mutual defense, or for other reasons, with the basic principle of voluntary association as the foundation of government.
“If freedom of choice is considered an advantage economically, why not also politically? For, with a great multitude of systems prevailing in an area inhabited by hundreds of millions of people, it becomes mathematically inevitable that far more individuals are able to obtain what their hearts desire than if the same region were to permit only a single system, even as in a restaurant many more people can obtain satisfaction if the menu includes a great variety of dishes rather than a single one which can be made palatable to all only through the propaganda of the cook.” (Leopold Kohr)
Again, those who favor involuntary association (subsidized slavery) are criminals, and they gain power by criminal means, including deception, threat of aggressive violence, and very well demonstrated aggressive violence by criminals upon victims. If people conflate involuntary association with voluntary association, as if both are the same thing, then people will confuse actual government, based upon actual law power, with the opposite, which is counterfeit government, fake government, and RULE BY CRIMINAL MEANS. If people conflate the two then two obvious results are:
1. Actual government, and actual law, which is voluntary association, grows weaker as people confuse the actual government ...
The Truth: Sidney Powell BOMBSHELL interview !
The republic is at STAKE !! If we want to be a free...
Josf-Kelley comments on Dec 15, 2020:
More than enough POWER to OVERPOWER the frauds? The alternative is blind obedience to falsehood without question, and some people want that shit.
Josf-Kelley comments on Dec 15, 2020:
More than enough POWER to OVERPOWER the frauds? The alternative is blind obedience to falsehood without question, and some people want that shit.
[youtu.be]
he Act of 1871: The “United States” Is a Corporation – There are Two Constitutions
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 13, 2021:
2 + 1 = 2?
No. 3 - New Constitution Creates A National Government; Will Not Abate Foreign Influence; Dangers Of Civil War And Despotism
___________________________________
Like the nome de plume "Publius" used by pro Constitution writers in the Federalist Papers, several Anti-Federalists signed their writings "A FARMER. " While the occupation of the writers may not have coincided with the name given, the arguments against consolidating power in the hands of a central government were widely read. The following was published in the Maryland Gazette and Baltimore Advertiser, March 7, 1788. The true identity of the author is unknown.
_____________________________________
"There are but two modes by which men are connected in society, the one which operates on individuals, this always has been, and ought still to be called, national government; the other which binds States and governments together (not corporations, for there is no considerable nation on earth, despotic, monarchical, or republican, that does not contain many subordinate corporations with various constitutions) this last has heretofore been denominated a league or confederacy. The term federalists is therefore improperly applied to themselves, by the friends and supporters of the proposed constitution. This abuse of language does not help the cause; every degree of imposition serves only to irritate, but can never convince. They are national men, and their opponents, or at least a great majority of them, are federal, in the only true and strict sense of the word.
Whether any form of national government is preferable for the Americans, to a league or confederacy, is a previous question we must first make up our minds upon. . . .
That a national government will add to the dignity and increase the splendor of the United States abroad, can admit of no doubt: it is essentially requisite for both. That it will render government, and officers of government, more dignified at home is equally certain. That these objects are more suited to the manners, if not [the] genius and disposition of our people is, I fear, also true. That it is requisite in order to keep us at peace among ourselves, is doubtful. That it is necessary, to prevent foreigners from dividing us, or interfering in our government, I deny positively; and, after all, I have strong doubts whether all its advantages are not more specious than solid. We are vain, like other nations. We wish to make a noise in the world; and feel hurt that Europeans are not so attentive to America in peace, as they were to America in war. We are also, no doubt, desirous of cutting a figure in history. Should we not reflect, that quiet is happiness? That content and pomp are incompatible? I have either read or heard this truth, which the...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 13, 2021:
2 + 1 = 2?
No. 3 - New Constitution Creates A National Government; Will Not Abate Foreign Influence; Dangers Of Civil War And Despotism
___________________________________
Like the nome de plume "Publius" used by pro Constitution writers in the Federalist Papers, several Anti-Federalists signed their writings "A FARMER. " While the occupation of the writers may not have coincided with the name given, the arguments against consolidating power in the hands of a central government were widely read. The following was published in the Maryland Gazette and Baltimore Advertiser, March 7, 1788. The true identity of the author is unknown.
_____________________________________
"There are but two modes by which men are connected in society, the one which operates on individuals, this always has been, and ought still to be called, national government; the other which binds States and governments together (not corporations, for there is no considerable nation on earth, despotic, monarchical, or republican, that does not contain many subordinate corporations with various constitutions) this last has heretofore been denominated a league or confederacy. The term federalists is therefore improperly applied to themselves, by the friends and supporters of the proposed constitution. This abuse of language does not help the cause; every degree of imposition serves only to irritate, but can never convince. They are national men, and their opponents, or at least a great majority of them, are federal, in the only true and strict sense of the word.
Whether any form of national government is preferable for the Americans, to a league or confederacy, is a previous question we must first make up our minds upon. . . .
That a national government will add to the dignity and increase the splendor of the United States abroad, can admit of no doubt: it is essentially requisite for both. That it will render government, and officers of government, more dignified at home is equally certain. That these objects are more suited to the manners, if not [the] genius and disposition of our people is, I fear, also true. That it is requisite in order to keep us at peace among ourselves, is doubtful. That it is necessary, to prevent foreigners from dividing us, or interfering in our government, I deny positively; and, after all, I have strong doubts whether all its advantages are not more specious than solid. We are vain, like other nations. We wish to make a noise in the world; and feel hurt that Europeans are not so attentive to America in peace, as they were to America in war. We are also, no doubt, desirous of cutting a figure in history. Should we not reflect, that quiet is happiness? That content and pomp are incompatible? I have either read or heard this truth, which the...
I think it's time for laser removal
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 14, 2021:
11/3/2020
The criminals were so desperate they actually had to stop counting the vote simultaneously in several key states.
1/6/2021
The criminals were again so desperate that they had to perpetrate yet another false flag blaming their victims for their treasonous crimes
1/20/2021
Desperation is replaced with rubber stamping as the RINO Pence fails to acknowledge the dueling electors sent to the National Government uncertified, yet the criminal Pence reads into the record an election result as if those states had certified the election.
3/4/2021
Forces for defense align, coordinate, and move step by grueling step against the treasonous criminal powers while people who care to know the facts that matter in the case are further polarized by the divisions in media sources dividing along clearly defined lines of accurate reporting, censorship of accurate reporting, and false propaganda openly contradicting itself in desperation.
3/20/2021
Summary Justice Debt Collection Agencies show their bias as members of the criminal cabal censoring, distorting, and blocking prosecution efforts to access rule of law.
Etc.
The forces volunteering for defense against the aggressive criminal cabal continue to learn, adapt, improvise, and create solutions while the criminals have only their 3 means to reach their criminal ends.
This, by the way, is not news.
To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine
November 15, 1802
"But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property. It is, therefore, no wonder that the "Rights of Man" was attacked by that faction, and its author continually abused. But let them go on; give them rope enough and they will put an end to their own insignificance. There is too much common sense and independence in America to be long the dupe of any faction, foreign or domestic.
"But, in the midst of the freedom we enjoy, the licentiousness of the papers called Federal (and I know not why they are called so, for they are in their principles anti-federal and despotic), is a dishonor to the character of the country, and an injury to its reputation and importance abroad. They represent the whole people of America as destitute of public principle and private manners.
"As to any injury they can do at home to those whom they abuse, or service they can render to those who employ them, it is to be set down to the account of noisy nothingness. It is on themselves the disgrace recoils, for the reflection easily presents itself to every thinking mind, that those who abuse liberty when they possess it would abuse power could they obtain it; and, ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 14, 2021:
11/3/2020
The criminals were so desperate they actually had to stop counting the vote simultaneously in several key states.
1/6/2021
The criminals were again so desperate that they had to perpetrate yet another false flag blaming their victims for their treasonous crimes
1/20/2021
Desperation is replaced with rubber stamping as the RINO Pence fails to acknowledge the dueling electors sent to the National Government uncertified, yet the criminal Pence reads into the record an election result as if those states had certified the election.
3/4/2021
Forces for defense align, coordinate, and move step by grueling step against the treasonous criminal powers while people who care to know the facts that matter in the case are further polarized by the divisions in media sources dividing along clearly defined lines of accurate reporting, censorship of accurate reporting, and false propaganda openly contradicting itself in desperation.
3/20/2021
Summary Justice Debt Collection Agencies show their bias as members of the criminal cabal censoring, distorting, and blocking prosecution efforts to access rule of law.
Etc.
The forces volunteering for defense against the aggressive criminal cabal continue to learn, adapt, improvise, and create solutions while the criminals have only their 3 means to reach their criminal ends.
This, by the way, is not news.
To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine
November 15, 1802
"But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property. It is, therefore, no wonder that the "Rights of Man" was attacked by that faction, and its author continually abused. But let them go on; give them rope enough and they will put an end to their own insignificance. There is too much common sense and independence in America to be long the dupe of any faction, foreign or domestic.
"But, in the midst of the freedom we enjoy, the licentiousness of the papers called Federal (and I know not why they are called so, for they are in their principles anti-federal and despotic), is a dishonor to the character of the country, and an injury to its reputation and importance abroad. They represent the whole people of America as destitute of public principle and private manners.
"As to any injury they can do at home to those whom they abuse, or service they can render to those who employ them, it is to be set down to the account of noisy nothingness. It is on themselves the disgrace recoils, for the reflection easily presents itself to every thinking mind, that those who abuse liberty when they possess it would abuse power could they obtain it; and, ...
House Passes 'ASSAULT WEAPONS' Ban, More Political ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 30, 2022:
The representatives of the people are the people capable of representing the (whole number of) people. Only those in a working republic represent the (whole number of) people, otherwise the so-called government is a Dictatorship involving people divided into factions and whoever has control of the Dictatorship has control over all the other factions.
The American federated republics made one step up from a number of republics, as representatives of republics formed a federation of republics, but all were still under the common law, but that only lasted in America from 1774 to 1789, and then the Faction known as the Nationalists Party Consolidated all the republics into One Nation-State Legal Fiction Monopoly of Power and Profit, and the Nationalist Party Faction, as a rule, considered all other factions as their property to do with as they please, and do so by giving themselves immunity from prosecution, doing that with the establishment of a National Appellate Court that over-rules common law jurisdictions.
Representatives of the people in a republic include each individual in each republican county capable of performing the duties of a private prosecutor, in criminal cases, taking on the duties of the Attorney General office, and that is done according to common law moral principle, precedent, statute, and code.
Anyone capable, meaning anyone, with or without a so-called "title" or "license" or "permission slip" from any officer holder in any position of government other than a Count Grand Jury.
A County Grand Jury assembles on their own authority or as warranted by the evidence brought to a County Grand Jury in all criminal cases, by anyone, including private prosecutors taking on the duties of an Attorney General, an elected Attorney General, or a County Sheriff, again anyone capable from the entire population (whole number) of the people.
Private prosecutors can "vote" to get rid of a suspected Treasonous Fraud Predator, and do to so the Treasonous Fraud Predator suspect is offered their Criminal Trial by Jury if the independent County Criminal Grand Jury (not government employees, and not directed by government employees) validates the accusation brought to them by the private prosecutor.
Each Grand Juror can "vote" to get the suspected Treasonous Fraud Predator to their County Criminal Trial by Jury in a County Court of law assembled for that Trial by Jury.
Each Trial Juror can "vote" to get rid of someone they find proven to be guilty of Treasonous Fraud Predation, and again, all this is according to well-established common law principle, precedent, statute, code, and rule of law on an equal footing.
Anyone caught red handed with confessions confessing the fact that they infringe upon natural rights not limited...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 30, 2022:
The representatives of the people are the people capable of representing the (whole number of) people. Only those in a working republic represent the (whole number of) people, otherwise the so-called government is a Dictatorship involving people divided into factions and whoever has control of the Dictatorship has control over all the other factions.
The American federated republics made one step up from a number of republics, as representatives of republics formed a federation of republics, but all were still under the common law, but that only lasted in America from 1774 to 1789, and then the Faction known as the Nationalists Party Consolidated all the republics into One Nation-State Legal Fiction Monopoly of Power and Profit, and the Nationalist Party Faction, as a rule, considered all other factions as their property to do with as they please, and do so by giving themselves immunity from prosecution, doing that with the establishment of a National Appellate Court that over-rules common law jurisdictions.
Representatives of the people in a republic include each individual in each republican county capable of performing the duties of a private prosecutor, in criminal cases, taking on the duties of the Attorney General office, and that is done according to common law moral principle, precedent, statute, and code.
Anyone capable, meaning anyone, with or without a so-called "title" or "license" or "permission slip" from any officer holder in any position of government other than a Count Grand Jury.
A County Grand Jury assembles on their own authority or as warranted by the evidence brought to a County Grand Jury in all criminal cases, by anyone, including private prosecutors taking on the duties of an Attorney General, an elected Attorney General, or a County Sheriff, again anyone capable from the entire population (whole number) of the people.
Private prosecutors can "vote" to get rid of a suspected Treasonous Fraud Predator, and do to so the Treasonous Fraud Predator suspect is offered their Criminal Trial by Jury if the independent County Criminal Grand Jury (not government employees, and not directed by government employees) validates the accusation brought to them by the private prosecutor.
Each Grand Juror can "vote" to get the suspected Treasonous Fraud Predator to their County Criminal Trial by Jury in a County Court of law assembled for that Trial by Jury.
Each Trial Juror can "vote" to get rid of someone they find proven to be guilty of Treasonous Fraud Predation, and again, all this is according to well-established common law principle, precedent, statute, code, and rule of law on an equal footing.
Anyone caught red handed with confessions confessing the fact that they infringe upon natural rights not limited...
Martin Luther King: As you press on for justice, be sure to move with dignity and discipline, using...
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 21, 2022:
"With you rests the power of perpetuating or destroying slavery. It lives by your sufferance, it dies at your mandate. We are well aware that these assertions will be received by you and others with surprise and incredulity. But we ask your attention to the following considerations and statistics."
Address to the Non-Slaveholders of the South, on the Social and Political Evils of Slavery, Tappan, Lewis, 1788-1873
ttps://archive.org/details/addresstononslav00lcamer
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 21, 2022:
"With you rests the power of perpetuating or destroying slavery. It lives by your sufferance, it dies at your mandate. We are well aware that these assertions will be received by you and others with surprise and incredulity. But we ask your attention to the following considerations and statistics."
Address to the Non-Slaveholders of the South, on the Social and Political Evils of Slavery, Tappan, Lewis, 1788-1873
ttps://archive.org/details/addresstononslav00lcamer
$900 USD to charge a TESLA?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 17, 2021:
The vulnerabilities of needed supplies of power are known by many people, perhaps not the sheeple.
An example:
Electric Grid Attack Could Kill 90% of U.S. Population
https://pandemic.warroom.org/2021/02/13/electric-grid-attack-could-kill-90-of-u-s-population/
Of course that type of prediction assumes that those in power destroy any competition by people who organize (or go at it alone) to solve the power scarcity problem on their own.
The simple fact that Power Producers Organize to form Cartels is lost on a lot of people. The forming of a Cartel is done to Monopolize (as best as possible) a target market. Once the Cartel is formed there is then an ability (a power) to restrict or flood the market at will.
Restricting the market results in rising prices.
Flooding the market results in lower prices.
None of that happens with competition.
Electric transportation fuel is a competitor for petroleum (it is not "fossil fuel") powered transportation.
Solar, Wind, Geo, Lunar, Bio, etc., is competition for Electric Grid Power Markets.
A simple way to look at this is by applying what I coined as Joe's Law:
Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.
The opposite is clearly true.
Power reduced into undersupply increases the price of power while purchasing power decreases because lack of power increases the cost of production.
The price of oil during a managed scarcity managed by the Petroleum Cartel can reach record highs when there are no competitive options.
The price of Purchasing Power (money) during a managed scarcity by the Central Bank Frauds can reach record highs when there is no competitive options.
What is the price of a bitcoin when a bitcoin was first offered in the Purchasing Power Markets?
Why are useful and needful things forced into managed scarcity, and by who and what army?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 17, 2021:
The vulnerabilities of needed supplies of power are known by many people, perhaps not the sheeple.
An example:
Electric Grid Attack Could Kill 90% of U.S. Population
https://pandemic.warroom.org/2021/02/13/electric-grid-attack-could-kill-90-of-u-s-population/
Of course that type of prediction assumes that those in power destroy any competition by people who organize (or go at it alone) to solve the power scarcity problem on their own.
The simple fact that Power Producers Organize to form Cartels is lost on a lot of people. The forming of a Cartel is done to Monopolize (as best as possible) a target market. Once the Cartel is formed there is then an ability (a power) to restrict or flood the market at will.
Restricting the market results in rising prices.
Flooding the market results in lower prices.
None of that happens with competition.
Electric transportation fuel is a competitor for petroleum (it is not "fossil fuel") powered transportation.
Solar, Wind, Geo, Lunar, Bio, etc., is competition for Electric Grid Power Markets.
A simple way to look at this is by applying what I coined as Joe's Law:
Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production.
The opposite is clearly true.
Power reduced into undersupply increases the price of power while purchasing power decreases because lack of power increases the cost of production.
The price of oil during a managed scarcity managed by the Petroleum Cartel can reach record highs when there are no competitive options.
The price of Purchasing Power (money) during a managed scarcity by the Central Bank Frauds can reach record highs when there is no competitive options.
What is the price of a bitcoin when a bitcoin was first offered in the Purchasing Power Markets?
Why are useful and needful things forced into managed scarcity, and by who and what army?
copied and pasted:
IF YOU HAVE HAD YOUR HEALTH DESTROYED BY A COVID VACCINE THE ANSWERS YOU ARE ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 6, 2021:
What is the cure?
If treasonous fraud is the source of the virus deception, then what is the cure?
If enough people are cured, what happens to the deceivers who are still running around deceiving people with their known virus?
I mean, more precisely, how are all the future victims inoculated so as to prevent them from being infected by this virus called deception?
How about, for example, a Notice of Liability used as a vaccine to inoculate innocent people and protect them from this horrible virus?
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 6, 2021:
What is the cure?
If treasonous fraud is the source of the virus deception, then what is the cure?
If enough people are cured, what happens to the deceivers who are still running around deceiving people with their known virus?
I mean, more precisely, how are all the future victims inoculated so as to prevent them from being infected by this virus called deception?
How about, for example, a Notice of Liability used as a vaccine to inoculate innocent people and protect them from this horrible virus?
An ammendment under attack 🇺🇲
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 17, 2022:
Words falling on deaf ears and beating dead horses are not my thing, notwithstanding evidence that "The Majority" indicate those conditions. There are those among us, always, that prefer the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, at the fork in the road where signs of free stuff a posted on the road veering off to the far LEFT or RIGHT of the moral path.
"The Constitution"
That may seem like a good thing to The Majority, and to ensure that it does, a Bill of Rights vainly attempted to put the criminal genie of tyranny back in the bottle, or similarly, the Bill of Rights was an attempt to vainly push the camel's nose out of the federal tent. Similarly, those very poorly written versions of natural rights, that version of Bill of Rights attached to that version of a Constitution, was a vain attempt to arrest the acceleration down the slipper slope knowable as Nationalism.
Alone, "The Constitution" was like "The Science" is today, no peer review allowed, either you accept the dictates of your dictator, or you will be subjected to the use of your former property, taken from you, to then force you to obey, and do so without question.
"The Constitution" with the attached, but failed, version of a "Bill of Rights," made the whole scene less criminal. Just like removing the N word, replacing it with the term "other persons," the criminals behind the monopoly with "The Constitution" had to deceive their intended victims or else their intended victims would not accept the annihilation of their republics that were federated for mutual defense of the republics, and by extension thereby, the defense of the people in each republic bound voluntarily in federation.
Naked, and without a vain and failed "Bill of Rights," the people could clearly see "The Constitution" had created an Empire, materially or principally no different than the British Empire, other than the change of color from Red to Blue.
Nationalists caught into the cult of Nationalism, as a rule, are not allowed to point out that their Emperor is, in fact, naked.
Furthermore, and more to the point, National Communists on the Nation LEFT, National Nationalists in the National CENTER, and National Socialists on the National RIGHT, all take steps from their founding foundation of Fraud, the same fraud that bears the fraudulent name Legal Fiction.
The orphans of Empire are herded toward their Nanny State that appears like magic out of the fog of lies, the smoke and mirrors, to arrive on the scene complete with the sheep costume, offering freedom from moral duty.
Free at last!
Nanny is here to stay.
"The question, then, between trial by jury, as thus described, and trial by the government, is simply a question between liberty and despotism. The authority ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 17, 2022:
Words falling on deaf ears and beating dead horses are not my thing, notwithstanding evidence that "The Majority" indicate those conditions. There are those among us, always, that prefer the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, at the fork in the road where signs of free stuff a posted on the road veering off to the far LEFT or RIGHT of the moral path.
"The Constitution"
That may seem like a good thing to The Majority, and to ensure that it does, a Bill of Rights vainly attempted to put the criminal genie of tyranny back in the bottle, or similarly, the Bill of Rights was an attempt to vainly push the camel's nose out of the federal tent. Similarly, those very poorly written versions of natural rights, that version of Bill of Rights attached to that version of a Constitution, was a vain attempt to arrest the acceleration down the slipper slope knowable as Nationalism.
Alone, "The Constitution" was like "The Science" is today, no peer review allowed, either you accept the dictates of your dictator, or you will be subjected to the use of your former property, taken from you, to then force you to obey, and do so without question.
"The Constitution" with the attached, but failed, version of a "Bill of Rights," made the whole scene less criminal. Just like removing the N word, replacing it with the term "other persons," the criminals behind the monopoly with "The Constitution" had to deceive their intended victims or else their intended victims would not accept the annihilation of their republics that were federated for mutual defense of the republics, and by extension thereby, the defense of the people in each republic bound voluntarily in federation.
Naked, and without a vain and failed "Bill of Rights," the people could clearly see "The Constitution" had created an Empire, materially or principally no different than the British Empire, other than the change of color from Red to Blue.
Nationalists caught into the cult of Nationalism, as a rule, are not allowed to point out that their Emperor is, in fact, naked.
Furthermore, and more to the point, National Communists on the Nation LEFT, National Nationalists in the National CENTER, and National Socialists on the National RIGHT, all take steps from their founding foundation of Fraud, the same fraud that bears the fraudulent name Legal Fiction.
The orphans of Empire are herded toward their Nanny State that appears like magic out of the fog of lies, the smoke and mirrors, to arrive on the scene complete with the sheep costume, offering freedom from moral duty.
Free at last!
Nanny is here to stay.
"The question, then, between trial by jury, as thus described, and trial by the government, is simply a question between liberty and despotism. The authority ...
Paul Harrell shoots 3 AR platforms and discusses barrel lengths.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 23, 2020:
Cool, thanks.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 23, 2020:
Cool, thanks.
[youtube.com]
Doctor Exposing Coronavirus! What do you think?
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 24, 2020:
If there is a test (see Koch's Postulates) to find a virus, but that test is not used to find a virus, then does it stand up to common sense that those who claim this to be a virus (while avoiding the steps to prove that claim) are lying? And lying at this level (world wide) is a very serious crime, so here me out, please, if then this is a crime, then where are the crime fighters? Why are trillions of dollars being spent in the name of fighting crime, yet that money appears to be funding it instead?
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 24, 2020:
If there is a test (see Koch's Postulates) to find a virus, but that test is not used to find a virus, then does it stand up to common sense that those who claim this to be a virus (while avoiding the steps to prove that claim) are lying? And lying at this level (world wide) is a very serious crime, so here me out, please, if then this is a crime, then where are the crime fighters? Why are trillions of dollars being spent in the name of fighting crime, yet that money appears to be funding it instead?
The Revolutionary Elite Eats Their Own - The American Mind
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 2, 2020:
"Take a closer look at the mob. A new study by Pew research says only 1/6 of the protesters are Black. Four out of five are Democrats. This is not the poor working class fighting for a livable wage. It’s an act of performance art staged and underwritten by our nation’s elite, in the tradition of Woodstock or Occupy Wall Street. A viral video was shared recently of a white woman clad in $300 worth of Lululemon designer yoga apparel yelling at a Black male police officer and an Asian female police officer that they are “part of the problem.” She’s not fighting for justice. She’s fighting to quiet her own conscience."
That is a good article, and I am incited into action by it. I read it and I comment. My actions are affected by those words. I want to add to the quoted words above, and my addition is to say that many of these fake protesters (inciting race war) are paid to do so, so they are merely employees who are merely following orders: just, just, just, following orders, and nothing more, nothing personal.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 2, 2020:
"Take a closer look at the mob. A new study by Pew research says only 1/6 of the protesters are Black. Four out of five are Democrats. This is not the poor working class fighting for a livable wage. It’s an act of performance art staged and underwritten by our nation’s elite, in the tradition of Woodstock or Occupy Wall Street. A viral video was shared recently of a white woman clad in $300 worth of Lululemon designer yoga apparel yelling at a Black male police officer and an Asian female police officer that they are “part of the problem.” She’s not fighting for justice. She’s fighting to quiet her own conscience."
That is a good article, and I am incited into action by it. I read it and I comment. My actions are affected by those words. I want to add to the quoted words above, and my addition is to say that many of these fake protesters (inciting race war) are paid to do so, so they are merely employees who are merely following orders: just, just, just, following orders, and nothing more, nothing personal.
Absolute Truth!!
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 7, 2020:
Another great one, downloaded, uploaded, thanks.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 7, 2020:
Another great one, downloaded, uploaded, thanks.
Ever wondered what’s wrong with the world?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 10, 2020:
The truth has a way of lighting things up.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 10, 2020:
The truth has a way of lighting things up.
Democratic strategist talks about Biden's deteriorating mental health: 'clearly not all there'.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 7, 2020:
Pedojoe is a time bomb. The dictatorship disease rots the brain, as the dictator no longer (or never) exercises the moral muscle, and the lack of strength in morality removes reason and logic, just as the lack of movement of limbs removes running or crafting.
The desperation is not simply palpable now, in the Marxist Party (hidden behind the false front and false flag of democracy: which is not so-called Majority Rule), the situation is as claimed by Thomas Paine, they (Marxist Treasonous Criminals) took enough rope to hang themselves.
Their only option now (the Marxists) is to dig faster into the hell of their own creation, and fewer, and fewer, Americans are stupid enough to dig with them.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 7, 2020:
Pedojoe is a time bomb. The dictatorship disease rots the brain, as the dictator no longer (or never) exercises the moral muscle, and the lack of strength in morality removes reason and logic, just as the lack of movement of limbs removes running or crafting.
The desperation is not simply palpable now, in the Marxist Party (hidden behind the false front and false flag of democracy: which is not so-called Majority Rule), the situation is as claimed by Thomas Paine, they (Marxist Treasonous Criminals) took enough rope to hang themselves.
Their only option now (the Marxists) is to dig faster into the hell of their own creation, and fewer, and fewer, Americans are stupid enough to dig with them.
Will the Midterm Elections Be Stolen?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 12, 2022:
The Treasonous Fraud Parasitic Predator Cartel members offer, not surprisingly, false choices.
A. Evil
B. Lesser Evil
C. The enemy of my enemy is my friend until NOT, and then I stab that fucker in the back.
Voting in a National Election is a National Narrative spread like a virus through the Nation State kidnapped population, so as to create a problem with a non-creative, uncompetitive, fraudulent solution.
Fraudulent Problem Stated:
We the people are
the rightful masters of both
Congress and the courts,
not to overthrow the Constitution
but to overthrow the men
who pervert the Constitution
Nationalism speaking Nationalism as if nothing but Nationalism can Nationalize we the people.
We the people give ourselves permission to give Nationalists permission to kidnap we the people and force we the people to pay Nationalists to do whatever they please to we the people without question, as we the people give Nationalists permission to immunize Nationalists against prosecution by we the people in courts run by we the people.
We the people give Nationalists a Witch Hunt Witch Court of Nationalists, by Nationalists, and for Nationalists, so that Nationalists can discover, validate, and persecute anyone of we the people Nationalists demand blindingly obedient timely extractions of surplus wealth produced by we the people, including a steady flow of infants flowing to Nationalists for Nationalists to do with as they please, not limited to ripping their innocent bodies apart so as to make bank on selling those parts to other Nationalists.
Nationalists give we the people three choices:
1. Pay National Communists on the LEFT, whatever they demand, without question.
2. Pay National Nationalists in the CENTER, whatever they demand, without question.
3. Pay National Socialists on the RIGHT, whatever they demand, without question.
Your choice.
Nationalists fraudulently claim that we the people cannot dutifully prosecute Nationalists as volunteer private prosecutors taking command of moral principle, precedent, statute, code, and rule of law on an equal footing.
Nationalists fraudulently claim that we the people cannot dutifully validate inculpatory evidence charged to accused Nationalists brought to independent County Criminal Grand Jurors assembled for that purpose.
Nationalists fraudulently claim that we the people cannot dutifully determine a just verdict and remedy as County Criminal Trial Jurors assembled in County Criminal Courts of Law for that warranted purpose in defense of we the people from Treasonous Fraud Parasitic Predators like Lincoln, the Emperor behind the Pogrom fraudulently called a Civil War.
Civil Rules in Civil Courts is uncivilized by confessions and body counts accurately ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 12, 2022:
The Treasonous Fraud Parasitic Predator Cartel members offer, not surprisingly, false choices.
A. Evil
B. Lesser Evil
C. The enemy of my enemy is my friend until NOT, and then I stab that fucker in the back.
Voting in a National Election is a National Narrative spread like a virus through the Nation State kidnapped population, so as to create a problem with a non-creative, uncompetitive, fraudulent solution.
Fraudulent Problem Stated:
We the people are
the rightful masters of both
Congress and the courts,
not to overthrow the Constitution
but to overthrow the men
who pervert the Constitution
Nationalism speaking Nationalism as if nothing but Nationalism can Nationalize we the people.
We the people give ourselves permission to give Nationalists permission to kidnap we the people and force we the people to pay Nationalists to do whatever they please to we the people without question, as we the people give Nationalists permission to immunize Nationalists against prosecution by we the people in courts run by we the people.
We the people give Nationalists a Witch Hunt Witch Court of Nationalists, by Nationalists, and for Nationalists, so that Nationalists can discover, validate, and persecute anyone of we the people Nationalists demand blindingly obedient timely extractions of surplus wealth produced by we the people, including a steady flow of infants flowing to Nationalists for Nationalists to do with as they please, not limited to ripping their innocent bodies apart so as to make bank on selling those parts to other Nationalists.
Nationalists give we the people three choices:
1. Pay National Communists on the LEFT, whatever they demand, without question.
2. Pay National Nationalists in the CENTER, whatever they demand, without question.
3. Pay National Socialists on the RIGHT, whatever they demand, without question.
Your choice.
Nationalists fraudulently claim that we the people cannot dutifully prosecute Nationalists as volunteer private prosecutors taking command of moral principle, precedent, statute, code, and rule of law on an equal footing.
Nationalists fraudulently claim that we the people cannot dutifully validate inculpatory evidence charged to accused Nationalists brought to independent County Criminal Grand Jurors assembled for that purpose.
Nationalists fraudulently claim that we the people cannot dutifully determine a just verdict and remedy as County Criminal Trial Jurors assembled in County Criminal Courts of Law for that warranted purpose in defense of we the people from Treasonous Fraud Parasitic Predators like Lincoln, the Emperor behind the Pogrom fraudulently called a Civil War.
Civil Rules in Civil Courts is uncivilized by confessions and body counts accurately ...
Every living thing is doomed to endure what it is willing to accept.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 13, 2020:
I am going to save that one, thanks.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 13, 2020:
I am going to save that one, thanks.
Let's make a hypothetical.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 13, 2020:
So...no rule of law in the list?
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 13, 2020:
So...no rule of law in the list?
Will the court decide or will congress?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 9, 2020:
"The only way President Trump won’t be President is if he concedes the election and that will never happen."
That explains the following false propaganda:
https://idw.community/group/ConspiracyResearch/post/148715/https-youtu-be-wzwrhlw7y8w-what-if-a-us-presidential-candidate-refuses-to-concede-after-an-electi
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 9, 2020:
"The only way President Trump won’t be President is if he concedes the election and that will never happen."
That explains the following false propaganda:
https://idw.community/group/ConspiracyResearch/post/148715/https-youtu-be-wzwrhlw7y8w-what-if-a-us-presidential-candidate-refuses-to-concede-after-an-electi
Russia Moves Reinforcements to Kharkov Region to Counter Ukraine Balakliye Offensive
...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 9, 2022:
https://thedreizinreport.com/2022/09/09/prepare-for-nukes/ Prepare for Nukes
Published by dreizinreport on September 9, 2022
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 9, 2022:
https://thedreizinreport.com/2022/09/09/prepare-for-nukes/ Prepare for Nukes
Published by dreizinreport on September 9, 2022
The Revolutionary Elite Eats Their Own - The American Mind
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 2, 2020:
"Well, the children have internalized their parents’ messages."
How many cases out of the total number of cases involve parents nurturing their children to be criminals who will perpetrate the crime known as rioting? Is that quote above an off hand way to say that a nebulous Legal Fiction (The Nanny State) is the actual parent while the people who bore these children are absent during the formative years of these children?
Out went the traditional family and in place is placed a legal fiction nanny state where trained propagandists pose as teachers?
Why does that sound familiar?
Oh, well there are people who confess:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wi5R9WI6_w0
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 2, 2020:
"Well, the children have internalized their parents’ messages."
How many cases out of the total number of cases involve parents nurturing their children to be criminals who will perpetrate the crime known as rioting? Is that quote above an off hand way to say that a nebulous Legal Fiction (The Nanny State) is the actual parent while the people who bore these children are absent during the formative years of these children?
Out went the traditional family and in place is placed a legal fiction nanny state where trained propagandists pose as teachers?
Why does that sound familiar?
Oh, well there are people who confess:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wi5R9WI6_w0
Is there another historical example of a government revolting against its people?
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 13, 2021:
America in 1789.
Secret proceedings and debates of the convention assembled at Philadelphia, in the year 1787, Page 13 Luther Martin
"One party, whose object and wish it was to abolish and annihilate all State governments, and to bring forward one general government, over this extensive continent, of monarchical nature, under certain restrictions and limitations. Those who openly avowed this sentiment were, it is true, but few; yet it is equally true, Sir, that there were a considerable number, who did not openly avow it, who were by myself, and many others of the convention, considered as being in reality favorers of that sentiment; and, acting upon those principles, covertly endeavoring to carry into effect what they well knew openly and avowedly could not be accomplished."
Does that sound at all familiar to anyone?
No?
How about this:
To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine
November 15, 1802
"But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property."
No?
There is much more evidence, words to the wise.
"The judiciary of the United States is so constructed and extended, as to absorb and destroy the judiciaries of the several states; thereby rendering laws as tedious, intricate, and expensive, and justice as unattainable by a great part of the community, as in England; and enabling the rich to oppress and ruin the poor."
George Mason, 1787
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 13, 2021:
America in 1789.
Secret proceedings and debates of the convention assembled at Philadelphia, in the year 1787, Page 13 Luther Martin
"One party, whose object and wish it was to abolish and annihilate all State governments, and to bring forward one general government, over this extensive continent, of monarchical nature, under certain restrictions and limitations. Those who openly avowed this sentiment were, it is true, but few; yet it is equally true, Sir, that there were a considerable number, who did not openly avow it, who were by myself, and many others of the convention, considered as being in reality favorers of that sentiment; and, acting upon those principles, covertly endeavoring to carry into effect what they well knew openly and avowedly could not be accomplished."
Does that sound at all familiar to anyone?
No?
How about this:
To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine
November 15, 1802
"But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property."
No?
There is much more evidence, words to the wise.
"The judiciary of the United States is so constructed and extended, as to absorb and destroy the judiciaries of the several states; thereby rendering laws as tedious, intricate, and expensive, and justice as unattainable by a great part of the community, as in England; and enabling the rich to oppress and ruin the poor."
George Mason, 1787
What say you?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 22, 2020:
When reality sets in, and actual concerns replace false propagandized fears, people dust off their own moral conscience, their own power of logic and reason, and they take steps to deal with potential confrontations with unreasonable people.
"We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth -- and listen to the song of that siren, till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those, who having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it."
Modernized:
They are apt to attempt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, such as the fact that they are the criminals, and they are running the government ever closer toward absolute dictatorship, and they manufacture a narrative that is based upon the "song of the siren" mythology, as they will transform many people into carbon copy beasts such as the criminals running fake government DEMONstrate that they are, but the victims they target include some who hold their own power of moral conscience dear enough to defend. Therefore we arm ourselves with the facts that matter in the case, and if peaceful means (actual law power) fails, we have more than rocks and sticks to defend ourselves when the criminals become even more violent, such as would be an order to poison each one of us with a Snake Oil Poison falsely called a Vaccine.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 22, 2020:
When reality sets in, and actual concerns replace false propagandized fears, people dust off their own moral conscience, their own power of logic and reason, and they take steps to deal with potential confrontations with unreasonable people.
"We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth -- and listen to the song of that siren, till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those, who having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it."
Modernized:
They are apt to attempt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, such as the fact that they are the criminals, and they are running the government ever closer toward absolute dictatorship, and they manufacture a narrative that is based upon the "song of the siren" mythology, as they will transform many people into carbon copy beasts such as the criminals running fake government DEMONstrate that they are, but the victims they target include some who hold their own power of moral conscience dear enough to defend. Therefore we arm ourselves with the facts that matter in the case, and if peaceful means (actual law power) fails, we have more than rocks and sticks to defend ourselves when the criminals become even more violent, such as would be an order to poison each one of us with a Snake Oil Poison falsely called a Vaccine.
Teen ordered to delete Instagram post about virus or face arrest-
[bearingarms.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 18, 2020:
Dr. Thomas Cowan:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/TEThRUAWIxR1/?fbclid=IwAR11lmuSyo8POD9lwvJJRom-aIIDAAJm6I6VMwl2z9h2xeajqxwiqzne1cE
Time: 6:54 or so... "...how we know that a certain disease or certain set of symptoms is caused by a micro-organism at all..."
Mention of Koch's Postulates, explaining the procedure. I can enumerate some of the steps:
1.
Use the procedure if a "virus" is suspected (don't assume)
2.
Example: meningococcal meningitis
3.
Everyone has the same symptoms (don't assume any symptom is good enough to fit the assumed virus)
4.
Blood culture (grow culture of 100% pure meningococcus from blood taken from victims)
5.
All people with this sickness have that one product growing out in their blood, and only that product found in the culture.
6.
None of the healthy people tested have this product growing in their blood.
7.
Isolate and purify the product (bacteria) from the blood culture, then inject that pure product into a susceptible Lab Rat (or if you are Bill Gates inject that into innocent people in Africa).
8.
100% of the injected Lab Rats (or undefended innocent people in Africa if you are Bill Gates) succumb to the same, or nearly the same, symptoms as everyone else whose blood grows this product.
9.
100% of the Lab Rats (or undefended innocent people) can be farmed to grow the same pure product from their blood.
10.
The Way We Prove Infectious Ideology
That is how it is done. That would prove something. If something is not proven, then it is not proven.
Who decides to launch a campaign to control the people on the planet earth based upon an assumption?
I can use my brain, with my moral conscience, logic, and reason, to piece the evidence together and claim right now that no one is that stupid, not if they have that much power. They know exactly what they are doing on a very specific schedule, based upon current realities.
If you do not want to continue to be a Lab Rat, then my suggestion is to look into the actual law power: please.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 18, 2020:
Dr. Thomas Cowan:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/TEThRUAWIxR1/?fbclid=IwAR11lmuSyo8POD9lwvJJRom-aIIDAAJm6I6VMwl2z9h2xeajqxwiqzne1cE
Time: 6:54 or so... "...how we know that a certain disease or certain set of symptoms is caused by a micro-organism at all..."
Mention of Koch's Postulates, explaining the procedure. I can enumerate some of the steps:
1.
Use the procedure if a "virus" is suspected (don't assume)
2.
Example: meningococcal meningitis
3.
Everyone has the same symptoms (don't assume any symptom is good enough to fit the assumed virus)
4.
Blood culture (grow culture of 100% pure meningococcus from blood taken from victims)
5.
All people with this sickness have that one product growing out in their blood, and only that product found in the culture.
6.
None of the healthy people tested have this product growing in their blood.
7.
Isolate and purify the product (bacteria) from the blood culture, then inject that pure product into a susceptible Lab Rat (or if you are Bill Gates inject that into innocent people in Africa).
8.
100% of the injected Lab Rats (or undefended innocent people in Africa if you are Bill Gates) succumb to the same, or nearly the same, symptoms as everyone else whose blood grows this product.
9.
100% of the Lab Rats (or undefended innocent people) can be farmed to grow the same pure product from their blood.
10.
The Way We Prove Infectious Ideology
That is how it is done. That would prove something. If something is not proven, then it is not proven.
Who decides to launch a campaign to control the people on the planet earth based upon an assumption?
I can use my brain, with my moral conscience, logic, and reason, to piece the evidence together and claim right now that no one is that stupid, not if they have that much power. They know exactly what they are doing on a very specific schedule, based upon current realities.
If you do not want to continue to be a Lab Rat, then my suggestion is to look into the actual law power: please.
On Happy Homelands, Styx recommended reading about the Salem Witch Trials- does anyone have good ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 28, 2020:
The Salem Witch Trials is covered briefly in the book Conceived in Liberty by Murray Rothbard.
Example:
59
Aftermath of the 1690s:
The Salem Witch-Hunt and Stoughton’s Rise to Power
Page 442
"If the Mather-Phips coalition had been allowed to continue in control, Massachusetts might have found a tolerable and even welcome path into the eighteenth century: the steady easing of Puritan restrictions combined with a decided drift back to the effective Massachusetts independence from royal depredatoins. In short, Massachusetts might have been able to advance toward a synthesis of the best of the two contending sides of the recent past: the self-governing and freedom of trad of the Puritans (without the theocratic persecutions), and the religious freedom and mercantile cosmopolitanism of the pro-royal opportunists (without the royal despotism). But such a synthesis for liberal independence was not to be. For at the heart of the new regime was a sinister canker: Lieutenant Governor William Stoughton. Stoughton was determined to overthrow this moderate liberalism in order that he and his friends – including the formerly discredited Joseph Dudley – might return to power, and that he might renew his plundering of Massachusetts.
"Stoughton and Dudley were determined to regain power and to reimpose a royal absolutism that they would lead, at the head of a newly plundering oligarchy. To do this they would have to discredit and eliminate Governor Phips. With great luck, William Stoughton found his opportunity at hand; opportunity to split the ordinarily antiroyalist masses and to rally the body of Puritan theocrats behind him. In short, Stoughton found a way to rally the two extremes, to swing the Puritan masses behind his Tory opportunists in order to crush the moderate center. This opportunity was the notorious Salem witch-hunt of 1692."
Page 443
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 28, 2020:
The Salem Witch Trials is covered briefly in the book Conceived in Liberty by Murray Rothbard.
Example:
59
Aftermath of the 1690s:
The Salem Witch-Hunt and Stoughton’s Rise to Power
Page 442
"If the Mather-Phips coalition had been allowed to continue in control, Massachusetts might have found a tolerable and even welcome path into the eighteenth century: the steady easing of Puritan restrictions combined with a decided drift back to the effective Massachusetts independence from royal depredatoins. In short, Massachusetts might have been able to advance toward a synthesis of the best of the two contending sides of the recent past: the self-governing and freedom of trad of the Puritans (without the theocratic persecutions), and the religious freedom and mercantile cosmopolitanism of the pro-royal opportunists (without the royal despotism). But such a synthesis for liberal independence was not to be. For at the heart of the new regime was a sinister canker: Lieutenant Governor William Stoughton. Stoughton was determined to overthrow this moderate liberalism in order that he and his friends – including the formerly discredited Joseph Dudley – might return to power, and that he might renew his plundering of Massachusetts.
"Stoughton and Dudley were determined to regain power and to reimpose a royal absolutism that they would lead, at the head of a newly plundering oligarchy. To do this they would have to discredit and eliminate Governor Phips. With great luck, William Stoughton found his opportunity at hand; opportunity to split the ordinarily antiroyalist masses and to rally the body of Puritan theocrats behind him. In short, Stoughton found a way to rally the two extremes, to swing the Puritan masses behind his Tory opportunists in order to crush the moderate center. This opportunity was the notorious Salem witch-hunt of 1692."
Page 443
Get this, in the 1800's it was the democrats that fought the republicans from keeping the slaves ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 8, 2020:
It is no more Democrat and Republican (left and right) than it is Black and White.
It is Slave Consumers (now called Human Trafficking) and the slaves.
Buy one, set him or her free, buy a young one, fresh, not yet turned into a nut case from abuse, if you can't then perhaps you are the slave.
I don't think that it is a coincidence that Maxwell is now ready for prime time or the door nob gallows.
On the 20th day of October 1774
This agreement contained a clause to discontinue the slave trade, and a provision not to import East India tea from any part of the world. In the article respecting non-exportations, the sending of rice to Europe was excepted."
On the 1st of April, 1775
"On this occasion, the importation of slaves was expressly prohibited."
"On the 21st of March, Congress recommended to the several provincial assemblies to exert their utmost endeavors to promote the culture of hemp, flax, and cotton, and the growth of wool, in the United Colonies; to take the earliest measures for erecting and establishing, in each colony, a society for the improvement of agriculture, arts, manufactures, and commerce; and forthwith to consider of the ways and means of introducing and improving the manufactures of duck, sail-cloth, and steel."
http://teachingamericanhistory.org/ratification/elliot/vol1/approaches/
______________________________
In the Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. I. p. 10
"The clause, too, reprobating the enslaving the inhabitants of Africa, was struck out in complaisance to South Carolina and Georgia, who had never attempted to restrain the importation of slaves, and who, on the contrary, still wished to continue it. Our northern brethren also, I believe felt a little tender under those censures; for, though their people had very few slaves themselves, yet they had been pretty considerable carriers of them to others."
http://teachingamericanhistory.org/ratification/elliot/vol1/approaches/
Thomas Jefferson
Declaration of Independence
"he has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating it's most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. this piratical warfare, the opprobrium of infidel powers, is the warfare of the CHRISTIAN king of Great Britain. determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought & sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce: and that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 8, 2020:
It is no more Democrat and Republican (left and right) than it is Black and White.
It is Slave Consumers (now called Human Trafficking) and the slaves.
Buy one, set him or her free, buy a young one, fresh, not yet turned into a nut case from abuse, if you can't then perhaps you are the slave.
I don't think that it is a coincidence that Maxwell is now ready for prime time or the door nob gallows.
On the 20th day of October 1774
This agreement contained a clause to discontinue the slave trade, and a provision not to import East India tea from any part of the world. In the article respecting non-exportations, the sending of rice to Europe was excepted."
On the 1st of April, 1775
"On this occasion, the importation of slaves was expressly prohibited."
"On the 21st of March, Congress recommended to the several provincial assemblies to exert their utmost endeavors to promote the culture of hemp, flax, and cotton, and the growth of wool, in the United Colonies; to take the earliest measures for erecting and establishing, in each colony, a society for the improvement of agriculture, arts, manufactures, and commerce; and forthwith to consider of the ways and means of introducing and improving the manufactures of duck, sail-cloth, and steel."
http://teachingamericanhistory.org/ratification/elliot/vol1/approaches/
______________________________
In the Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. I. p. 10
"The clause, too, reprobating the enslaving the inhabitants of Africa, was struck out in complaisance to South Carolina and Georgia, who had never attempted to restrain the importation of slaves, and who, on the contrary, still wished to continue it. Our northern brethren also, I believe felt a little tender under those censures; for, though their people had very few slaves themselves, yet they had been pretty considerable carriers of them to others."
http://teachingamericanhistory.org/ratification/elliot/vol1/approaches/
Thomas Jefferson
Declaration of Independence
"he has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating it's most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. this piratical warfare, the opprobrium of infidel powers, is the warfare of the CHRISTIAN king of Great Britain. determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought & sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce: and that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase ...
The Revolutionary Elite Eats Their Own - The American Mind
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 2, 2020:
"They don’t care about producing real change—they just want to be last one in line for the guillotine."
A clear and present danger to those in line for the guillotine is the arrest of one of the "Elite" whose crimes may soon become Public Knowledge from Public Trial Transcripts, or that one may RAT on the other RATS in a "plea bargain," or that one may find a guillotine in her cell made out of suicide rope.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 2, 2020:
"They don’t care about producing real change—they just want to be last one in line for the guillotine."
A clear and present danger to those in line for the guillotine is the arrest of one of the "Elite" whose crimes may soon become Public Knowledge from Public Trial Transcripts, or that one may RAT on the other RATS in a "plea bargain," or that one may find a guillotine in her cell made out of suicide rope.
FBI Agents Seize Phone Of Mike Lindell Associate | The Daily Caller
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 17, 2022:
All the loot stolen that flows into The FUND is used to maintain the process of stealing the loot.
Now, most of you know, or could know, precisely what constitutes an enemy of the moral people.
You can call it Globalism, but why do that when the forensic evidence documenting the flow of loot does not flow from each victim of this fraud to Globalists.
Here you are, producing things worth stealing, including children by the way, and there is a Globalist, someone known as Pedo Joe, and there you are made weaker today compared to yesterday, not without arguments claiming otherwise, but facts persist to forensically document the trend, and how are those facts employed if they are made out of pure fiction?
The Globalist boogie man in charge of The FUND can make Russians mad enough to unleash the dogs of...
Legal Fiction?
Dead bodies everywhere, and no one is ever facing a trial jury for some strange reason.
So, abandon the law of the land, the unwritten law, the ancient law, you know, or you don't, the will of the people expressed through private prosecutors voting to place a suspect before a criminal trial jury in a Court of Law, you know, or you don't know, the will of the people expressed through independent county criminal grand jurors validating a cause of defensive action at law, writing up a True Bill, presenting the indictment discretely to the defendant to offer the defendant the opportunity to clear the charges before a Count Criminal Trial Jury assembled expediently in defense of the public, the republic, and any defenseless victims wandering around presenting to weak morally minded individuals an opportunity to turn to crime.
You know.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 17, 2022:
All the loot stolen that flows into The FUND is used to maintain the process of stealing the loot.
Now, most of you know, or could know, precisely what constitutes an enemy of the moral people.
You can call it Globalism, but why do that when the forensic evidence documenting the flow of loot does not flow from each victim of this fraud to Globalists.
Here you are, producing things worth stealing, including children by the way, and there is a Globalist, someone known as Pedo Joe, and there you are made weaker today compared to yesterday, not without arguments claiming otherwise, but facts persist to forensically document the trend, and how are those facts employed if they are made out of pure fiction?
The Globalist boogie man in charge of The FUND can make Russians mad enough to unleash the dogs of...
Legal Fiction?
Dead bodies everywhere, and no one is ever facing a trial jury for some strange reason.
So, abandon the law of the land, the unwritten law, the ancient law, you know, or you don't, the will of the people expressed through private prosecutors voting to place a suspect before a criminal trial jury in a Court of Law, you know, or you don't know, the will of the people expressed through independent county criminal grand jurors validating a cause of defensive action at law, writing up a True Bill, presenting the indictment discretely to the defendant to offer the defendant the opportunity to clear the charges before a Count Criminal Trial Jury assembled expediently in defense of the public, the republic, and any defenseless victims wandering around presenting to weak morally minded individuals an opportunity to turn to crime.
You know.
The pendulum is swinging -
[bitchute.]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 29, 2021:
Direct linking (goes to the page, and someone can then cut and paste the link)?
https:// www.bitchute.com/video/Mb4IcGQRFveo/
This type of situation is coded into IDW:
1. People cannot view IDW posts without joining
2. A Forum Setting
a. Edit Group
b. Show Group Access & Use Options
c. "You can use this if you want members to be active before joining your group. By default, we require someone to join the site before viewing a group. You can make your group available to non-members by selecting the first option below."
3.
Linking an IDW Forum Page is NOT accessible to those who do not join the site.
4.
A good report, such as the one above, cannot be cut and pasted from IDW to YouTwitFace for other people to view the good report.
5.
The direct link won't post on IDW? I just tried, it does not post the direct link, it loads the video only in the IDW post: no loading of the direct link (it works with YouTube links?)
So...a gated community?
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 29, 2021:
Direct linking (goes to the page, and someone can then cut and paste the link)?
https:// www.bitchute.com/video/Mb4IcGQRFveo/
This type of situation is coded into IDW:
1. People cannot view IDW posts without joining
2. A Forum Setting
a. Edit Group
b. Show Group Access & Use Options
c. "You can use this if you want members to be active before joining your group. By default, we require someone to join the site before viewing a group. You can make your group available to non-members by selecting the first option below."
3.
Linking an IDW Forum Page is NOT accessible to those who do not join the site.
4.
A good report, such as the one above, cannot be cut and pasted from IDW to YouTwitFace for other people to view the good report.
5.
The direct link won't post on IDW? I just tried, it does not post the direct link, it loads the video only in the IDW post: no loading of the direct link (it works with YouTube links?)
So...a gated community?
The JUSSIE SMOLLET HATE HOAX WAS PRAISED BY OUR NEW VP CANDIDATE
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 11, 2020:
History must be rewritten if this is going to work!
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 11, 2020:
History must be rewritten if this is going to work!
Is the Democratic party gone?
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 23, 2020:
The 2 Party Monopoly in its present State is relatively less powerful than any competition against it in any form, such as a long list:
1. Actual Republicans learning the difference between a RINO (republican in name only) and an actual republican.
2. Actual Democrats learning the difference between a DINO (democrat in name only) and an actual democrat.
3. Libertarians learning the difference between a LINO (libertarian in name only) and an actual libertarian.
4. Socialists, Communists, Fascists, and other assorted criminals no longer posing as Republicans, Democrats, and Libertarians.
Number 4 on the list gains power relative to the 2 Party Monopoly System of Extortion and Fraud (used to steal anything worth stealing - including children - from anyone still able to produce anything worth stealing while these criminals counterfeit governments) because - #4 gains power because - some people actually want the criminals in charge so they invest in the rise of those criminals to power because they are criminals, not because someone is fooled into investing in a counterfeit republican, democrat, or libertarian.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 23, 2020:
The 2 Party Monopoly in its present State is relatively less powerful than any competition against it in any form, such as a long list:
1. Actual Republicans learning the difference between a RINO (republican in name only) and an actual republican.
2. Actual Democrats learning the difference between a DINO (democrat in name only) and an actual democrat.
3. Libertarians learning the difference between a LINO (libertarian in name only) and an actual libertarian.
4. Socialists, Communists, Fascists, and other assorted criminals no longer posing as Republicans, Democrats, and Libertarians.
Number 4 on the list gains power relative to the 2 Party Monopoly System of Extortion and Fraud (used to steal anything worth stealing - including children - from anyone still able to produce anything worth stealing while these criminals counterfeit governments) because - #4 gains power because - some people actually want the criminals in charge so they invest in the rise of those criminals to power because they are criminals, not because someone is fooled into investing in a counterfeit republican, democrat, or libertarian.
YahooFinance: JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon: 'Why can't we get it through our thick skulls?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 15, 2022:
Repeat offenders find opportunity to repeat offenses because no one prosecutes them, and when the offense is "pay me to make sure you remain a defenseless victim of fraud" it is virtually impossible for the victims to pay the criminals enough of what they demand as payment for those criminals to have mercy upon their victims.
What is the same question?
"Why can't..."
Why can't "we" ever pay the National-Debt Interest?
XIV - Citizen rights not to be abridged
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868
"The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned."
The masters let the slaves know that the masters cannot be questioned.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 15, 2022:
Repeat offenders find opportunity to repeat offenses because no one prosecutes them, and when the offense is "pay me to make sure you remain a defenseless victim of fraud" it is virtually impossible for the victims to pay the criminals enough of what they demand as payment for those criminals to have mercy upon their victims.
What is the same question?
"Why can't..."
Why can't "we" ever pay the National-Debt Interest?
XIV - Citizen rights not to be abridged
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868
"The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned."
The masters let the slaves know that the masters cannot be questioned.
What is worse than Nationalist Dominance FUNDED with a National Treasonous Money Laundering ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 7, 2021:
The Power Storage Problem solves the Use it or Lose it Problem.
When a criminal can get away with adding Purchasing Power to their Bank Account by book-keeping entry, that criminal can buy anything that money can buy by simply adding zeros to any Purchase Order with a Purchase Agreement, a Purchase Price, and a Power Transfer; a transfer of numbers from the buyers account to the sellers account.
Who exactly receives TITLE when Real Estate is repossessed?
Liar Loans = Power Storage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Am20lBo6xk
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 7, 2021:
The Power Storage Problem solves the Use it or Lose it Problem.
When a criminal can get away with adding Purchasing Power to their Bank Account by book-keeping entry, that criminal can buy anything that money can buy by simply adding zeros to any Purchase Order with a Purchase Agreement, a Purchase Price, and a Power Transfer; a transfer of numbers from the buyers account to the sellers account.
Who exactly receives TITLE when Real Estate is repossessed?
Liar Loans = Power Storage
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Am20lBo6xk
Please share this question.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 10, 2021:
Bots do not use reason, they merely obey.
"The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto
“Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.”
“The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.”
“How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.”
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 10, 2021:
Bots do not use reason, they merely obey.
"The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto
“Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.”
“The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.”
“How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.”
[paulcraigroberts.org]
We Live In A Fraud Of Unprecedented Dimensions
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 24, 2021:
"The illegitimate Occupant of the Oval Office Continues to Spread Disinformation Designed to Cause People to Damage their Health and perhaps Terminate their Lives by having the Covid shots."
History helps:
THE REVOLUTIONARY AMERICAN JURY:
A CASE STUDY OF THE 1778-1779
PHILADELPHIA TREASON TRIALS
Carlton F.W. Larson
"The British occupation of Philadelphia was the seminal event of the War for Independence in Pennsylvania. Following Washington's defeat at Brandywine Creek, the British army entered Philadelphia on September 26, 1777. The Continental Congress and the Pennsylvania state government had already fled the city, and Washington would eventually withdraw his army to Valley Forge for the winter. Historians estimate that about one-third of Philadelphia's population, some 12,000 people, had fled the city in advance of the invasion.
The state government, in exile in Lancaster, soon began hearing reports of Pennsylvanians who were actively aiding or joining the British army. In March 1778, the Assembly, with assistance from Chief Justice McKean, passed a law entitled "An Act for the attainder of divers traitors." The law named twelve prominent individuals who had sided with the British and required them to appear for trial by April 20, 1778. If they failed to appear, they would be deemed "convicted and attainted of high treason, to all intents and purposes whatsoever." The Act also authorized the Supreme Executive Council to issue additional proclamations naming persons who had joined the British army. Any such persons who failed to appear for trial would also be attainted of high treason. Although such conditional bills of attainder would soon be prohibited by the U.S. Constitution, Pennsylvania did not seek primarily to hang people without trials, but to seize promptly the abandoned estates of loyalists who had fled to the British. The law accordingly set forth various procedures for seizing the estates of those persons who failed to report for trial."
I have this problem as seen by other people.
To me it is a cause to solve.
To other people it is a problem, my problem.
My problem is this idea that facts matter.
Take the words in the title for instance:
"We Live In A Fraud Of Unprecedented Dimensions"
Fact:
All those who are not fooled are all those who do not belong in the group who are fooled.
All those who live outside the dimensions of victimization of falsehoods, are all those who know better than to believe the falsehoods, and they all belong outside rather than inside the confines of the FRAUD in progress, whatever that fraud may be.
Which Fraud has captured which people?
"The illegitimate Occupant of the Oval Office Continues to Spread Disinformation Designed to Cause People to Damage ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 24, 2021:
"The illegitimate Occupant of the Oval Office Continues to Spread Disinformation Designed to Cause People to Damage their Health and perhaps Terminate their Lives by having the Covid shots."
History helps:
THE REVOLUTIONARY AMERICAN JURY:
A CASE STUDY OF THE 1778-1779
PHILADELPHIA TREASON TRIALS
Carlton F.W. Larson
"The British occupation of Philadelphia was the seminal event of the War for Independence in Pennsylvania. Following Washington's defeat at Brandywine Creek, the British army entered Philadelphia on September 26, 1777. The Continental Congress and the Pennsylvania state government had already fled the city, and Washington would eventually withdraw his army to Valley Forge for the winter. Historians estimate that about one-third of Philadelphia's population, some 12,000 people, had fled the city in advance of the invasion.
The state government, in exile in Lancaster, soon began hearing reports of Pennsylvanians who were actively aiding or joining the British army. In March 1778, the Assembly, with assistance from Chief Justice McKean, passed a law entitled "An Act for the attainder of divers traitors." The law named twelve prominent individuals who had sided with the British and required them to appear for trial by April 20, 1778. If they failed to appear, they would be deemed "convicted and attainted of high treason, to all intents and purposes whatsoever." The Act also authorized the Supreme Executive Council to issue additional proclamations naming persons who had joined the British army. Any such persons who failed to appear for trial would also be attainted of high treason. Although such conditional bills of attainder would soon be prohibited by the U.S. Constitution, Pennsylvania did not seek primarily to hang people without trials, but to seize promptly the abandoned estates of loyalists who had fled to the British. The law accordingly set forth various procedures for seizing the estates of those persons who failed to report for trial."
I have this problem as seen by other people.
To me it is a cause to solve.
To other people it is a problem, my problem.
My problem is this idea that facts matter.
Take the words in the title for instance:
"We Live In A Fraud Of Unprecedented Dimensions"
Fact:
All those who are not fooled are all those who do not belong in the group who are fooled.
All those who live outside the dimensions of victimization of falsehoods, are all those who know better than to believe the falsehoods, and they all belong outside rather than inside the confines of the FRAUD in progress, whatever that fraud may be.
Which Fraud has captured which people?
"The illegitimate Occupant of the Oval Office Continues to Spread Disinformation Designed to Cause People to Damage ...
If forced to take the possible covid vaccine, are there any supplements to help any negative effects...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 6, 2020:
I found this (too awhile):
https://thetruthaboutvaccines.com/minimize-vaccine-damage/
"Dr. Yoshiaki Omura, MD, a New York-based general practitioner and cardiologist with more than 50 years of experience in his field, accidentally discovered (while treating his patients for eye infections) that cilantro (aka Chinese parsley), is a powerful natural chelator of metals and other neurotoxins."
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 6, 2020:
I found this (too awhile):
https://thetruthaboutvaccines.com/minimize-vaccine-damage/
"Dr. Yoshiaki Omura, MD, a New York-based general practitioner and cardiologist with more than 50 years of experience in his field, accidentally discovered (while treating his patients for eye infections) that cilantro (aka Chinese parsley), is a powerful natural chelator of metals and other neurotoxins."
21.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 5, 2021:
Legal Fiction Dogma was known a long time ago, long before Communism (TM) was dreamed up, packaged, and sold by psychopaths to their ripe and ready victims.
Claiming that this word or that word is "semantics" is like claiming a euphemism is an example of a euphemism. Why not call it Treasonous Fraud instead?
What harm is done, and to who is this harm done, if someone labels Treasonous Fraud with the actual words that describe accurately what the fuck is going on?
Case in point:
GLOBALISM IS DUPLICITOUS SEMANTICS FOR INTERNATIONAL SOCIALISM IN ROUTE TO INTERNATIONAL FULL BLOWN COMMUNISM!
Rewriting the above so as to remove all the stupid ass semantics:
Treasonous Fraud is used to make fools of all the people fooled by semantics.
"A federal, or rather a national city, ten miles square, containing a hundred square miles, is about four times as large as London; and for forts, magazines, arsenals, dock yards, and other needful buildings, congress may possess a number of places or towns in each state. It is true, congress cannot have them unless the state legislatures cede them; but when once ceded, they never can be recovered. And though the general temper of the legislatures may be averse to such cessions, yet many opportunities and advantages may be taken of particular times and circumstances of complying assemblies, and of particular parties, to obtain them. It is not improbable, that some considerable towns or places, in some intemperate moments, or influenced by anti-republican principles, will petition to be ceded for the purposes mentioned in the provision. There are men, and even towns, in the best republics, which are often fond of withdrawing from the government of them, whenever occasion shall present. The case is still stronger. If the provision in question holds out allurements to attempt to withdraw, the people of a state must ever be subject to state as well as federal taxes; but the federal city and places will be subject only to the latter, and to them by no fixed proportion. Nor of the taxes raised in them, can the separate states demand any account of congress. These doors opened for withdrawing from the state governments entirely, may, on other accounts, be very alluring and pleasing to those anti-republican men who prefer a place under the wings of courts.
"If a federal town be necessary for the residence of congress and the public officers, it ought to be a small one, and the government of it fixed on republican and common law principles, carefully enumerated and established by the constitution. it is true, the states, when they shall cede places, may stipulate that the laws and government of congress in them shall always be formed on such principles. But it is easy to discern, that the stipulations of a...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 5, 2021:
Legal Fiction Dogma was known a long time ago, long before Communism (TM) was dreamed up, packaged, and sold by psychopaths to their ripe and ready victims.
Claiming that this word or that word is "semantics" is like claiming a euphemism is an example of a euphemism. Why not call it Treasonous Fraud instead?
What harm is done, and to who is this harm done, if someone labels Treasonous Fraud with the actual words that describe accurately what the fuck is going on?
Case in point:
GLOBALISM IS DUPLICITOUS SEMANTICS FOR INTERNATIONAL SOCIALISM IN ROUTE TO INTERNATIONAL FULL BLOWN COMMUNISM!
Rewriting the above so as to remove all the stupid ass semantics:
Treasonous Fraud is used to make fools of all the people fooled by semantics.
"A federal, or rather a national city, ten miles square, containing a hundred square miles, is about four times as large as London; and for forts, magazines, arsenals, dock yards, and other needful buildings, congress may possess a number of places or towns in each state. It is true, congress cannot have them unless the state legislatures cede them; but when once ceded, they never can be recovered. And though the general temper of the legislatures may be averse to such cessions, yet many opportunities and advantages may be taken of particular times and circumstances of complying assemblies, and of particular parties, to obtain them. It is not improbable, that some considerable towns or places, in some intemperate moments, or influenced by anti-republican principles, will petition to be ceded for the purposes mentioned in the provision. There are men, and even towns, in the best republics, which are often fond of withdrawing from the government of them, whenever occasion shall present. The case is still stronger. If the provision in question holds out allurements to attempt to withdraw, the people of a state must ever be subject to state as well as federal taxes; but the federal city and places will be subject only to the latter, and to them by no fixed proportion. Nor of the taxes raised in them, can the separate states demand any account of congress. These doors opened for withdrawing from the state governments entirely, may, on other accounts, be very alluring and pleasing to those anti-republican men who prefer a place under the wings of courts.
"If a federal town be necessary for the residence of congress and the public officers, it ought to be a small one, and the government of it fixed on republican and common law principles, carefully enumerated and established by the constitution. it is true, the states, when they shall cede places, may stipulate that the laws and government of congress in them shall always be formed on such principles. But it is easy to discern, that the stipulations of a...
Laurie Garrett reporter who has worked in over 30 epidemic zones, including SARS in China and Ebola ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 15, 2020:
https://www.healthline.com/health/r-nought-reproduction-number
What do R0 values mean?
Three possibilities exist for the potential spread or decline of a disease, depending on its R0 value:
If R0 is less than 1, each existing infection causes less than one new infection. In this case, the disease will decline and eventually die out.
If R0 equals 1, each existing infection causes one new infection. The disease will stay alive and stable, but there won’t be an outbreak or an epidemic.
If R0 is more than 1, each existing infection causes more than one new infection. The disease will spread between people, and there may be an outbreak or epidemic.
Importantly, a disease’s R0 value only applies when everyone in a population is completely vulnerable to the disease. This means:
no one has been vaccinated
no one has had the disease before
there’s no way to control the spread of the disease
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 15, 2020:
https://www.healthline.com/health/r-nought-reproduction-number
What do R0 values mean?
Three possibilities exist for the potential spread or decline of a disease, depending on its R0 value:
If R0 is less than 1, each existing infection causes less than one new infection. In this case, the disease will decline and eventually die out.
If R0 equals 1, each existing infection causes one new infection. The disease will stay alive and stable, but there won’t be an outbreak or an epidemic.
If R0 is more than 1, each existing infection causes more than one new infection. The disease will spread between people, and there may be an outbreak or epidemic.
Importantly, a disease’s R0 value only applies when everyone in a population is completely vulnerable to the disease. This means:
no one has been vaccinated
no one has had the disease before
there’s no way to control the spread of the disease
sounds reasonable to me!
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 25, 2021:
1patriot,
Where did you find that Meme? My daughter is upset about me posting something from 4Chan on Facebook. I'm trying to communicate how Liability (in letters or otherwise) predates Falsehood, so it really isn't a new thing.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 25, 2021:
1patriot,
Where did you find that Meme? My daughter is upset about me posting something from 4Chan on Facebook. I'm trying to communicate how Liability (in letters or otherwise) predates Falsehood, so it really isn't a new thing.
BQQM 💣💣💣🔥🔥🔥🔥
Situation Update – Nov.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 27, 2020:
Note: The Natural News Link is immediately censored on Facebook.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 27, 2020:
Note: The Natural News Link is immediately censored on Facebook.
I suggest you flee to your underground bunker and let the people get busy restoring the planet you ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 23, 2021:
"This letter isn’t to beg or plead or ask you to stop. This letter is to put you on notice."
"Hallam says, “The relation established between a lord and his vassal by the feudal tenure, far from containing principles of any servile and implicit obedience, permitted the compact to be dissolved in case of its violation by either party. This extended as much to the sovereign as to inferior lords. If a vassal was aggrieved, and if justice was denied him, he sent a defiance, that is, a renunciation of fealty to the king, and was entitled to enforce redress at the point of his sword. It then became a contest of strength as between two independent potentates, and was terminated by treaty, advantageous or otherwise, according to the fortune of war. * * There remained the original principle, that allegiance depended conditionally upon good treatment, and that an appeal might be lawfully made to arms against an oppressive government. Nor was this, we may be sure, left for extreme necessity, or thought to require a long enduring forbearance. In modern times, a king, compelled by his subjects’ swords to abandon any pretension, would be supposed to have ceased to reign; and the express recognition of such a right as that of insurrection has been justly deemed inconsistent with the majesty of law. But ruder ages had ruder sentiments. Force was necessary to repel force; and men accustomed to see the king’s authority defied by a private riot, were not much shocked when it was resisted in defence of public freedom.” - 3 Middle Ages, 240-2."
"That the question was not whether, by a declaration of independence, we should make ourselves what we are not; but whether we should declare a fact which already exists:
That, as to the people or Parliament of England, we had always been independent of them, their restraints on our trade deriving efficacy from our acquiescence only, and not from any rights they possessed of imposing them; and that, so far, our connection had been federal only, and was now dissolved by the commencement of hostilities:
That, as to the king, we had been bound to him by allegiance, but that this bond was now dissolved by his assent to the late act of Parliament, by which he declares us out of his protection, and by his levying war on us a fact which had long ago proved us out of his protection, it being a certain position in law, that allegiance and protection are reciprocal, the one ceasing when the other is withdrawn:"
9.2 - Escalation
Further:
"A law enforcement officer will lose his bond if he oppresses a citizen to the point of civil. rebellion when that citizen attempts to obtain redress of grievances (U.S. constitutional 1st so-called amendment).
When a state, by and through its officials and agents, deprives a citizen ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 23, 2021:
"This letter isn’t to beg or plead or ask you to stop. This letter is to put you on notice."
"Hallam says, “The relation established between a lord and his vassal by the feudal tenure, far from containing principles of any servile and implicit obedience, permitted the compact to be dissolved in case of its violation by either party. This extended as much to the sovereign as to inferior lords. If a vassal was aggrieved, and if justice was denied him, he sent a defiance, that is, a renunciation of fealty to the king, and was entitled to enforce redress at the point of his sword. It then became a contest of strength as between two independent potentates, and was terminated by treaty, advantageous or otherwise, according to the fortune of war. * * There remained the original principle, that allegiance depended conditionally upon good treatment, and that an appeal might be lawfully made to arms against an oppressive government. Nor was this, we may be sure, left for extreme necessity, or thought to require a long enduring forbearance. In modern times, a king, compelled by his subjects’ swords to abandon any pretension, would be supposed to have ceased to reign; and the express recognition of such a right as that of insurrection has been justly deemed inconsistent with the majesty of law. But ruder ages had ruder sentiments. Force was necessary to repel force; and men accustomed to see the king’s authority defied by a private riot, were not much shocked when it was resisted in defence of public freedom.” - 3 Middle Ages, 240-2."
"That the question was not whether, by a declaration of independence, we should make ourselves what we are not; but whether we should declare a fact which already exists:
That, as to the people or Parliament of England, we had always been independent of them, their restraints on our trade deriving efficacy from our acquiescence only, and not from any rights they possessed of imposing them; and that, so far, our connection had been federal only, and was now dissolved by the commencement of hostilities:
That, as to the king, we had been bound to him by allegiance, but that this bond was now dissolved by his assent to the late act of Parliament, by which he declares us out of his protection, and by his levying war on us a fact which had long ago proved us out of his protection, it being a certain position in law, that allegiance and protection are reciprocal, the one ceasing when the other is withdrawn:"
9.2 - Escalation
Further:
"A law enforcement officer will lose his bond if he oppresses a citizen to the point of civil. rebellion when that citizen attempts to obtain redress of grievances (U.S. constitutional 1st so-called amendment).
When a state, by and through its officials and agents, deprives a citizen ...
Gain of melody.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 25, 2022:
Gold
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 25, 2022:
Gold
How many of these groups do you think are in the us? This boggles my mind.
[youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 20, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARPJJSPcFhM
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 20, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARPJJSPcFhM
How has the world gotten so crazy and corrupt?
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 25, 2020:
How far back do you want to look?
King John sells out to Pope Innocent III who "annuls" Magna Carta?
1798 was a U turn into crazy and corrupt.
George Mason, 1788:
"Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common defence; and by that clause (so often called the sweeping clause) they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws. Now, suppose oppressions should arise under this government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of those powers; could not Congress, under the idea of providing for the general welfare, and under their own construction, say that this was destroying the general peace, encouraging sedition, and poisoning the minds of the people? And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within the ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury?"
George Mason, 1788:
"Mr. Chairman, this is a fatal section, which has created more dangers than any other. The first clause allows the importation of slaves for twenty years. Under the royal government, this evil was looked upon as a great oppression, and many attempts were made to prevent it; but the interest of the African merchants prevented its prohibition. No sooner did the revolution take place, than it was thought of. It was one of the great causes of our separation from Great Britain. Its exclusion has been a principal object of this state, and most of the states in the Union. The augmentation of slaves weakens the states; and such a trade is diabolical in itself, and disgraceful to mankind; yet, by this Constitution, it is continued for twenty years. As much as I value a union of all the states, I would not admit the Southern States into the Union unless they agree to the discontinuance of this disgraceful trade, because it would bring weakness, and not strength, to the Union."
George Mason, 1787
"The judiciary of the United States is so constructed and extended, as to absorb and destroy the judiciaries of the several states; thereby rendering laws as tedious, intricate, and expensive, and justice as unattainable by a great part of the community, as in England; and enabling the rich to oppress and ruin the poor."
Thomas Jefferson, A Summary View of the Rights of British America, August 1745
"For the most trifling reasons, and sometimes for no conceivable reason at all, his majesty has rejected laws of the most salutary tendency. The abolition of domestic slavery is the great object of desire in those colonies, where it was...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 25, 2020:
How far back do you want to look?
King John sells out to Pope Innocent III who "annuls" Magna Carta?
1798 was a U turn into crazy and corrupt.
George Mason, 1788:
"Among the enumerated powers, Congress are to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and to pay the debts, and to provide for the general welfare and common defence; and by that clause (so often called the sweeping clause) they are to make all laws necessary to execute those laws. Now, suppose oppressions should arise under this government, and any writer should dare to stand forth, and expose to the community at large the abuses of those powers; could not Congress, under the idea of providing for the general welfare, and under their own construction, say that this was destroying the general peace, encouraging sedition, and poisoning the minds of the people? And could they not, in order to provide against this, lay a dangerous restriction On the press? Might they not even bring the trial of this restriction within the ten miles square, when there is no prohibition against it? Might they not thus destroy the trial by jury?"
George Mason, 1788:
"Mr. Chairman, this is a fatal section, which has created more dangers than any other. The first clause allows the importation of slaves for twenty years. Under the royal government, this evil was looked upon as a great oppression, and many attempts were made to prevent it; but the interest of the African merchants prevented its prohibition. No sooner did the revolution take place, than it was thought of. It was one of the great causes of our separation from Great Britain. Its exclusion has been a principal object of this state, and most of the states in the Union. The augmentation of slaves weakens the states; and such a trade is diabolical in itself, and disgraceful to mankind; yet, by this Constitution, it is continued for twenty years. As much as I value a union of all the states, I would not admit the Southern States into the Union unless they agree to the discontinuance of this disgraceful trade, because it would bring weakness, and not strength, to the Union."
George Mason, 1787
"The judiciary of the United States is so constructed and extended, as to absorb and destroy the judiciaries of the several states; thereby rendering laws as tedious, intricate, and expensive, and justice as unattainable by a great part of the community, as in England; and enabling the rich to oppress and ruin the poor."
Thomas Jefferson, A Summary View of the Rights of British America, August 1745
"For the most trifling reasons, and sometimes for no conceivable reason at all, his majesty has rejected laws of the most salutary tendency. The abolition of domestic slavery is the great object of desire in those colonies, where it was...
Waste isn't worthless.
[outdoorrevival.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 29, 2020:
https://www.plastic2oil.com/site/home
Where can I find a lot of waste plastic? Hmmmm
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 29, 2020:
https://www.plastic2oil.com/site/home
Where can I find a lot of waste plastic? Hmmmm
The Timing of Russia’s Ultimatum to NATO
[youtube.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Dec 21, 2021:
The west is run by sociopaths and psychopaths hell bent on imploding wester culture, economy, military, and that is not news to Russians.
The west is run by sociopaths and psychopaths hell bent on distorting collective Public Information to a point at which the Public is absolutely defenseless, and that is not news to Russians.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/gy5husXdvH2d/
If all that is news to YOU, then perhaps it may be time to stop following the sociopaths and psychopaths.
Or not.
Josf-Kelley comments on Dec 21, 2021:
The west is run by sociopaths and psychopaths hell bent on imploding wester culture, economy, military, and that is not news to Russians.
The west is run by sociopaths and psychopaths hell bent on distorting collective Public Information to a point at which the Public is absolutely defenseless, and that is not news to Russians.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/gy5husXdvH2d/
If all that is news to YOU, then perhaps it may be time to stop following the sociopaths and psychopaths.
Or not.
Long (45m) but current info on COVID/Ivermectin and related …
The guy is well papered and ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 6, 2021:
According to WHO?
The experimental RNA treatment (fraudulently labeled as vaccine) murdered:
20,000 victims in a few months
That is the safe and effective prescription prescribed by the treasonous mass murderers.
Ivermectin failed to prevent death by parasite in how many cases?
16 or 60 over a span of 25 years.
That is the toxin that kills people according to the treasonous mass murderers.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 6, 2021:
According to WHO?
The experimental RNA treatment (fraudulently labeled as vaccine) murdered:
20,000 victims in a few months
That is the safe and effective prescription prescribed by the treasonous mass murderers.
Ivermectin failed to prevent death by parasite in how many cases?
16 or 60 over a span of 25 years.
That is the toxin that kills people according to the treasonous mass murderers.
The fix is in it appears. The election is over.
Josf-Kelley comments on Dec 11, 2020:
There was never an election if someone makes false claims about so-called "election integrity."
What may be very important at this time is a general understanding of the facts that matter in the case where Election Fraud is no longer conveniently swept under the rug where those injured by it refuse to see it.
Josf-Kelley comments on Dec 11, 2020:
There was never an election if someone makes false claims about so-called "election integrity."
What may be very important at this time is a general understanding of the facts that matter in the case where Election Fraud is no longer conveniently swept under the rug where those injured by it refuse to see it.
Not sure this is a joke.
Josf-Kelley comments on Dec 29, 2020:
It is a confession. Take guns first, means "infringe" which is expressly forbidden and doing so is a criminal act. So if then, after perpetrating a treasonous felony, the felon then decides to go through due process of law, does that mean she will then write up a written confession and turn herself in to the nearest Sheriff, so as then to assemble a grand jury, which then leads to an indictment, a trial by jury, and adjudication of both fact and law by the unanimous jury?
The felon is then sentenced to whatever sentence The People decide on through their jury in the case of infringement?
Josf-Kelley comments on Dec 29, 2020:
It is a confession. Take guns first, means "infringe" which is expressly forbidden and doing so is a criminal act. So if then, after perpetrating a treasonous felony, the felon then decides to go through due process of law, does that mean she will then write up a written confession and turn herself in to the nearest Sheriff, so as then to assemble a grand jury, which then leads to an indictment, a trial by jury, and adjudication of both fact and law by the unanimous jury?
The felon is then sentenced to whatever sentence The People decide on through their jury in the case of infringement?
Guess this is going to become the norm now.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 16, 2020:
Two unprepared women...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 16, 2020:
Two unprepared women...
Breaking Truth Educate Yourselves [lewrockwell.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 29, 2020:
Fantastic post, thanks.
"Officially there is no treatment for COVID-19, and that is why they can get away with saying salvation hinges on a vaccine. If there are treatments that work, which there are, there is no need for a vaccine. What kind of people would deny treatments that would help millions?"
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 29, 2020:
Fantastic post, thanks.
"Officially there is no treatment for COVID-19, and that is why they can get away with saying salvation hinges on a vaccine. If there are treatments that work, which there are, there is no need for a vaccine. What kind of people would deny treatments that would help millions?"
Gender ideology: leading children to disaster before they're old enough to know better
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 5, 2023:
Can you drive a car?
Who pays the cost of you driving the car over someone?
Can you pick your bedtime?
Who pays the cost when your bedtime causes harm to you and those you are dependent upon?
Can you drink a beer?
Who pays for how much beer, the behavior after drinking how much beer, and any unintended consequences when dependents dependent upon guidance have no guidance or worse?
Can you vote?
Voting in fraudulent elections is like running away from your own moral duties, the faster you run, the more dependent you are on those picking up the tab.
Can you FUND Treasonous Frauds preying upon humanity, consuming humanity, and transforming humanity into inhuman beasts?
https://usdebtclock.org/world-debt-clock.html
No joke, yes...
You are.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 5, 2023:
Can you drive a car?
Who pays the cost of you driving the car over someone?
Can you pick your bedtime?
Who pays the cost when your bedtime causes harm to you and those you are dependent upon?
Can you drink a beer?
Who pays for how much beer, the behavior after drinking how much beer, and any unintended consequences when dependents dependent upon guidance have no guidance or worse?
Can you vote?
Voting in fraudulent elections is like running away from your own moral duties, the faster you run, the more dependent you are on those picking up the tab.
Can you FUND Treasonous Frauds preying upon humanity, consuming humanity, and transforming humanity into inhuman beasts?
https://usdebtclock.org/world-debt-clock.html
No joke, yes...
You are.
Laurie Garrett reporter who has worked in over 30 epidemic zones, including SARS in China and Ebola ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 15, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=6&v=ZyZwtKJn-Ac=emb_logo
PM Lee urges Singapore to take courage amid coronavirus outbreak
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 15, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=6&v=ZyZwtKJn-Ac=emb_logo
PM Lee urges Singapore to take courage amid coronavirus outbreak
What Happens to Postings
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 23, 2020:
I don't know. I can tell you that for some time now I save my comments (for the reason you state), so as then to offer precise examples of just exactly what was removed, when, and where, if someone volunteers to explain if, or why it happened.
I sometimes hit the wrong button and my comment is lost, so I also write comments on a word processor first if it appears to be worthy of the effort.
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 23, 2020:
I don't know. I can tell you that for some time now I save my comments (for the reason you state), so as then to offer precise examples of just exactly what was removed, when, and where, if someone volunteers to explain if, or why it happened.
I sometimes hit the wrong button and my comment is lost, so I also write comments on a word processor first if it appears to be worthy of the effort.
I’m not sure I hold the “sins of the Grandfather” against this guy but this article has a lot ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 5, 2020:
California 50th District:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California%27s_congressional_districts#/media/File:California_US_Congressional_District_50_(since_2013).tif
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 5, 2020:
California 50th District:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California%27s_congressional_districts#/media/File:California_US_Congressional_District_50_(since_2013).tif
"The latest on Kyle Rittenhouse, and updates on some 2nd Amendment cases heading to SCOTUS.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2021:
YouTube version (loads a new tab on my end): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WK5_2imyfo8
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2021:
YouTube version (loads a new tab on my end): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WK5_2imyfo8
Scotland: Pandemic of the Fully Vaccinated
“The data available from Public Health Scotland ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Dec 3, 2021:
An obvious cause to act in defense at law.
Where is the law?
Both sides blaming each other as Conspiracy Theorists guilty of publishing treasonously fraudulent information, doing so without doing so overtly, which means both sides are confessing culpability as frauds.
Side C (Marxist Communist Side) says vaccines are needed to save humanity on planet earth from death by new viruses attacking mankind in rapid succession, requiring new vaccines in rapid succession, and the evidence proves, beyond reasonable doubt, that the new vaccines justify their use against the deadly new viruses, only if everyone is forced to take each new vaccine in defense against each new virus.
Less Death, demands Side C, is accurately accountable because people are lessening death with vaccines.
Each new virus attack kills this many people.
Each new virus is defeated with defensive vaccines, saving this many people.
Vaccines are harmless, there are no vaccine deaths at all.
C\case closed.
Anyone not taking the vaccine is guilty of mass murder.
Those not taking the vaccine are guilty of mass murder.
In defense of the innocent, The Science backed vaccine producers, having immunity from prosecution, demand that governments purchase retail priced (marked up well above cost) vaccines produced by the immune from prosecution vaccine manufacturers.
The Science backed vaccine producers demand mandated vaccines, forcing everyone to save everyone else from those who are guilty of mass murderer, those who refuse to save everyone with retail priced vaccines sold at market prices marked up to meet the demand for higher prices demanded by the vaccine producers who have demanded, and received, immunity from prosecution for their generous gift to mankind, saving mankind from mass murder perpetrated by guilty vaccine hesitant people who virtually cause mass death by viruses that they refuse to eliminate with tried and true vaccines backed by The Science.
This many people are now murdered by people refusing to save those people with tried and true vaccines produced by vaccine producers having immunity from prosecution.
No vaccine ever has ever killed anyone, to make such a false claim, is a conspiracy theorist conspiring to murder mankind, using fraudulent data to stop people from being forced to take the cure that saves mankind.
Words are not as useful, if the idea is to document the facts with accurate accounts proving just how the problem can be solved with math.
Problem: virus
Evidence of problem: dead people
The Science: are people dead by the virus?
Problem confirmed: virus kills people: this many people documented this way, here is the evidence, virus A kills this one, this one, this one, confirmed ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Dec 3, 2021:
An obvious cause to act in defense at law.
Where is the law?
Both sides blaming each other as Conspiracy Theorists guilty of publishing treasonously fraudulent information, doing so without doing so overtly, which means both sides are confessing culpability as frauds.
Side C (Marxist Communist Side) says vaccines are needed to save humanity on planet earth from death by new viruses attacking mankind in rapid succession, requiring new vaccines in rapid succession, and the evidence proves, beyond reasonable doubt, that the new vaccines justify their use against the deadly new viruses, only if everyone is forced to take each new vaccine in defense against each new virus.
Less Death, demands Side C, is accurately accountable because people are lessening death with vaccines.
Each new virus attack kills this many people.
Each new virus is defeated with defensive vaccines, saving this many people.
Vaccines are harmless, there are no vaccine deaths at all.
C\case closed.
Anyone not taking the vaccine is guilty of mass murder.
Those not taking the vaccine are guilty of mass murder.
In defense of the innocent, The Science backed vaccine producers, having immunity from prosecution, demand that governments purchase retail priced (marked up well above cost) vaccines produced by the immune from prosecution vaccine manufacturers.
The Science backed vaccine producers demand mandated vaccines, forcing everyone to save everyone else from those who are guilty of mass murderer, those who refuse to save everyone with retail priced vaccines sold at market prices marked up to meet the demand for higher prices demanded by the vaccine producers who have demanded, and received, immunity from prosecution for their generous gift to mankind, saving mankind from mass murder perpetrated by guilty vaccine hesitant people who virtually cause mass death by viruses that they refuse to eliminate with tried and true vaccines backed by The Science.
This many people are now murdered by people refusing to save those people with tried and true vaccines produced by vaccine producers having immunity from prosecution.
No vaccine ever has ever killed anyone, to make such a false claim, is a conspiracy theorist conspiring to murder mankind, using fraudulent data to stop people from being forced to take the cure that saves mankind.
Words are not as useful, if the idea is to document the facts with accurate accounts proving just how the problem can be solved with math.
Problem: virus
Evidence of problem: dead people
The Science: are people dead by the virus?
Problem confirmed: virus kills people: this many people documented this way, here is the evidence, virus A kills this one, this one, this one, confirmed ...
Kyle Rittenhouse Responds to Biden Labeling Him a White ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 28, 2022:
No mention of actual justice?
Injustice Part A: Self-defense on trial as a crime punishable by criminals infesting government.
Injustice Part B: The Independent Grand Jury is not in force to prevent the persecution of Kyle for "the crime" of self-defense, and it goes to a jury trial, after the accused is presumed to be guilty by "the government" from Top to Bottom, and the jury finds the accused not guilty because the defending forces prove not-guilty because there was no case against Kyle to begin with, and then, instead of independent, private prosecutors filing criminal charges against the fake government judge, the fake government prosecutor, and the fake government police forces, including the fake government county sheriff, the persecuted Kyle, found not guilty when the fake "government" predetermined Kyle guilty for defending himself, was fooled into taking the bribe that "the public" can be made to pay for the crimes perpetrated by the fake "government" in a false accusation case, a case of nonfeasance, a case of misfeasance, a case of malfeasance, and a case of misprision of treason, on the part of those people caught Red-Handed in the crime of infringing up on the rights of Kyle and everyone else in need of justice instead of injustice counterfeiting the real deal.
Injustice Part C:
No one, not anyone, except me apparently, knows, beyond reasonable doubt, that those claiming to be the "government" are in fact criminals incapable of policing themselves with any process known to mankind, while a process built for that specific purpose is written into the books that those Treasonous Frauds claim to be their source of authority to ignore their source of authority.
Some things, for criminals and their minions, is better LEFT unsaid.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 28, 2022:
No mention of actual justice?
Injustice Part A: Self-defense on trial as a crime punishable by criminals infesting government.
Injustice Part B: The Independent Grand Jury is not in force to prevent the persecution of Kyle for "the crime" of self-defense, and it goes to a jury trial, after the accused is presumed to be guilty by "the government" from Top to Bottom, and the jury finds the accused not guilty because the defending forces prove not-guilty because there was no case against Kyle to begin with, and then, instead of independent, private prosecutors filing criminal charges against the fake government judge, the fake government prosecutor, and the fake government police forces, including the fake government county sheriff, the persecuted Kyle, found not guilty when the fake "government" predetermined Kyle guilty for defending himself, was fooled into taking the bribe that "the public" can be made to pay for the crimes perpetrated by the fake "government" in a false accusation case, a case of nonfeasance, a case of misfeasance, a case of malfeasance, and a case of misprision of treason, on the part of those people caught Red-Handed in the crime of infringing up on the rights of Kyle and everyone else in need of justice instead of injustice counterfeiting the real deal.
Injustice Part C:
No one, not anyone, except me apparently, knows, beyond reasonable doubt, that those claiming to be the "government" are in fact criminals incapable of policing themselves with any process known to mankind, while a process built for that specific purpose is written into the books that those Treasonous Frauds claim to be their source of authority to ignore their source of authority.
Some things, for criminals and their minions, is better LEFT unsaid.
"It is only when the people become ignorant and corrupt, when they degenerate into a populace, that ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 27, 2021:
Legal Fiction Dogma as explained by Richard Henry Lee, 6th President of The United (federated) States of America:
"A federal, or rather a national city, ten miles square, containing a hundred square miles, is about four times as large as London; and for forts, magazines, arsenals, dock yards, and other needful buildings, congress may possess a number of places or towns in each state. It is true, congress cannot have them unless the state legislatures cede them; but when once ceded, they never can be recovered. And though the general temper of the legislatures may be averse to such cessions, yet many opportunities and advantages may be taken of particular times and circumstances of complying assemblies, and of particular parties, to obtain them. It is not improbable, that some considerable towns or places, in some intemperate moments, or influenced by anti-republican principles, will petition to be ceded for the purposes mentioned in the provision. There are men, and even towns, in the best republics, which are often fond of withdrawing from the government of them, whenever occasion shall present. The case is still stronger. If the provision in question holds out allurements to attempt to withdraw, the people of a state must ever be subject to state as well as federal taxes; but the federal city and places will be subject only to the latter, and to them by no fixed proportion. Nor of the taxes raised in them, can the separate states demand any account of congress. These doors opened for withdrawing from the state governments entirely, may, on other accounts, be very alluring and pleasing to those anti-republican men who prefer a place under the wings of courts.
"If a federal town be necessary for the residence of congress and the public officers, it ought to be a small one, and the government of it fixed on republican and common law principles, carefully enumerated and established by the constitution. it is true, the states, when they shall cede places, may stipulate that the laws and government of congress in them shall always be formed on such principles. But it is easy to discern, that the stipulations of a state, or of the inhabitants of the place ceded, can be of but little avail against the power and gradual encroachments of the union. The principles ought to be established by the federal constitution, to which all states are parties; but in no event can there be any need of so large a city and places for forts, etc. , totally exempted from the laws and jurisdictions of the state governments.
"If I understand the constitution, the laws of congress, constitutionally made, will have complete and supreme jurisdiction to all federal purposes, on every inch of ground in the United States, and exclusive jurisdiction on the high seas, and ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 27, 2021:
Legal Fiction Dogma as explained by Richard Henry Lee, 6th President of The United (federated) States of America:
"A federal, or rather a national city, ten miles square, containing a hundred square miles, is about four times as large as London; and for forts, magazines, arsenals, dock yards, and other needful buildings, congress may possess a number of places or towns in each state. It is true, congress cannot have them unless the state legislatures cede them; but when once ceded, they never can be recovered. And though the general temper of the legislatures may be averse to such cessions, yet many opportunities and advantages may be taken of particular times and circumstances of complying assemblies, and of particular parties, to obtain them. It is not improbable, that some considerable towns or places, in some intemperate moments, or influenced by anti-republican principles, will petition to be ceded for the purposes mentioned in the provision. There are men, and even towns, in the best republics, which are often fond of withdrawing from the government of them, whenever occasion shall present. The case is still stronger. If the provision in question holds out allurements to attempt to withdraw, the people of a state must ever be subject to state as well as federal taxes; but the federal city and places will be subject only to the latter, and to them by no fixed proportion. Nor of the taxes raised in them, can the separate states demand any account of congress. These doors opened for withdrawing from the state governments entirely, may, on other accounts, be very alluring and pleasing to those anti-republican men who prefer a place under the wings of courts.
"If a federal town be necessary for the residence of congress and the public officers, it ought to be a small one, and the government of it fixed on republican and common law principles, carefully enumerated and established by the constitution. it is true, the states, when they shall cede places, may stipulate that the laws and government of congress in them shall always be formed on such principles. But it is easy to discern, that the stipulations of a state, or of the inhabitants of the place ceded, can be of but little avail against the power and gradual encroachments of the union. The principles ought to be established by the federal constitution, to which all states are parties; but in no event can there be any need of so large a city and places for forts, etc. , totally exempted from the laws and jurisdictions of the state governments.
"If I understand the constitution, the laws of congress, constitutionally made, will have complete and supreme jurisdiction to all federal purposes, on every inch of ground in the United States, and exclusive jurisdiction on the high seas, and ...
Is there any truth in Qanon or the "deep state"?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 28, 2020:
While looking further into this narrative that exists under the heading Qanon I found a few relevant facts, such as the facts reported on a government document:
"Epinephrine solution deteriorates rapidly on exposure to air or light, turning pink from oxidation
to adrenochrome and brown from the formation of melanin. Replace EpiPen and EpiPen Jr if the
epinephrine solution appears discolored (pinkish or brown color), cloudy, or contains particles."
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2014/019430s059lbl.pdf
An alleged "government" document, perhaps.
I looked for that information after listening to this:
"The pedo Cover-Upperers in the Deep State Media have gone crazy. Legislators have gone crazy! Everyone in the child-trafficking business are in full blown panic over the fact that people on the left and right are coming together on common ground: we want an end to Human Trafficking and Child Exploitation."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=xfF3uCcrbO8=emb_logo
In that video there was a report on the shortage of EpiPens, and how an EpiPen deteriorates (or improves to some?) going from epinephrine to adrenochrome.
Then I found this:
"Witch Hunt: The Storm is Upon Us"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=6&v=pTP4bZgMmp4=emb_logo
So..."Is there any truth in Qanon or the "deep state"?"
The assumption here is that someone asking the question is someone who wants an accurate answer.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 28, 2020:
While looking further into this narrative that exists under the heading Qanon I found a few relevant facts, such as the facts reported on a government document:
"Epinephrine solution deteriorates rapidly on exposure to air or light, turning pink from oxidation
to adrenochrome and brown from the formation of melanin. Replace EpiPen and EpiPen Jr if the
epinephrine solution appears discolored (pinkish or brown color), cloudy, or contains particles."
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2014/019430s059lbl.pdf
An alleged "government" document, perhaps.
I looked for that information after listening to this:
"The pedo Cover-Upperers in the Deep State Media have gone crazy. Legislators have gone crazy! Everyone in the child-trafficking business are in full blown panic over the fact that people on the left and right are coming together on common ground: we want an end to Human Trafficking and Child Exploitation."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=xfF3uCcrbO8=emb_logo
In that video there was a report on the shortage of EpiPens, and how an EpiPen deteriorates (or improves to some?) going from epinephrine to adrenochrome.
Then I found this:
"Witch Hunt: The Storm is Upon Us"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=6&v=pTP4bZgMmp4=emb_logo
So..."Is there any truth in Qanon or the "deep state"?"
The assumption here is that someone asking the question is someone who wants an accurate answer.
My dogma ate my homework.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 24, 2020:
"That's the tricky one. If you live in a country whose borders have never been attacked militarily in your whole life, why would you think it's likely to happen?"
I am not talking about a possible future situation (utopia?), rather I am speaking about real present dangers to life, liberty, and property, warranting defense against those dangers, because there is probable cause to act in defense, when criminals both foreign and domestic are robbing, assaulting, raping, enslaving, torutring, murdering, and mass murdering with impunity, and the most dangerous, based upon body count, are the fake governments.
If you have a more important "common goal" in mind, then place that one (instead of the one I just placed) on the table for deliberation by those who may or may not agree with that goal as a goal worthy of the costs required to reach it.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 24, 2020:
"That's the tricky one. If you live in a country whose borders have never been attacked militarily in your whole life, why would you think it's likely to happen?"
I am not talking about a possible future situation (utopia?), rather I am speaking about real present dangers to life, liberty, and property, warranting defense against those dangers, because there is probable cause to act in defense, when criminals both foreign and domestic are robbing, assaulting, raping, enslaving, torutring, murdering, and mass murdering with impunity, and the most dangerous, based upon body count, are the fake governments.
If you have a more important "common goal" in mind, then place that one (instead of the one I just placed) on the table for deliberation by those who may or may not agree with that goal as a goal worthy of the costs required to reach it.
Serious question.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 29, 2020:
I won't be pretending my vote counts, for the pedophile or the guy that allows the Nazi Party to enforce mask wearing.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 29, 2020:
I won't be pretending my vote counts, for the pedophile or the guy that allows the Nazi Party to enforce mask wearing.
Some good news imo
[youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 27, 2021:
Biden is a low level, penny anti, common criminal, if a "Judge" is blocking something the said individual is defending free people in liberty from treasonous frauds and worse criminals currently UNIDENTIFIED and UNACCOUNTED for (legally, lawfully, morally, defensively) by due process of law: those pulling the strings of their well paid puppet servant.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 27, 2021:
Biden is a low level, penny anti, common criminal, if a "Judge" is blocking something the said individual is defending free people in liberty from treasonous frauds and worse criminals currently UNIDENTIFIED and UNACCOUNTED for (legally, lawfully, morally, defensively) by due process of law: those pulling the strings of their well paid puppet servant.
NRO: Can Bloomberg win the nomination?
[nationalreview.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 8, 2020:
"Nate Silver's forecasting model at FiveThirtyEight gives Bloomberg a less than 1 percent shot at the nomnation. But betting markets disagree: As the degree of Joe Biden's failure in Iowa became apparent, Bloomberg's prospects surged. At PredictIt.org, for instance, Bernie Sanders is the heavy favorite, selling at 43 cents for a potential payoff of a dollar. Bloomberg runs a strong second, at 23 cents. Biden is in fourth place, at a pathetic 14 cents."
Josf-Kelley comments on Feb 8, 2020:
"Nate Silver's forecasting model at FiveThirtyEight gives Bloomberg a less than 1 percent shot at the nomnation. But betting markets disagree: As the degree of Joe Biden's failure in Iowa became apparent, Bloomberg's prospects surged. At PredictIt.org, for instance, Bernie Sanders is the heavy favorite, selling at 43 cents for a potential payoff of a dollar. Bloomberg runs a strong second, at 23 cents. Biden is in fourth place, at a pathetic 14 cents."
"Consider what is at stake if we don’t resist the blatant attempt at a power grab by the ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 11, 2020:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/gOp7MhaIRWZC/
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 11, 2020:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/gOp7MhaIRWZC/
[rumble.com]
Reiner fuellmich what the hell is happening
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 21, 2022:
https://rumble.com/vsz5an-1202022-new-maxwell-trial-docs-countries-dropping-mandates.html
https://leohohmann.files.wordpress.com/2022/01/icc-complaint-7.pdf
"December 6, 2021"
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 21, 2022:
https://rumble.com/vsz5an-1202022-new-maxwell-trial-docs-countries-dropping-mandates.html
https://leohohmann.files.wordpress.com/2022/01/icc-complaint-7.pdf
"December 6, 2021"
"There is no greater tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of the law and in the ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 16, 2020:
"An error occurred. Please try again later.
(Playback ID: gZAklovJ4hQQxOL)
I call it Counterfeit Law. Examples abound where original, grass-roots, organic, defensive, moral, law power emerges and is named, and then the counterfeiters counterfeit the name and that deception aids and abets their abuse of power.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 16, 2020:
"An error occurred. Please try again later.
(Playback ID: gZAklovJ4hQQxOL)
I call it Counterfeit Law. Examples abound where original, grass-roots, organic, defensive, moral, law power emerges and is named, and then the counterfeiters counterfeit the name and that deception aids and abets their abuse of power.
"The latest on Kyle Rittenhouse, and updates on some 2nd Amendment cases heading to SCOTUS.
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2021:
"...Constitutionally fair jury..."
That is a false narrative. Trial by Jury, also known as The Law of the land, predates the second Constitution that was exposed as an obvious coup d'état, so a fair jury is a fair jury, not a "Constitutionally" fair jury.
14th of October, 1774
"On the same day, Congress unanimously resolved, “that the respective colonies are entitled to the common law of England, and more especially to the great and inestimable privilege of being tried by their peers of the vicinage according to the course of that law.” They further resolved, “that they were entitled to the benefit of such of the English statutes as existed at the time of their colonization, and which they have, by experience, respectively found to be applicable to their several and local circumstances.” They also resolved, that their ancestors, at the time of their immigration, were “entitled to all the rights, liberties, and immunities, of free and natural-born subjects within the realms of England.”
Josf-Kelley comments on Oct 27, 2021:
"...Constitutionally fair jury..."
That is a false narrative. Trial by Jury, also known as The Law of the land, predates the second Constitution that was exposed as an obvious coup d'état, so a fair jury is a fair jury, not a "Constitutionally" fair jury.
14th of October, 1774
"On the same day, Congress unanimously resolved, “that the respective colonies are entitled to the common law of England, and more especially to the great and inestimable privilege of being tried by their peers of the vicinage according to the course of that law.” They further resolved, “that they were entitled to the benefit of such of the English statutes as existed at the time of their colonization, and which they have, by experience, respectively found to be applicable to their several and local circumstances.” They also resolved, that their ancestors, at the time of their immigration, were “entitled to all the rights, liberties, and immunities, of free and natural-born subjects within the realms of England.”
2208211402Su TAXATION TYRANNY?
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 21, 2022:
Pots calling Kettles Black in mirrors.
National Communist LEFT
National Nationalist CENTER
National Socialist RIGHT
What is the common denominator?
George Mason Speech Virginia Ratifying Convention
June 04, 1788
"Mr. Chairman—Whether the Constitution be good or bad, the present clause clearly discovers, that it is a National Government, and no longer a confederation. I mean that clause which gives the first hint of the General Government laying direct taxes. The assumption of this power of laying direct taxes, does of itself, entirely change the confederation of the States into one consolidated Government. This power being at discretion, unconfined, and without any kind of controul, must carry every thing before it. The very idea of converting what was formerly confederation, to a consolidated Government, is totally subversive of every principle which has hitherto governed us. This power is calculated to annihilate totally the State Governments. Will the people of this great community submit to be individually taxed by two different and distinct powers? Will they suffer themselves to be doubly harrassed? These two concurrent powers cannot exist long together; the one will destroy the other: The General Government being paramount to, and in every respect more powerful than, the State governments, the latter must give way to the former."
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 21, 2022:
Pots calling Kettles Black in mirrors.
National Communist LEFT
National Nationalist CENTER
National Socialist RIGHT
What is the common denominator?
George Mason Speech Virginia Ratifying Convention
June 04, 1788
"Mr. Chairman—Whether the Constitution be good or bad, the present clause clearly discovers, that it is a National Government, and no longer a confederation. I mean that clause which gives the first hint of the General Government laying direct taxes. The assumption of this power of laying direct taxes, does of itself, entirely change the confederation of the States into one consolidated Government. This power being at discretion, unconfined, and without any kind of controul, must carry every thing before it. The very idea of converting what was formerly confederation, to a consolidated Government, is totally subversive of every principle which has hitherto governed us. This power is calculated to annihilate totally the State Governments. Will the people of this great community submit to be individually taxed by two different and distinct powers? Will they suffer themselves to be doubly harrassed? These two concurrent powers cannot exist long together; the one will destroy the other: The General Government being paramount to, and in every respect more powerful than, the State governments, the latter must give way to the former."
Time to show the radical leftists & anarchists our teeth. Enough is enough.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 25, 2020:
Is there a process by which those deserving "our teeth" are discovered and processed?
Josf-Kelley comments on Jun 25, 2020:
Is there a process by which those deserving "our teeth" are discovered and processed?
Huckabee Update: Background on Mesa County, CO election machine interference.
[youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 13, 2021:
Not censored yet:
HUGE NEWS from Mike Lindell's Eléctiøn Fâ“¡åâ±´ÆŒ Cyber Symposium Day 2 | Breakdown | Huckabee
Wonder why.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 13, 2021:
Not censored yet:
HUGE NEWS from Mike Lindell's Eléctiøn Fâ“¡åâ±´ÆŒ Cyber Symposium Day 2 | Breakdown | Huckabee
Wonder why.
"Vices are those acts by which a man harms himself or his property.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 24, 2020:
Reading through the work of Lysander Spooner is refreshing in a world were mountains of official government lies are routinely believed and enforced. Not only does the information offer that refreshing light of truth, it offers the lawful means to the lawful ends.
"The question, then, between trial by jury, as thus described, and trial by the government, is simply a question between liberty and despotism. The authority to judge what are the powers of the government, and what the liberties of the people, must necessarily be vested in one or the other of the parties themselves - the government, or the people; because there is no third party to whom it can be entrusted. If the authority be vested in the government, the government is absolute, and the people have no liberties except such as the government sees fit to indulge them with. If, on the other hand, that authority be vested in the people, then the people have all liberties, (as against the government,) except such as substantially the whole people (through a jury) choose to disclaim; and the government can exercise no power except such as substantially the whole people (through a jury) consent that it may exercise." Essay on The Trial by Jury, Lysander Spooner, 1852
Josf-Kelley comments on Jan 24, 2020:
Reading through the work of Lysander Spooner is refreshing in a world were mountains of official government lies are routinely believed and enforced. Not only does the information offer that refreshing light of truth, it offers the lawful means to the lawful ends.
"The question, then, between trial by jury, as thus described, and trial by the government, is simply a question between liberty and despotism. The authority to judge what are the powers of the government, and what the liberties of the people, must necessarily be vested in one or the other of the parties themselves - the government, or the people; because there is no third party to whom it can be entrusted. If the authority be vested in the government, the government is absolute, and the people have no liberties except such as the government sees fit to indulge them with. If, on the other hand, that authority be vested in the people, then the people have all liberties, (as against the government,) except such as substantially the whole people (through a jury) choose to disclaim; and the government can exercise no power except such as substantially the whole people (through a jury) consent that it may exercise." Essay on The Trial by Jury, Lysander Spooner, 1852
It isn't reparations; it's just grifting.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 10, 2023:
Bribes.
Thomas Jefferson
Declaration of Independence, 1776
"he has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating it's most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. this piratical warfare, the opprobrium of infidel powers, is the warfare of the CHRISTIAN king of Great Britain. determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought & sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce: and that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, & murdering the people upon whom he also obtruded them; thus paying off former crimes committed against the liberties of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the lives of another."
In the Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. I. p. 10
"The clause, too, reprobating the enslaving the inhabitants of Africa, was struck out in complaisance to South Carolina and Georgia, who had never attempted to restrain the importation of slaves, and who, on the contrary, still wished to continue it. Our northern brethren also, I believe felt a little tender under those censures; for, though their people had very few slaves themselves, yet they had been pretty considerable carriers of them to others."
“A jury of twelve local farmers, all men and all white according to Levinson, rule in favor of Freeman in 1781, giving her freedom and awarding her 30 shillings in damages.”
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 10, 2023:
Bribes.
Thomas Jefferson
Declaration of Independence, 1776
"he has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating it's most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. this piratical warfare, the opprobrium of infidel powers, is the warfare of the CHRISTIAN king of Great Britain. determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought & sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce: and that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, & murdering the people upon whom he also obtruded them; thus paying off former crimes committed against the liberties of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the lives of another."
In the Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. I. p. 10
"The clause, too, reprobating the enslaving the inhabitants of Africa, was struck out in complaisance to South Carolina and Georgia, who had never attempted to restrain the importation of slaves, and who, on the contrary, still wished to continue it. Our northern brethren also, I believe felt a little tender under those censures; for, though their people had very few slaves themselves, yet they had been pretty considerable carriers of them to others."
“A jury of twelve local farmers, all men and all white according to Levinson, rule in favor of Freeman in 1781, giving her freedom and awarding her 30 shillings in damages.”
In another thread [slug.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 17, 2020:
I'm going to pick out one sentence that will then launch my reply.
"The only area it has not penetrated is theology but religion is in sharp decline. Consciously or unconsciously the cause and effect paradigm of determinism has undermined traditional ideas of individual responsibility."
I think that art, gambling, sports, and most certainly economy prove otherwise.
The use of "only" to me is part of the dogma that leads to demoralization.
To explain what I mean I have to build from a solid foundation first:
1. The only irrefutable fact, an absolute fact, is that perception exists
a. Every effort to disprove the only, absolute, irrefutable fact, proves it, in fact.
b. No known alternative can be perceived without perceiving it.
c. etc.
2. Life is good or life is not good
3. If life is not good, life does not exist for long
4. In order to perceive a way in which life (which is good) can continue to exist, life must adapt to every need required in order for life to continue to exist, which leads to the idea of POWER
5. If POWER exists (a perception) and it either does exist continually or it eventually no longer exists, including the POWER to perceive that life is good, then it can be perceived that there is a POWER STRUGGLE, and it can be worded in many ways so as to inform life forms other than ONE perceptive life form perceiving the POWER STRUGGLE.
So, with that in mind, the POWER STRUGGLE can be worded as Entropy vs Ectropy, explained as:
Entropy is the POWER that returns all perceptive matter to the simplest form (which would eventually be only perception, and then nothing at all anywhere anytime anyplace) and opposing Entropy is the POWER that forces perception into greater things, more things, other than perception, such as, for example, a Big Bang, or less complicated forms, such as a Hydrogen Atom.
Somehow the ectropic force (POWER) forces additional things into being, making things more complicated, more organized, and more livable, lovable, better, eventually reaching to a point at which a perceiver (or the only perceiver which is you) can perceive a Song, which is beautiful, and which inspires the perceiver not only to live, but to reproduce, to adapt, to make life more complex, more organized, better, and worth living, sustaining, etc.
So, with that in mind, as far as one, single, monopoly, perceiver of one individual living being is concerned, you if you are the only one in a dream where everyone else is pure imagination, or you as one of many perceivers - as far as you are concerned - life will either go from less to more organized, less to more complex, or life will go the other direction and if you can't do anything about it (free will) then test your POWER to do so.
Stop ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 17, 2020:
I'm going to pick out one sentence that will then launch my reply.
"The only area it has not penetrated is theology but religion is in sharp decline. Consciously or unconsciously the cause and effect paradigm of determinism has undermined traditional ideas of individual responsibility."
I think that art, gambling, sports, and most certainly economy prove otherwise.
The use of "only" to me is part of the dogma that leads to demoralization.
To explain what I mean I have to build from a solid foundation first:
1. The only irrefutable fact, an absolute fact, is that perception exists
a. Every effort to disprove the only, absolute, irrefutable fact, proves it, in fact.
b. No known alternative can be perceived without perceiving it.
c. etc.
2. Life is good or life is not good
3. If life is not good, life does not exist for long
4. In order to perceive a way in which life (which is good) can continue to exist, life must adapt to every need required in order for life to continue to exist, which leads to the idea of POWER
5. If POWER exists (a perception) and it either does exist continually or it eventually no longer exists, including the POWER to perceive that life is good, then it can be perceived that there is a POWER STRUGGLE, and it can be worded in many ways so as to inform life forms other than ONE perceptive life form perceiving the POWER STRUGGLE.
So, with that in mind, the POWER STRUGGLE can be worded as Entropy vs Ectropy, explained as:
Entropy is the POWER that returns all perceptive matter to the simplest form (which would eventually be only perception, and then nothing at all anywhere anytime anyplace) and opposing Entropy is the POWER that forces perception into greater things, more things, other than perception, such as, for example, a Big Bang, or less complicated forms, such as a Hydrogen Atom.
Somehow the ectropic force (POWER) forces additional things into being, making things more complicated, more organized, and more livable, lovable, better, eventually reaching to a point at which a perceiver (or the only perceiver which is you) can perceive a Song, which is beautiful, and which inspires the perceiver not only to live, but to reproduce, to adapt, to make life more complex, more organized, better, and worth living, sustaining, etc.
So, with that in mind, as far as one, single, monopoly, perceiver of one individual living being is concerned, you if you are the only one in a dream where everyone else is pure imagination, or you as one of many perceivers - as far as you are concerned - life will either go from less to more organized, less to more complex, or life will go the other direction and if you can't do anything about it (free will) then test your POWER to do so.
Stop ...
Has anyone ever read the 319 page interview with an alien by Matilda O'Donnell?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 11, 2020:
"The status quo of our government establishment has been to "protect the people" from knowledge of such matters. In fact, the only protection afforded by ignorance and secrecy is to hide the private agenda of those in power to enslave others. And, by doing so, to disarm every perceived enemy, and ally, through superstition and stupidity."
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 11, 2020:
"The status quo of our government establishment has been to "protect the people" from knowledge of such matters. In fact, the only protection afforded by ignorance and secrecy is to hide the private agenda of those in power to enslave others. And, by doing so, to disarm every perceived enemy, and ally, through superstition and stupidity."
Wow, I think they are going to have a problem when trying to give that shot to the ones who are ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 23, 2020:
What is described as Anitbody Immune Enhancement (vaccine injection causes severe illness and death) sounds exactly like the current Wuhan Virus or Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud, for those people who are getting severely ill and dying. The consensus (junk science) is "we don't know what is causing this."
I think that some people know exactly what is causing this, as it is the same cause that causes them to exponentially gain even more power over their victims.
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 23, 2020:
What is described as Anitbody Immune Enhancement (vaccine injection causes severe illness and death) sounds exactly like the current Wuhan Virus or Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud, for those people who are getting severely ill and dying. The consensus (junk science) is "we don't know what is causing this."
I think that some people know exactly what is causing this, as it is the same cause that causes them to exponentially gain even more power over their victims.
Pentagon Releases Terrifying Video Of Russian Su-27 Turning Directly In Front Of A B-52
...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 30, 2020:
Show off.
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 30, 2020:
Show off.
Decisions, decisions.
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 9, 2022:
If the meaning of the word government is a synonym for crime, then that message reasons out factually. If the meaning of government is to check evil with a process that accurately accounts for evil efficiently and expediently, at the highest humanly possible quality, and at the lowest humanly possible cost, then that meme is nonsense.
"It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States.
"If the trial by jury were reëstablished, the Common Law principle of taxation would be reëstablished with it; for it is not to be supposed that juries would enforce a tax upon an individual which he had never agreed to pay. Taxation without consent is as plainly robbery, when enforced against one man, as when enforced against millions; and it is not to be imagined that juries could be blind to so self-evident a principle. Taking a man’s money without his consent, is also as much robbery, when it is done by millions of men, acting in concert, and calling themselves a government, as when it is done by a single individual, acting on his own responsibility, and calling himself a highwayman. Neither the numbers engaged in the act, nor the different characters they assume as a cover for the act, alter the nature of the act itself.
"If the government can take a man’s money without his consent, there is no limit to the additional tyranny it may practise upon him; for, with his money, it can hire soldiers to stand over him, keep him in subjection, plunder him at discretion, and kill him if he resists. And governments always will do this, as they everywhere and always have done it, except where the Common Law principle has been established. It is therefore a first principle, a very sine qua non of political freedom, that a man can be taxed only by his personal consent. And the establishment of this principle, with trial by jury, insures freedom of course; because:
"1. No man would pay his money unless he had first contracted for such a government as he was willing to support; and,
"2. Unless the government then kept itself within the terms of its contract, juries would not enforce the payment of the tax. Besides, the agreement to be taxed would probably be ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 9, 2022:
If the meaning of the word government is a synonym for crime, then that message reasons out factually. If the meaning of government is to check evil with a process that accurately accounts for evil efficiently and expediently, at the highest humanly possible quality, and at the lowest humanly possible cost, then that meme is nonsense.
"It was a principle of the Common Law, as it is of the law of nature, and of common sense, that no man can be taxed without his personal consent. The Common Law knew nothing of that system, which now prevails in England, of assuming a man’s own consent to be taxed, because some pretended representative, whom he never authorized to act for him, has taken it upon himself to consent that he may be taxed. That is one of the many frauds on the Common Law, and the English constitution, which have been introduced since Magna Carta. Having finally established itself in England, it has been stupidly and servilely copied and submitted to in the United States.
"If the trial by jury were reëstablished, the Common Law principle of taxation would be reëstablished with it; for it is not to be supposed that juries would enforce a tax upon an individual which he had never agreed to pay. Taxation without consent is as plainly robbery, when enforced against one man, as when enforced against millions; and it is not to be imagined that juries could be blind to so self-evident a principle. Taking a man’s money without his consent, is also as much robbery, when it is done by millions of men, acting in concert, and calling themselves a government, as when it is done by a single individual, acting on his own responsibility, and calling himself a highwayman. Neither the numbers engaged in the act, nor the different characters they assume as a cover for the act, alter the nature of the act itself.
"If the government can take a man’s money without his consent, there is no limit to the additional tyranny it may practise upon him; for, with his money, it can hire soldiers to stand over him, keep him in subjection, plunder him at discretion, and kill him if he resists. And governments always will do this, as they everywhere and always have done it, except where the Common Law principle has been established. It is therefore a first principle, a very sine qua non of political freedom, that a man can be taxed only by his personal consent. And the establishment of this principle, with trial by jury, insures freedom of course; because:
"1. No man would pay his money unless he had first contracted for such a government as he was willing to support; and,
"2. Unless the government then kept itself within the terms of its contract, juries would not enforce the payment of the tax. Besides, the agreement to be taxed would probably be ...
The history of US Service Rifles-
[ammoland.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 22, 2020:
Please consider the following book:
Unintended Consequences by John Ross (Wow, and I loaned out my copy!)
https://www.thriftbooks.com/w/unintended-consequences_john--ross/248969/?mkwid=heYWuUrg|dc=77240706869719=thriftbooks=bb====1235851098199146=dat-77240712317549:loc-190=bing=cpc=Search%20%7C%20Dynamic%20Search%20Ad%20Test=thriftbooks=heYWuUrg|dc|pcrid|77240706869719|pkw|thriftbooks|pmt|bb|product||slid||pgrid|1235851098199146|ptaid|dat-77240712317549:loc-190|#isbn=1888118040=1277836
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 22, 2020:
Please consider the following book:
Unintended Consequences by John Ross (Wow, and I loaned out my copy!)
https://www.thriftbooks.com/w/unintended-consequences_john--ross/248969/?mkwid=heYWuUrg|dc=77240706869719=thriftbooks=bb====1235851098199146=dat-77240712317549:loc-190=bing=cpc=Search%20%7C%20Dynamic%20Search%20Ad%20Test=thriftbooks=heYWuUrg|dc|pcrid|77240706869719|pkw|thriftbooks|pmt|bb|product||slid||pgrid|1235851098199146|ptaid|dat-77240712317549:loc-190|#isbn=1888118040=1277836
PATRIOTS LOST THEIR LIVES IN THE SERVER RAID/YUGE REVELATIONS FROM SIDNEY POWELL FILING/FLYNN SPEAKS...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 29, 2020:
https://www.worldviewweekend.com/tv/video/wvw-tv-exclusive-lt-general-michael-flynns-first-interview-president-trumps-pardon?fbclid=IwAR0Q4UPgvmN7nSyeIia226kxMiH9h6BYDtvcD6J158sHSIknR083-H0Af9M WVW-TV Exclusive: Lt. General Michael Flynn's First Interview Since President Trump's Pardon Includes His Talking About the Ongoing Coup w/ Guest Lt. General McInerney and Mary Fanning.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 29, 2020:
https://www.worldviewweekend.com/tv/video/wvw-tv-exclusive-lt-general-michael-flynns-first-interview-president-trumps-pardon?fbclid=IwAR0Q4UPgvmN7nSyeIia226kxMiH9h6BYDtvcD6J158sHSIknR083-H0Af9M WVW-TV Exclusive: Lt. General Michael Flynn's First Interview Since President Trump's Pardon Includes His Talking About the Ongoing Coup w/ Guest Lt. General McInerney and Mary Fanning.
Hippodrome anyone
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 20, 2020:
Good bait, rewarding consequence.
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 20, 2020:
Good bait, rewarding consequence.
[summit.
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 18, 2020:
In America is it routine for those in power to execute those deemed by them as disobedient, or merely troublesome. What does Law have to do with it?
Josf-Kelley comments on Sep 18, 2020:
In America is it routine for those in power to execute those deemed by them as disobedient, or merely troublesome. What does Law have to do with it?
Looks like the smoking "gun" bioweapon has been traced back to the origin. [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 18, 2020:
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/harvard-university-professor-and-two-chinese-nationals-charged-three-separate-china-related
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, January 28, 2020
Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 18, 2020:
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/harvard-university-professor-and-two-chinese-nationals-charged-three-separate-china-related
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, January 28, 2020
Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases
Why, come tragedy, come calamity, come suffering, does civilization consistently mistake the ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 13, 2020:
An instrument is Indoctrination, a fact that matters.
What is the lesson in the following discovery of that fact that matters?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eP98ZKt709A
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 13, 2020:
An instrument is Indoctrination, a fact that matters.
What is the lesson in the following discovery of that fact that matters?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eP98ZKt709A
Project Veritas Panel with James O'Keefe, Judge Kozinski, Ron Coleman and Viva Frei - Freedom Fest...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 16, 2022:
Further into this sing song parrot parade the third guy from the LEFT in that row claims that these attacks on journalism is a new thing.
Really.
Virginia Resolution - Alien and Sedition Acts
December 24, 1798
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/virres.asp
"That the General Assembly doth particularly protest against the palpable and alarming infractions of the Constitution, in the two late cases of the "Alien and Sedition Acts" passed at the last session of Congress; the first of which exercises a power no where delegated to the federal government, and which by uniting legislative and judicial powers to those of executive, subverts the general principles of free government; as well as the particular organization, and positive provisions of the federal constitution; and the other of which acts, exercises in like manner, a power not delegated by the constitution, but on the contrary, expressly and positively forbidden by one of the amendments thererto; a power, which more than any other, ought to produce universal alarm, because it is levelled against that right of freely examining public characters and measures, and of free communication among the people thereon, which has ever been justly deemed, the only effectual guardian of every other right."
Kentucky Resolutions - October 1798
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/jeffken.asp
"7. _Resolved_, That the construction applied by the General Government (as is evidenced by sundry of their proceedings) to those parts of the Constitution of the United States which delegate to Congress a power "to lay and collect taxes, duties, imports, and excises, to pay the debts, and provide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States," and "to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers vested by the Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof," goes to the destruction of all limits prescribed to their power by the Constitution: that words meant by the instrument to be subsidiary only to the execution of limited powers, ought not to be so construed as themselves to give unlimited powers, nor a part to be so taken as to destroy the whole residue of that instrument: that the proceedings of the General Government under color of these articles, will be a fit and necessary subject of revisal and correction, at a time of greater tranquillity, while those specified in the preceding resolutions call for immediate redress."
Previous to The Alien and Sedition Acts those in power had a dry run with Shays's Rebellion before the Nationalists took over the federated republics, and then The Whiskey Rebellion after the Nationalists took over the federated republics.
Those who dared to ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Jul 16, 2022:
Further into this sing song parrot parade the third guy from the LEFT in that row claims that these attacks on journalism is a new thing.
Really.
Virginia Resolution - Alien and Sedition Acts
December 24, 1798
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/virres.asp
"That the General Assembly doth particularly protest against the palpable and alarming infractions of the Constitution, in the two late cases of the "Alien and Sedition Acts" passed at the last session of Congress; the first of which exercises a power no where delegated to the federal government, and which by uniting legislative and judicial powers to those of executive, subverts the general principles of free government; as well as the particular organization, and positive provisions of the federal constitution; and the other of which acts, exercises in like manner, a power not delegated by the constitution, but on the contrary, expressly and positively forbidden by one of the amendments thererto; a power, which more than any other, ought to produce universal alarm, because it is levelled against that right of freely examining public characters and measures, and of free communication among the people thereon, which has ever been justly deemed, the only effectual guardian of every other right."
Kentucky Resolutions - October 1798
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/jeffken.asp
"7. _Resolved_, That the construction applied by the General Government (as is evidenced by sundry of their proceedings) to those parts of the Constitution of the United States which delegate to Congress a power "to lay and collect taxes, duties, imports, and excises, to pay the debts, and provide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States," and "to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers vested by the Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof," goes to the destruction of all limits prescribed to their power by the Constitution: that words meant by the instrument to be subsidiary only to the execution of limited powers, ought not to be so construed as themselves to give unlimited powers, nor a part to be so taken as to destroy the whole residue of that instrument: that the proceedings of the General Government under color of these articles, will be a fit and necessary subject of revisal and correction, at a time of greater tranquillity, while those specified in the preceding resolutions call for immediate redress."
Previous to The Alien and Sedition Acts those in power had a dry run with Shays's Rebellion before the Nationalists took over the federated republics, and then The Whiskey Rebellion after the Nationalists took over the federated republics.
Those who dared to ...
FACTS OR THEORY?
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 13, 2020:
"Fact 1. The Covid19 virus likely came from bats - the intermediate horseshoe bat."
Is that likely a pseudo-fact?
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 13, 2020:
"Fact 1. The Covid19 virus likely came from bats - the intermediate horseshoe bat."
Is that likely a pseudo-fact?
GEORGIA RUN-OFF: County Elections Board Throws Out Challenge To Toss 16,000+ Potentially Ineligible...
Josf-Kelley comments on Dec 21, 2020:
Treasonous Criminal Frauds - as a rule - cannot afford to acknowledge any evidence of their ongoing Treasonous Criminal Fraud. If that is difficult to comprehend, then maybe you drank the cool-aid.
"The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto
“Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.”
“The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.”
“How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.”
Josf-Kelley comments on Dec 21, 2020:
Treasonous Criminal Frauds - as a rule - cannot afford to acknowledge any evidence of their ongoing Treasonous Criminal Fraud. If that is difficult to comprehend, then maybe you drank the cool-aid.
"The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto
“Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.”
“The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.”
“How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.”
What the Ukrainian Invasion has Revealed about Russian Military Power
[youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 16, 2022:
Time 13:18
“We, meaning United States and our NATO partners need to do what’s necessary to support the cause of freedom worldwide while avoiding World War III insofar as it can be avoided, so to this point western support has by and large been effective.”
That is at best half truth.
We, meaning a captured Nation-State titled U.S.A., run currently by a compromised American Treasonous Fraud pedophile, having very close criminal ties to The Chinese Communist Party and the criminal organizations in the captured Nation-State titled Ukraine, are advised by the above "authority" to aid and abet known criminals in their fight against known criminals.
Known criminals advising who?
Known criminals advising who is being advised to aid and abet known criminals in their fight against known criminals?
If you cannot see this as a whole truth and nothing but the truth situation, they you may be inspired to aid and abet known criminals to do what criminals are known to do when they have the full support of known stupid and servile masses of idiots.
Idiots incited to aid and abet known criminals, to FUND their criminal activities, are routinely incited to do so with false patriotism, false slogans, such as Spreading Democracy, but the sales pitch does pad bank accounts for those who profit with arms deals to all sides in all wars.
Without the full support of known idiots, who would these warmongers have for their cannon fodder roles in their Spreading Democracy plays?
How does one manage to create a massive supply of known idiots?
Would it help to tug a bit on those patriotism strings?
All hail the Nation-State flag?
Why can't they be as Nationalist as "we" are?
The narrative falls apart when two criminal gangs or more are all fighting over the same disputed strategic territory for some strange reason.
National Central Bank Interests.
If one has National Central Bank Interests, then it is their National Interest to ensure that there are no competitors competing for World Reserve Currency Power.
If there is a better competitor seeking World Reserve Currency Power, those would be the Nation-State Central Bank interests that get the most interest payments paid to them by all the useful idiots using that Central Bank Currency.
That "change" from a former World Reserve Currency Power to a new World Reserve Currency Power would be forensically documented with the accurate measure of Purchasing Power Parity that favors the new World Reserve Currency Power instead of the old World Reserve Currency Power.
Cheer leaders for those who have been a long time in the business of "Spreading Democracy" know that the root of their power is Treasonous Fraud, and having that power causes their victims to aid and ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 16, 2022:
Time 13:18
“We, meaning United States and our NATO partners need to do what’s necessary to support the cause of freedom worldwide while avoiding World War III insofar as it can be avoided, so to this point western support has by and large been effective.”
That is at best half truth.
We, meaning a captured Nation-State titled U.S.A., run currently by a compromised American Treasonous Fraud pedophile, having very close criminal ties to The Chinese Communist Party and the criminal organizations in the captured Nation-State titled Ukraine, are advised by the above "authority" to aid and abet known criminals in their fight against known criminals.
Known criminals advising who?
Known criminals advising who is being advised to aid and abet known criminals in their fight against known criminals?
If you cannot see this as a whole truth and nothing but the truth situation, they you may be inspired to aid and abet known criminals to do what criminals are known to do when they have the full support of known stupid and servile masses of idiots.
Idiots incited to aid and abet known criminals, to FUND their criminal activities, are routinely incited to do so with false patriotism, false slogans, such as Spreading Democracy, but the sales pitch does pad bank accounts for those who profit with arms deals to all sides in all wars.
Without the full support of known idiots, who would these warmongers have for their cannon fodder roles in their Spreading Democracy plays?
How does one manage to create a massive supply of known idiots?
Would it help to tug a bit on those patriotism strings?
All hail the Nation-State flag?
Why can't they be as Nationalist as "we" are?
The narrative falls apart when two criminal gangs or more are all fighting over the same disputed strategic territory for some strange reason.
National Central Bank Interests.
If one has National Central Bank Interests, then it is their National Interest to ensure that there are no competitors competing for World Reserve Currency Power.
If there is a better competitor seeking World Reserve Currency Power, those would be the Nation-State Central Bank interests that get the most interest payments paid to them by all the useful idiots using that Central Bank Currency.
That "change" from a former World Reserve Currency Power to a new World Reserve Currency Power would be forensically documented with the accurate measure of Purchasing Power Parity that favors the new World Reserve Currency Power instead of the old World Reserve Currency Power.
Cheer leaders for those who have been a long time in the business of "Spreading Democracy" know that the root of their power is Treasonous Fraud, and having that power causes their victims to aid and ...
(admin) The Media is the Enemy
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 16, 2020:
Not "by media," if the Shadow Gate information is as true as it reasons out.
https://banned.video/watch?id=5f37fcc2df77c4044ee2eb03
In other words: The "Media" includes every single individual who is brainwashed and triggered by those who now have the gun, and the gun is IIA (Time: 5:45 or so) Interactive Internet Activities: management.
Time: 29:50 or so...
"How to make them nod their head or..."
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 16, 2020:
Not "by media," if the Shadow Gate information is as true as it reasons out.
https://banned.video/watch?id=5f37fcc2df77c4044ee2eb03
In other words: The "Media" includes every single individual who is brainwashed and triggered by those who now have the gun, and the gun is IIA (Time: 5:45 or so) Interactive Internet Activities: management.
Time: 29:50 or so...
"How to make them nod their head or..."
Wow, what an idea!
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 20, 2020:
"There are at least 5,000 federal criminal laws, with 10,000-300,000 regulations that can be enforced criminally. In fact, our entire criminal code has become a leviathan unto itself. In 2003, there were only 4,000 offences that carried criminal penalties. By 2013, that number had grown by 21 percent to 4,850. The code has become so big, that the Congressional Research Service and the American Bar Association simply do not have enough staff to adequately categorize every law we have on the books."
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2015/06/06/how-many-federal-laws-are-there-again-n2009184
So...
Josf-Kelley comments on Aug 20, 2020:
"There are at least 5,000 federal criminal laws, with 10,000-300,000 regulations that can be enforced criminally. In fact, our entire criminal code has become a leviathan unto itself. In 2003, there were only 4,000 offences that carried criminal penalties. By 2013, that number had grown by 21 percent to 4,850. The code has become so big, that the Congressional Research Service and the American Bar Association simply do not have enough staff to adequately categorize every law we have on the books."
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2015/06/06/how-many-federal-laws-are-there-again-n2009184
So...
Isn’t this the “Intellectual” dark web, a type of crowd-sourced “think tank”?
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 5, 2020:
I find it very interesting, even telling, as in telling a story or confessing something interesting, that specific subjects that are of the utmost importance are not discussed with a deliberate effort to get to the truth of the matter.
To put context on this phenomenon that appears to me as a confession I think the following quote fits as a poignant message relating to this matter.
"For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country." Patrick Henry, 1775
In those times World War III was a real present danger. It wasn't then called World War III, but the point is to point out that clear and present dangers, such as pending World War, or ongoing Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace, have not been defended against effectively, despite claims of taking the steps to do so.
So why isn't there any discussion on this matter? Or where is such discussion if it isn't here and now?
Perhaps the following might lead to a viable answer:
Q. Let me ask you finally -- this has
been a long road -- how you regard -- what is
your explanation for the fact that there has
been such little national media coverage of
these -- of this trial and this evidence and
this event here in this Memphis courtroom,
which is the first trial ever to be able to
produce evidence on this assassination --
what has happened here that Mighty Wurlitzer
is not sounding but is in fact totally
silent -- almost totally silent?
A. Oh, but -- as we know, silence can be
deafening. Disinformation is not only
getting certain things to appear in print,
it's also getting certain things not to
appear in print. I mean, the first -- the
first thing I would say as a way of
explanation is the incredibly powerful effect
of disinformation over a long period of time
that I mentioned before. For 30 years the
official line has been that James Earl Ray
killed Martin Luther King and he did it all
by himself. That's 30 years, not -- nothing
like the short period when the line was that
the Cubans raped the Angolan women. But for
30 years it's James Earl Ray killed Dr. King,
did it all by himself.
And when that is imprinted in the
minds of the general public for 30 years, if
somebody stood up and confessed and said: I
did it. Ray didn't do it, I did it. Here's
a movie. Here's a video showing me do it. 99
percent of the people wouldn't believe him
because it just -- it just wouldn't click in
the mind. It would just go right to -- it
couldn't be. It's just a powerful
...
Josf-Kelley comments on Mar 5, 2020:
I find it very interesting, even telling, as in telling a story or confessing something interesting, that specific subjects that are of the utmost importance are not discussed with a deliberate effort to get to the truth of the matter.
To put context on this phenomenon that appears to me as a confession I think the following quote fits as a poignant message relating to this matter.
"For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country." Patrick Henry, 1775
In those times World War III was a real present danger. It wasn't then called World War III, but the point is to point out that clear and present dangers, such as pending World War, or ongoing Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace, have not been defended against effectively, despite claims of taking the steps to do so.
So why isn't there any discussion on this matter? Or where is such discussion if it isn't here and now?
Perhaps the following might lead to a viable answer:
Q. Let me ask you finally -- this has
been a long road -- how you regard -- what is
your explanation for the fact that there has
been such little national media coverage of
these -- of this trial and this evidence and
this event here in this Memphis courtroom,
which is the first trial ever to be able to
produce evidence on this assassination --
what has happened here that Mighty Wurlitzer
is not sounding but is in fact totally
silent -- almost totally silent?
A. Oh, but -- as we know, silence can be
deafening. Disinformation is not only
getting certain things to appear in print,
it's also getting certain things not to
appear in print. I mean, the first -- the
first thing I would say as a way of
explanation is the incredibly powerful effect
of disinformation over a long period of time
that I mentioned before. For 30 years the
official line has been that James Earl Ray
killed Martin Luther King and he did it all
by himself. That's 30 years, not -- nothing
like the short period when the line was that
the Cubans raped the Angolan women. But for
30 years it's James Earl Ray killed Dr. King,
did it all by himself.
And when that is imprinted in the
minds of the general public for 30 years, if
somebody stood up and confessed and said: I
did it. Ray didn't do it, I did it. Here's
a movie. Here's a video showing me do it. 99
percent of the people wouldn't believe him
because it just -- it just wouldn't click in
the mind. It would just go right to -- it
couldn't be. It's just a powerful
...
Info dump follow the crumbs...
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 20, 2020:
After the muzzle is firmly in place the next battle is in hell.
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 20, 2020:
After the muzzle is firmly in place the next battle is in hell.
Images: Report From The Chairman Of The Senate Judiciary Subcommittee On Elections In Georgia, Has ...
Josf-Kelley comments on Dec 22, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8q9pOY4_qkE
War Room: Pandemic Ep 601
Josf-Kelley comments on Dec 22, 2020:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8q9pOY4_qkE
War Room: Pandemic Ep 601
DR KAUFMAN M.D. EXPLAINS HOW THIS IS ALL FAKE
[youtube.com]
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 5, 2020:
https://www.inpowermovement.com/
There Is Beauty In Freedom
Josf-Kelley comments on Apr 5, 2020:
https://www.inpowermovement.com/
There Is Beauty In Freedom
Enjoy another from JP [youtu.be]
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 13, 2020:
Impartial Judges?
Who in the world came up with that CON? "Impartial" Judges?
Josf-Kelley comments on Nov 13, 2020:
Impartial Judges?
Who in the world came up with that CON? "Impartial" Judges?
You like Josf-Kelley
X
Details
- BirthdayJuly 5
- Education2-Year
- Top tags#government #USA #rights #video #truth #crime #money #world #reason #laws #evidence #freedom #justice #evil #god #children #death #federal #society #media
- Level8 (85,725pts)
- Posts777
-
Comments
Replies 1,895
1,213 - Followers 17
- Fans 0
- Following 1
- Referrals11
- Joined Oct 29th, 2019
- Last Visit 3+ months ago
Josf-Kelley's Groups
Q is for question
460 members, Host
Voluntary Mutual Defence
37 members, Host
End Game (formerly Ryan Faulk Fans)
14 members, Host
Controversial Charts
48193 members
Jordan Peterson Group
25437 members
Ben Shapiro Group
22986 members
Joe Rogan Group
16345 members
Just Jokes and Memes
14496 members
Tucker Carlson Fans
13549 members
Dinesh D'Souza Fans
10234 members
IDW Topic-of-the-Day
9848 members
News From All Views
7280 members
DaisyCousens
5902 members
Tim Pool Group
5879 members
Sydney Watson Fanspace
5513 members
Classical Liberalism
4844 members
Canadian Politics
4021 members
Arielle Scarcella FanSpace!
2802 members
IDW Political Party
2798 members
Politically Incorrect folks
2479 members
Anti-Socialism
2269 members
Learning from Christ
2237 members
President Donald J. Trump... Latest
2066 members
Saving Western Civilisation
2055 members
RamZPaul
1889 members
John Paul Watson Group
1610 members
Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder
1568 members
Alex Jones Fans
1301 members
Conspiracy Truth : Wolves And Sheeple
1227 members
Stefan Molyneux Fans
1049 members
Anti Communists
1022 members
Emergency Preparedness and Survival
949 members
Libertarian Freethinkers
897 members
COVID-19
765 members
The Great Reset
708 members
The Second Amendment Sanctuary
649 members
True Crime Discussion Group
597 members
Conspiracy Research
575 members
Words of Wisdom
480 members
Feminism = cancer
474 members
International News
396 members
Comedy, Laughs and Humor.
327 members
Vaccine Education & Discussion Group
307 members
Ideas of God
291 members
The Case Against Corona Panic
250 members
Dr. Steve Turley Group
185 members
Joe Biden Is Not My President
178 members
United We Stand
153 members
The History Corner
150 members
Brain soup
128 members
IDW.Community Senate
124 members
ORIGINAL MEMES ( GREGORY ALAN ELLIOTT )
118 members
Liz Wheeler Fans Page.
116 members
Red Pilled Hotties (Yes you can still flirt & remain politically engaged)
107 members
Propaganda Clearing House
95 members
MGTOW: Exodus From The Plantation
63 members
Anarcho-Capitalism / Voluntaryism
55 members
IDW Liberty Alliance Culture War Room
49 members
Now You Are Talking With
48 members
Rednecks Anonymous
43 members
Current Events
28 members
50 Policies
23 members
Anthony Brian Logan Fans
21 members
Freemerica
19 members
Children's Health Defense
16 members
UnCommon Sense 42020 PodCast
9 members