The bolsheviks actually had a ruling class they were rebelling against. BLM/Antifa are just shock troops for our ruling class.

When pedos groom their victims so as to convince their victims that slavery is good, being used by the pedo is acceptable, that being consumed by a criminal is desired, that anyone daring to question the order to accept domination by criminals is wrong, that it is right to force other people to join the cult of victimization, the process is called grooming.

When pedos with badges do it, it is called Public School.

"The Six Purposes of Schooling" - John Taylor Gatto

“Now you are ready to hear the six purposes of modern schooling taken directly from Dr. Anglisse’s book.”

“The first function of schooling is adjustive. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. It is fixed habits of reaction. Notice that this precludes critical judgment completely. Notice too that requiring obedience to stupid orders is a much better test of function one than following sensible orders ever could be. You don’t know whether people are reflexibly obedient unless they will march right off the cliff.”

“How can you establish weather someone has successfully developed this automatic reaction, because people have a proclivity when they are given sensible orders to follow? That is not what they want to reach. The only way to measure this is to give stupid orders, and people automatically follow those. Now you have achieved function one.”

"What is currently happening in Our Country?"

Without law it is not "our Country". Without law it is a place where the criminals dominate and consume victims.

"Our Elites push this and what do we call it?"

You have Elites? Why do you automatically force your "Elites" upon me with your half-truths, outright lies, distortions, and falsehoods? Criminals who groom the public through indoctrination centers paid for by the victims are not my "Elites," even if you repeat it a thousand times, and even if a lot of people also repeat the same falsehoods: (so-called Majority Rules).

"What would we call this Antifa/BLM rioting everytime they don't get a court case their way"?

When a criminal injures an innocent victim (brainwashing, controlling, enslaving, deceiving, threatening, etc.) it is called a CAUSE to act in defense of the victim. A cause to act at law involves some steps that have been perfected over thousands of years in a form known as The Ancient Law, also known as the common law, also known as the law of the land, and this form derived from a CAUSE to act in defense of victims remains to be the law of the land in America as I type this response.

When a criminal in a government office perpetrates a crime there are formal names for those crimes such as:

Non-feasance (failure to do the job according to the job description, such as "defend the innocent from the guilty" )

Misfeasance (use the power of office to perpetrate a crime, such as "grooming" the public to accept subsidized slavery)

Malfeasance (consuming innocent people immorally, such as harvesting baby parts, Spirit Cooking innocent children and eating them, selling children for profit, torturing children for entertainment, etc.)

Misprision of treason (examples may suffice to "groom" the reader to "change" the heart and mind of the reader, to inspire the reader to think for themselves, and to give the reader who thinks that they need permission, to BE THE LAW POWER armed with individual moral conscience and a sense of public duty)

During the Revolution between 1774 and 1789 in America the people had to accept their duty to act in defense against an invading army of criminals intent upon enslaving Americans and making Americans pay for their own enslavement: OR ELSE.

The targeted victims reestablished the common law and those found to be investing in the criminal take-over of America were processed according to law, whereby those accused of aiding and abetting the criminals were brought before TRIAL JURIES that are not hand picked (jury tampering) by the criminals, so as to ensure that the criminals are never held accountable for their crimes while in government office.

Here is one case I found, and there are probably a lot of such cases (hidden or destroyed perhaps) during that period of time when the government was under the common law (1774 through 1789), and not the other way around: the government over-rules the common law.

U.S. Supreme Court
Court of Oyer and Terminer, at Philadelphia
September Sessions, 1778
Respublica v. Abraham Carlisle

This was an indictment for High Treason, which was set forth in the following words:

"'The Jurors for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, upon their oaths and affirmations, do present, That Abraham Carlisle, late of the city of Philadelphia, in the county of Philadelphia, carpenter; being an inhabitant of and belonging to and residing within the State of Pennsylvania, and under the protection of its laws, and owing allegiance to the same State, as a false traitor against the same, not having the fear of God before his eyes, but being moved and seduced by the instigation of the Devil, the fidelity which to the same State he owed wholly withdrawing, and with all his might intending the peace and tranquillity of this Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to disturb, and war and rebellion against the same to raise and move, and the government and independency thereof, as by law established, to subvert, and to raise again and restore the government and tyranny of the king of Great Britain within the same Commonwealth: On the first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and seventy eight, and at divers days and times, as well before as after, at the city of Philadelphia, in the county aforesaid, with force and arms, did falsely and traiterously take a commission or commissions from the king of Great Britain, and then and there, with force and arms did falsely and treacherously also take a commission or commissions from general Sir William Howe, then and there acting under the said king of Great Britain, and under the authority of the same king, to wit, a commission to watch over and guard the gates of the city of Philadelphia, by the said Sir William Howe, erected and set up for the purpose of keeping and maintaing the possession of the said city, and of shutting and excluding the faithful and liege inhabitants and subjects of this State and of the United States from the said city: And then and there also maliciously and traiterously, with a great multitude of traitors and rebels, against the said Commonwealth, (whose names are as yet unkown to the jurors) being armed and arrayed in a hostile manner, with force and arms did falsely and traiterously assemble and join himself against this Commonwealth, and then and there, with force and arms, did falsely and traiterously, and in a warlike and hostile manner, array and dispole himself against this Commonwealth; and then and there, in pursuance and execution of such his wicked and traiterous intentions and purposes aforesaid, did falsely and traiterously prepare, order, wage and levy a public and cruel war against this Commonwealth; then and there committing and perpetrating a miserable and cruel slaughter of and amongst the faithful and liege inhabitants thereof; and then and there did, with force and arms, falsely and traiterously aid and assist the king of Great Britian, being an enemy at open war against this State, by joining his armies, to wit, his army under the command of general Sir William Howe, then actually invading this State; and then and there maliciously and traiterously, (with divers other Traitors to the jurors aforesaid unknown,) with force and arms, did combine, plot and conspire to betray this State and the United States of America into the hands and power of the king of Great Britian, being a foreign enemy to this State and to the United States of America, at open war against the same; and then and there did, with force and arms, maliciously and traiterously give and send intelligence to the same enemies for that purpose, against the duty of his allegiance, against the form of the act of Assembly in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.'

Additional information of some use to those refusing to drink the cool-aid forced upon the public by the "Elites":

The Conviction Factory, The Collapse of America's Criminal Courts, by Roger Roots
Page 40
Private Prosecutors
"For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action.
Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, however, private prosecutors were prohibited from withdrawing the action pursuant to private agreement with the defendant. Court intervention was occasionally required to compel injured crime victims to appear against offenders in court and "not to make bargains to allow [defendants] to escape conviction, if they...repair the injury."

Page 42
Law Enforcement as a Universal Duty
"Law enforcement in the Founders' time was a duty of every citizen. Citizens were expected to be armed and equipped to chase suspects on foot, on horse, or with wagon whenever summoned. And when called upon to enforce the laws of the state, citizens were to respond "not faintly and with lagging steps, but honestly and bravely and with whatever implements and facilities [were] convenient and at hand. Any person could act in the capacity of a constable without being one, and when summoned by a law enforcement officer, a private person became a temporary member of the police department. The law also presumed that any person acting in his public capacity as an officer was rightfully appointed."