Are we going to burn the Constitution in order to save the Republic?

A "strong leader" taking such action would see a repeat of Julius Caesar's behavior in Rome. Different in the particulars, but of the same in type... We'd have a dictator, and perhaps soon after, the Republic would devolve into autocracy.

False question, therefore there is no reasonable answer listed in the false answers to the false question.

A criminal take-over of America (so-called Napoleon-like-figure) would be called despotism, tyranny, or more recently a "Failed State."

That already happened in 1789. The United States of America became a Corporate State in 1789, and it has been run by criminals ever since.

If an individual somehow managed to occupy the President of the United States of America Corporate Office, Trump for example, and said person wanted to dissolve "congress" (not "drain the swamp," but instead to dissolve it), and said "Leader" wanted to dissolve (not drain) the swamp Courts, then said immoral means to said immoral ends would be by definition outside the law: OUTLAW.

So the question is obviously couched in such a way as to fail to mention that a despot, or tyrant, is a criminal, and therefore the question is couched in such a way as to suggest that there is no such thing as law and order; sometimes "we" need a Bad Boy to take over, because "we" are so, so, so, bad!

The question is couched on such a way as to suggest that it takes a Napoleon-like-figure, an exceptional Strong-Man, to Rule the people, since the people are so unruly. This is not a new thing, it is a con game played often in human history, see "Lord" Coke or "The Prince" Machiavelli for 2 examples.

Why not simply return to rule of law? Why is the current president apparently incapable of bringing one criminal (Killary Clinton for example) before The People in a trial by jury case that proceeds according to the law of the land, which is the common law, see: The Bill of Rights? A Court of Law is a common law court, and The People, through their juries decide fact from fiction, guilt from innocence, lawful from unlawful, and the people adjudicate judgment of remedy, restitution, redemption, or punishment.

If people continue to blame things for the actions of individual people, then these types of misleading questions (polls) will help (aid and abet) the criminals who have taken over the government; where criminals over-rule their victims with fake government and fake (Admiralty) courts.

I will therefore rephrase the question to suit actual reality:

Assuming Marxist/Communist Treasonous Criminal Rioters escalate their current crime spree, what would be your reaction to a strong leader returning to rule of law with a speedy trial of any one of the worst treasonous criminals behind this latest Marxist/Communist Treasonous Crime Spree (which includes the Global Treasonous Pandemic Fraud)?

Answers:

1. I didn't know anything about that actual law process, so I thought that the most powerful man (or potentially woman) takes everything, assumes absolute power, because they can, once they win, and that is the law of the jungle, our natural STATE, our government.

2. Is Football Season canceled?

3. Good question, what would be a first step in bringing these criminals to justice?

4. I would volunteer for jury duty, but I'm not sure that I'd be able to maintain an unbiased position since I already know that Hillary is a criminal in need of a court date.

5. Put Fauci on the top of the list just below Bill Gates, please

6. I'll answer in the comments section.

Although I can understand why many would support this, I fear that the long term consequences of having a president with that much power would be to completely and unequivocally delegitimize the systems we have in place for the peaceful transfer of power. Force will determine who controls the presidency. Intrigue and assassination could become the norm. As Rome declined, during one 50 year period late in the empire, it had an average of one emperor a year—only one of whom died of natural causes. Unfortunately, at this point I don’t see how we could possibly escape such a fate at this point, for multicultural empires require a strong leader to impose order. I would certainly rather Trump do this than someone on the left; however, God help us if the left takes the same route and targets people like us who oppose what they’ve done and continue to do to our country.

Force is the only thing these people respect.
We have to stop pretending they have the same civility that we do.
If we refuse to deal with them at their level they interpret it as weakness and become emboldened.

I hate what Antifa an BLM are doing, but one of the three co-equal branches of government unilaterally dissolving the other two? I'm no expert in US law, but I think he would run into trouble with a little thing called the constitution! Besides, that's essentially what Antifa and BLM are trying to do, abolish the whole system and (theoretically) build a new one. They should be opposed the right way!

If Trump called forth the Militia, this would be over in an afternoon. We could spend the next interval leisurely dismantling the Enemy in all of its nests: media, tech, bureaucracy, cities. He doesn't have the vision or the guts, for if he did, he would have done it in the summer of 2017 after getting the Executive Branch in Order.

Trump's presidency will be remembered by our historians as a failure to understand the Big Picture. He desperately wanted this to be Politics as Usual when the bedrock of the nation has split. In this way he is similar to James Buchanan, but with more fault because he has Buchanan's historical example to learn from.

The speech on July 3rd pleased me because he spoke as one speaks of an Enemy that must be defeated, not appeased. This is no different and perhaps far worse than rag-headed terrorists, Soviet Appratchicks, or a hypothetical Chinese Flotilla attacking Los Angeles; it must be understood as a war, society as usual must be suspended and the war prosecuted.

Alas, this won't happen (though it did for a common cold) so we are left to plant the seeds for what is to come November 4th.

I don't trust anyone enough to have an opinion on the matter. I wouldn't be horrified, however.

I'd just be wondering if it was genuine or if we were getting played again in a different fashion.