slug.com slug.com
2 0

Atheism is an idea, it doesn’t have to be reasoned with, but emotions alter the interpretation of ideas.

Theology is a study, and like those who Search and research, those who study find patterns, and patterns oppose chaos, which means reason, thus patterns give meaning to those whom study with diligence.

Study an idea which is chaotic and subject to circumstances

Study a subject, and the subject is defined.

MisterEdmonds 6 Sep 18
Share
You must be a member of this group before commenting. Join Group

Be part of the movement!

Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

I get what you said, I totally understood what you meant by all that and atheism. I'm just saying, if you thought that was, right, then that's wrong just saying. I wouldn't dare telling you that you're wrong for that reason, but, you're right though, that totally is atheism and it just so happens to be wrong though just because you said that. I don't want to say, but atheism is good if I'm saying it's not, it's what you said about ideas that I disagree with, just like now because, I don't have to know anything right about my idea about your idea, and I would still be right, no mater what you said, and you could have said that about anything, don't blame me for what you were saying about atheism. True isn't fucking true, just because it happens to be or not. Speculation about truth and ideas, ha. And if what you say did exist within the chaos, well then that just makes what I'm saying even more true then, because there is no way that you can expect me to be saying that I would ever have that same idea about atheism. If any order existed within chaos, then it wouldn't be chaos anymore, chaos is a thing, like an idea, it's a thing just like ideas, ideas are real, do exist, they may just be solely existing just to be true or may not be, but that still is true that all ideas whether the potential of to ever be right, would have to be if they were ideas, because idea do exist whether it was ever made to be or not, that's just like chaos, except, order within chaos, is not what destroys chaos, because, chaos is the same thing just like an idea, it already existed, there's no way that you could have said what you said about something that was there regardless of what you said, and then not just what you're saying that you're right because you are, no, you're saying there's a wrong answer just because there is a right answer, hell no. And this is just exactly "why that I don't think that you be the one to be "you" who are saying it, and tell me I'm wrong then but it's just because you're are atheist. Tell me I'm wrong if you, don't believe me.

Understanding your post is like following a string through a pile of yarn made by kittens on crack laced catnip.

But for prosperities sake, it seems like you agree to disagree because you say so

@MisterEdmonds Yeah, I'm not ashamed, not ashamed at all, you're respectfully right on the mark. I didn't want to say that, but yes. I actually am forced to think about how I've had to deal with my psychic ability over the years it was constant, it was just like, yeah it was all in my head, but that's why nothing that I ever thought or could have ever thought about what's happening to me in this story playing out to me in my visions, it was always, someone else's thought, which naturally seemingly lead me to think that maybe ideas that I was having myself was exactly just the same very way too, I had to be the one to think so though, and not just that but and add plus to that I also had to, think that it was an idea that I was am the one able to be thinking myself, and then it's a clear straight path to what you were just saying, knowing these ideas would heighten our understanding and give those ideas definition, I mean, I sort of agree with you about that, but, like for me I think that what I would be thinking about wouldn't be the same ideas that everyone else is having it would be, because it would be just those things the very ideas that only I or if not no one else could have ever been imagining them themselves ever being the ones to have thought about it before. I can kind of give short little explains of anecdotal stories from that, but that's the jist of it. I would have had to have already known that just in order to say it, which as it did turn out in this case I did, but that's why that I disagree Maybe I just think that it may not have been that the same way that you just said for others if that's what it happened to have been for me. I think that.

@MisterEdmonds I have two modes for thinking about what I cannot understand, either I do understand it because it makes sense, or, or nothing else, that's it, because if it was anything else then I wouldn't understand it and therefore I'd disagree. I think that's fair isn't it? I only know what is idea or not, if it was something that I didn't, there is no in between to me, it's either true in that sense or not, but like I'm saying that's probably just for me.

@caseyxsharp the idea of reading minds to me isn’t that bizarre, as people for starters finish each others sentence, and people read body language so that’s close, also some groups have studied telephathy. I don’t know if you mean that you’re reading between the lines and feeling for why something was stated, or that you are attempting to read my mind long after I left a comment, or at anytime, you can intuitively receive from the ether what I was thinking at the time you red the comment.
Also people will claim to have thought of an idea that someone else put to practice, also there is synchronistic events/timings that cause you to think of someone right before they call you on a phone or you see them in person. It’s fun stuff, I relate to everyone being biological tuning fork antennas. We get and give vibes and ideas... kinda like prayer

@caseyxsharp I don’t know if you’re supporting your argument against atheism or against theism

Both are out of the realm of understanding, but as for the Definitive line as you say beyond the vale, only one reality actually exist, and the other is a complete inability to grasp the existence of existence, even if the existing house is derelict under our human minds

To me, atheism is a dance everyone experiences and exercises. When a Christian says love is the answer, and hates peiple who disagree, that’s a dose of atheistic judgement, as Christ says to forgive those who offend one. An “atheist” feeling moral duty by loving/correcting others beyond their natural judgement of good or evil the Apostle Paul of the New Testament describes the innate character of holiness of the manifester (God) channeled to human hearts/will.

Romans chpt2 v12: 12For those who have sinned without The Written Law are also destroyed without The Written Law, and those who sinned with The Written Law will be judged by The Written Law. 13The hearers of The Written Law are not righteous ones before God, but the doers of The Written Law are justified. 14For if the Gentiles who have not The Written Law would perform those things of The Written Law by their nature, while they have not The Written Law, they would be The Written Law to themselves. 15And they show the work of The Written Law written on their heart and their conscience testifies to them, while their reasoning rebukes or defends each one, 16In the day when God judges the secrets of the children of men according to my Gospel, by Yeshua The Messiah.

@MisterEdmonds I think maybe it's best if I just give you an example of what something I'm thinking. It's think of this that Jesus was a man who it's stated that is who is the person who rejected declining the temptation from the Devil, that's right, so my question to you is this, what does that mean to you that Jesus resisted temptation, to anyone who might think about it they might as well be thinking oh that Jesus is such a good guy for doing that, but that's not really the point nor is it that the Devil is the bad one for making Jesus become interested enough to say he rejected the temptation from of the Devil, but no one ever says that to you, what you'd know for a fact is that Jesus seen the temptation and the Devil was the one who was rejected, so that's the idea right, and you think that's right, right, but no one has ever been the one to tell you that Jesus was the good guy to have been actually rejecting the Devil in reality, so then my next question should be now where does that idea even come from, it comes from that's the reality of ideas themselves, but you'd never be the one to know that unless someone had told you before, so when you think about it thinking about it, what part of there was Jesus that rejects the temptation of the Devil doesn't make any sense to you, the idea of it that makes sense to you is that it was never about whether the Devil was bad for tempting Jesus, it was that the idea was that Jesus must have already been a good person enough to reject even the Devil, and how would you possibly ever know that, well the answer would be quiet very simple, because you already know that if you were that man being tempted by the Devil and you weren't such a great guy then you'd know why Jesus would have had to be that man like you that to have declined the Devil because Jesus would be that guy to know why he should reject the temptation from the Devil if he was really such a great guy in reality, and, the idea wasn't that Jesus was a good person to have done that so that's not ever going to be something that you're ever going to know, that's why it makes sense to you, because the idea was not that the idea is that Jesus is a good person for being the one who did reject the Devil, see how that works?

In the end however, you have to be a little more flexible with the reality of what ideas are whether they should exist in reality or not, because at the end of it all all that an idea is, is just another figment of the imagination whether we choose to believe they exist or not, I can imagine seeing how atheist people use the idea of the meaning of ideas as something else, that it's not something that just anyone would ever know, because that's right, it's not ever something that just anyone would ever know, not unless you're atheist, which then that would make sense, because to you, atheist person, you can only see whether something is strictly true or false, real or unreal, exists or nonexisting, but for as I am me an angelic Christian I would be way more flexible with the idea regardless of if whether I choose something exist at all exists or not, so that, would only be something like that, that only I would be able to know. But that's what leads me to this, now that you know that, is it something that you would be able to know if not for being atheist too, see that's not really a good question that you're able to answer being atheist, so how then, will you think about this now, that you may be able to say that by through your understanding of your idea of being a real atheist that you can see the defined meaning of what that idea means but it's not something that I would ever know because what wouldn't you say then that what I do or would be have been knowing even without you having to think about it that it is that is something that only I really would know then? But see, that's why it's not that I wanted to tell you that you're wrong just for thinking that you're right thinking about ideas, it's because I just couldn't agree with you then. That is the form that idea takes in reality, it's not something that just it might whether it exists or not possibly actually really exists, it does exist, it just happens to turn out that, that very same idea to you and me, it, actually, would be meaning something different to each of us, if not for then we would be agreeing on that's the same idea. Idea is what I'm saying it exists as to be existing should be existing because it should, not just for the idea itself to exist in reality or not or then it wouldn't be an idea that at least one would be agreeing on, it is because then it won't evne be an idea that really exists to be an idea then whether you chose to think it's real or not.

Take a look at how I imagine it sort of like, the idea is, that when you have an idea a light turns on above your head, now imagine you don't exist, so when this light comes on, is it because you exist or not, is it that the idea exists or not, not really, now imagine that you are in a white void to a white void that light is just another thing to it that is within it, so now you can imagine that this whole entire white void is just one big idea and within it exists you with your little idea light, here's what you don't know, not even this white void that is your very unique idea to create all this light in this void realizes it, here's what you don't know now, is that within this void also there exists other some things that you don't even know is there because you never thought of it since your idea was, this every time you at least had an idea this light turned on, we've just established now this idea you're having exists and does within this void, so how are you supposed to imagine now that you have the idea those other things do exist just like you too, you don't, so, what happens now if, when you happen to have yet another idea, now is there going to be another light turn on above your head because you happened to thought an idea, no, and besides that, how would you ever even know, you wouldn't, and you know why, because, everything that is now does exist within this void that you've never thought existed too, only exists within this light of this white void, so, the answer is, you couldn't have possibly known that both your idea which is this light also does exist when if there is also things that you've never imagined also existing within this void only if your idea light is on, so answer me this, does your idea exist to you right now or not if you really do also happen to would be existing within this white void as well even if you never knew that what else might also does or cannot exist too? See, it's not, something, that you'd ever be able to know, because it's not, however, just because if it was that, then it still wouldn't have to mean that if your idea did exist knowingly and for to be known then that if not for you having to be the one to think it then for someone else other than you that very same idea might exist without your knowledge even without that person who understands it does would ever know it does actually exist either to you or them, but that's it, it wouldn't ever be just something that you'd ever be able to know though, because that's the idea, you see it, you get it now? I would have to say that if you really don't ever want to think so then, here's what I would have to say to you then, it's alright if you don't think that's right that to you aren't the one to be just the one to understand what an idea is just like that whether you even thought it was or wasn't right at least, because, it wouldn't matter so much such to you if now that you know to understand that if you can now then when you really think about if then now you can imagine for yourself that it won't matter since you're gonna be able to now have way more opinions about ideas, purely for the fact since you ever be the one to ever be able to know whether or not what that idea truly exists is or not. In order for you to have a point, see this leads me right back to what I've started talking about too, then you have to have that idea, it's weird like that, without the point of something, the idea cannot exist, because that's not an idea, but ideas do exist and can exist even without a point or there having to be a point it just won't ever be that an idea that you're ever going to be the one to ever know anything about though unless it just so happens that you do, therefore then and then that idea would be real to you because that's the point it would have to you.

@MisterEdmonds That, when you mentioned the Definitive Line, that's, that's the Definitive Line, it's not something that you'd ever know existed, and for you to be able to then you have to have had someone else be pointing it out having told you about it too, because that's the only way you know it would or would not ever exist to you. Take a look at my comment above, there it says about it's either an idea someone has told you about or it's an idea that would exist because it would be an idea to exist to you, that's only something that you would be able to know without knowing that's the idea and having to put that ever into words, or take a look at the reply before that, it says that I only have two modes of understanding, it's either I understand it and agree because it makes sense or nothing else because then it wouldn't ever be something that I would know so since that I would have to disagree, I don't have to even tell you now that it would be that I would disagree only if you said what I don't agree with, because that's the Definitive Line I'm speaking about, understanding it is the easy part, knowing that it's really there is a completely other story, what it is that is it's something that you don't know what it exists when it existing on the other side of this line whether you knew it is real to you or imaginary. It's not, that you'd ever know what it, what it is, you don't, it''s like falling asleep and suddenly somehow waking up to find yourself in the land of Oz, what is the land of Oz you ask me, I can tell you what it's not, in a real imaginary place that you'd ever know existed, but how do you, know that, do I have to tell you that, would you think that I would be having to telling that you other any person, no, that's the Definitive Line, even right now, it's here in the replies that you've spoke of too, how did you just know to tell me that there is only one existence, was it that it was an idea that someone else had told you, no, so therefore then, it must mean that no one ever had to tell you that either it would have only been something that you would know because that's what you would know, not otherwise that you'd ever know. But that's what you know, you didn't need to think about it. What I'm talking about, is on the other side of that line right there. Here's a question for you, how do you know that there is only one existence to you if it's not ever something you had to think of, how do you also know that it's the same for everyone else too, and if you did knew that already, then answer this, you can answer this right now too I know you can right now, how do you know then that what you know is that same what it was that you know to you already being your existence I mean that thought of the idea to you, the Definitive Line. How did you know, I've just said it, the answer is the Definitive Line.

And check this out, it works better if you reverse imagine it that it's like the size and what's all on this page you're reading right now, but you can imagine each paragraph and each reply as being some thing here existing to you that's without being spoken of, this page, the Definitive Line, this post, the Definitive Line, a comment, the Definitive Line too, each one paragraph, the Definitive Line, all of the paragraphs, the Definitive Line. it's what we're talking about right now, it just so happens that where it is, or excuse me does simply happen to exist on this and within this page right now it does exist somewhere at least, we don't need to know where, that's what this page is meant to be telling you. Where is it, it's right there where the Definitive Line should be, that's where. In my other reply to you when I was talking replying to your other comment to my comment below, I was saying that all about this idea that this is how the world is going around right now talking about misdirection and convincing others of what meaning is, about that, that a thing that you'd have to know too, but the Definitive Line is something that thing that it is that thing that you wouldn't ever be convinced about because you'd know be the one to know it ever existed to you for real, it's not or not, no, it doesn't to you, but it exists, solely for to be a thing that you'd have to know existed first before in order ever to know it truly existed. Have you ever read the book called Maniac, it's about this boy who runs through the town, one day this town had a big strung out fight, so they divided the town between this line, whoever was on the other side of this line couldn't cross it, but this kid just kept on running right over the line like nothing, or if you want to just think about any situation you've ever seen where a community of people divided up their space, what's the morel of the story, that morel is easy to know and you know what it would be to you, it doesn't matter if you split two sides because you're still one piece, but that's not the point of the story that they lead with in order for to make you be thinking that though, the point of this story, it was, do not cross this line because it only exists to keep you out, you can understand that much can't you, I believe you can at least, so, this is my point, if you can understand that about a imaginary line that's formed out of the figment of people's imaginations, then you should also be able to understand that this line right here it does only exist to exist because it's what no one ever had what was imagined by them before as existing, because, that's the Definitive Line. And it's not something people think about, you think about it right now, it's not ever something that anyone is ever thinking about, that's the point.

@caseyxsharp so who was the first one to understand the definitive line if one must have it pointed out to them by someone else?.. 🧐

I loath reading your comments. Stop. Writing. Endless. Snot.

@MisterEdmonds There is a difference between what I'm saying the reality of ideas is and the Definitive Line that I'm pointing out, I would happen what I believe is that about ideas that they exist outside of ourselves regardless of ourselves existing or choosing to accept our existence able to see they do, a real idea is like a math number because it's not even a question do these theorized numbers exist as path of math which is technically measurable they exist to be discovered even before their discovery as a concept of math, the Definitive Line is different though, it's something that cannot be put into words, just like the idea of math, it's like this if number is the idea of math and math must exist in order to know the discovery of number is real, then the Definitive Line is something like it's the equation that gets you there and it's not the answer itself, because this what we know, that number is a part of equations because math does exist, so, you would have to know that before I mean before that you ever knew that in order to know that, but it's not something that has to be explained, the Definitive Line is already there to be existing, because the idea now is that the idea of what ideas are is irrefutable as a part of what the reality of ideas is since ideas are the things that do exist without question, the Definitive Line, it's not something that I can tell you exists, because that's not what it is, it would exist because I wouldn't have to tell you, ideas on the other hand can be debated about because we can choose to accept their existence as a part of reality. And that's the Definitive Line, it's not, x+x=?, it's one thing that is the process that knows that without having to be said like Definitive Line= x, because it does in reality, not that you would ever know that, because that's the Definitive Line that no one thinks about as part of existence and that line itself is not a wall that can't be passed through it's the line that has been drawn to keep you from what's on the other side, the question should be what's on the other side of that line, I can't tell you what it is, that, is the Definitive Line on the other side. It's not that hard to understand, but you'd have to understand it before being able to understand how to tell it to another person for them to know, in this case what is the Definitive Line, it's the answer is, it would only have to be something that you'd be the one to be able to only tell me, but that doesn't mean that I won't understand it if you tell me or that I can't accept it's existence, since that is, the equivalent of an idea existing, just like a math equation that does exist.

@caseyxsharp oh. So you argue for the questionable status of ideas and an unknowable definitive line. this sounds like you’re arguing your stance on words.

How about this:ideas exist because of the power of “life”. Do they still exist without “life”.

This is a silly conversation

I’m done

@MisterEdmonds You got it wrong. Ideas are; things that do exist no matter the reality of existence to the person who knows them already, the Definitive Line; the stream of knowable knowledge that is to be understood, just because it's unknowable to exist doesn't mean that the knowledge of these ideas which aren't having to be understood to be able to exist should have to exist just for the sake of the imagined idea, that's why, that if I was trying to give an idea, you would have had to have already known that, you stupid fuck, but if I was saying that there is a Definitive Line that exists then it would be that you have to know that first because the idea would have been just either said to you like it just was or guess what it is it is an idea of something that is still left unspoken and that doesn't mean that there can't be a person to understand it, the same just like if it was a real idea. What you said, about ideas, that was silly. That is like trying to say that the fact that the way humans conceive ideas means that they don't have to be said for them to be for humans to know them to exist, and all you're doing when you say ideas being understood gives definition is playing on that fact in order to support your idea which is literally if what you said was true, it couldn't be, because the people would have had to have already known that your idea of ideas giving definition, which renders your argument that ideas even do that just to support your idea of atheism meaningless. The Definitive Line, bitch.

@caseyxsharp I’ve read your endless comments and only find you making arguments pages long that are circular and you just repeat some metaphor like it’s actual representation of the situation.

People wonder why the kids are staying away from faith, maybe because people of “faith” use that as definitive excuse of their character.

@MisterEdmonds That's you, that's what you're doing, saying atheism is an idea and then saying that ideas are what give clear insight like somehow that's supposed to support your idea of atheism and for why that's what people should believe about that idea you have of atheism, all that you're doing is playing on the fact that it's always true people have to know ideas have a meaning for them to be ideas and then you say just with words that because of that these ideas must give people insight and so that is what's supposed to support your idea of atheism like that's just supposed to be true.

Then you say things about people's character, like what you just said doesn't make you sound like a moron. I mean if you're going to call what you said a real argument then say something about how people are, the least you could do is give more to the argument that you're also making about people, I was just saying the exact same thing that you just did about atheism but the difference was I actually had an argument, this is probably exactly what an atheist would say. I don't need an argument to be able to be able to beat you at arguing, so whether you say that my argument is wrong or not, I'm gonna goe ahead and say that your argument for people who do believe is wrong, and you shouldn't be judging character just to make a point anyways just because someone did happen to disagree with you.

I don't know how you're not getting what I'm saying, ideas are sometimes wrong, maybe it's true that maybe knowing how to understand an idea makes the idea more clearly understood as well, but that doesn't mean you get to decide that all ideas are right or good ideas meant to be about something, like your idea of atheism, the only reason that you wanted to say that about ideas, is to say it supports your idea of atheism, well I'm saying that atheism is a wrong idea to begin with, so that would explain why you would think, this was a good idea, it's not, ideas can be wrong even without anyone or any clear understanding of how to understand or what an idea is, I hate to break it to you, some things are bad, some things are wrong, ideas can be wrong, you don't need an argument just to support something that's right, but you have no argument here, I just happen to be the one who disagrees with you, that in no way means that if you have an argument that you're right or that you have an idea about ideas that your idea of ideas is right, because you're full of shit if you think so but don't let me convince you, you're the atheist here trying to win an argument that's not even an argument.

Maybe your idea about ideas you could say is an argument meant to support the idea of atheism, and you could possibly at least say that is your argument if this was a real debate in a debate, in order to actually support your idea of atheism, that's a good enough argument to call an argument for a debate, but that doesn't mean that your argument is a good one, it doesn't even mean that your idea is even right about you having that argument, if you're going to claim to have a good argument that supports something that is an idea, then the least you could do if you're now gonna to also claim other people are wrong too because of your idea, is to be fucking right, it''s like you don't understand that, at least I have an argument, I don't need to make this a debate to tell you that you're idea about what makes you think you're having an argument for really supports your idea your claim to be right is wrong, and I am telling you're wrong about ideas, I don't need more reason than that, all you do, is run your mouth totting to be right because your argument is that you're right, while calling other people wrong just for disagreeing with your idea, and I can say that about you, you're wrong just for thinking that I'm wrong, and if you needed a reason to understand that besides the fact that you are the atheist, then I am telling you this without needing to say it's my argument that you're the one who is wrong just because if you actually thought this was a good idea to have if you were atheist that it would make you think your idea is right, it's not.

You fool. People can be wrong, ideas can be wrong, sometimes ideas that are thought to be real ideas never turn out to give insight, but they still are ideas, not something that had to be said just so it could be right, dumbass, arguments can be wrong, thinking can be wrong, it's not like I have to fucking be the one to tell you that because you're atheist, at least I thought so, but I guess I was wrong, if here we goe again then.

@caseyxsharp I already stated I’m not atheist

But everyone can behave with atheist principle

@MisterEdmonds Well that doesn't change what I'm saying, and I've read all your comments you never stated you weren't atheist, it still doesn't change anything, I would be saying people who are atheist would be thinking of saying my argument against what you said would be wrong because they would be thinking they were just right, if you aren't atheist but are thinking like one that changes nothing. I still disagree with your idea of ideas, purely for the fact that you tried to use the concept of ideas to say atheism was a good enough idea to be easily understood just if you studied the idea, noting about atheism is logical ok so don't make it seem that way, especially if you're not atheist then, over here saying shit like my argument is stupid and you're not even fucking atheist.

@caseyxsharp its ridiculously hard to read your comments because they’re so endless. Just like you talk into a mic and think that makes your text message simple

I think you presume only atheist support Jaclyn, when she has a wide audience of spiritualist, majority with Christian alignment divorced from institutionalization of the stagnant modern model of church. Perhaps we see the endless circularity to the debate, and regardless of how prominent either side illustrates their idea and private interpretation or scientific citations, no definitive example or answer emerges from these talks, usually sabotage debates when anyone side is cornered. Either one side mocks the other for not obtaining perfection in quoting the “big picture” faultlessly, or cliche anger at the inevitable detraction from any point established.

There’s very little integrity to the situation. Both sides use each others reasoning and don’t even notice the appeal to authority they practice to justify their idea

I do argue atheism solely existing as a chaotic idea, a belief, built on irrelevant venial banal for emotional implications on life. Every group of people is subject to, the justice crusade of insidious self defined priorities. yet few break from a mold in order to achieve conservative progress of any value. Ex: you claim you’re here to discuss with Jaclyn Glenn ( and her fan community) how wrong she’s got it and you will make it clear. Yet you have no idea of the impression you have already been shown to be self centered, which is expected, every one is the center of their own life, but you communicate so carelessly, it already lost the momentum of interaction, except with those who are dead thirsty to rationalize a situation nobody got time for.

yet did we advance
I would like to know

@MisterEdmonds None of that is stopping me. It's clear to me that since you're not on the side to believe Jaclyn Glenn being atheist that being atheist is a good idea, that you're not really the best person to be discussing with me what I say is intractable or not, or you seem basically just like you're just one of those who might just be caught in the middle. That's why to me nothing you say would even oppose me.

I also support Jaclyn Glenn, I think her idea of being atheist is stupid, but that's for me to know and her to find out, not a person like you to be randomly postulating about whether what I do is socially acceptable just because you happen to think so, I don't care dude what you think. You honestly believe that what you just said to me is acceptable to being the right thing to say.

If you know that their is such turmoil between both sides, that you can also see that each side is supporting the other without even realizing it, that it is leading you to the conclusion that there cannot be a clear right answer under these circumstances, then you're not the person that I should be even caring having this idea you have, why, because you're wrong, you're arguing like there has to absolutely be truly some right answer, but that's what is keeping you blinded to the fact there really is one, and you're trying to take that aggravation out on me because I just happen to be one person that does disagree with you, don't give me that crap, you're no better than the people that you're complaining about dude, and what's even worse it's just like as you stated too, because of that what all you just said, what's worse, even worse than you having these complaints just to have something to complain about, is, you actually believe that you would be the one to be right about anything and that if someone does disagree it must mean they are wrong, it's like, I don't know, almost like you don't even care which ever side that you agree with just as long as you have something to complain about because someone does disagree with you. You think I've lost the interaction of the situation here, dude you were lost in the situation the moment that you stepped foot into it.

Like this, you are saying that you're not atheist, except you're also saying that atheism is an idea that is chaotic to you in that it is an idea, well hear what I'm saying then, your idea of atheism is a bad idea not just because it's not really a real idea to you, me or anyone but because it's the wrong idea to have, and you're too stupid to just accept it because you actually thought that your idea was one worth having in order to argue in support of it, so now it's because of you that there is nothing left for me to say to you now, because you obviously weren't just one mother fucker that ever did ever care about being right, you just wanted to have something to be bitching about, and you found it, congratulations.

1

Hey there, my critic buddy, are you sure that what you're saying and meaning to is really right to you? It's just making me think, that what you said that was chaotic, excuse me, I meant to say, some real chaotic shit my friend, I'm not being mean but you kind of had to have expected this from me, allow me to point out some of my thoughts about this just what specifically you said.

That is a very bold statement to be making, don't you think, like what was the alternative to you, it's not that it's chaotic so much so that it seems and does seems very highly likely to be wrong just for that reason, what does get me thought is this, it's like that's not what you're saying at all about atheism or ideas, what you're really trying to say is, that ideas must always be right only if you've had made yourself put such effort into it that it now therefore has to be too, that is for example if someone put an extra step into scientific method and it was that speculation, because that's what that is, speculation is what leads to ideas, and yeah you'd be right that not every idea is right just for that right there, but here's what I'm saying, still it is still true that you have to speculate about an already idea to you to be right then, you know, that, doesn't make you right and you should know that, and what you're saying now is basically that if you have an idea, then if you put the effort in to understand it then it must or will be right, that's what you're saying, you think that's right, I mean no not what you're saying here about atheism, you think that's right you say about ideas being true in the order to being defined as being, because that's not how that works, I don't know anyone who would say that, it's whatever, you can say that I have no problem with that there however it's now you're gonna try saying that also means and makes it true about atheism true too, that's not an idea that you could be right about, that's nothing but speculation. It also seems looking like, also circular reasoning if that's what you did really meant to say. What was the alternative? How am I supposed to know that about atheism anyways, all you said was true is true because true is true, that doesn't tell me anything about atheism. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to call you wrong, it's not my intentions, I'm just point that out, and of course you could be right about atheism too, but you wouldn't be, just the statement that you just made, because for you to be right then, you'd have to be talking about ideas that everyone has so it's not just your idea about atheism, and it wouldn't make you right just because you said true is true, like true is true, because ideas, because atheism, that's not how that shit works, personally I would say this, you're wrong about ideas in the first place, why, because this is one thing that I know too very well, ideas don't have to be right because they were speculated about in the mists of the chaos, that actually as a matter of fact, is exactly why that you wouldn't be right, just, for saying that what about what you did about ideas, it wouldn't be true, and then saying that it would be, because it would be, because atheism is that idea, then that's just stupid, and if you expect other to have that same idea and be right it's true to them, then don't say that, that was stupid. Ideas are, something else that exists, regardless, is to be true, 100% of the time, whether anyone else or whoever decides to see it to be or speculates whether maybe possibly it to be true, in other words, it's something that is both true or false whether anyone decides it to be true or not, just saying it's true because it's true, it wouldn't make you right, even about anything you said about that was, so don't say that. I can't help but imagining now, that you must be one of those like other atheists I know that would say they are only right just because other people they say everyone else thinks they are right, and that does not actually make you right, if this was, a pattern with clearly, what you say is basically atheism, then oh yeah, now I can totally see that now. But that isn't something that I didn't know. Only an athiest who did ever really believe that, would in fact, think about ever saying such a thing to being true for real, like you just did. And look at how that turned out, you could have had a point, but that whole thing you just said was purely, utterly, unconcentrated speculation. It didn't even prove anything, why would you even listen to the verbal sounds of these words right now, true is true because true would be true, no, that is a very dumb thing to say, you couldn't possibly be right about that, which defeats the purpose of even saying it about what's being true or let alone ideas and atheism, why in the world, would you think that would ever make you right about ideas or what ideas define, that doesn't make any sense? That just sounds like, you're just all you wanna do is be preparing to tell other's they're wrong, and there is no way that is ever going to be right.

If there be any who by wisdom was so purified as to be without reproach, it would be a voice worth time to understand

But until then, we must do with mere mortal human, who spends most its collective time figuring out how to fornicate itself

Por favor. people cannot understand enough to ever be right because we get stuck on self righteous. Or did I get graced with a conversation beyond the Elysian Fields

@MisterEdmonds I don't know what kind of conversation this is. But now that you mention that, I mean I don't know what I might have said but, yeah I do see that people are so concerned with being right, it's all of these social norms, in normal circumstances people wouldn't be lashing out, but with the world view that our society imposes onto people which does happen to be sort of true, it's like all of the walls of the boxes that separate everyone individually have been cast down, not really it's still there it's it's the people inside they really think because of society that they must be a person in a box or to at least have that one wall up, when in reality, everyone is in those boxes throwing a tantrum while still in the box and I'm just like well if everyone is in a box then why not everyone just climb out of the box if it's so damn irritating, that doesn't even begin to cover it, I am still fairly new on here to Slug before I wasn't thinking, thinking as much about that I mean, you have some impeccable timing, because I've been seeing on here to not that it really surprises me, and, I say social norms are bad, I've been saying that, but there's a reason which is why I say and what you just brought up too, the problem isn't really the being in a box or society, you're right and people are only interested in righteousness or being right more so than you know just actually being right being people, one instance for example recently I've dealt with a couple times, when people first get that impression of you or someone anyone else, it's like now that's it, the one and only thing they that I've only seen they only those people do now is project themselves and their believes onto you, it's like whether they know they are in a box or not, those specific people before I've even mentioned them that's what they only do is always projecting no matter if they exist in their boxes or you do inside of their's, they act like you're just a wooden post holding their horse or something when you are a person just like them, but that's just one or what that problem does cause when the problem is allowed to exist, that problem, now that problem is, that, once they get that impression, once it's their's, no matter what, there's not going to ever be anything that you can do or say to change their mind's about you, which is a bigger problem than if you think about it because now I'll bet you all that I have that they will be the one now making you feel bad because they disagree with you and you can't tell them that since not only they have already this image of you but also they are going to blame you for that problem too, and everyone is just taught, think about this if you will, everyone has been instance taught that if there is such a problem to be a problem in the world that now without there having to be any real explanation there must be a real explanation even when they don't know, which is, well, that's why it shouldn't even be a problem right now it's not it alone would have been until everyone decided that since everyone has a problem that it must be because of someone else now, if you don't watch your step around them, be careful you could impale yourself right there, let me back up for a second, I was just trying to say this, with that image they have of you, it's because of this right now, now, when something new comes to challenge that image meant to represent you to them, well I just said what happens, but what really does happen though is this, nothing you can say or do can change what they already thought, which is exactly why that everyone still thinks they know that everyone else must think they are right if they should be, and that, if you were the one to ever be wrong, that now it's no one's fault but yours, and then, then well you get the picture they blame you for it trying to bully you into changing just to make them feel better, I'm like, alright so, if you didn't already have that one image that you happened to just I mean just so happened to judge me because you had a problem, now you're going to blame me now for always having to be that wrong to you that you feel just the need to do something about it, even though you were the one to have the problem in the first place. There is no, reasoning, with these people. The only way to actually make your point known to them, is one single way, make them believe it's not them but it's people who have the problem with them what they do, which I can't honesty lie, to you right now, it's not all that great of an alternative to blaming someone else if, well since, this is exactly why that this problem exists between everyone, it's because everyone already assumes that since they are everyone people that everyone must now have a problem too.

You can't point that out to a person, a person who does always think they are right, which is the problem. So, you're asking me now, if, I think that what I said reached beyond the vale, I technically gave it a name and tried calling it the Definitive Line, I call it that because it means to me that what that everything that cannot ever be understood with words alone, like alone, too so, nothing cannot be expressed with words in some way that isn't as a matter of fact meaningful precisely in some way, however then again, there still are apparently some things that can be and but still not ever fully understood, not, by that individual, the individual that still lives in a box, not alone, that's what I call the meaning beyond that exists on the other side, where, exactly, the other side of the Definitive Line, where else, to answer that you would ask, for me I'd say this, I don't know, it might not be the brightest thing to say when asked, but you know what else, I hope so, I mean the alternative is to be the fool thinking everyone else must be the idiot, yeah so I hope so.

Somme times, sometimes it's better to let a person think they are right, than to be who proves them wrong, and be letting them keep on thinking they are right, why, because, if anyone is asking, should there be any explanation, right now, should there be right now, it's because people are stupid, I liked your approach to this, why, because also, it's not even really, really, a real question, but the question must first be asked shouldn't it, if anyone is to be who claims to know the right answer outside of themselves, I say, yes, that exists, there is a right answer, even when, even when, no one else bothers to possibly ask the question, and if there was, was just that one person, out there, that cares enough, not to be right through what is righteousness to them, then, just enough, then, maybe not everyone has to be blaming every problem on someone else and ask such stupid needless questions when no one clearly knows the right answer, people, would actually know the right answer then.

Anyways, so that's what I have to say, all, to that. But like I said that's for starters, it's still better than having to blame everyone's or your problems as a matter of fact for that matter on someone else, right, I mean, I mean even if you didn't care ever to really tell me that you cared enough to say otherwise? Well, there you goe. See, see, see that, The Definitive Line, it does exist. Well, would you look at that, it's almost like the equivalent of a caveman first discovering fire, oh that's funny, whoops.. Now, let me goe on, I have a feeling this is like a thing right now, there's something I have that probably also helps explain this on another different level, it's when I talk to people I usually say this mentioning it, I've had to say it a couple times here and there on here so far with good response, tell me if this means anything to you, so, you heard that what the problem is now right, so there's another thing that humans just don't ever seem to ever think or know to think about, it's that if you're, ever, going to be the one to convince someone else of anything, you can't, you have to first assume they will be able and do understand what you mean, I'm more shocked now that I realize not very many people have ever thought about this, it's like trying to tell someone that you like their smile when you can't talk and all they do is keep smiling all of the time always, you can't do it, you can think you get pretty close, but just even the simplest thing as knowing that you're actually right in the first place if you think so, there is no way to actually make someone else understand you, so then now you see how this question suddenly becomes much more relevant right that how do you get people to understand what you can't tell them, it is, a good question, you should be asking yourself how then how does that happen if it is known by you to happen but you've never seen it before happen, the answer is also a simply simple on too, you know how too, it's to confuse, to misdirect, to goe on and on about something entirely different in most cases until finally, you've come back to them after claiming not to be the one to know and ask them, if they say yes, then you know they understand, so now there can't be question, now you tell them that now what you're talking about is that, that what you're trying to make them understand about this other thing, if they still don't get it, it's either they really don't know or they're stupid, there is no in between, just like two wrongs don't make a right, but people act like there's no way, well there isn't any way, it's like people don't even think that other people still do think even when they may might not be agreeing with you, that's why ask the question, there is no way to know, if you don't ask the question, and in order to ask the question you must be the one then now to know there is a way because it's what people do, they make their own ideas whether they are thinking what you are or not, as a matter of fact. As a matter of fact, I've said this before, this is exactly what makes the world goe around right now, now if you think really about it yeah look around out there everything that is on earth that is literally on earth right now or ever it all means something but what does it mean, what does it all mean, it means something, all of it means that, that all things that even we humans do know right now also still has meaning beyond what we have thought each and every thing does simply mean, everything on earth, it's how movies, books, writers, posters, anything comes to mean what it does in the world, so of course when someone doesn't really know it becomes necessary to now ask is if there is anyone who doesn't understand this, it's not if someone is wrong, it's, if this is wrong right here then, everyone really becomes wrong because, then no one will ever really know the right answer, no blame is required, whether for simply asking the question or understanding the right answer, if there is to be believed a world where we can all understand each other, it's not a solve all problems kind of deal, but you know what though, at least it tells someone that it is truly possible to understand one another, and, well, you guessed it, you guessed, that sometimes, sometimes that's, understanding is sometimes the only thing that's really needed at all, so it must be right, if we are to believe that it is possible someone here is without blame, another thing that no one thinks that also means this same thing as right here, that's, what I just happened to say, sometimes it's not some other thing that makes the problem, we have to be who understand ourselves in order to know that and well or not to be blaming another person when we don't get it, because like I'm saying sometimes it really is that we either don't know ourselves or have to question, should I goe on, if it was me, if I had to say anything about this, I'm saying I don't know about you but hey I'd rather have to be the one that has the ability to say they are right and not just me, it doesn't have to mean there is a problem, or that it has to mean everyone will understand this, it's just that, that, it's only for those people that do that they only are the ones to be able to know just what that right answer could be in the end, even when no one else possibly would know the answer at all. What do you think about that? And yes that was two things. I think you see what I'm going for to say, that I can see that we, I mean you and I, we do understand this even without words of understanding, well, if that was, was what you were going for too then hey we know we're on the right path now don't we, that's the kind of the point of me saying this to you right now. Asking the question, it shouldn't have to be looked down on, it's not just if everyone thinks they are right or not, but this, this just happens to be far beyond my ability to say to you right now that at least I know everyone else also would understand this even if they knew just to think it, I hate it, because I know, know for real now too, everyone is running around pointing figures and saying they know the right answer and it's not what anyone is thinking, because I can't tell people I mean to hate it and why, if I did like them, then all I would be then would be just a person no like any better than they are for pointing their figures at someone, that's why I don't claim to know anything, at least not to know anything that I would claim I having to tell to anyone else just for them to know, I don't want to be them, someone has to be right in the end, if this is what I'm trying to say to them, then, what's it even matter then, what right or wrong the answer might be outside of me, it shouldn't matter, that's what I'm saying, I'm saying there is no one way to be right or for anyone to be right knowing the right answer in the end, and then that's why that I have this to say, it's not that it matters, it must mean something if it does in the end, so therefore then, then, that it shouldn't even matter, if it does matter, guess what, it's not what you or I thinks, because, someone had to be that person in the very beginning to have asked, such a question indeed. The question, is more important than knowing as it turns out don't ya know? Well then, so I guess, who would have known... .-.

People have never been taught, how to be wrong, they only think being wrong is for people that don't know how to solve problems, but just as there must be that one person who is without blame there must also be that one person who is undoubtedly wrong no matter the circumstance, people are wrong right, well then, well then of course now you know there's a reason that there's a problem, that people don't know it and why that they have always chosen to be blaming another too. No higher intelligence needed, although sometimes I suspect that there should be, it's not fucking rocket science right, but it still beats everyone you're talking to blaming you for just about everything never even knowing why doesn't it? I think there should be a higher intelligence to understand this, not that there should just be that, all that you have to really be, is not intelligent like what people think of having to know to say to others for them to know, it's just, well if you're gonna be fucking telling people that they are wrong and there must be a problem they aren't getting, then for God sakes at least fucking be a real fucking human, that's it, if you have to ask yourself oh I wonder what people will think about this, then don't ask the fucking question, just be a fucking real human being, that's all you have to do to know. But, what can be said, humans are so stupid that they need to climb the highest peaks of the alps just to come to ask a monk that's taken a vow of silence, just for them to know the answer, figures, because people. And this is the best case scenario, it can get worse, like people really ask themselves why that there's actually a group of monks at the top, having to take a vow of silence to know themselves better, I'm like, I'll tell you why, here's probably fucking why, because, they don't fucking care to hear what you have to say, God damn. And about that it getting worse, this, people think there is only one way to be right, people are stupid, it's not that someone does know better, it's just that if you didn't know people and you are people, then you should probably be first to know that people are stupid, and that's exactly why that it will be that one stupid fucking idiot who happens to climb that mountain just to know the answer that they themselves couldn't have figured out that hey you know what it didn't take a man with his fucking head in the clouds just to know. Stupid humans. I actually did meant that for atheists but, whatever you get it, see, I'm no one who is the one to be judging you, even no matter what or for whatever reason, I don't need to be right for anyone else's sake, I just to be there to ask the question why. And the question to me should be, why are humans, humans being so stupid? That's the best I can hope to do.

This role I choose to take, it just seems natural to me. It probably would, or could, give others some trouble, but now that I've been able to say I have spent time as a real human being, fuck it then, I'll be that guy if no one else thinks I will be. This is, precisely what I happen to believe myself too, I mean reasons are for why I write like I do, but to sum it all up it basically means the real reason is that I just so happen to be one who believes no matter what I say, or how it happens to be understood, the real meaning of what is said just like with everyone else's thought on ideas, it will be understood by someone even if no one happens to be that one whom does understand what is being said. In the end, that's why I do, kind of just picked this up all on my own. It works. How often do you hear someone saying someone or something is wrong, and how often to you do you hear that there really just is that one person who really is trying to say that they do know what they are talking about and why they are the ones having to say it? Eeh, I mean I rest my case. You know what, that's exactly why I do it too.

I know, and that's why I choose to move against the crowd, I never needed a reason to think I should, scientists be saying like, you are left handed and that's why you move against the crowd, I'm like, oh that's cool, that is funny but hey, but hey I'm the one it's not like it would ever matter to me, if I am going to be known as anything then it's gonna be what I damn make it, God damn it, or shame on me. Well, or, shame on me, I don't know.

I took a long hard look, at all of this in front of you right now, and after, just after having, to be the one to have to deal with it, I know what's it like to be wrong even without having to be, and because, because of that, I can't do it, solve the world's problems, no one can as a matter of fact, it's, the world, the world is now the real problem, because of there have been be this problem, but, that, is exactly why that I say these things to you, I meant even if you didn't even know. This is what I happened to have thought. If this is acceptable to you, then say so,, I believe that it's easy to understand and that if it should be said or asked then it should be and all that, but again, I so too am also a, or the one, who, would happen to think there must be a better way to know right answers than this right, right? I know, I think so too. But I just didn't want to be the one to think, having to think it. I don't care, if I am wrong anymore, in the end I'm always, the one, who either is has is having to be the one who has to tell that to another person or say it to someone because they really don't know, if it means that I must be wrong regardless, then, this is what I'm getting at now, I don't want to be right if I must have to be so wrong like these other dumb mother fuckers. I didn't think that I was a genius before, and for that matter hey, I didn't know before either that I had to be the one to get someone who agrees with me to think that I'm who is right, because I think it, I just thought something like moths are different than butterflies, because in my little kid mind I had the idea hey you know what it's fucking hard to find a moth when it's the same color camouflaged as a tree on the inside, fuck me if I'm wrong, God damn it. That will probably circle back around and after it sinks in make you think oh by the way, there's a lot to unpack there.

I think that, there should be a world like this one, in which all things should be able to be known just like this but and even without having anyone having to be who has to say it too, it's because no one has ever been taught how just to be wrong, that they all must be ones who now think that there is only one right answer and that they have to be the ones to be right just to know it, I'm like, that's wrong, and just as a side note, fuck all of these people that think they can raise a hand in the name of justice, if justice wanted to be saved by such stupid humans, then, it would be the bitch to do so all alone and on it's own, that's the way things should be around here. People should be a little more hesitant to be calling others wrong just for if they are happening to think so, especially if it's if they are the ones happening to think so, dude. Why? Like people need to ask, because, look at how everyone just points blaming anything on another and claims they are the ones that do know right, bullshit!... Is that meant to be that way? If that's what's right, I will also say that it's because people think that they think people think that people are right and so that's why it blinds people not just them but people I'm talking themselves from ever knowing what is truly possibly right in the end to begin with, that's also a possibility, just one, that, no one ever seems to even possibly be thinking about too not either, that's kind of, what, fucked up, right, I know, yeah I know, that's why this is the best that I can say to you, even right now, people don't know what problems are, real fucking problems, people, they are people that think that there is only a problem when other people see it, see, this is how society rots and is bringing into your brain, people should know this and no one should be who has to saying it, it's like, you see how there are those people over there, they are the ones who keep wanting to be right because they think the world is just so fucked up alright, and then there are these people here, it's like there to those people that, that to those people, these people like you and me need to have someone telling them they are wrong, like they don't know, to me, it's like when someone does that to me, I either punch them in the face or if it's something really thrown off that I can't even begin to be as pissed off as I am as I am all of the time because of those people then I'll act like I am the one who knows what they are talking about and I mean just so that I can if they are just too stupid to ask a question I'll pretend they are right yeah but it's just so that I can now be the one to prove them wrong, and if you asked me, then I, think that's way even more better than having to be the one who is wrong, you see how I mean. This is what I believe the world should be. I don't care that anyone doesn't agree, maybe I would, I would give a shit, I'll admit that, only if, if I didn't have to be the one who has already known that if not me then someone at some time out there is having to be called wrong first just to be called right by others and not just themselves. I take that knife, and I stick it to it, no asking questions, if that walls is having to come down then I'm the one, it's me tearing that son of bitch down, because, it's me holding the knife I picked up and started chiseling away at it. Fuck, this God damn, God damn, grab a fucking ladder so we can see over the horizon shit if we simply wanted to. This is for Jaclyn Glenn, wayaaauuuhh, that's me attacking that wall right now, and there better be a fucking better world on the other side, or so help me God.

But, I've tried. Just to see over that horizon, you know what the problem was, there wasn't a ladder big enough. And so, what happens when you've climbed it and, the better world out there just turns out to be a morel on another wall, so the problem isn't the wall is blocking the way, it's that fucking wall man. It's like when I talk about Adam and Eve to people, lets get this straight right now, the devil Satan was not the one that tricked a woman into eating a forbidden apple, you know what it was, you know, why, because it was that fucking fruit, God damn it. I have a point to all this, well if not for anything else, I'll wrap this up just for you. This right now, was exactly why that right when from the first time you've ever said anything to me in the beginning, I started off by calling you something like friend or buddy, you know why isn't that, it's because now this I already knew since I was assuming that maybe if we really did talk that, well, we might not be agreeing, it's just usually people already have their first impressions without there being sharing of words, and usually one way or another whether you know people agree or not with you, someone just is wrong and someone just is right, and it's usually the one that didn't know that people's opinions can change that happen to think that the other person is wrong even when they never know and most likely than not it's usually true, but that's really only if one person does simply already have their own image of a person before ever starting talking to them, I didn't know or really seem to care whether it was me or you so, right off the bat I just started calling you friend and buddy, and you know why, because it doesn't even matter for one but for two I have to say we can still understand each other, can't we? I'm glad that I gave you the benefit of the doubt. Or, you know, if you were actually really simply pulling my leg by asking such a question, then I guess fuck you too but what's it matter right? Don't look at me, the hell if I know but that's just me. I still don't know. We were just talking, about, how people do stupid things, oh yeah that's right, so, here's my point, anyone, other people they wouldn't have a point if they never come back around to talking about it and start talking about other things, you know these people as crazy, psychotic, can't tell real from imaginary, and that's why they never have a point even when you do ask them, maybe what I said is true, really could be true, I don't know, I'm wrong for saying that either, and that's the point, this was never something that I would hand and should have ever been saying to you for just you to know, so it's what I mean, it's not I mean whether or not it happens to be right or not you see, it because it shouldn't matter does it, and this is getting off the books now, it's because I knew if I said anything like that, that one of us would have to be right or wrong, for that matter, even if it was only one of us that happens thought they were right, although even when they not knowing themselves why the other was in fact wrong as a matter of fact, and so now, if you can ask this question to yourself for yourself now, the answer, is, is this was my point all along, I'm not just the one who would actually know I'm right or not, just like people would, think. That is, just as I say, off the books, because you asked, and now here's what my real point really is now, without anyone having to be with or without having to say it now, it's, look at these people that this is about, you'd see, I shall say expecting, that them they should be able to know this even without having to be specifically the ones to think about it, you'd think so, and you'd not be wrong, however, as you can see, humans are just plain stupid, and there is no questioning, since, in order, there is no way to change that without having to ask why humans are, so stupid, lets not be the ones whom pretend that we know whats really right like we must think we have to be just to be, there is a better way, and we know it is real, right here, we wish that there was a way to change that possibly, and that's why that, if I am to be saying this to you right now as, just as I am, now, we can be the ones to know that humans are capable of knowing they understand this even when they think that them as people would know no thing to be thought of, have you ever, wondered why it is friend, that when you were in school the class kept on giving you such harder and harder questions which were problems to be solved, here's why, because it's necessary, especially not just that question, those were just warming us up to finally knowing that there really can it's true possibly such problems that any many of asking questions will ever give the answer to us in the end, that they were as a matter of fact the problems that we were able to know the answers to because we did know them to be real problems without having to be told, so when, we first encounter this one question, the question you know as Critical Thinking question, that's the moment that we know, because now that we've come to know so much about how to, we can clearly see from this one single question that we never really knew anything at all, it's why I hate this kind of question, it's important yes, but I hate it so much, why, because you'd think now learning from asking from knowing yourself, that other humans just like you could have been able to tell the difference between this question and those not so real problem questions, you'd think so, and honestly, I agree with you too, but that's not the problem, you see, the problem was that you've had to be the one to have learned that this was one of those problems that merely simply asking the question it wasn't ever going to help you solve it, if, if you didn't already know, that this question, is that "critical thinking" question, that you must be asked, just if for you to know that you are right. If there was a way, to tell people, without having to tell them, that there really are such problems like that, that, have no right answer no matter how hard you try to think about it, then, maybe the world wouldn't need to rely itself on that humans being the ones to blame real problems on others and to be thinking that everyone else has to be wrong just to be right. Yeah, that wasn't really something that I could have said in words to you just so you know, but it's because I know too I was able to, if I had said that right from the beginning, it wouldn't have made sense, not to you, I am not a total asshole like I wished I wanted to be, I don't assume anything myself, I know things, so it was easy to me, if I had said that, then it would have been like I am just one of those pointing my finger peoples but the difference would have been I hadn't anyone and anyone not to just be blaming, and if I was one of those then it I would have seemed to you like I was mocking you by assuming that it was I that couldn't have tell this to you, I have now, and it makes sense doesn't it? Well, there, you have it, that's what my point by this would have been. See, that's how you know things and ask them critical thinking questions. No one ever had to tell me these things, the point of them asking those questions in school, it wasn't to make you learn or think you know, not just that, it was to make you learn from those "problems" that you should be the one to be asking such questions and if it was worth it like it needs should be then you will know because, because even when you don't think about it, you still know the fucking right answer. There's one and only one way to be right, it's in the end, it's not to worry, but to but just to fucking be right, and I'll tell you what helps, knowing and understand, one thing, another, even better, you don't really have to know it but, it's this, this right here, it helps, fucking be a human being, that, is the one and only exception you know, you know. It was bad, having to read all that just to get to the point or the answer I'm offering, wasn't it, I know, I mean, why does it it have to be so fucking hard just to know things, I can understand learning and thinking you do, but just knowing something, that's unacceptable even if you ask me. Oh, yeah and I'm sorry for that. I'm sorry too I mean, if I'm making a point or making a point in a story by you know having a real fucking morel that people would know, then that's what I'd be doing, making a real fucking point, not just a morel just so that people too stupid to know learning or themselves would be able to, because, I don't claim to be the smartest person in the world even though no one would think so, I am the fucking smartest person in the world whether any one ever thought so, look at how stupid this planet is, and if I had to like as if that mattered tell why that is, then, I would be, saying this, to you, it's because I'm not fucking stupid, I'm not so that stupid, that I would be one of those people to be saying to others that is not a real problem, that or I would be claiming that wouldn't be a real problem even if I cared so that much to say it, I know, that's a problem, because like I just said, no one ever had to be that one to ever be who tells me in the end, right from the very beginning is what I'm saying, I, knew I did know that is a fucking real problem no matter whether any one, or someone ever did thought so or agreed with me, because I'm not one of those fucking stupid people, who I might as well add, that, they are who doesn't know that there doesn't have to be that any one person to be wring just for any one just to be them who is right. For starters, just for starters, I mean, if the majority of people out there at least did come to know what I had just all just said to you, then perhaps maybe, maybe, the world wouldn't have to be that, the very problem with the world that everyone is just such so afraid. And also, just to if I mean that wasn't something good for you to help you see it too, then how about this, maybe it does, maybe, maybe it also would probably help if you were like me too and I just don't give a fucking shit. Some people hear, be all like, oh that's some next level wisdom that you had to just by luck pull right out of thin air like it's straight out God's ass or something, I'm like, really, this was not either about being that right or wrong yourself, no, it's just it's a thought, because I had it and I wanna share it. It's those people that try telling like really try telling other people how to be right, that they themselves will never even know they were, ever, wrong at all, in the end. You get me?

@caseyxsharp if I have to scroll, I’ve already lost interest in what COMMENT someone post.

The walls are higher than ever of the box people militarize and fortify behind. We have decided common ground is a hazard.

Recent Visitors 7

Photos 19 More

Posted by OprichnikiNext I watch muppets Haunted Mansion! 👍 👻 Happy Spooktober everyone! 🎃

Posted by OprichnikiReligious faith corrupts and absolute religious faith corrupts absolutely.

Posted by GodlessPlease join the Atheist Watch Facebook Group. We are anti-feminist [facebook.com]

Posted by jaclynglennfanTrying To Find Other Jaclyn Glenn Fans

Posted by caseyxsharpHere, I want to tell some things that might be helpful for you.

Posted by caseyxsharpHere you can probably find this information more appealing to you than anyone else, so I'm gonna speak it to you instead.

Posted by caseyxsharpHey you know what's great to eat, an omelet on a tortilla with spicy corn beef and Dioblo taco bell sauce.

Posted by caseyxsharpHey you know what's great to eat, an omelet on a tortilla with spicy corn beef and Dioblo taco bell sauce.

Posted by caseyxsharpHey you know what's great to eat, an omelet on a tortilla with spicy corn beef and Dioblo taco bell sauce.

Posted by caseyxsharpThis is about.

Posted by caseyxsharpHey.. So you would like people to say things to you that they think of you on here, right, is that right?

Posted by caseyxsharpHey.. So you would like people to say things to you that they think of you on here, right, is that right?

Posted by havenonoHi, Jaclyn! You're nice.

Posted by CollieSo thankful to you Jacker-Lin-Glenn, for telling me about this Slug business

Posted by MadisonAvenueThe Red Book Is Public Now.

Posted by CleverFoxFaceH-O-L-A ppl

  • Top tags#video #world #reason #god #youtube #hope #truth #society #TheTruth #hell #evil #videos #humans #Atheist #government #money #death #media #hello #kids #book #devil #Canada #Christian #earth #freedom #children #culture #Jesus #community #created #rights #religious #evidence #Police #fear #racist #bullshit #religion #friends #vote #China #atheism #Constitution #laws #Christians #faith #church #belief #liberal ...

    Members 1,323Top

    Moderator