2302041400Sa IS INTERSECTIONAL IDENTITY POLITICS ANTITHETICAL TO LIBERTY?

These United States of America was established based on the sovereignty of the ‘Individual’ – not on perceived group identities. In order to form a union capable of confronting England Jefferson did mistakenly concede slavery to the southern plantation owners in return for their participation in a revolt. How he thought plantation owners held sway over the fighting cracker (poor white) population is something that should be considered. There was/is no excuse for making deals with the Devil – not any more than Christ succumbed to his (the devil’s) entreaties in the wilderness. None-the-less what’s done has been done – now we’re forced to endure the aftermath of that decision.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Excerpt from the Declaration of Independence:

     We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are 

created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the
Pursuit of Happiness—-That to secure these Rights, Governments
are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the
Consent of the Governed,…………………………………………

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

It should be clear by now that misandrous feminism initially wanted to free womankind of natures chains that bind her. Correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t it look like feminists have finally come to the realization that the chains that bind womankind are not of man’s doing. If they were man made chains those same chains wouldn’t likewise bind all of the animal kingdom as well.

Having come to the no-fault realization regarding accusations of male oppression, they (feminists) now appear to be back-peddling as fast as they can attempting to regain as much of the lofty privileged status women once held in society. I would posit that it is likely too late for womankind to regain the privileged status feminists brilliance talked them out of in their hatred of mankind. But I digress.

The video interview linked hereto subtly demonstrates the identity mire we were once bogged down in as a society. A society of identity politics we dare not return to. We can no more look back longingly at days such depicted in this interview than Lot’s wife could look back longingly at Sodom.

Posted by: Firing Line with William F. Buckley, Jr.: Is the World Funny ~ 6 years ago ~ 871K views
“Firing Line with William F. Buckley Jr.: Is the World Funny?”

Please do correct for me any errors that you discern – thanks in advance?

#LETSGOBRANDON ~ A Male-Feminist.
#MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) an individualist philosophy of life

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Identity politics
Political position based on the interests and perspectives of social groups with which people identify

Identity politics is a political approach wherein people of a particular race, nationality, religion, gender, sexual orientation, social background, social class, or other identifying factors develop political agendas that are based upon these identities. Identity politics is deeply connected with the idea that some groups in society are oppressed and begins with analysis of that oppression. Wikipedia