2207261400Tu THE CORRUPTION OF OBJECTIVE RIGHT & WRONG?

The tree from which man was forbidden to eat in the Biblical Garden of Eden was the tree of good and evil, not a persimmon tree? Eating of it fruit produced in man the, theretofore unheard of, ability to discern what was/is either good or evil. {Genesis 3:22}

Several lessons can be learned just from this short passage of Scripture. Addressing the one ridiculous objection that’s goaded feminists so much over so many years years – not to imply it to be the most important to be understood by any means. Yet like typical females they just plain refuse to accept common sense. Take note that when GOD said that “…... man is become as one of us , to know good and evil:…...” HE was obviously speaking of mankind as both Adam and Eve had eaten of the fruit – was he not? But feminists harbor so much disdain for man as a sex, the insist that the founding documents of these United States excluded them by using that same word ‘man’ in them. Just how do you go about having a reasonable discussion with people that genuinely stupid – how’s it done?

If that’s not enough, women were not excluded from serving as judges –notably serving in that capacity I might add. What man hating feminists can’t abide is that judgeship's were and are not exclusive to women alone. The only conclusion men are left with is that they dealing with supremacists, not rational human beings?

Men and women are not equal because they are not the same – seems quite straight forward and simple to understand UNLESS other nefarious factors are at work? An apple is a fruit, and likewise an orange is a fruit, but they’re not the same fruit with the same attributes – are they? Just substitute ‘human’ for ‘fruit’ in that last sentence – and voila, all sexual disagreements disappear, or at least they’re supposed to disappear?

This post was intended to show ludicrous it is to not see the last Presidential election as rigged – or just plain wrong if you prefer that? The rules of a horse race can’t be improperly change resulting in a prejudiced result then still call it a legitimate race – unless your a democrat, I suppose? Try it this way, next Kentucky Derby let’s require all jockeys except one to wear a 100 pound back-pack during the race – do you still want to place your bet not knowing which doesn’t have a back-pack – get real? Of course, that election was rigged!

PS1. I have no knowledge or insight on British politics, however the gentleman saw fit to chime in on America’s. I therefore feel it not improper to chime in as well, as to the scandalous behavior displayed by the democrat party with a win at all cost attitude.

PS2. When is it going to be realized that anytime race is cited in anything that thing instantly becomes racist? Unless it’s intended that there be a forever them verses us -- unless a perpetual climate of bickering and hostility is that goal?

Posted by: The Britisher ~ Jul 17, 2022
“The Week that was #259 - 17 July 2022”

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Genesis 3:22 “And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to
know good and evil: ………..” (kjv)