Forbes wrote an article today titled "Yes, the vaccines change your DNA. A tiny bit. That's a good thing". They then changed the title and are trying to cover up what they initially posted after it started getting shared online.
Proof 1: Look at the URL slug [forbes.com]
Proof 2: Look at the archive [archive.md]
Blah, blah, blah. Why inject this stuff into kids under 12 because "they don't get sick from covid, and only need this jab because quote ,
1."SARS-CoV-2 infection or exposure results in other negative impacts, such as school absences and social isolation
2. While children and adolescents are less likely to develop severe COVID-19 compared to older adults. Minimal deaths recorded.
Quotes taken from" [cdc.gov]
The proof that the vaccine is going to cause some medical issues is not disputed. The long term effect is not established and severe injury is certainly a possibility. Childrens injuries are probably going to follow data extrapolated from a process called immunobridging. In the absence of efficacy data, immunobridging is an approach to infer the likelihood of a vaccine protective effect, by translating vaccine immunogenicity in humans to a protective effect, using the relationship between vaccine immunogenicity and the desired outcome in a suitable animal model.
Another shot in 100 days!!!!!!!
'Omicron COVID-19 variant: Pfizer, BioNTech say vaccine could be reworked in 100 days to counter strain.