20.12.23.1900W THE CRUX OF THE CULTURE WAR? Yes there is a so called ‘Culture War’ that is not just an agitation scheme by some to make money – though it may look that way at times. While there is a genuine so called ‘Culture War’ used to describe a battle field that I submit is much harder to define & map out. And that is the goal of this post – to refine & define the essence of this ongoing ‘Culture War’ as it’s so loosely described.

I submit that it comes down a refinement of this old adage: “A woman’s strength is her beauty; a man’s beauty is his strength.” At least to me the first half of that adage goes without explanation as it’s easily understood. BUT,,,BUT,,,BUT the meaning of the second half has been redefined and/or elaborated upon with the passage of time – and most importantly with the popular advent of Marxist socialism lies of equality. Possibly out of concern for gender diplomacy I feel the author of that famous adage, above cited, used the word “strength” assuming it would never be contested due to its desirability even necessity over the eons of human history – they were wrong!

The present so called ‘Culture War’ involves a strong element of duplicitous prestidigitation sleight of hand. Diversion from the true socialist target, by overly emphasized condemnation of masculinity & the male physical strength that has served to enable the survival of humanity through the ages. Or have you not had the diversionary term ‘domestic violence’ pounded in your ear enough to wonder why? I submit that they (socialists) can’t afford to not keep everyone's attention on their contrived fantasy image of contemporary brutish male troglodyte strength – not for a moment can they.

So I ask myself what would be a timeless better word than “strength” in that adage? And though there may be a better that you may come up with, the single word MERIT stands out best to me. One indicator that ‘merit’ is the correct word for that above cited adage is the utter disdain, even animosity, these socialists have for it and meritocracy. The venomous hatred of all things male & masculine makes no rational sense otherwise.

When you need a plumber do you set out to find the worst plumber possible – or is it the best you look for? When you need heart surgery do you insist on having the worst surgeon the hospital has available?

By socialist so called equality standards the human race would long since be nothing more than excrement of long forgotten meritorious predators. I’m reasonably sure that man has created everything bad in this world because meritorious man has created everything in this world. The logic of the socialists is to blame men for creating rather than the individual persons that subverted those creations to evil purposes. Isn’t that the very same view(s) held when keeping very small children away from dangerous objects like knives & fire arms (and a multitude of other things)?

I therefore submit that the above famous adage should be: “A woman’s strength is her beauty; a man’s beauty is his masculine merit.” Use of quotas for gender or race etc. to evade & side step merit is wrongful perpetration of the very same wrong(s) it intends to redress.

Posted by: Viking Traveler Dec 15, 2020
“Finland A MGTOW Leader of Scandinavia & Why Finnish Men Are Fed Up With Relationships.”