I have been able to condense my political argument

People (everyone) has the right to exist they have the right to exist freely, this right exists for the simple reason - no one asked to be born. The nature of group is vampire, it’s takes and will take everything from you if you let it. It will Cush individuals under the weight of there boots and think nothing of it if you let it, it will take over your every thought if you let it. It will tray to make you a copy of itself and call that good. It will demand of you contribution to system wither that system works for you or not, it will do this under the guise of a “grater good” which is a dead metaphor, having lost entirely its original meaning in modern discourse. No one know what it means.

The division of Capitalism from Socialism is an error, Marxism is in simple terms is a deviation from Socialism. In as much as it forms or leads to dictatorship and manifesting a social tyranny, it is the cumulative effect of errors in forming an idealised system of government.

Socialism should be defined as: The choice of the people in how society is governed. As opposed to other systems of government such as Absolute Monarchy, Dictatorship and Theocracy. In effect that is to say Democracy is Socialism in practice manifesting cooperation in society by means of debate and the ballot box. Also that we leave the realm of socialism in the democratic appointment oppressive measures and means aimed at one person, one part or the whole of society.

It’s is my express view that the only way to get out of this is for individuals to choose to better themselves, the way to this is not some religious dogma it is not surrendering yourself to group nor subjugating and prostrating yourself before symbols and other other people. It’s is to cultivate the intellect.

CULTIVATE THE INTELLECT by ELBERT HUBBARD

“Cultivate the intellect, and you shall have a mind that produces beautiful thoughts, worthy images, helpful ideas; that will serve as a solace in times of stress, and be to you a refuge 'gainst all the storms that blow. The cultured mind, as compared with the uncultured, is the difference between a beautiful garden which produces vegetables, fruits or flowers, and a tract of land that is overgrown with weeds and brambles.
To be a person of culture is to be at home under all conditions. Your mind is stored with mental images, and memory comes to keep you company, and guide you from nostalgia and the sense of separateness to universality or oneness with the Divine. The country will be beautiful to you in any season, and society and solitude each will be welcomed by you in turn. You are to reject nothing, despise nothing, knowing that everything belongs somewhere, and that it is needed to make up the great mosaic of life.”

About "A Message to Garcia - Elbert Hubbard 1899"
Often this essay has been heavily criticised, many say it is to simplistic and anti- intalecual. Yes sure it can be misunderstood as many writings can at a lazy reading of it, with low leaveal thinking.
I encourage you all to research this peace for yourself, also study both the criticism and the parse. To form your own understanding of it.
My thoughts on it are: it encourages one to act and act with cerinity in the capacity of the individual, to preform tasks autnoumsly and to be informed enough to do it and learn for oneself. I fell it is a notion repeated in several works including "Medications by Marcus Aurelius"
The line that seems to be picked on in "A Message To Garcia" is "it is not book-learning that young men need, nor instruction about this or that, but a stiffening of the vertebrae which will cause them to be loyal to a trust..." this where the question usually ends in my exprerance missing "... To act promptly, concentrait there energies; do the thing -"carry a message to garcia."
In the essay Hubbard draws a parrile with asking a clerk to prefrom a task, "You, reader, put this matter to a test: You are sitting now in your office—six clerks are
within your call. Summon any one and make this request: “Please look in the encyclopedia
and make a brief memorandum for me concerning the life of Corregio.”
Will the clerk quietly say, “Yes, sir,” and go do the task?
On your life, he will not. He will look at you out of a fishy eye, and ask one or more of
the following questions:
Who was he?
Which encyclopedia?
Where is the encyclopedia?
Was I hired for that?
Don’t you mean Bismarck?
What’s the matter with Charlie doing it?
Is he dead?
Is there any hurry?
Shan’t I bring you the book and let you look it up yourself?
What do you want to know for?
And I will lay you ten to one that after you have answered the questions, and explained
how to find the information, and why you want it, the clerk will go off and get one of the other clerks to help him find Garcia - and then come back and tell you there is no such man.
Of course I may lose my bet, but according to the Law of Average, I will not."
In essence Hubbard is talking of the lazy selfish man, with no backbone, moral compitence or will to act and get the job done. I I fell his comments on "pure socalism" ring true in this essay and very relivent today. Hubbard writes "when all the world has gone a-slumming I wish to speak a word of sympathy for the man who succeeds" prior to that sentence he wrote "We have recently been hearing much maudlin sympathy expressed for the “down-trodden
denizen of the sweat shop” and the “homeless wanderer searching for honest employment,”
and with it all often go many hard words for the men in power.
Nothing is said about the employer who grows old before his time in a vain attempt to
get frowsy ne’er-do-wells to do intelligent work; and his long patient striving with “help” that
does nothing but loaf when his back is turned. In every store and factory there is a constant
weeding-out process going on. The employer is constantly sending away “help” that have
shown their incapacity to further the interests of the business, and others are being taken on.
No matter how good times are, this sorting continues, only if times are hard and work is
scarce, this sorting is done finer - but out and forever out, the incompetent and unworthy go.
It is the survival of the fittest. self-interest prompts every employer to keep the best-those who
can carry a message to Garcia."
To close I don't feel that this essay promotes anti-intellectualism but rather promotes "the man that can" as someone of moral virtue, duty and intelligence. To act autonomously to complete a task with spead and due loyalty to the task. It attempts to remove the stigma imposed by cultural marxism on sucsessful people who hold power of employment, that not all successful people are to be opposed but prassed for their loyalty, ability and achievements.
I hope I carried the message well.
[google.co.uk];