2304220100Sa DISPOSABILITY?

For some time now I’ve been perplexed by the common place acceptance of the idea of “male disposability.” It’s just taken granted like it were a given of nature like sun in the daytime and the moon at night. It just doesn’t ring true for some reason?

It’s like the age old question of which crossed the road first – the chicken or the egg? Why is it a given that the first to cross the proverbial road had to be either the chicken or the egg? Considering that the answer to that old question is that neither crossed the road before the rooster did – and that with or without benefit of religious reference – any religion if at all.

That’s why Mary Shelly even authored “Frankenstein’s Monster,” because she wanted to undermine this realization that must’ve been gnawing at her for quite some time.

Throughout human history tribal collectivism has been used by women to spuriously inculcate this idea of collective female value. And indeed with a cursory examination this gynocentric premise of female superior value does appear to be true. The problem with this false idea arises only after a truly objective look at the matter. Womankind can hardly be blamed for there deception of mankind all these years considering the harsh existence they’ve faced. And yet, the consideration of the men’s basic human rights seems not to have been an issue in the least.

A way to explain what I’m trying to point out is to abstractly, hypothetically of course, strand EITHER one male or one woman on a deserted island then come back a year or two later to discover which survived and which didn’t. What you’ve done is recreate the situation womankind found herself in from the beginning.

Now add to the situation the lengthy gestation period of womankind you’re presented with an even more existential reason for her male deception.

BUT, THAT WAS THEN and NOW IS NOW! There is no longer an existential threat to compel womankind to malign and encroach upon the human rights of men. Those days of survival are over and no need to abuse men exists as before. This is why feminism is in reality a political female supremacy hate movement that’s convinced itself that life is a zero sum game situation requiring militancy. And MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) is a logical response to such a hate division by feminism.

PS. The core purpose of this post is to point out that ‘male disposability’ is archaic gynocentric survival brainwashing in need of a trash bin. After all, “A woman can do anything a man can do, do it better, and do it in heels” ~ Barrack Obama.

Posted by: MGTOW Headquarters ~ 8 years ago ~ 12K views ~ 3.06K subscribers
“The Disposable Male by Spetsnaz”

Please do correct for me any errors that you discern – thanks in advance?

#LETSGOBRANDON ~ A Socialist (whether he’s capable of realizing it or not?
#MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) an existentialist (individualist) philosophy of life.
#ONLY PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE – STICKS & STONES DON’T, NOT EVEN GUNS KILL PEOPLE

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

disposability

DEFINITION
noun form of disposable

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

dis·pos·a·ble

ADJECTIVE
disposable (adjective)

1. (of an article) intended to be used once, or until no longer useful, and then thrown away:

"disposable diapers" · "a disposable razor"

SIMILAR: throwaway, expendable, nonreturnable, replaceable, paper, plastic, biodegradable, photodegradable, one-use.

• (of a person or idea) able to be dispensed with; easily dismissed:

"the poor performer is motivated by the fear that he or she is highly disposable"

SIMILAR: expendable, replaceable, inessential, unessential, nonessential, skippable, unnecessary, unneeded, needless, redundant, superfluous, gratuitous, not required, surplus to requirements, uncalled for.

OPPOSITE: indispensable.

2. (chiefly of financial assets) readily available for the owner's use as required:

"he made a mental inventory of his disposable assets"

SIMILAR: available, usable, accessible, obtainable, spendable.

NOUN
disposable (noun) · disposables (plural noun)

1. an article designed to be thrown away after use:

"don't buy disposables, such as razors, cups, and plates"

Data from Oxford Languages