I just asked ChatGPT to define what a woman is. As expected its woke AF. When asked what is a man? Its not as woke. Not because its not generally woke, but because its woke programmers forgot to ask and restrict the question about a man, compared to a woman. That is how retarded these people are.

Hey, ChatGPT, what is a woman?

Answer by chat: "A woman is an adult human female. In terms of biological sex, women typically have two X chromosomes, as opposed to men who typically have one X and one Y chromosome (XY). Women usually have reproductive anatomy that includes structures such as ovaries, fallopian tubes, a uterus, and a vagina. However, it is important to note that not all women have these biological traits.

In addition to biological differences, gender identity plays a significant role in defining what it means to be a woman. Gender identity is a deeply-held sense of being male, female, or something else, and may not necessarily align with an individual’s biological sex. A person who identifies as a woman may do so based on their own feelings, experiences, and understanding of their identity, regardless of their biological sex. Society and culture also shape expectations and norms around gender roles and behaviors, which further contribute to the understanding of what it means to be a woman."

Now I ask. Is that a matter of misunderstanding or weaponization?

Hey, ChatGPT, What is a man?

A man is an adult human male, typically characterized by the presence of male reproductive organs, secondary sexual characteristics such as facial hair and a deeper voice, and a typically higher level of physical strength compared to adult females. In social and cultural contexts, the term “man” can also refer to a male individual who displays traits and characteristics traditionally associated with masculinity, such as assertiveness, responsibility, and leadership. However, it is essential to recognize that gender roles and expectations can vary significantly across different societies and cultures.

[huggingface.co]

.......................

My take on this once obvious answer that no one really bothered to ask for and is now a weaponized topic. A lingisting weapon in the arsenal of the postmodernist unrealists. 

The definition of a woman is an ADULT, HUMAN, FEMALE. Conversely and obviously the definition of a man is an ADULT, HUMAN, MALE.

The term ADULT, makes a distinction between a girl and a young woman, or woman. Sexual maturity, after puberty is what constitutes an adult. Psychological maturity is an individual thing, since most people, even in their 70s, can act like immature, spoiled brats. But from a biological point of view, sexual maturity after puberty is used here for the term adult.

The term HUMAN, makes a distinction between Homo sapiens and other species of animals.

The term FEMALE makes a distinction between male and female based on two X chromosomes and is capable of pregnancy and giving birth from puberty until menopause. Female anatomy, as distinguished from male anatomy, is too diverse to include here.

Like the genomes of most other male mammals, a man’s genome typically inherits an X chromosome from his mother and a Y chromosome from his father. The male fetus generally produces larger numbers of androgens and smaller numbers of estrogens than a female fetus. This difference in the relative amounts of these sex steroids is largely responsible for the physiological differences that distinguish men from women. During puberty, hormones that stimulate androgen production result in the development of secondary sexual characteristics, thus exhibiting greater differences between the sexes.

Secondary sex characteristics are features that appear during puberty in humans and at sexual maturity in other animals. In humans, visible secondary sex characteristics include pubic hair, enlarged breasts and widened hips in females, and facial hair and Adam’s apples in males.

Anorexia = body image mental disorder.
Bigorexia = body image mental disorder.
Transgender = new human species? Lol, give me a break.

What really happened?

Roger Scruton made a key observation, which is that feminists understood, they could not win in direct competition with men, so in a sneaky way they saw opportunity in hijacking the language of the society and turning it into a political weapon.

"As far back as 1949, the seminal feminist thinker Simone de Beauvoir made this programmatic recommendation: ‘Language is inherited from a masculine society and contains many male prejudices . . . Women simply have to steal the instrument; they don’t have to break it or try a priori to make it something totally different. Steal it and use it for their own good’ (1972, p. 123)."

And indeed, they tried to do this with sex and gender. "During the 1970s American feminists seized on the idea of gender as a social construct, and used it to hide the truth about sex as a biological destiny. By replacing the word ‘sex’ with the word ‘gender’ they imagined that they could achieve at a stroke what their ideology required of them – to rescue sex from biology and to recast it as a complex social choice." (December 2002/January 2003, p. 1)

This led to the creation of a monster. The trans movement, which now is the enemy of the very same feminists that created it. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the danger of letting politically ambitious people play with language. I mean, what could possibly go wrong?

Women reaped numerous social benefits from feminism simply by being part of the in-group and repeating religious dogmas. Once it got too big and powerful, weaker men, who could not compete with other stronger men, simply said, "Screw this, I self-identify as a woman now," and boom, they outranked the feminists in the oppression Olympics game and got even more social benefits.

Now the feminists feel cheated, so they try to walk back on the linguistic engineering they helped promote. Gender is a social construct , but not one of biology but of language. Until recently, the whole world, for the whole of our history, knew what a woman is and what a man is, and they still do, but they bend the knee to this new religion to not get cast out of society. It would be poetic justice if this cult of postmodernist cancerous insanity were not tearing apart the cultures and countries in which it gestates.