LINK Anti-LGBTQ+ Tennessee Lt. Gov. McNally Has Been Liking Gay Thirst Pics
The state of Tennessee has become a hotbed of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation. Last week, the state’s governor, Bill Lee, signed a bill into law that banned trans youth healthcare as well as the nation’s first-ever drag felony bill. And that’s not all: There are another 26 bills targeting the community moving through the state’s legislature.
Lee was called out for the hypocrisy of the drag bill, as he has been photographed in... wait for it... drag.
But the hypocrisy doesn’t stop there. This week, the Tennessee Holler has released an interview with Franklyn McClur, 20, a young gay influencer and performer whose thirst pics Tennessee Lt. Gov. Randy McNally has been committing on — for years.
McNally voted for the anti-gay legislation but has been posting fire and heart emojis on steamy booty pics. We would be shocked if it wasn’t so utterly predictable.
The photos came to the attention of the Holler when an anonymous fan of McClur spotted them and pointed them out to the publication. “McNally repeatedly used his VERIFIED account to post underneath some of Franklyn’s raciest pictures,” writes Justin Kanew. “McNally is very big on heart and flame emojis.”
The two were friendly enough that McNally would call McClur by his nickname, Finn, in the comments — information that the publication notes wasn’t listed anywhere on his bio.
According to McClur, the two have been friends online for years. They first met through “mutual friends” on Facebook where MacNally got his Instagram and began commenting there. McClur said he wasn’t aware that McNally was the same person who has been heavily involved in leading the anti-LGBTQ+ charge in his home state. “I just thought he was older and out of touch. I’ve always taken it as a compliment. I don’t dislike him or think he’s a bad person, he’s one of the only people who has consistently uplifted me and made me feel good,” said McClur.
The story has now made its way to local news, which reported on both its racy nature and McNally’s surprise response of not denying that he did indeed write the comments. Many assumed he would just claim he had been hacked.
However, McNally also released an incredibly gaslighting statement claiming that all his fire emojis on the thirst pics were being misrepresented and that he was just communicating with one of his constituents.
“Trying to imply something sinister or inappropriate about a great-grandfather’s use of social media says more about the mind of the left-wing operative making the implication than it does about Randy McNally,” the statement read. “As anyone in Tennessee politics knows, Lt.Governor McNally is a prolific social media commenter. He takes great pains to view every post he can and frequently posts encouraging things to many of his followers. Does he always use the proper emoji at the proper time? Maybe not. But he enjoys interacting with constituents and Tennesseans of all religions, backgrounds, and orientations on social media. He has no intention of stopping.”
Sure, Jan.
This would honestly be hilarious if McNally weren’t simultaneously cheering on thirst posts while actively working to push through increasingly discriminatory legislation that would make McClur and other queer and trans people’s lives harder and more painful.
We wish we could say we’re shocked, but instead we’re just saddened and infuriated at the standard hypocrisy.
1
Be part of the movement!
Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.Create your free account
2 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.It seems the message here is that everyone who says they are not gay is really gay? The more they deny it the more likely they are gay.
Is there a similarity between someone who claims he is not anti-American and the more he proclaims he is not anti-American the more likely he is anti-American?
The more loudly the person complains about the right-wing destroying democracy the more likely they themselves are destroying democracy. Let's see, we can name a few who are the loudest. Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, Joe Biden (although I think Joe has no clue about democracy) Liz Cheney, Rashida Tlaib, AOC, Ilhan Omar. You could probably name a few others yourself. Does that allegory give you a window into how Democrats are destroying democracy? Or are these two examples of "projection" simply untrue? Or perhaps unrelated? You know, totally different. I think the aforementioned individuals believe America is only about democracy. So was the soviet union. The communists too pretended they were all about democracy.
Of course, the definition of "American" must be held into question as well. Words mean things says Barack Obama. We'll redef...er....define them for you.
You continue to demonstrate your torment. So sad!
FrankZeleniuk
Level 8
Mar 10, 2023
0
On the other side, the more someone beats their chest saying they are an American patriot, and calls others anti-American, the more they hate America. The more the Right Wing complains about godless Liberals and Socialists trying to groom children and destroy Western culture, the more they want to groom children and kill minorities. The more Republicans claim the Democrats are trying to steal elections, the more they are actually attempting to steal elections.
You still don't get it do you? The left are useful idiots. Once the right is done the corporatists will come after the left. Why do you think they are using this silly LGBTQ issue to divide people when the left was traditionally about the working person. Is there any evidence they care about the big issues? Have they done anything useful about homelessness or the drug epidemic? Most illegals end up in one form of slavery or another and the the countries they come from sink deeper and deeper into chaos. Why is it important to have drag queen story hour when most kids are now functionally illiterate? Why do they use the environmental movement to detract from the fact that the basic infrastructure that serves the poor is falling apart? Streets, sewers, water, housing, all basically neglected for decades in poor neighborhoods. Water and other utilities have become unaffordable for the poor in part because of decades of neglect. Could it be that they don't want to pay for improvements they don't need? Once they no longer need you you will be discarded. Like the diversity and inclusion hires at twitter. They give you a little bit, just enough to keep you agitating, distracted and creating chaos.
@JacksonNought LOL! Excellent!
Let the truth prevail in all cases. Let's investigate.
Would there be a problem with an impartial investigation into accusers? Why is it only Trump haters can investigate Trump. We can't have only democrats or republicans investigating and clearing themselves of all wrong doing. I've seen many a kangaroo court in my time. Jan6 is a good example. When select evidence is suppressed and only some evidence allowed you have to be suspicious. Tucker Carlson is only providing more evidence for you to judge for yourself.
But there will more than likely be evidence they will try and bury before anyone can look. Like Hillary Clinton did with her 33,000 e-mail deletions or her bleach-bit computer or her smashed cell phones. Not suspicious at all. Right?
Did Dr. Fauci present all the evidence in the pandemic? We have learned he was not quite forthcoming. His flip-flops on masks, and origins of the virus should have brought some suspicions that required closer scrutiny.
Not all allegations and/or accusations are psychological projections. The closer the evidence starts to point back to the accuser the more desperate they become. That's why all the evidence must be investigated and found not just what the accuser presents. Looks like Matt Gaetz is going to skate after you had him all but convicted. Are you going to discount your sources on that?
How about your sources on the Trump/Russia collusion hoax? Hillary and Obama were actually colluding with Russia. Clinton selling 20% of American uranium. Obama promising more to Putin after his re-election.
Ho-hum.Guess we shouldn't waste time looking for actual evidence. Nothing more to see here. Nudge! Nudge! Wink! Wink! Say no more! Say no more!
I was only suggesting we look a little closer at who is anti-American. America is not and never has been a socialist state although socialism has been allowed to gain a foothold in America with the proper indoctrination.
@wolfhnd You still don't get it do you? The Right are useful idiots. Once the Left is done, the Right will start eating itself, as you can see today with the fight between "MAGA" and "ultra-MAGA", turning on each other, the laughable display during the speaker votes, etc. There's a reason the "Leopards Ate My Face" meme exists.
Why do you think the Right rails about dangerous "migrant caravans" a few weeks before elections, then suddenly it's like it never happened after? Why do you think the tired "Obama is going to steal your guns" talking point kept coming up? Why do you think Trump said plain as day he could not lose unless it was rigged (in both elections) his whole time campaigning? Why do you think the Right likes to redefine terms like CRT or come up with nonsense like a war on Christmas? The Right do nothing but create a phony culture war to create outrage and divide the country.
I thought the Right was actually supposed to be the part of the working man? Isn't that how they brand themselves? Pro-America, Pro-Workers, Pro-Vets? They love railing against "coastal elites" and say they care more about the poor coal miners in flyover country. Yet they consistently vote on policies that hurt the working man. They care more about bailing out corporations and lowering taxes for billionaires. They vote against lowering medical costs for poor families. They vote against acknowledging the bravery of vets and helping 9/11 first responders get medical care. They care more about voting to declare Socialism "dangerous" than voting to help the country.
How many times did Trump claim his "beautiful" healthcare plan was just "two weeks away"? Hmm, still haven't seen it? Republicans have the House now... and have they tried to pass legislation to fix inflation or infrastructure? Nope! It's all Hunter Biden Hunter Biden Hunter Biden! It's all about drag bans now. Nothing but culture war to keep the poor working families distracted and thinking that the Right is helping them by kicking them.
@FrankZeleniuk what evidence was suppressed? The DOJ and the lawyers for the "shaman" have said that all of the footage Tucker has been showing was available to them. It's almost like Tucker selectively editing and cherry picking footage doesn't tell the whole story, but spins a narrative, hm?
The Jan 6 committee was to be bipartisan. McCarthy selected 5 Republicans to be on it. Of those 5, he picked Jim Jordan, who had a hand in the insurrection. Jordan was rejected, and McCarthy refused to pick a replacement, and rescinded his picks. It is on the Republicans that they didn't have proper representation. They did have Liz Cheney - a staunch Republican who voted in lock step with Trump over 90% of the time. A Republican so dedicated to the cause that she alienated her gay sister to publicly oppose same-sex marriage. Yet because she was willing to tell the truth about the 2020 election, the Republican establishment had to ostracize her.
what evidence was suppressed?
14,000 hours of recorded evidence. The "Shaman" lawyer was on Tucker, I guess you didn't watch it, said he had never before seen the video Tucker had shown . Have you found out who Ray Epps was?
Have you found out how many FBI agents were, in the mostly destructive, looting and pillaging mob of terrorists, were used as agents provocateur? Obviously there were none, right? Just there to monitor. If anyone cherry picked data it was Nancy Pelosi.
It's about time you realized that the omniscient Trump is god and he causes everything. He caused the train derailment in East Palestine. He caused the current SVB collapse. He has brought 5 million migrants into the country. He is destroying lives allowing fentanyl to pour into the country. The Democrats aren't responsible for any of this. Maybe he is Satan, as he destroys the nation.
Could itbe thatTrump is a figment of the minds of Democrats?
I wonder, speaking about suppressing evidence, have you seen any stonewalling by Garland, Wray and others in congressional hearings lately?
@FrankZeleniuk all footage involving the "shaman" was available to his lawyers. It failed to prove any innocence. Showing some cherry picked footage of him walking around aimlessly doesn't discount the footage of him storming the Capitol behind Dominic Pezzola, breaching a police line, facing off with members of the U.S. Capitol Police for more than thirty minutes in front of the Senate Chamber doors while elected officials, including the Vice President of the United States, were fleeing from the chamber, entering the Senate Gallery and screaming obscenities, and using his bullhorn to rile up and encourage more rioting.
Why are we still using anything on Tucker's show as a talking point? The man has been found to have lied day after day on his show. He never believed the 2020 election was stolen. He hates Trump "passionately" and called him a "demonic force". He only cares about the Fox stock price, and will say anything to keep his mindless viewers watching... and looks like he got you hooked.
all footage involving the "shaman" was available to his lawyers.
Sorry!. His lawyer says different. Straight from the man himself. Pelosi wouldn't let anyone see 14,000 feet of footage.
Who was Ray Epps? Why isn't he in jail? He is plainly urging the crowd to go into the Capital building.
Don't know where you get your information?
If you listen to Democrat politicians and MSM they will tell you Tucker lies. It is just denial. Obviously, they have you hooked. For a guy that doesn't believe in fantasy you sure eat up their fairy tales.
@FrankZeleniuk you mean his lawyer Albert Watkins? Whom he fired in favor of other representation? Why not ask his other lawyers? The DOJ says otherwise, that all footage was available. I guess you should pick who to trust. I guess I am skeptical to trust anything aired on Tucker - who intentionally lies to his audience.
Why hasn't McCarthy released the footage to other outlets? Why only Tucker? You don't see a problem with that?
The whole Ray Epps thing is just another conspiracy theory. Why is everyone laser focused on that one man. There are plenty of others who urged people to go in. He is in no way an agent of the government, if that is what you are implying. You want him to be in jail? I thought they were all patriots who did nothing wrong? You think a man who told people to go in should be in jail over someone who actually did go in and faced off against police?
Court documents show Tucker lies. Don't need Democrats to tell me. Tucker tells me himself. You are so fooled by these people.
@JacksonNought
you mean his lawyer Albert Watkins? Whom he fired in favor of other representation? Why not ask his other lawyers?
All his lawyers should have had access to all the evidence. Your statement here is irrelevant.
DOJ says otherwise, that all footage was available.
Available to whom? Nancy Pelosi. I'm sorry but four years of DOJ, FBI and CIA focus on the red herring of Trump/Russia collusion has left me wondering what they are doing. They have yet to restore any trust in them at all. The Biden administration is being run by some proxy whom I suspect is Barack Obama since he was close to capturing the crown of worst President ever. Of course most of the current administration is from the Obama era.
Ray Epps is a puzzle since he was never investigated but is plainly seen as an agent provocateur in several locations yet he is just ignored in the hearing and by the MSM.
Court documents show Tucker lies.
Schumer said one of Tucker's shows was the most disgraceful thing he has ever seen on television.
Then he called for censorship. Tucker must have hit a nerve for him to suggest ignoring the first amendment. Shouldn't Tucker have been hit with a slew of lawsuits for libel?
Anyway, all this is theater and not central to what is actually going on. As David Horowitz said, "The issues are never the issue. The issue is the revolution."
Right, comrade?
How about Albert Watkins goes into court and argues under oath that he didn't have the footage? Would be a good way to get an appeal. Why isn't he doing that, using the footage to try and prove his case, instead on whining on Fox News? How many times have lawyers gone on Fox News and lied, since they aren't under oath? Rudy did it so many times and so severely that his license was actually suspended. Sidney Powell did it a ton of times, claiming she had evidence that Dominion was changing votes... Her evidence? A random email from someone claiming to be a "decapitated time traveler". Why isn't horned guy's new lawyer going on Fox and claiming the same?
You can scream till you are blue in the face that Trump & Russia was a "hoax". That doesn't make it so. Collusion doesn't have a legal meaning in criminal law, there is no criminal charge called collusion, so the fact that no one was charged with "collusion" is meaningless. 34 people from Trump's team were indicted / convicted during the Russian investigation. It was proven that Russia was spreading propaganda. Russia hacked Democrat emails after Trump asked them to, live on air. This is a fact. Paul Manafort, Trump's campaign manager, met with Russian agents at Trump Tower along with Trump Jr and Kushner. Manafort also worked for a pro Russia group overseas, and hid millions of dollars, and was convicted of financial crimes. Konstantin Kilimnik, a Russian agent who worked for Manafort, was charged with obstruction of justice. Roger Stone was convicted of lying to Congress and witness tampering in relation to the Russia investigation. Michael Flynn was convicted of lying to Congress about meeting with Russian agents. Michael Cohen was convicted of lying to Congress about working with Russia, on behalf of Trump, to build a Trump Tower in Moscow - something that Trump was working on throughout his presidential campaign, despite telling the American people he had no business dealings with Russia - one of his many lies. George Papadopoulos was convicted of lying to Congress about having dealings with Russian agents. Trump openly admitted that he would take foreign assistance in his campaign. Noticing a pattern?
Mueller never exonerated Trump, another Trump lie. He specifically said “if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.” Because the Justice Department prohibits the prosecution of a sitting president, he also said "charging the president with a crime was therefore not an option we could consider.” But go on calling it all a hoax. Yet keep clinging to the "clearly not a hoax" of 2020 election fraud and mules and scary machines... all of which Fox News hosts including Tucker Carlson did not believe.
The Biden administration is being run by some proxy
And what evidence do you have of this? I hope you don't try and use the whole "Biden old" or "Biden senile" excuse - there are plenty of examples of Trump being even worse in those aspects.
Barack Obama since he was close to capturing the crown of worst President ever
Who would you say is the worst then? Obama gave healthcare to millions. He ushered in marriage equality, and made many advancements in LGBTQ+ rights. He helped save the economy after the financial collapse under Bush. He got Bin Laden. Seems like a pretty decent president to me.
Schumer said one of Tucker's shows was the most disgraceful thing he has ever seen on television. Then he called for censorship.
Trump called for censorship of people on Twitter and talk show hosts on TV because they hurt his feelings. I don't see you being concerned about that?
Shouldn't Tucker have been hit with a slew of lawsuits for libel?
He is. He is part of the Dominion defamation lawsuit. And considering there are texts that show he purposefully lied, and showed actual malice, he may very well face consequences.
But go on believing everything he says, despite arguing in a court of law that "no reasonable person" would trust what he says.
Collusion doesn't have a legal meaning in criminal law, there is no criminal charge called collusion, so the fact that no one was charged with "collusion" is meaningless.
Why would they even investigate collusion then? Please comrade, spare me.
How about Albert Watkins goes into court and argues under oath that he didn't have the footage?
Give him time. It's only been a week.
34 people from Trump's team were indicted / convicted during the Russian investigation.
You mean a crime had been found that could be interpreted, if worded the right way, to fit even Trump, let alone his team. You conveniently, tied "indicted/ convicted together, how many exactly were convicted? Truth is, in most instances, they were crimes that were made to fit the person by biased prosecutors. The establishment had no fondness for Trump or any of his administration and fostered this witch hunt of Trump and any one linked to him.
While someone rots in jail for 4 years for wandering around the Capitol building Ray Epps is ignored as an obvious provocateur. Fair? Some in the crowd that never went into the Capitol building were heavily investigated even having their bank accounts handed over to the FBI and some are in jail. Fair? Didn't see any of that during BLM/Antifa riots. Fair? Just?
According to the DOJ, specifically Merrick Garland, 5 police officers died that day. Didn't happen.
The DOJ continues to obfuscate and deny the facts while also ignoring allies to the cause.
Scam Bankrupt Fraud can sit comfortably at home after bilking investors out of billions and get blown a kiss from a Congresswoman. Fair? Just?
Mueller never exonerated Trump.
Of course not. After a $34 million dollar investigation he found nothing but had to keep the narrative alive. If they couldn't charge the President why did they have the special counsel? I suppose they could have impeached him, which they did. But if Mueller hadn't said what he did they couldn't even have done that.
And what evidence do you have of this (Proxy)? I hope you don't try and use the whole "Biden old" or "Biden senile" excuse
He is obviously not cognitively acute. But regardless of that, he is not allowed to speak freely in case he "f#&*s things up". His proxy has said he should not be underestimated in this regard.
Tucker has nothing to fear about the Dominion lawsuit. They have so much as said themselves that their machines had flaws.
Anyway, "The issues are never the issue. The issue is the revolution." Today, it is the great reset. The issues we discuss are quite petty.
You have to open your eyes a little wider than concerns over your personal freedom in order to see proper threats to your personal freedom. Even in granting you legal freedom you still do not find happiness. And you can never form a society because a society is about cooperation not coercion. Government is just a social construct where coercion takes sanctuary under the auspices of agreed upon authority.
Thanks for the input, comrade. I hope you can see that the revolution will not settle all your "issues" for you. After the revolution we will just be denied our rights or, if we are lucky, they will minimally be ignored. We will be disappeared if we push things a bit too hard.
Later.
Recent Visitors 16
Photos 11,795 More
Posted by JohnHoukWATCH OUT FOR AN AI TYRANNY & NSA Spying SUMMARY: I’ve witnessed too many dark-side leaps and bounds to give credence to AI-Tyranny naysayers.
Posted by Sensrhim4hizvewzCohencidence or PLANNED???
Posted by Sensrhim4hizvewz Hopefully, everyone catches it and everyone gets better
Posted by JohnHoukFBI Investigates Baltimore Bridge Collapse! Suggests NOT an Accident! SUMMARY: On 3/27/24 I shared a Lara Logan Tweet on her opinion of what caused the Francis Scott Key Bridge near Baltimore ship ...
Posted by JohnHoukPolitical Tyranny – Part Two Videos Showing the Political Tyranny of Factionalism & Globalist Entanglements SUMMARY: IN Part 1 I used President Washington’s 1796 Farewell Address as a ...
Posted by JohnHoukPolitical Tyranny – Part One President Washington Warned of the Insidious Outcome of Political Factions & Foreign Entanglements SUMMARY: George Washington – RIGHTLY SO – is called the Father...
Posted by JohnHoukFuellmich Political Persecution Encapsulates Globalist Lawfare SUMMARY: A few thoughts on Deep State Political Persecution of Trump & Supports.
Posted by JohnHoukLooking at Birx Not Fauci Managed Medical Tyranny Includes Personal Observations on Legit President Trump SUMMARY: Looking at a VNN examination of the short Documentary: “It Wasn't Fauci: How ...
Posted by FocusOn1Uh oh, i hate to say this, but israel was formed in 1948, 100 years after karl marx wrote his book. Was it formed as a atheist communist country?
Posted by MosheBenIssacWith woke fat ass acceptance, only applies to women (fat bitches). What used to be funny is now illegal. The video won a Grammy Award for Best Concept Music Video in 1988 [youtu.be]
Posted by JohnHoukRemember WHY You Are Resisting the Coup Summary: Well… It’s series of videos time again.
Posted by JohnHoukA Call for Intercession Over WHO Power Grab Treaty SUMMARY: A call for prayer on America’s leaders related to the National Sovereignty terminating Pandemic (better known as Plandemic) Treaty.
Posted by MosheBenIssacDisney COLLAPSES Billions Lost In MINUTES After Shareholders Troll Company Sticking With WOKE! [youtu.be]
Posted by JohnHoukIntro to Maj.
Posted by FocusOn1Communists murdered people on the titanic
Posted by JohnHoukAnti-Medical Tyranny Read Over the Easter Weekend 2024 SUMMARY: Here are two posts focused on combatting Medical Tyranny… 1) Dr.