The only person that was quicker to yell WWIII, Russia did it than Zelensky, was Tim freaking Pool. I don't know which is a bigger fool. Does anyone remember when Ukraine unreliable rockets hit Croatia? This seems like its similar situation.
Anything Goes: Sheer madness.
4
Be part of the movement!
Welcome to the community for those who value free speech, evidence and civil discourse.Create your free account
3 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.I can't watch that smug, know-it-all. Ever look at his soft little hands? He hasn't worked a day in his life. About the only callus he might have is on his index finger for taking selfies. He thinks he's some sort of an intellectual but he's a self-centered little boy who lives in a bubble of his own making.
xX2AFanXx
Level 7
Nov 16, 2022
0
I like Tim but he is a product of his environment. He has been exposed to the radical elements of society throughout his life. Even while covering the news as an independent journalist what he saw was a world filled with hate. Since eight percent of the population are criminals and less than five percent of the overall hold radical enough political views to violently protest living in that environment warps your perceptions. It's also important to note that he grew up a liberal and still clings to that perspective of justice in many ways. That said he has also seen the hypocrisy and venality of politicians and activists. That environment encourages a dim view of humanity in general. He assumes the worst in almost every situation.
Russia since the fall of the Soviet Union has become traditional and nationalistic. That includes a return to a kind of Tsar in the form of Putin and a revival of the orthodox church. Someone with a liberal attitude is going to find that alarming. It doesn't matter if he has enough experience to see through the propaganda and realize that Putin is not a Hitler.
wolfhnd
Level 8
Nov 16, 2022
2
If Tim toned down his World War and Civil War and Dems are panicking habits that he repeats in every single video and actually start reading books instead of reacting to media articles, which is basically how he build a career. Daily reaction to select few media outlets and than commenting on it from his source of very limited knowlage.
He seems to have a hearth in the right place, but he also tends to have an ego. A little big of humbleness would help. Most of the comments that he gets correct are related to his specialty, media in the USA., Contemporary media. Anything outside of that and he quickly is way over his head. But like I said, it does not stop him from using "WWIII" or "civil war" in virtually every headline of his videos, even he has zero understanding of geopolitics and Russia or anything that is really going on.
"Russia since the fall of the Soviet Union has become traditional and nationalistic. "
I'm not sure how much truth there is in that, because traditional is a strong word. They are not becoming like pre WWI that's for sure. Traditional values are really just sane values at this point. Some western nations like USA and western Europe have gone so far into the postmodernist world of unreality that people start using traditional for anything but that. In reality, Russia is very modern place. But not completely postmodern.
As for nationalism. You say it almost as if its a bad word. They are not National Socialist, they are fighting those. They are simply not insane about globalism for obvious reasons. And at this point with sanctions there is little chance of that even if they wanted to. One might say, choice was made for them.
"That includes a return to a kind of Tsar in the form of Putin and a revival of the orthodox church."
I think you are getting wrong impression about Putin. He is nothing like Tsar. There are probably people who would be more like Tsars of Imperial Russia., I assure you the moderate, lawyer is not one of them. meaning Putin.
As for Orthodox Church. That is more complicated. Putin sees it as best defense against wokeness, and I'm sure there are many who share his views in that sense. How much are their really becoming more religious as Oradox Christians is hard to say, because in time of war and threats more people chose it for sense of community and stability than they would otherwise. Lets see what happens after the war.
" Someone with a liberal attitude is going to find that alarming. It doesn't matter if he has enough experience to see through the propaganda and realize that Putin is not a Hitler. "
I guess not. Even you see Putin as form of Tzar. Its too much to expect Tim to know much about Russia.
We are just going to have to disagree on the nature of Putin's popularity in Russia. You say he is nothing like a Tsar and you are technically right but for such a complex subject it's little different than coining the phrase "imperial presidency" in the US. [en.wikipedia.org] . People everywhere are drawn to "strong" leaders especially in times of doubt about the future. It's not a sign of backwardness and I didn't imply that was the case in Russia. The idea that traditional is backwards only applies to the extent that traditional was backwards which is loaded with all sorts of subjective opinions. For example if traditional scientific standards of open inquiry and debate were still the norm then "climate science" would be a different and in my opinion better animal. For many conservatives however aspects of science such as evolution are unacceptable. It's my opinion that in Russia the line between what constitutes a strong leader is tilted more towards authoritarianism than has traditionally been the case in the West.
There are some aspects of tradition we would not want to maintain. Liberal ideas about individual freedom and even the right of workers to organize are not entirely negative. Free speech was once a liberal priority. Then of course there is civil rights and regulations of various types that protect us from things like pollution and other excesses of free markets. While controversial for most conservatives even some of the social safety nets have improved society.
@wolfhnd What is your idea of what a Tzar is to compare Putin to one?
In regards to The Imperial Presidency and Putin in particular. I don't think that is how he uses his powers. Which is the most remarkable thing about him. As Thucydides says:
“Of all manifestations of power, restraint impresses me the most.”
― Thucydides, The History of the Peloponnesian War
“The measure of a man is what he does with power.”
― Plato
I don't see Putin neither as a tyrant nor as a Tzar. Constitutionally he does not have the power of a Tzar and he does not act like one. If anything you could say Biden is closer to both, since constitutions is not followed and he acts as a tyrant.
I don't see that in Putin. Certainly no Tyrant or Tzar as far as I know does what he does when he spends 4 hours well prepared answering questions to journalists and allies. Have you read his speeches? They are in large part written by him, not ghostwriters. and he can talk about it, but the speeches themselves are nothing like tyrannical or something Tzar would bother with.
Putin is by his actions a statesmen and perhaps one of the last great statesmen remaining. For the most part the rest of the world either has tyrants or actors and puppets moonlighting as presidents and prime ministers. But true statement, like Churchill was for example or Theodore Roosevelt or James Adams maybe.... those are long gone in much of the world. Putin seems to be the last one that still has any legit power.
Look closer and past the myths and you will find that to be closer to truth in relative terms than most either realize or are willing to admit.
...............................
"Liberal ideas about individual freedom and even the right of workers to organize are not entirely negative."
All I know is that workers of the world unite, is inspired by Karl Marx. During his time, unions showed up on the scene as a result of his writings. And every since they were founded it always ends up being the same story. There are those that want power but cannot be part of the corporation and they don't want to work so they greatly benefit from being union bosses. This was always the case. It does not benefit the ordinary works or the corporations. It is a power position.
So much so that anyone who controls the unions has a lot of leverage. In the past we have seen this with infamous Mafia control of unions and today its the various NGO's that control for example teachers union that indoctrinates the children in America. While the association and unionization of medical professionals do similar things in their field. This is the extension of the guild system.
Guilds are defined as associations of craftsmen and merchants formed to promote the economic interests of their members as well as to provide protection and mutual aid. As both business and social organizations, guilds were prolific throughout Europe between the eleventh and sixteenth centuries. A significant part of the skilled labor force in medieval cities was structured around the organization of guilds, which provided economic, educational, social and religious functions.
Problem is that once they become powerful enough they get to act as gatekeepers for those bellow them and they use the threat of strike and all kinds of collective resources to leverage their power against those above them. But off course instead of everyone being a collective union, we are not ants, we instead get union, guild or assassination bosses that make the most of it at the expense of others.
I'm yet to see such an organization that did not end up in that way over long enough time. Its a nice sounding system, but in practice it leaves doors open for all sorts of corruption.
Take medical association, the American Bar Association etc. They act as gatekeepers that issue licenses and if you are not on friendly terms with their interests, they cut you off. A bar examination is an examination administered by the bar association of a jurisdiction that a lawyer must pass in order to be admitted to the bar of that jurisdiction. and they can issue it or revoke it, based on all kinds of special interests.
We have seen during scamdamic what has happened to the medical professionals who did not want to go along with the jab mandates and other agenda, they were threaten with their licencnces taken away.
Look at police unions. Did they do anything for the average police officer or for citizens. Maybe some, but I've watched plenty of them during last 2 years only union leaders negotiate coverage for themselves. Certainly it was the case in my country.
There are far more bad examples than good examples in the case of unions. So I'm not sure its a good thing. It sounds noble and good on paper. But in reality. Not so much.
If you think Biden is more like a tyrant than Putin you are getting desperate for an argument. Biden is a puppet and is so stupid he isn't even good at being a puppet.
As to the right of workers to organize it's not that much different than a democracy always becoming a dictatorship of the majority no matter how small that majority is. That is why constitutional republics are at least somewhat more sustainable. Some would argue that constitutional monarchies serve the same purpose of restraining democracy. Either way democracies have to be restrained because of human nature. Peasants are too easily seduced by bread and circus.
Sure unions abuse their power so do businesses corporations and politicians. You could argue that the British Empire was done in by unions fairly effectively. But empires are very expensive to maintain. The U.S. and the Soviet Union being examples of empires that got to expensive to maintain. Their are always rivals just waiting for some weakness to take advantage of or a popular rebellion by the masses who see no personal benefit in empire maintenance.
With few exceptions capitalist fail to see how fair wages increase economic growth. The emergence of unions in the US after WWII contributed to amazing economic growth. Workers with extra money will spend it stimulating the growth of new businesses. The worst thing you can do in an economic slow down is cut wages because it has a domino effect. You end up with nobody to buy not only your products but the workers at other businesses that are impacted by you reducing wages have workers that could have bought you products had your worker bought theirs. There are many fatal flaws in unfettered capitalism monopolies and concentration of power being just one.
Even with fair trade natural hierarchies always become tyrannies. It is one of those ironies of life that hierarchies of competence are necessary to maintain civilization but that hierarchies are self corrupting. Unions like corporations have to be regulated by a third party. The challenge is to find an uncorruptible third party. That depends on a moral population of which none have every existed in a sufficient majority. In part because their has never been a philosophy sophisticated enough to deal with the conflicts between public and private morality. Marxism is laughably crude, Adam Smith relied on Religion and we all know how self corrupting religions are, today's philosophers of any wide influence are mostly developed by determinists of one sort or the other and we are seeing how poorly that works out. Humanism is almost as crude an answer as Marxism. Even those philosophers who understand abstract reality have had very little success when it comes to morality. Jordan Peterson seems to understand the role of religion in civilization but he doesn't seem able to put God in the equation. Without God religion seems half empty. The new religions such as diversity, inclusion and equality while not purely Marxist they have the same crudeness. For the most part they have more to do with moral panics and cults than workable morality. Eschatological religions such as Christianity ignore public morality in favor of the here after.
Even if we were to solve the morality issue their is the dysgenic effects of luxus. General intelligence is clearly declining because of a lack of selection. Certainly our elites are not very elite and resemble the beautiful ones in the mouse utopia experiments more than people capable of solving complex problems. Maybe our AI masters will be intelligent enough to solve our problems but we certainly will not like the solutions.
@wolfhnd "If you think Biden is more like a tyrant than Putin you are getting desperate for an argument. Biden is a puppet and is so stupid he isn't even good at being a puppet."
I don't see them as mutually exclusive. Biden is a puppet, that is correct. But why is he also not a tyrant. He thinks like one and signs executive orders as one. Rulling by decree. You can make the argument he is tyrant by proxy, but even if you go back to his earlier career, he was still the same old Joe, just not with the position of president. There is plenty of clips online to demonstrate his way of dealing with problems. A way of a tyrant.
He is also a pedo, a syle politician, and a pretty disgusting person overall, but these characteristics are not mutually exclusive and can co-exist in someone like Joe, because they don't oppose each other, they reinforce each other.
tyrant ˈtaɪrənt
• n.
An oppressive or cruel ruler.
A person exercising power arbitrarily or cruelly.
Gk Hist. an absolute ruler who seized power without the legal right.
We all know Joe didn't get 81 million votes. Yes he was put in place of a president by more powerful people. But while he is officially a president of United States and enough people pretend he is, he is able to put his signature and make statements that still many people consider are coming from the president of the United States... along with authorization of the office of president.
When he was put in office, he immediately sign record number of executive orders. He may have not known what he was signing because he is a senile fool, but he did signing it as officially president of united states. And he did gave that V for Vendetta style speech in front of a red backdrop. Sounded like a tyrant.
Has Putin ever gave such a speech? If Putin was a tyrant, why would the globalists fear him and hate him so much and why would he gave speeches directly against them? You could say because he wants power for himself... and that could be true.... certainly is true in the case of China and Xi.
But if you look at his speeches and actions and his back story... he comes across as a statesmen, not a tyrant. I cannot say that for the puppets of the west. Ursual, Biden, Boris, Jucinda, Trudoe etc.
They may be just puppets and stupid as hell and chosen precisely for that, but the have also been chosen because they are willing to play the role of a tyrant when given position of power, to please their masters and satisfy personal cravings for tyrannical powers. These people enjoy it. They enjoy those positions.
Again, compared to Putin who does not. But to understand that you need to understand Russia and Putin himself. Something you won't find in western press.
@wolfhnd Why would anyone move from Russia to USA at this stage of the game is beyond me. But to each their own, I guess.
Anyway, there are other Russians with other opinions, and these Russians have done do diligence. To be fair, its only fragment of the story, there is plenty move to do before one gets a better picture of what is Russia and who is Putin but its more than most have done.
Russians With Attitude @RussiansWithAttitude
Who Is Mr. Putin? Part 1. 1952-1991
This is just a 16 min trailer. Listen to the full episode!
On Patreon: [patreon.com]
Or on Gumroad: [gumroad.com]
The voice effects are experimental and are done via ai15. Intro: P Loco - Vladimir Putin
00:00:00 - The difference between Soviet and Russian leaders
00:12:20 - Conspiracy theories about Putin's family
00:19:00 - Volodya's early life. Hooliganism, The Rule Of the Jungle and Sambo school
00:24:20 - Putin in University and KGB. His secret trip to New Zealand and service in Eastern Germany
00:30:40 - The fall of Eastern Germany and Putin's disillusionment
00:38:00 - Putin in the 90s. First steps in politics as Anatoly Sobchak's sidekick
..............................................
Who Is Mr. Putin? Part 2. 1991-1999
Tune in to our PUTIN series & listen to full episodes: [patreon.com]...
Or do it on a platform for trve sigmas: [gumroad.com]
Note that we ain't popular yet so there are no free full versions just FLOATING on the net!
Kalinka in the first 4 mins is completely accidental...
00:00:00 - Intro
00:03:00 - Piter clan vs Moscow family
00:04:28 - end of kalinka malinka
00:13:50 - Stolen gold of the Communist Party. Solar Putin vs Lunar Putin theories
00:25:00 - Putin's rise to power. Pacification of the Oligarchy and organized crime
00:31:15 - Autistic technocrat at work. Siloviki world order.
00:42:30 - Putin's involvement in the Second Chechen War and Acting Presidency
..............................................
Who is Mr. Putin? Part 3. 2000-2004
Full 1hr30m episode [patreon.com]
Or here: [russianswithattitude.gumroad.com]
00:00:00 - General vibe of the early 2000s. ♬ Lyube - Davay za ♬
00:18:10 - Putin coming to power. Apartment bombing conspiracy.
00:29:50 - Second Chechen War
00:37:45 - Kursk submarine tragedy of 2000
00:44:00 - Akhmat Kadyrov changing sides. ♬ Timur Mutsuraev - Pogasli Svechi ♬
00:51:00 - Putin against Berezovsky
00:58:00 - Putin against oil tycoon Khodorkovsky and media tycoon Gusinsky
01:04:20 - Terrorism. 'Nord Ost' Moscow theather hostage crisis in 2002. Subway bombing in 2004. Beslan school siege in 2004.
01:17:30 - US-Russia relations. Afghan & Iraq war. ♬ Mr Credo - Saddam Hussein ♬
..............................................
Putin's Russia 2004-2008. Army reforms, Emo culture, Georgian war
Join and listen to full episode here: [patreon.com]
Or here: [russianswithattitude.gumroad.com]
00:00:00 - Intro
00:03:00 - Overview of 2004
00:13:00 - Gas Wars with Ukraine
00:17:52 - New Minister of Defense. Serdyukov's reforms. Dedovschina problem
00:31:35 - Shamil Basaev. Biography, shady international connections and death
00:42:50 - 2007 nostalgia, subcultures & vibology
01:02:43 - Medvedev, Surkov and Hyperfakeality
01:08:55 - Ossetian and Abkhaz fight for independence
01:15:40 - Russo-Georgian War
01:20:00 - The curious case of Mikhail Saakashvili
Some people have no interest in nationalism and no loyalty to any particular government. That seems perfectly rational to me from an intellectual perspective. Unfortunately the world is not rational. The whole great reset thing has more to do with ego and emotion than rationality for example. It has to do with evolution of the species.
@wolfhnd But there is no evidence that human spices are rational animals. We are rationalizing animals and always were, plenty of evidence for that. That has not change. What has changed is that technology has allowed us the luxury to avoid being reasonable in more and more areas of ourselves and to start thinking of ourselves as God like creatures.
Imagine if an average western had the same level of skill and intelligence, and had to survive in the world 5000 years ago. He would starve to death. Be guild by others or be eaten by a wild animals.
Today many can go to get a debt on credit card, or be on welfare and go to supermarket or order food and do nothing but watch TV all day.
My point is that, we were not rational before in the past , but we had far less wiggle room to be stupid, hence we had to respect some things or we would not survive. Today the technology and other aspects of society have allowed us to outsource the effort of critical thinking almost completely and still survive.
And misery is on our way for that kind of behaviour so we will have to evolve on a social level. Or we won't survive not just as individuals but as a civilization. And others that don't do those things will leading to more competitive edge.
AI if it ever happens is one of the things unique to our time. The problem is that people misunderstand artificial. Nothing is artificial in the sense that it shouldn't exist from a naturalist perspective. All of human evolution is artificial if by artificial you mean technological. Humans are the tool users both abstract and physical. Our big brains are useless without programming. Swarm intelligence developed through cultural evolution. It is artificial eusociality especially in complex societies. You can argue all you want about natural intelligence but IQ measures abstract reasoning which is the key to human evolution. So you can say we are a rationalizing species but the tension between emotion and rationality is only one aspect of our nature. We would never have evolved without rational abstract reasoning.
@wolfhnd AI as in Artificial Intelligence is important concept because human intelligence is not just math its much more than that and one thing critical for it is self awareness as filtered by emotions, memories, senses, DNA and intelligence in various forms.
Artificial Intelligence, does not have that ability and its questionable can it be achieved. IQ is not measure of intelligence its a measure of bureaucracy and compliance to standards created by ego maniacs who like to fiddle with numbers to measure what cannot be measured in that way. Its the same kind of people that are into technocracy and trans-humanism and think of humans as same as machines and think they can hack and program humans the same way. They are wrong.
"All of human evolution is artificial if by artificial you mean technological."
How so? We have not been born with technology, we have developed it via techniques that we have evolved to posses. Technology is artificial creation by and large, although some is happy accidents recognized as useful for technological use. But evolution is not technology.
Evolution by natural selection is not the same as evolution by artificial selection. The was Darwins contribution. NAZI's tried the artificial route via eugenics, but as it happens they were driven by human nature which evolved naturally so the ended up screwing it all up.
The eugenics ideas and practices are still alive and well and in use today in America and other other countries. But so is natural evolution that is not under human influence, but happens spontaneously because of the pressures to survive and reproduce in the new modern technological age.
"Our big brains are useless without programming."
Err... well you can flip that around. Our programming cannot exist without our big brains. Its not a contest. But if the argument is what comes first, chicken or an egg. The answer is egg. In in this case programming. Fight of flight instinct that we all still have, exists in other species long before humans developed their big brains. Just as eggs existed before chickens evolved.
"You can argue all you want about natural intelligence but IQ measures abstract reasoning which is the key to human evolution"
No IQ measures scores made for bureaucrats and technocrats. The point of IQ was not to measure intelligence in any real sense, but to satisfy bureaucrats who wanted data to compare people and justify largely preconceived notions about humans or races. The so called movement of "Scientific racism" for example could be justified with something like IQ scores, just as measuring "racism" by algorithms of twitter is done today to justify similar ideologies. It was no more path to human nature than as it is now. In short. IQ scores are measure of human intelligence, but its proportional to how much one takes them at face value.
"Beware of people who use statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts – for support rather than illumination." — Andrew Lang, British author (1844-1912)
" So you can say we are a rationalizing species but the tension between emotion and rationality is only one aspect of our nature. We would never have evolved without rational abstract reasoning."
That is true. But this needs further clarification. Its more about purpose of cognitive economy I would say than other reasons. That is the evolutionary purpose. As well as for social cohesion.
Imagine if you were Muslim warrior in the battle during Crusades. You are about to go into battle and anything can happen. You really don't have time to evaluate by reason alone all the possible outcomes in real time, it would take too much computational power and that means too much energy. And if you do it slowly, to calculate all the possible sword swings and everything, you get your head chopped off.
So a Muslim warrior might say. It will be as god wishes it. That way he outsources heavy load of thinking in real time to an abstract figure of God and abstract set of rules governing that metaphysical world and he can devote his energy to fighting a battle. Avoiding sword swings etc.
In other words, cave man invented Zeous the god of thunder so he does not have to explain in scientific terms how lighting sets bushes of fire. Its easier to simply say, Zeous had a bad day.
Its good enough emotional satisfaction for as little intellectual effort as possible, but still good enough for survival. Hence its about cognitive economy we have evolved rationalization. Use of reason to do abstract reasoning in order to serve both emotional needs and survival needs.
Religion comes from the Latin religare ("to bind together" ), and that provides a clue to its function. Religion's primary function is to bind society together through shared beliefs and values, rules and rituals, ceremonies, and worship practices, and to provide stability. It often features a hierarchical structure.
And that is why we have evolved abstract reasoning as well. Also we are political animals, hence we have to use imagination to imagine what might be other primate thinking or what his moves might be if we do this or that. Some anthropologists say that size of brain in primates got bigger somewhat proportional to the size and complexity of social groups among primates and inevitable political influence that arose from it.
As for rationalization.
Every person has three needs, to be accepted, to feel secure and to be significant.
We have the same emotional needs but different ways of trying to meet them. Some ways are more neurotic than others.
“Neurotic suffering indicates inner conflict. Each side of the conflict is likely to be a composite of many partial forces, each one of which has been structured into behavior, attitude, perception, value. Each component asserts itself, claims priority, insists that something else yield, accommodates. The conflict therefore is fixed, stubborn, enduring. It may be impugned and dismissed without effect, imprecations and remorse are of no avail, strenuous acts of will may be futile; it causes - yet survives and continues to cause - the most intense suffering, humiliation, rending of flesh. Such a conflict is not to be uprooted or excised. It is not an ailment, it is the patient himself. The suffering will not disappear without a change in the conflict, and a change in the conflict amounts to a change in what one is and how one lives, feels, reacts.”
― Allen Wheelis, How People Change
“Neurotics complain of their illness, but they make the most of it, and when it comes to taking it away from them they will defend it like a lioness her young.” ― Sigmund Freud
“The tenacity with which the neurotic adheres to any attitude is a sure indication that the attitude fulfills functions which seem indispensable in the framework of his neurosis.” ― Karen Horney, Neurosis and Human Growth: The Struggle Towards Self-Realization
“Rationalization is a process of not perceiving reality, but of attempting to make reality fit one’s emotions.” ― Ayn Rand
Hence: “Man is not a rational animal, he is a rationalizing animal.”
―Robert A. Heinlein
Clearly the more luxury we have for survival with little critical thinking, the less we do reasoning about facts and we reason with our own facts. If the use of brain the wrong way results in death we would have to either use it more in line with consequences of reality or we would perish.
To put it in another way.
“You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.”
― Ayn Rand
"Sooner or later everyone sits down to a banquet of consequences."
— Robert Louis Stevenson, Scottish writer (1850-1894)
Ignoring the consequences is at ones own peril. The current crop of political elites can outsource many of the consequences to others, but at what long term cost. They cannot survive the collapse of the entire civilization and that is where we are heading because of their rationalization.
"To err is human; to blame it on the other guy is even more human."
—Bob Goddard, US physicist, rocketry pioneer (1882-1945)
No, Putin didn't do it. We did it to ourselves.
Just look at the comments/replies left for me when I denounced the claim that Russia was responsible. I won't repeat their account names nor their vitriol but to say this:
People have got to learn how to think critically, learn history, and apply empathetic diplomacy. Few commenting appear to be adept at any of those practices. Suffice it to say, Russia makes a much better friend than an enemy
Sensrhim4hizvewz
Level 8
Nov 16, 2022
3
People want to believe that there are good guys and bad guys. That picking the "right" side gives them some moral authority. Unfortunately that is not the way the world works. Morality is personal and within the public sphere complexity makes amorality the rule. There is a strange divide in which the rule is to “Pay to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's.” When personal morality conflicts with political reality a great deal of cognitive dissonance can result.
Absolutely right. People (especially liberals/demoncrats) are so quick to believe anything they’re told as long as it fits the currently popular narrative as pushed by the “news” media outlets, they always have their finger on the trigger for when the media or the leftist tyrants say, “Ready, Fire, aim”.
Recent Visitors 10
wolfhnd
MO, USA
Krunoslav
Croatia
xX2AFanXx
Pro Gun City,
Daveclark5
FL, USA
Sensrhim4hizvewz
Calgary,
Photos 11,797 More
Posted by JohnHoukGlobalist Tyranny Videos Batch – Part TWO SUMMARY: The video list I’m sharing leans more toward Globalist Tyranny (which includes the American traitors – the Dem-Marxists) in this batch.
Posted by JohnHoukGlobalist Tyranny Videos Batch – Part ONE SUMMARY: I’ve spent the last few days looking at saved videos largely from Telegram Social Media.
Posted by JohnHoukWATCH OUT FOR AN AI TYRANNY & NSA Spying SUMMARY: I’ve witnessed too many dark-side leaps and bounds to give credence to AI-Tyranny naysayers.
Posted by Sensrhim4hizvewzCohencidence or PLANNED???
Posted by Sensrhim4hizvewz Hopefully, everyone catches it and everyone gets better
Posted by JohnHoukFBI Investigates Baltimore Bridge Collapse! Suggests NOT an Accident! SUMMARY: On 3/27/24 I shared a Lara Logan Tweet on her opinion of what caused the Francis Scott Key Bridge near Baltimore ship ...
Posted by JohnHoukPolitical Tyranny – Part Two Videos Showing the Political Tyranny of Factionalism & Globalist Entanglements SUMMARY: IN Part 1 I used President Washington’s 1796 Farewell Address as a ...
Posted by JohnHoukPolitical Tyranny – Part One President Washington Warned of the Insidious Outcome of Political Factions & Foreign Entanglements SUMMARY: George Washington – RIGHTLY SO – is called the Father...
Posted by JohnHoukFuellmich Political Persecution Encapsulates Globalist Lawfare SUMMARY: A few thoughts on Deep State Political Persecution of Trump & Supports.
Posted by JohnHoukLooking at Birx Not Fauci Managed Medical Tyranny Includes Personal Observations on Legit President Trump SUMMARY: Looking at a VNN examination of the short Documentary: “It Wasn't Fauci: How ...
Posted by FocusOn1Uh oh, i hate to say this, but israel was formed in 1948, 100 years after karl marx wrote his book. Was it formed as a atheist communist country?
Posted by MosheBenIssacWith woke fat ass acceptance, only applies to women (fat bitches). What used to be funny is now illegal. The video won a Grammy Award for Best Concept Music Video in 1988 [youtu.be]
Posted by JohnHoukRemember WHY You Are Resisting the Coup Summary: Well… It’s series of videos time again.
Posted by JohnHoukA Call for Intercession Over WHO Power Grab Treaty SUMMARY: A call for prayer on America’s leaders related to the National Sovereignty terminating Pandemic (better known as Plandemic) Treaty.
Posted by MosheBenIssacDisney COLLAPSES Billions Lost In MINUTES After Shareholders Troll Company Sticking With WOKE! [youtu.be]
Posted by JohnHoukIntro to Maj.