2209270300Tu WOKE SOPHISTRY:

Changing the word used serves only to obfuscate a thing; it doesn’t necessa4rily change what’s being objected to?

Such as:

1. ‘Cancel Culture’ is nothing more or less than ‘censorship’ articulated differently – is it?

2. ‘Fee Speech’ is nothing more or less than ‘free thought’ being spoken aloud – is it?

{How many times have you thought out loud in your lifetime?}

3. To control a thing is to be responsible for that thing – is it not? {Are we to believe that social media platforms owned and operated within this United States aren’t subject to taxes and oversight by the FCC (Federal Communication Commission) and the FTC (Federal Trade Commission) in their interstate business operations? { Who is responsible for a hit-and-run, the driver of the vehicle or the owner they stole the vehicle from?} By allowing a social media platform to be established and subsequently operate within these United States it is at minimum ‘de facto’ violating the 1st Amendment to the Constitution of theses United States?

It is noteworthy that when Adolf Hitler (national socialist) was asked if he/they were going to nationalize corporations in Germany as the Global Socialists had done in the Soviet Union, he responded by saying he/they didn’t need to in order to get them to do what he/they wanted of them. The very same is taking place in America today with Corporate America (including media tech) bending the knee, as it were, to socialist democrats in power?

Adolf Hitler (and the National Socialists) were in de facto control of corporate Germany just like Socialist Democrats are in de facto control of corporate America – including social media? Congress doesn’t need to pass any law “ … abridging the freedom of speech…..” to be in de facto limiting free speech by controlling indirectly social medias?

Or am I somehow mistaken in thinking that Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists of Ger4many were/are held responsible for the events of World War II and the Holocaust?

PS. I keep hearing the ridiculous claim by democrats that MAGA Republicans somehow want to destroy their Socialist Democracy? But they are the only people that want to change the founding documents of this Republic of these United States – why is that? Isn’t that a way of changing America from a Constitutional Republic to Socialist (not very democratic) Democracy? Shouldn’t democrats consider that if the founders had wanted a Socialist Democracy they wouldn’t have established a Constitutional Republic – think about it?

Posted by: Fuat5Baba ~ Sep 25, 2022 ~ 72,344 views ~ (two days ago)
“Watch Trump sends SH0CKWAVE to Biden after DIRTY ‘censorship’…Hunter ADMITS crime”

Please do correct for me any errors that you discern – thanks in advance?

#LETSGOBRANDON ~ A Male-Feminist.
#MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) an individualist philosophy of life.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Soph·ist·ry
/ˈsäfəstrē/
noun

1. the use of fallacious arguments, especially with the intention of deceiving:

"trying to argue that I had benefited in any way from the disaster was pure sophistry"

▪ a fallacious argument.

Similar: specious reasoning, the use of fallacious argument, ssophism, casuistry, quibbling, equivocation, fallaciousness, fallacious argument, sophism, fallacy, quibble, paralogism.

Powered by Oxford Languages

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

De fac·to
/ˌdā ˈfaktō/
adverb

1. in fact, or in effect, whether by right or not:
   "the island has been de facto divided into two countries"

adjective

1. denoting someone or something that is such in fact:
   "a de facto one-party system"

Word Origin:
Latin, literally ‘of fact’.

Powered by Oxford Languages

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

De facto
Practical rather than theoretical reality

De facto describes practices that exist in reality, whether or not they are officially recognized by laws or other formal norms. It is commonly used to refer to what happens in practice, in contrast with de jure ("by law" ), which refers to things that happen according to law. Wikipedia