2207170700Su THE DUPLICITY OF SOCIALIST COLLECTIVE THINKING?

The first deceit that really needs to be dispelled, is that ‘The Greater Good’ is what’s of paramount importance – with the individual’s only purpose is to serve it? This has been said many times in many ways throughout human history – all of which have been profoundly harmful lies ultimately designed specifically to deceive?

Take the word ‘socialism’ for instance? Break it (the word) down,? Is there anyway that you can contemplate the word ‘social’ yet visualize, with your minds eye, only one person, by themselves, individually? I dassent think you can? Your mind goes straight to at least two people interacting with one another – does it not?

In no way am I intimating that power and assurance (of whatever sorts) multiplies exponentially with numbers – no that can’t be denied, can it? Therefore doesn’t it seem only reasonable that a birthing woman would always be assured by the company of her sisters during travails?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Genesis 3:16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. (kjv)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Instead of “Misery love company” might we also say “There’s safety (security) in numbers”? It’s almost as if tribulations of the individual can be reduced by disbursing it/them among a crowd, a herd, a tribe, a clan, an army, a political party, and even quite possibly an ideology? But does anything actually reduce the pain? Man has created anesthetics that will mask the pain, but that pain still exists – if not, simply don’t use the anesthetic(s) to mask it? But I’m diverting myself!

Surely it does go without saying that whatever one person can do can also be done more expeditiously by more than just that one. And yet accountability (responsibility) of the individual is not something that cannot be dispensed with by disbursing it among the crowd, the collective, the government or even a collective of governments – can it?

This is precisely why our forefathers, in the absence of GOD’s Kingdom at present, chose a Libertarian Constitutional Republic form of government for these United States.

A form of government least prone to devolve into an Identitarian Socialist form of government – as is happening now? Did I hear you say that it isn’t devolving as we speak into an Identitarian Socialist regime? Choose your words carefully, what precisely is Identitarian-ism if ‘intersectionality’ is not? That self same ‘intersectionality’ that measures your individual value by oppression point they (someone) attributes to your identity – be it male, female, ethnicity, and/or religion etc. etc. Never does a socialist want to admit that in the final computation the individual is, and can only be, the ultimate intersectional minority?

As a result DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) really does mean death to the human species – it really does mean DIE! In short, show me a socialist and I’ll immediately show you a bigot trying to escape their individual accountability (their responsibility)!

Can you not see the ‘The Last Man’ the nihilist NPC collectivists of socialism – be they National Socialists, Communist Socialists, or any other degree or flavor of its putrification? If not look again at who is repeatedly proclaiming doom and gloom when only GOD knows of what time and circumstance HE alone has foreordained. Because GOD is GOD (I Am that I Am) death does not exist to HIM and HE’S not dead simply because they (socialists) wish it so?

Please do correct for me any errors that you discern – thanks in advance?

#LETSGOBRANDON ~ A Male-Feminist
#MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) an individualist philosophy of life.

Posted by: Eternalised
“Nihilism - Friedrich Nietzsche’s Warning to The World”

cc: @2FolowHim

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Du·plic·i·ty
/do͞oˈplisədē/
noun

1. deceitfulness; double-dealing:

"he was accused of duplicity and branded a traitor"

2. doubleness.

archaic

Word Origin
late Middle English: from Old French duplicite or late Latin duplicitas, from Latin duplic- ‘twofold’ (see duplex).

Powered by Oxford Languages