2207030400Su THE IMPORTANCE OF FATHERHOOD!

The word father quite literally means LIFE GIVER. And it’s for that reason that I refrain from using it in reference to anyone other than a biological father and/or spiritual FATHER – Almighty GOD to be more precise. I’m not insisting that I’m right, only that that’s my chosen path – or proclivity if you prefer you prefer Dr. Peterson phraseology? Otherwise, it’s just my way.

Proclivity does sound better – doesn’t it? And each and every person has their own personal one (proclivity) – it’s not something that can be stamped out uniformly, cookie cutter style, as socialists would rather they be?

If everyone was absolutely identical there’d be no individual free will and therefore no individual responsibility to be answered for individually. No need for ‘due process’ as collective identity would become the absolute determiner of one’s guilt, innocence, or anything else for that matter. Your not likely to hear this about socialism because logic can’t be allowed to progress far enough to expose it (socialism) for the ultra--bigotry that it surreptitiously is.

Think about it: What is this socialist (woke if they insist) term ‘intersectionality’ if not rationalization(s) for bigotry? What I’m trying to get across is that socialism (in all its many flavors and disguises) is nothing more than bigoted hate all compacted in the one ideology of socialism.

The individual is all that matters because in the final analysis that’s who will have to answer for their individual behavior (it having been good or bad) before the Judgment Seat of GOD – not some collective guilt or innocence? Think about it: Hitler can’t be judged innocent based on his membership in a collective identity (group) can he? Well that is precisely what socialists are spuriously saying – they just don’t want you to see it for what it is.

As you can tell by the title above I’ve once again veered off course – seems to be a bad habit I’m falling into?

This post was intended to be about the importance of fathers to children then veer off to discuss their importance to the female children – which they are unbelievably so! But I’ve digressed to far already?

I don’t consider my disdain for the creations of Frieda as misogynist, because I hold Picasso’s iwork n just as much disdain as hers. Each person gets to choose what they like and don’t individually – it’s call free will. Mankind was specifically created with free will so as to make their worship of Almighty God purely voluntary, Both GOD and man are in a never ending search for requited (reciprocal) love – seems a simply proposition to understand, why don’t they?

PS. Just to make things clear, I’m in uncharted waters because, I’ve never spawned a female child that I know of although. I’ve raise at a distance a handicapped one who’s as tough as nails living on her own today. No, little pudding men is what I’m accustomed to both spawning and raising – rather proudly I might add. Just the other day I watched a young man trying to navigate his fatherhood of two daughter – wow, what a train wreck. I suppose its just my personal proclivity, because it’s what I’m accustomed to, but boys sure do seem easier to raise in spite of all the obstacles feminism throws in the way?

Posted by: boots1953
“I Want To Be Wanted - Brenda Lee.avi”

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Pro·cliv·i·ty
/prəˈklivədē/
noun

1. a tendency to choose or do something regularly; an inclination or predisposition toward a particular thing:

"a proclivity for hard work"

Powered by Oxford Languages