2206300100Th YOU CAN IDENTIFY SOCIALISM BY ITS INORDINATE ADORATION (EVEN WORSHIP) OF POWER:

Just to say a few words about power if you don’t mind?

As you will discover Verdi apparently was mesmerized by it – power that is?

So was Eve as that’s what she anticipated gaining by eating the forbidden fruit – to be like Almighty GOD that is!

Yes, yes, do go ahead an replace the word ‘power’ with the word ‘energy’ as Albert did – go ahead if it makes what’s being said more pallet-able?

What Albert was trying to say is that power (energy) doesn’t actually get expended, dissipated or eliminated in in other way – that’s the first point of fact that typically a socialist can’t grasp? What it does is get converted and stored like you charging your battery for later use of – for what other purpose would you store ‘power’ or ‘energy’?

Socialists. apart from being greedy selfish creatures they’re extremely stupid as well. What ALWAYS happen when you overcharge any power (energy) storage medium or facility – does it not provoke a calamitous reaction? Not using fossil fuels provided us can only produce a calamitous reaction catastrophic for human life – you do understand that fossil fuels are nothing more that a storage medium that must be made use of sooner or later? I mean. that’s what Einstein's most famous equation is telling us – all of us?

Power (or energy) is always on the move being stored is one fashion (medium) or another. Consciousness to create with it, on the other hand, is significantly more important.

I thought it an interesting observation that everyone finds themselves in the top most affluent 10% for some period of time in their lives – however long that may be? It’s interesting because it’s likely very true? Remember that affluence is always relative to its context.

Man is endowed with the ‘power’ to create inherent within himself – don’t waste it gentlemen! Your individual consciousness is all that a human being actually has when you do the real math.

The universe is made up of stored ‘power’ (energy) – it’s consciousness that’s the real anomaly – the important ingredient in existence? That’s why GOD termed HIMSELF as “I AM THAT I AM” when inquired of who HE is – or do you think otherwise?

Therein is my puzzlement as to why Verdi was so enthralled by power – the most important ‘power’ was right there within him to create. Perhaps I must look past “Nabucco” and “Aida” to understand his creative motive(s)?

Worship CONSCIOUSNESS (I AM THAT I AM) rather than the creation; worship GOD not GOD’S creation(s) – seems like a pretty straight forward edict, don’t you think?

Please do correct for me any errors that you discern – thanks in advance?

#LETSGOBRANDON ~ A Male-Feminst
#MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) an individualist philosophy of life – consider it?

PS. I chose this production only because it provides English subtitles – there are several other productions on Youtube if you care to compare them? Either way, it’s (Nabucco) is non-toxic masculine creativity – what do you think?

Posted by: Darya Kiryushko
“NABUCCO - Bruson, Dimitrova, Baglioni, Garaventa - Arena di Verona, 1981 - English Subtitles”