2205270100F THINK OF WHAT YOU DEMAND OF MEN?

Feminism is most definitely a cancer on humanity? And just like cancer it spreads, ever so slowly or possibly with speed, it really matters not, as it continues to spreads through out the organism its devouring.

Symptoms are galore, school shootings being but just one such symptom? Does not there occur periodic eruptions in the diseased flesh of a cancer victim? Nasty painful eruptions oozing both puss and blood? Possibly even school shootings of innocence – the more innocent the better to proclaim the horror of itself?

If young men are defective members of society that are barred from being super heroes, then they’ll just present themselves as the best super villain they can muster? One way or another, young men will try their best to fit into the only narrative of feminist theory afforded their existence? If the only narrative part allowed them is villainous they’ll just be the best villain they possible can?

Men are neither guard dogs or beasts of burden – they’re individuals set adrift from their ethical moorings by the gender condemnations of a false narrative of history by feminist theory? Not all can find their way to the safe indifferent harbor of MGTOW (Men [that with indifference choose to] Go Their Own Way)? There are no safe spaces left to men other than within their own mind which feminism works each and every day to penetrate and control like it has all other spaces men frequented?

Some time back I received a comment that notified me that there was nothing new as Camille Paglia had been espousing the same things for a long time. Which is true with the one exception of which I had spoken. In my post they’d responded to reference the first time I’d heard her condemnation of ‘COEDUCATION’ – of which is an astute observation, or so I was pointing out. Before that time I’d never heard her, most appropriately, condemn it.

Apples and Oranges are both fruit and that’s as far as it goes – stop right there while humanity is ahead. Are not tomatoes a fruit as well – is the forced conversion of apples into oranges the goal of feminism? Seems to me the result might just as well turn out to be tomatoes instead?

Using the term feminist alchemy is not without merit – is it? After all it’s not limited to metals and such. Could it be that feminism is nothing more than a “medieval forerunner of chemistry, based on the supposed transformation of matter” - male humans into female ones – sounds a bit strange to me? Almost as if we’re contemplating trans-women doesn’t it? You know, the biological male species that’s utterly destroying female sports at present?

TRY TO UNDERSTAND THIS SIMPLE ENGLISH: MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) has nothing to do with this idea that sex is the be all of existence. MGTOW is not about raping – it’s about NOT raping! MGTOW is about not placing a value on women (YOU) at all! MGTOW is about placing a value on ones self! MGTOW is about NOT CARING if gender dysphoria destroys all female sports and spaces – it’s not a MGTOW problem. Women’s problems are of their own making! Go away now!

Posted by: Better Bachelor
“Why do we only care about men when it's too late?”

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
al·che·my
/ˈalkəmē/
noun

1. the medieval forerunner of chemistry, based on the supposed transformation of matter. It was concerned particularly with attempts to convert base metals into gold or to find a universal elixir:
   "occult sciences, such as alchemy and astrology"

▪ a seemingly magical process of transformation, creation, or combination:
"finding the person who's right for you requires a very subtle alchemy"

Powered by Oxford Dictionaries